Log in

Application of Multiple Point Geostatistics to Non-stationary Images

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simulation of flow and solute transport through aquifers or oil reservoirs requires a precise representation of subsurface heterogeneity that can be achieved by stochastic simulation approaches. Traditional geostatistical methods based on variograms, such as truncated Gaussian simulation or sequential indicator simulation, may fail to generate the complex, curvilinear, continuous and interconnected facies distributions that are often encountered in real geological media, due to their reliance on two-point statistics. Multiple Point Geostatistics (MPG) overcomes this constraint by using more complex point configurations whose statistics are retrieved from training images. Obtaining representative statistics requires stationary training images, but geological understanding often suggests a priori facies variability patterns. This research aims at extending MPG to non-stationary facies distributions. The proposed method subdivides the training images into different areas. The statistics for each area are stored in separate frequency search trees. Several training images are used to ensure that the obtained statistics are representative. The facies probability distribution for each cell during simulation is calculated by weighting the probabilities from the frequency trees. The method is tested on two different object-based training image sets. Results show that non-stationary training images can be used to generate suitable non-stationary facies distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Caers J (2001) Geostatistical reservoir modelling using statistical pattern recognition. J Petroleum Sci Eng 29:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caers J, Zhang T (2004) Multiple-point geostatistics: A quantitative vehicle for integrating geologic analogs into multiple reservoir models. In: Gramer M, Harris PM, Eberli GP (eds) Integration of outcrop and modern analogs in reservoir modeling. Am Assoc Petroleum Geol Memoir, 80:383–394

  • Carrera J (1993) An overview of uncertainties in modeling groundwater solute transport. J Contam Hydrol 13:23–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chugunova TL, Hu LY (2008) Multiple-point simulations constrained by continuous auxiliary data. Math Geosci 40:133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch CV, Hewet TA (1996) Challenges in reservoir forecasting. Math Geol 28:829–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and user’s guide. Oxford University Press, New York. 369 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd PA, Pardo-Igúzquiza E, Xu C (2003) Plurigau: a computer program for simulating spatial facies using truncated plurigaussian method. Comput Geosci 29:123–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falivene O, Arbués P, Gardiner AR, Pickup GE, Muñoz JA, Cabrera L (2006) Best-pactice stochastic facies modeling from a channel-fill turbidite sandstone analog (the Quarry Outcrop, Eocene Ainsa Basin, NE Spain). Am Assoc Petroleum Geol Bull 90:1003–1029

    Google Scholar 

  • Falivene O, Cabrera L, Muñoz JA, P. A, Fernández O, Saez A (2007) Statistical grid-based facies reconstruction and modelling for sedimentary bodies. Alluvial-palustrine and turbiditic examples. Geol Acta 5:199–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Galli A, Beucher H, Le Loc’h G, Doliguez, Heresim Group (1994), The pros and cons of the truncated Gaussian method. In: Armstrong M, Dowd PA (eds) Geostatistical simulations, pp 217–233

  • Guardiano F, Srivastava RM (1993) Multivariate geostatistics: beyond bivariate moments. In: Soares A (ed) Geostatistics-Troia. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldorsen HH, Damsleth E (1990) Stochastic modeling. J Petroleum Geol 42:404–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel AG, Deutsch CV (1993) Entropy and spatial disorder. Math Geol 25:329–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journel AG, Isaaks EH (1984) Conditional indicator simulation: Application to a Saskatchewan uranium deposit. Math Geol 16:685–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journel A (1985) The deterministic side of geostatistics. Math Geol 17:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King MJ, Mansfield M (1999), Flow simulation of geologic models. Society of Petroleum Engineers Reservoir Eval. & Eng, vol 2 (SPE Paper number 57469)

  • Knudby C, Carrera J (2005) On the relationship between indicators of geostatistical, flow and transport connectivity. Adv Water Resour 28:405–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koltermann CE, Gorelick SM (1996) Heterogeneity in sedimentary deposits: A review of structure-imitating, process-imitating, and descriptive approaches. Water Resour Res 32:2617–2658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y (2006) Using the Snesim program for multiple-point statistical simulation. Comput Geosci 32:1544–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu GS, Zheng CM, Gorelick SM (2004a) Limits of applicability of the advection-dispersion model in aquifers containing connected high-conductivity channels. Water Resour Res. doi: 10.1029/2003WR002735

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Harding A, Abriel W, Strebelle S (2004b) Multiple-point simulation integrating wells, three-dimensional seismic data, and geology. Am Assoc Petroleum Geol Bull 88:905–921

    Google Scholar 

  • de Marsily G, Delay F, Teles V, Schafmeister MT (1998) Some current methods to represent the heterogeneity of natural media in hydrogeology. Hydrogeol J 6:115–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardo-Igúzquiza E, Dowd PA (2003) CONNEC3D: a computer program for connectivity analysis of 3D random set models. Comput Geosci 29:775–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor WA (1973) Permeability-porosity patterns and variations in some holocene sand bodies. Am Assoc Petroleum Geol Bull 57:162–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Slooten L, Batlle F, Carrera J, Gamazo P, De Vries LM (2007), Prosit manual: Getting started

  • Strebelle S (2002) Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Math Geol 34:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strebelle S, (2006), Sequential simulation for modeling geological structures from training images. In: Yarus JM, Chambers RL (eds) Stochastic modelling and geostatistics: Principles, methods and case studies, vol 2, pp 139–149

  • Strebelle S, Payrazyan K, Caers J (2002) Modeling of a deepwater turbidite reservoir conditional to seismic data using multiple-point geostatistics. Society of Petroleum Engineers Paper number 77425, 10 p

  • Tetzlaff DM, Harbaugh JW (1989) Simulating clastic sedimentation. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. 202 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (2007) 4D Seismic and multiple-point pattern data integration using geostatistics. PhD Thesis, Energy Resources Engineering Department, Stanford University (California, USA), 275 p

  • Xu W (1996) Conditional curvilinear stochastic simulation using pixel-based algorithms. Math Geol 28:937–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oriol Falivene.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Vries, L.M., Carrera, J., Falivene, O. et al. Application of Multiple Point Geostatistics to Non-stationary Images. Math Geosci 41, 29–42 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-008-9188-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-008-9188-y

Keywords

Navigation