Abstract
Universities worldwide are facing enormous strains as a result of increased external expectations where global visibility should be mixed with local and regional utility. In debates on the future of higher education, becoming an entrepreneurial university has been highlighted as a novel – although perhaps a more hybrid – way to deal with this challenge. However, while the label entrepreneurial points to an image of the university as a dynamic free agent shaped in the interplay between dynamic environments and internal flexibility, the current article takes a more critical view on the factors conditioning universities with the ambitions of becoming more entrepreneurial – particularly those of more recent age and less academic standing. For these institutions it is suggested that the university ideal of being entrepreneurial may lead to a situation of strategic inertia characterized by an institutionalized ‘lock-in’ with few alternative development paths.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amaral, Alberto, Lynn Meek, and Ingvild M. Larsen. 2003. The higher education managerial revolution? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Ben-David, Joseph. 1991. Universities and academic systems in modern societies. In Essays on the social organization and ethos of science ed. Gad Freudenthal. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Brint, Stephen. 2005. Creating the future: ‘New directions’ in American research universities. Minerva 43: 23–50.
Bonaccorsi, Andrea, Cinzia Daraio, and Aldo Geuna. 2010. Universities in the new knowledge landscape: Tensions, challenges, change—An introduction. Minerva 48(1): 1–4.
Burgelman, Robert A. 2002. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly 47: 325–356.
Cerych, Ladislav, and Paul Sabatier. 1986. Great expectations and mixed performance. The implementation of higher education reforms in Europe. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
Clark, Burton R. 1972. The organizational saga in higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 178–184.
Clark, Burton R. 1983. The higher education system. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Clark, Burton R. 1998. Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. New York: International Association of Universities Press/Pergamon: Elsevier.
Clark, Burton R. 2004. Sustaining change in universities. Continuities in case studies and concepts. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Czarniawska, Barbara, and Rolf Wolff. 1998. Constructing new identities in established organizational fields. Young universities in old Europe. International Studies in Management and Organization 28: 32–56.
Enders, Jürgen. 2004. Higher education, internationalization, and the nation-state: Recent developments and challenges to governance theory. Higher Education 47: 361–382.
Etzkowitz, Henry. 2003. Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy 32: 109–121.
Etzkowitz, Henry, Andrew Webster, Christiane Gebhardt, and Branca R. Terra. 2000. The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy 29: 313–330.
Etzkowitz, Henry, Marina Ranga, Mats Benner, Lucia Guaranys, Anne Marie Macukan, and Robert Kneller. 2008. Pathways to the entrepreneurial university: Towards a global convergence. Science and Public Policy 35: 681–695.
Geiger, Roger. 2004. Knowledge and money: Research universities and the paradox of the marketplace. Stanford: Standford University Press.
Gibbons, Michael, et al. 1994. The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.
Halffman, Willem, and Loet Leydesdorff. 2010. Is inequality among universities increasing? Gini coefficients and the elusive rise of elite universities. Minerva 48(1): 55–72.
Hermanowicz, Joseph C. 2009. Lives in science: How institutions affect academic careers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Huisman, Jeroen, Jorunn D. Norgård, Jørgen G. Rasmussen, and Bjørn Stensaker. 2002. ‘Alternative’ universities revisited—A study of the distinctiveness in universities established in the spirit of 1968. Tertiary Education and Management 8: 315–332.
Jarzabkowski, Paula. 2005. Strategy as practice. An activity-based approach. London: Sage.
Jessop, Bob. 2001. The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity.
Kerr, Clark. 2001. The uses of the university, 5th ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kyvik, Svein. 2009. The dynamics of change in higher education. Expansion and contraction in an organisational field. Dordrecht: Springer.
Labianca, Guiseppe, James F. Fairbank, James B. Thomas, and Dennis Gioia. 2001. Emulation in academia: Balancing structure and identity. Organization Science 12: 312–330.
Lamont, Michele. 2009. How professors think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Leibfried, Stephan. 2009. Die Exzellenzinitiative. Zwischenbilanz und Perspektiven. Frankfurt: Campus.
Maassen, Peter, and Johan P. Olsen. 2007. University dynamics and European integration. Dordrecht: Springer.
March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1976. Ambiguity and Choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.
Martin, Ben. 2012. Are universities and university research under threat? Towards an evolutionary model of university speciation. Cambridge Journal of Economics 36: 543–565.
Martin, Ben, and Henry Etzkowitz. 2001. The origin and evolution of the university species. Journal for Science and Technology Studies. 13: 9–34.
Musselin, Christine. 2005. Change and continuity in higher education governance? Lessons drawn from twenty years of national reforms in European countries. In Governing knowledge, eds. Ivar Bleiklie, and Mary Henkel, 65–80. Dordrecht: Springer.
O′Shea, Rory, Thomas Allen, Kenneth Morse, Colm O′Gorman, and Frank Roche. 2007. Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Management 37: 1–16.
Power, Michael. 2007. Organized uncertainty: Designing a world of risk management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ritzen, Jo. 2010. A chance for European universities. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Robbins, Keith. 2003. Universities: Past, present, and future. Minerva 41: 397–406.
Schuetze, Hans Georg. 2007. Research universities and the spectre of academic capitalism. Minerva 45: 435–443.
Thelen, Kathleen. 2000. Timing and tempority in the analysis of institutional evolution and change. Studies in American Political Development 14: 101–108.
Teixeira, Pedro, Ben Jongbloed, David D. Dill, and Alberto Amaral. 2004. Markets in higher education. Rhetoric or reality? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Tuchman, Gaye. 2009. Wannabe U: Inside the corporate university. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wildavsky, Ben. 2010. How global universities are resha** the world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Whitley, Richard. 2008. Constructing universities as strategic actors: Limitations and variations. In The university in the market, eds. Lars Engwall, and Denis Weaire, 23–37. Cochester: Portland Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stensaker, B., Benner, M. Doomed to be Entrepreneurial: Institutional Transformation or Institutional Lock-Ins of ‘New’ Universities?. Minerva 51, 399–416 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9238-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9238-6