Abstract
This study analyzes the determinants of Whites’ support for punitive and preventive crime policies. It focuses on the predictive power of beliefs about race as described by symbolic racism theory. A dataset with 849 White respondents from three waves of the Los Angeles County Social Survey was used. In order to assess the weight of racial factors in crime policy attitudes, the effects of a range of race-neutral attitude determinants were controlled for, namely individual and structural crime attributions, perceived seriousness of crime, crime victimization, conservatism and news exposure. Results show a strong effect of symbolic racism on both types of crime policies, and in particular on punitive policies. High levels of symbolic racism are associated with support for tough, punitive crime policies and with opposition to preventive policies. Sub-dimensions of symbolic racism qualified these relationships, by showing that internal symbolic racism (assessing perceived individual deficiencies of Blacks) was most strongly predictive of punitiveness, whereas external symbolic racism (denial of institutional discrimination) predicted opposition to structural remedies. On the whole, despite the effects of race-neutral factors, the impact of symbolic racism on policy attitudes was substantial. Thus, White public opinion on both punitive and preventive crime policies is at least partially driven by racial prejudice.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10979-006-9020-5/MediaObjects/10979_2006_9020_Fig1_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Many of the states in the United States now mandate more or less extensively increased sentences for repeat offenders under laws called “Three Strikes and You’re Out.” Under this law, anyone convicted of three felonies is subject to a mandatory prison sentence of 25 years to life. The present study was carried out in California, where this law is one of the strictest in the country.
References
Aquirre, A., & Baker, D. V. (1993). Racial prejudice and the death penalty: A research note. Social Justice, 20, 150–156.
Baldus, D. C., Woodworth, G., & Pulanski, C. A., Jr. (1990). Equal justice and the death penalty. A legal and empirical analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Baldus, D. C., Woodworth, G., Zuckerman, D., Weiner, N. A., & Broffitt, B. (1998). Racial discrimination and the death penalty in the post-Furman era: An empirical and legal overview, with recent finding from Philadelphia. Cornell Law Review, 83, 1638–1770.
Barkan, S. E., & Cohn, S. F. (1994). Racial prejudice and support for the death penalty by Whites. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency, 31, 202–209.
Bennett, W. J., DiIulio, J., & Walters, J. P. (1996). Body count: Moral poverty and how to win America's war against crime and drugs. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Blume, J. H., Eisenberg, T., & Johnson, S. L. (1998). Post-McCleskey racial discrimination claims in capital cases. Cornell Law Review, 83, 1771–1810.
Bobo, L. (2000). Race and beliefs about affirmative action. Assessing the effects of interests, group threat, ideology, and racism. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics. The debate about racism in America (pp. 137–164). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Campbell, C. P. (1995). Race, myth and the news. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 284–299.
Chiricos, T., & Eschholz, S. (2002). The racial and ethnic typification of crime and the criminal typification of race and ethnicity in local television news. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 400–420.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/Correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cullen, F. T., Wright, J. P., Brown, S., Moon, M. M., Blankenship, M. B., & Applegate, B. K. (1998). Public support for early intervention programs: Implication for a progressive policy agenda. Crime and Delinquency, 44, 187–205.
Currie, E. (1998). Crime and punishment in America. Why the solutions to America's most stubborn social crisis have not worked—and what will. New York: Owl books.
Dixon, T. L., Azocar, C. L., & Casas, M. (2003). The portrayal of race and crime on television network news. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47(4), 498–523.
Dixon, T. L., & Linz, D. (2000a). Overrepresentation and underrepresentation of African Americans and Latinos as lawbreakers on television news. Journal of Communication, Spring, 131–154.
Dixon, T. L., & Linz, D. (2000b). Race and misrepresentation of victimization of local television news. Communication Research, 27(5), 547–573.
Ellsworth, P. C., & Gross, S. R. (1994). Hardening of the attitudes: Americans’ views on the death penalty. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–52.
Feather, N. T. (1996). Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 571–587.
Feather, N. T., Boeckmann, R. J., & McKee, I. R. (2001). Reactions to an offense in relation to authoritarianism, knowledge about risk and freedom of action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 109–126.
Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61–89). San Diego: Academic Press.
Gallup Poll Analyses (2003, May). Support for the death penalty remains high at 74%. Retrieved May 27, 2003 from http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr030519.asp
Gilliam, F. D., Jr. (1998). Race, crime, and public policy in California. In M. B. Preston, B. E. Cain, & S. Bass (Eds.), Racial and ethnic politics in California (Vol. 2, pp. 305–347). Berkeley, CA: IGS Press, Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California at Berkeley.
Gilliam, F. D., Jr., & Iyengar, S. (2000). Prime suspects: The influence of local television news on the viewing public. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 560–573.
Gordon, R. A., Bindrim, T. A., McNicholas, M. L., & Walden, T. L. (1988). Perceptions of blue-collar and white-collar crime: The effect of defendant race on simulated juror decisions. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 191–197.
Graham, S., & Lowery, B. S. (2004). Priming unconscious racial stereotypes about adolescent offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 483–504.
Green, D. P., & Citrin, J. (1994). Measurement error and the structure of attitudes: Are positive and negative judgments opposites? American Journal of Political Science, 38, 256–281.
Gross, S. R., & Mauro, R. (1984). Patterns of death: An analysis of racial disparities in capital sentencing and homicide victimization. Stanford Law Review, 37, 27–153.
Halim, S., & Stiles, B. L. (2001). Differential support for police use of force, the death penalty, and perceived harshness of the courts. Effects of race, gender, and region. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 3–23.
Hamilton, V. L., & Rauma, D. (1995). Social psychology of deviance and law. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 524–547). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Henry, P. J., & Sears, D. O. (2002). The Symbolic racism 2000 scale. Political Psychology, 23, 253–283.
Hewstone, M. (1989). Causal attribution. From cognitive processes to collective beliefs. Oxford: Blackwell.
Johnson, J. H., Jr., Farrell, W. C., Jr., & Stoloff, J. A. (2000). African American males in decline: A Los Angeles case study. In L. D. Bobo, M. L. Oliver, J. H. Johnson Jr., & A. Valenzuela Jr. (Eds.), Prismatic metropolis. Inequality in Los Angeles (pp. 315–337). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Jost, J., & Banaji, M. (1994). The role of stereoty** in system-justification and production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.
Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893–905.
Katz, P. A. (2003). Racists or tolerant multiculturalists? How do they begin? American Psychologist, 58 (11), 897–909.
Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 414–431.
McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). San Diego: Academic Press.
Mendelberg, T. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit measures, and the norm of equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Murray, C., & Herrnstein, R. (1994). The Bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
Oliver, M. B., & Fonash, D. (2002). Race and crime in the news: Whites' identification and misidentification of violent and nonviolent criminal suspects. Media Psychology, 4, 137–156.
Oliver, M. B., Jackson, R. L. I., Moses, N. N., & Dangerfield, C. L. (2004). The face of crime: Viewers' memory of race-related facial features of individuals pictured in the news. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 88–104.
Peffley, M., & Hurwitz, J. (2002). The racial components of “race-neutral” crime policy attitudes. Political Psychology, 23, 59–75.
Peffley, M., Shields, T., & Williams, B. (1996). The intersection of race and crime in television news stories: An experimental study. Political Communication, 13, 309–327.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75.
Roberts, J. V., & Stalans, L. J. (1997). Public opinion, crime and criminal justice. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Sanchez-Mazas, M., & Licata, L. (2005). L’Autre: Regards psychosociaux [The Other: Social psychological views]. Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Sears, D. O. (1988). Symbolic racism. In P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 53–84). New York: Plenum.
Sears, D. O., & Funk, C. L. (1991). The role of self-interest in social and political attitudes. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 1–91). San Diego: Academic Press.
Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (2003). The origins of symbolic racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 259–275.
Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (2005). Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism and its critics. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 95–150). New York: Academic Press.
Sears, D. O., Henry, P. J., & Kosterman, R. (2000). Egalitarian values and contemporary racial politics. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics. The debate about racism in America (pp. 75–117). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sears, D. O., Lau, R. R., Tyler, T. R., & Allen, H. M. (1980). Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting. American Political Science Review, 74, 670–684.
Sears, D. O., & Levy, S. (2003). Childhood and adult political development. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. L. Jervis (Eds.), Handbook of political psychology (pp. 114–159). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sears, D. O., van Laar, C., Carrillo, M., & Kosterman, R. (1997). Is it really racism? The origins of white Americans’ opposition to race-targeted policies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 16–53.
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Rabinowitz, J. L., & Federico, C. M. (1999). Peering into the jaws of the beast: The integrative dynamics of social identity, symbolic racism, and social dominance. In D. A. Prentice, & D. T. Miller (Eds.), Cultural Divides: Understanding and Overcoming Group Conflict (pp. 80–132). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sniderman, P. M., & Carmines, E. G. (1997). Reaching beyond race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Soss, J., Langbein, L., & Metelko, A. R. (2003). Why do white Americans support the death penalty? Journal of Politics, 65, 397–421.
Tarman, C., & Sears, D. O. (2005). The conceptualization and measurement of Symbolic racism. Journal of Politics, 67, 731–761.
Tyler, T. R., & Boeckmann, R. J. (1997). Three strikes and you are out, but why? The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers. Law and Society Review, 31, 237–265.
Tyler, T. R., & Weber, R. (1982). Support for the death penalty; instrumental response to crime, or symbolic attitude? Law and Society Review, 17, 21–45.
Valentino, N. A. (1999). Crime news and the priming of racial attitudes during evaluations of the president. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 293–320.
Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., & White, I. K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 75–90.
Warr, M. (1995). Public opinion on crime and punishment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 296–310.
Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility. A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford Press.
Wilson, J. Q., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1985). Crime and Human Nature. New York: Touchstone Simon & Schuster.
Young, J. (1999). Exclusive society. London: Sage.
Young, R. L. (1991). Race, conceptions of crime and justice, and support for the death penalty. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 67–75.
Acknowledgment
The first and second authors were supported by Swiss National Science Foundation grants (No. PA001-104981 and No. 8210-067659 respectively).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Portions of this article were presented at the 26th Annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, July 6–9, 2003, Boston, and at the 5th Annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, January 29–30, 2004, Austin, Texas.
Appendix
Appendix
Symbolic Racism items
Internal symbolic racism
Work ethic and individual responsibility
-
1.
It's really a matter of some people not trying hard enough; if Blacks would only try harder they could be just as well off as Whites. (1997, 1998, 1999 LACSS)
-
2.
Irish, Italian, Jewish and many other minorities overcame prejudice and worked their way up. Blacks should do the same without any special favors. (1997 LACSS)
-
3.
Blacks work just as hard to get ahead as most other Americans (R).* (1998 LACSS)
-
4.
Most Blacks who receive money from welfare could get along without it if they tried. (1997 LACSS)
Excessive demands
-
5.
Blacks are getting too demanding in their push for equal rights. (1997, 1999 LACSS)
-
6.
Blacks are demanding too much from the rest of society. (1998 LACSS)
-
7.
Some say that Black leaders have been trying to push too fast. Others feel that they haven't pushed fast enough. (1998 LACSS)
-
8.
How much of the racial tension that exists in the United States today do you think Blacks are responsible for creating? (1998, 1999 LACSS)
-
9.
Blacks generally do not complain as much as they should about their situation in society (R). (1998 LACSS)**
External symbolic racism
Denial of discrimination
-
10.
How much discrimination against Blacks do you feel there is in the United States today, limiting their chances to get ahead (R)? (1997, 1998, 1999 LACSS)
-
11.
Generations of slavery and discrimination have created conditions that make it difficult for Blacks to work their way out of the lower class (R). (1997, 1998, 1999 LACSS)
-
12.
Discrimination against Blacks is no longer a problem in the United States. (1998 LACSS)
-
13.
Racial and ethnic discrimination is still as serious problem in the United States (R). (1999 LACSS)
-
14.
Some say that the civil rights people have been trying to push too fast. Others feel that they haven't pushed fast enough. (1997 LACSS)
Undeserved disadvantage
-
15.
Over the past few years, Blacks have gotten less than they deserve (R). (1997, 1998, 1999 LACSS)
-
16.
Do Blacks get much more attention from the government than they deserve? (1997 LACSS)
-
17.
Government officials usually pay less attention to a request or complaint from a Black person than from a White person (R). (1997 LACSS)
-
18.
Over the past few years, Blacks have gotten more economically than they deserve (R). (1998 LACSS)**
Note. With one exception, these items are listed in the four themes as in the a priori categorization of Henry and Sears (2002). Later empirical analysis (Tarman & Sears, 2005) suggested that the “civil rights people have been trying to push too fast” item better falls into the “denial of discrimination” rather than the “excessive demands” theme, so that change has been made above.
*(R) indicates items that are reverse-coded.
**Items discarded from final symbolic racism scores.
About this article
Cite this article
Green, E.G.T., Staerklé, C. & Sears, D.O. Symbolic Racism and Whites’ Attitudes Towards Punitive and Preventive Crime Policies. Law Hum Behav 30, 435–454 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9020-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9020-5