Abstract
The “semicompeting risks” include a terminal event and a non-terminal event. The terminal event may censor the non-terminal event but not vice versa. Because times to the two events are usually correlated, the non-terminal event is subject to dependent/informative censoring by the terminal event. We seek to conduct marginal regressions and joint association analyses for the two event times under semicompeting risks. The proposed method is based on the modeling setup where the semiparametric transformation models are assumed for marginal regressions, and a copula model is assumed for the joint distribution. We propose a nonparametric maximum likelihood approach for inferences, which provides a martingale representation for the score function and an analytical expression for the information matrix. Direct theoretical developments and computational implementation are allowed for the proposed approach. Simulations and a real data application demonstrate the utility of the proposed methodology.
References
Aalen OO (1977) Weak convergence of stochastic integrals related to counting process. Z Wahrsch verw Gebiete 38: 261–277
Andersen PK, Borgan Ø, Gill R, Keiding N (1993) Statistical models based on counting processes. Springer, New York
Chen YH (2009) Weighted Breslow-type and maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric transformation models. Biometrika 96: 591–600
Chen YH (2010) Semiparametric marginal regression analysis for dependent competing risks under an assumed copula. J Roy Stat Soc B 72: 235–251
Coleman TF, Li Y (1994) On the convergence of reflective Newton methods for large-scale nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. Math Program 67: 189–224
Coleman TF, Li Y (1996) An interior, trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. SIAM J Optim 6: 418–445
Day R, Bryant J, Lefkopolou M (1997) Adaptation of bivariate frailty models for prediction, with application to biological markers as prognostic indicators. Biometrika 84: 45–56
Ding AA, Shi G, Wang W, Hsieh JJ (2009) Marginal regression analysis for semicompeting risks data under dependent censoring. Scand J Stat 36: 481–500
Fine JP, Jiang H, Chappell R (2001) On semicompeting risks data. Biometrika 88: 907–919
Goethalsa K, Janssenb P, Duchateaua L (2008) Frailty models and copulas: similarities and differences. J Appl Stat 35: 1071–1079
Hsieh JJ, Wang W, Ding AA (2008) Regression analysis based on semicompeting risks data. J Roy Stat Soc B 70: 3–20
Huang X, Zhang N (2008) Regression survival analysis with an assumed copula for dependent censoring: a sensitivity analysis approach. Biometrics 64: 1090–1099
Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (2002) The Statistical analysis of failure time data, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Klein JP, Moeschberger ML (2003) Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Nelsen RB (2006) An introduction to copulas, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Peng L, Fine JP (2007) Regression modeling of semicompeting risks data. Biometrics 63: 96–108
Tsiatis A (1975) A nonidentifiability aspect of the problem of competing risks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72: 20–22
van der Vaart AW, Wellner JA (1996) Weak convergence and empirical processes. Springer, New York
Wang W (2003) Estimating the association parameter for copula models under dependent censoring. J Roy Stat Soc B 65: 257–274
Zeng D, Lin DY (2006) Efficient estimation of semiparametric transformation models for counting processes. Biometrika 93: 627–640
Zeng D, Lin DY (2007) Maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric regression models with censored data. J Roy Stat Soc B 69: 507–564
Zheng M, Klein JP (1995) Estimates of marginal survival for dependent competing risks based on an assumed copula. Biometrika 82: 127–138
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, YH. Maximum likelihood analysis of semicompeting risks data with semiparametric regression models. Lifetime Data Anal 18, 36–57 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-011-9202-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-011-9202-4