Abstract
Context
The prevalence of edges is increasing due to anthropogenic landscape change. Edge responses can vary considerably between and within species. Understanding species’ responses to edges, and the causes of variation in such responses is central to managing biodiversity in contemporary landscapes.
Objective
A resource distribution model predicts that species that require complementary resources in different land cover types will be most abundant at edges, displaying a positive edge response. Eastern tiger (Papilio glaucus) and spicebush (P. troilus) swallowtail butterflies use forest plant species for oviposition sites but open-habitat plants for nectar. They are excellent models for testing the positive edge response and exploring sources of variability in edge responses, such as species-specific traits or temporal effects.
Methods
In southwestern Ontario, we examined both the abundance and flight orientation of these species in relation to forest/meadow edges and at different times of day. We used a transect method similar to the Pollard walk and a catch and release method, respectively.
Results
The distribution and flight behaviour of these butterfly species were overall consistent with a positive edge response. Both species were most abundant at the edge and oriented their flight towards the edge from the forest and meadow. However, P. glaucus demonstrated a much stronger positive edge response, while P. troilus showed temporal variation in its response.
Conclusions
Our results confirm the ability of the resource distribution model to predict species edge responses and movement behaviours, but also indicate that species-specific traits and time of sampling can influence such responses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argus W (1992) The phytogeography of rare vascular plants in Ontario and its bearing on plant conservation. Can J Bot 70:469–490
Bartoń K (2013) MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1.9.18. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/. Accessed 19 Dec 2013
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2013) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.0-5. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/. Accessed 25 Oct 2013
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc 57:289–300
Brommer JE, Fred MS (1999) Movement of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo related to host plant and nectar plant patches. Ecol Entomol 24:125–131
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag New York Inc, New York
Caballero-Mendieta N, Cordero C (2013) Male mating costs in a butterfly that produces small ejaculates. Physiol Entomol 38:318–325
Conradt L, Bodsworth EJ, Roper TJ, Thomas CD (2000) Non-random dispersal in the butterfly Maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models. Proc Biol Sci 267:1505–1510
Conradt L, Roper TJ, Thomas CD (2001) Dispersal behaviour of individuals in metapopulations of two British Butterflies. Oikos 95:416–424
Crins WJ (1997) Rare and endangered plants and their habitats in Canada. Can Field Nat 111:506–519
Fisher NI (1993) Statistical analysis of circular data. The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge
Fletcher RJ Jr, Ries L, Battin J, Chalfoun AD (2007) The role of habitat area and edge in fragmented landscapes: definitively distinct or inevitably intertwined? This review is one of a series dealing with some aspects of the impact of habitat fragmentation on animals and plants. This series is one of severa. Can J Zool 85:1017–1030
Fonderflick J, Besnard A, Martin J-L (2013) Species traits and the response of open-habitat species to forest edge in landscape mosaics. Oikos 122:42–51
Grossmueller DW, Lederhouse RC (1987) The role of nectar source distribution in habitat use and oviposition by the tiger swallowtail buterfly. J Lepid Soc 41:159–165
Haddad NM (1999) Corridor use predicted from behaviors at habitat boundaries. Am Nat 153:215–227
Haddad NM, Baum KA (1999) An experimental test of corridor effects on butterfly densities. Ecol Appl 9:623–633
Hirota T, Obara Y (2000) Time allocation to the reproductive and feeding behaviors in the male cabbage butterfly. Zool Sci 17:323–327
Hurst ZM, McCleery RA, Collier BA, Fletcher RJ Jr, Silvy NJ, Taylor PJ, Monadjem A (2013) Dynamic edge effects in small mammal communities across a conservation-agricultural interface in Swaziland. PLoS One 8:e74520
Ide J (2004) Diurnal and seasonal changes in the mate-locating behavior of the satyrine butterfly Lethe diana. Ecol Res 19:189–196
Kareiva PM, Shigesada N (1983) Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia 56:234–238
Klein AL, Araújo AM (2010) Courtship behavior of Heliconius erato phyllis (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) towards virgin and mated females: conflict between attraction and repulsion signals? J Ethol 28:409–420
Kuefler D, Haddad NM (2006) Local versus landscape determinants of butterfly movement behaviors. Ecography 29:549–560
Laurance W (2008) Theory meets reality: how habitat fragmentation research has transcended island biogeographic theory. Biol Conserv 141:1731–1744
Lidicker WZ (1999) Responses of mammals to habitat edges: an overview. Landscape Ecol 14:333–343
Lindell CA, Riffell SK, Kaiser SA, Battin AL, Smith ML, Sisk TD (2007) Edge responses of tropical and temperate birds. Wilson J Onithol 119:205–220
Lund U, Agostinelli C (2013) Circular: circular statistics. R package version 30.4-3. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/circular/. Accessed 15 Feb 2013
Macreadie PI, Connolly RM, Jenkins GP et al (2010a) Edge patterns in aquatic invertebrates explained by predictive models. Mar Freshw Res 61:214–218
Macreadie PI, Connolly RM, Jenkins GP, Hindell JS, Keough MJ (2010b) Resource distribution influences positive edge effects in a seagrass fish. Ecology 91:2013–2021
Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:58–62
Nitao JK, Ayres MP, Lederhouse RC, Scriber JM (1991) Larval adaptation to lauraceous hosts: geographic divergence in the spicebush swallowtail butterfly. Ecology 72:1428–1435
Pexioto PEC, Benson WW (2009) Daily activity patterns of two co-occurring tropical satyrine butterflies. J Insect Sci 9:1–14
Pollard E (1977) A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol Conserv 12:115–134
R Development Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 25 Sept 2013
Ries L, Debinski DM (2001) Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central Iowa. J Anim Ecol 70:840–852
Ries L, Fletcher RJ, Battin J, Sisk TD (2004) Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:491–522
Ries L, Sisk TD (2004) A predictive model of edge effects. Ecology 85:2917–2926
Ries L, Sisk TD (2008) Butterfly edge effects are predicted by a simple model in a complex landscape. Oecologia 156:75–86
Roland J (1982) Melanism and diel activity of alpine Colias (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Oecologia 53:214–221
Roland J (2006) Effect of melanism of alpine Colias nastes butterflies (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) on activity and predation. Can Entomol 138:52–58
Ross JA, Matter SF, Roland J (2005) Edge avoidance and movement of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus in matrix and non-matrix habitat. Landscape Ecol 20:127–135
Rutowski RL (1991) The evolution of male mate-locating behaviour in butterflies. Am Nat 138:1121–1139
Samejima Y, Tsubaki Y (2010) Body temperature and body size affect flight performance in a damselfly. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:685–692
Schtickzelle N, Joiris A, Van Dyck H, Baguette M (2007) Quantitative analysis of changes in movement behaviour within and outside habitat in a specialist butterfly. BMC Evol Biol. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-4
Schultz CB (1998) Dispersal behavior and its implications for reserve design in a rare oregon butterfly. Conserv Biol 12:284–292
Schultz CB, Franco AM, Crone EE (2012) Response of butterflies to structural and resource boundaries. J Anim Ecol 81:724–734
Scott JA (1986) The butterflies of North America: a natural history and field guide. Standford University Press, California
Scriber JM, Giebink BL, Snider D (1991) Reciprocal latitudinal clines in oviposition behavior of Papilio glaucus and P. canadensis across the Great Lakes hybrid zone: possible sex-linkage of oviposition preferences. Oecologia 87:360–368
Skórka P, Nowicki P, Lenda M, Witek M, Śliwińska EB, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2013) Different flight behaviour of the endangered scarce large blue butterfly Phengaris teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) within and outside its habitat patches. Landscape Ecol 28:533–546
Tiple AD, Khurad AM, Dennis RLH (2009) Adult butterfly feeding–nectar flower associations: constraints of taxonomic affiliation, butterfly, and nectar flower morphology. J Nat Hist 43:855–884
Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A, Thies C (2002) Contribution of small habitat fragments to conservation of insect communities of grassland-cropland landscapes. Ecol Appl 12:354–363
Turchin P (1991) Translating foraging movements in heterogeneous environments into the spatial distribution of foragerse. Ecology 72:1253–1266
Turchin P, Odendaal FJ, Rausher MD (1991) Quantifying inset movement in the field. Environ Entomol 20:955–963
Van Dyck H, Matthysen E (1998) Thermoregulatory differences between phenotypes in the speckled wood butterfly: hot perchers and cold patrollers? Oecologia 114:326–334
Watt WB (1968) Significance of pigment polymorphisms in Colias butterflies. I. Variation of melanin pigment in relation to thermoregulation. Evolution 22:437–458
Wiens JA, Crawford CS, Gosz JR (1985) Boundary dynamics: a conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems. Oikos 45:412–427
Zar JH (2010) Statistical analysis, 5th edn. Pearson Hall, Upper Saddle River
Acknowledgments
We thank Sarah Kruis, Ryan Smith, and volunteers who helped with field work and data entry. The Nature Conservancy of Canada, Long Point Regional Conservation Authority, Mary Gartshore and Peter Carson, Brian Craig and Paula Jongerden, Jim and Carol Knack, and Kathryn Boothby kindly allowed us to work on their properties. This research was supported by the Canada Foundation for Innovation, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (including a graduate scholarship to J. C. Siu), Canada Research Chairs, and Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation. Handling of swallowtail butterflies was authorized by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (Wildlife Scientific Collector’s Authorization No. 1067555).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siu, J.C., Koscinski, D. & Keyghobadi, N. Swallowtail butterflies show positive edge responses predicted by resource use. Landscape Ecol 31, 2115–2131 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0385-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0385-7