Log in

Impact of hybrid nanofluid on thermal behavior of flat-plate solar collector: performance study

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Energy consumption in buildings is a major contributor to India's greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for a significant portion of the country's environmental impact. Consequently, there is a crucial need to prioritize energy-efficient heating, ventilation, and air conditioning technologies supported by solar thermal collectors to minimize the environmental consequences associated with building energy consumption. In this investigation, a flat-plate collector thermal performance is enhanced by the adaptations of 0.1 volume percentage concentrations of aluminum oxide (Al2O3), nickel (Ni), and combinations of Al2O3–Ni nanoparticles dispersed in water as hybrid nanofluid at 0.028, 0.041, 0.055, and 0.068 kgs−1 flow rates. Influences of nanofluid and flow rate conditions on thermal and exergy efficiency, heat transfer coefficient, entropy generation, and coefficient of performance of FPC are experimentally analyzed and spot that the hybrid nanofluid (Al2O3/Ni/water) own higher thermal and exergy efficiency of 72.8% and 22.9%, better heat transfer coefficient of 133.2 Wm−2 K−1, and high COP of 7.9 under high flow rate. These output results are higher than those of the water-fluid-operated FPC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the data required are available within the manuscript.

Abbreviations

A c :

Collector area (m2)

Al2O3 :

Aluminum oxide

C p :

Specific heat of fluid (J kg1 K1)

COP:

Coefficient of performance

D :

Tube diameter (m)

F R :

Heat removal factor

Fe2O4 :

Iron dioxide

FPC:

Flat-plate collector

H :

Heat transfer coefficient (Wm2 K1)

HVAC:

Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning

I :

Solar radiation (Wm2)

K :

Thermal conductivity (Wm1 K1)

:

Flow rate of fluid (kgs1)

MgO:

Magnesium oxide

MWCNT:

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes

Ni:

Nickel

Nu:

Nusselt number

Q u :

Heat gain (W)

Q in :

Energy input (W)

S :

Entropy generation (W K1)

SiO2 :

Silicon dioxide

T amb :

Ambient temperature (K)

T in :

Inlet temperature (K)

T out :

Outlet temperature (K)

T sun :

Sun temperature (5770 K)

U l :

Heat loss coefficient (Wm2 K1)

\(\tau\) :

Transmittance

\(\alpha\) :

Absorptivity

η th :

Thermal efficiency (%)

η e :

Exergy efficiency (%)

References

  1. Oloruntobi O, Mokhtar K, Mohd Rozar N, Gohari A, Asif S, Fatt CL. Effective technologies and practices for reducing pollution in warehouses - a review. Cleaner Eng Technol. 2023;13: 100622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2023.100622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gao D, Hao Y, Pei G. Investigation of a novel space heating scheme based on evacuated flat-plate solar collector and virtual energy storage. Appl Therm Eng. 2023;219: 119672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li X, Zeng G, Lei X. The stability, optical properties and solar-thermal conversion performance of SiC-MWCNTs hybrid nanofluids for the direct absorption solar collector (DASC) application. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2020;206: 110323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110323.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Syam Sundar L, et al. Efficiency analysis of thermosyphon solar flat plate collector with low mass concentrations of ND–Co3O4 hybrid nanofluids: an experimental study. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2021;143:959–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-10176-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rangabashiam D, Ramachandran S, Sekar M. Effect of Al2O3 and MgOnanofluids in heat pipe solar collector for improved efficiency. Appl Nanosci. 2023;13:595–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-021-01865-w.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Salman AM, Anead HS, Sultan KF. An experimental investigation on the effect of hybrid Nanofluid (Al+ Al2O3/distilled water) on the thermal efficiency of evacuated tube solar collector. IOP Conf Series Mater Sci Eng. 2020;745:1. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/745/1/012073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dehaj MS, Rezaeian M, Mousavi D, Shamsi S, Salarmofrad M. Efficiency of the parabolic through solar collector using NiFe2O4/Water nanofluid and U-tube. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2021;120:136–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2021.02.029.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Khanlari A. The Effect of utilizing Al2O3-SiO2/deionized water hybrid nanofluid in a tube-type heat exchanger. Heat Transfer Res. 2020;52:991–1005. https://doi.org/10.1615/HeatTransRes.2020034103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elshazly E, Rehim AAA, Mahallawi IE. 4E study of experimental thermal performance enhancement of flat plate solar collectors using MWCNT, Al2O3, and hybrid MWCNT/ Al2O3 nanofluids. Res Eng. 2020;16: 100723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100723.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaya H, Alkasem M, Arslan K. Effect of nanoparticle shape of Al2O3/Pure Water nanofluid on evacuated U-Tube solar collector efficiency. Renew Energy. 2020;162:267–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bayram K, Osman I. Thermodynamic analysis of absorption cooling system with LiBr-Al2O3/water nanofluid using solar energy. Therm Sci. 2022;26:135–46. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI200817340K.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ukueje WE, Abam FI, Obi A. A perspective review on thermal conductivity of hybrid nanofluids and their application in automobile radiator cooling. J Nanotechnol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2187932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar PG, Prabakaran R, Sakthivadivel D. Ultrasonication time optimization for multi-walled carbon nanotube based Therminol-55 nanofluid: an experimental investigation. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2022;147:10329–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-022-11298-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. ASHRAE (2003) Standard, Methods of Testing to Determine the Thermal Performance of Solar Collectors. 3rded.Atlanta: GA, USA

  15. Selimefendigil F, Irin CS, Oztop HF. Experimental analysis of combined utilization of CuO nanoparticles in latent heat storage unit and absorber coating in a single-slope solar desalination system. Sol Energy. 2022;233:278–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.01.039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharafeldin MA, Grof G, Nada EA, Mahian O. Evacuated tube solar collector performance using copper nanofluid: energy and environmental analysis. Appl Therm Eng. 2019;162: 114205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Coccia G, Nicola GD, Sotte M. Design, manufacture, and test of a prototype for a parabolic trough collector for industrial process heat. Renew Energy. 2015;74:727–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.077.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mubarrat M, Mashfy MM, Farhan T, Ehsan MM. Research advancement and potential prospects of thermal energy storage in concentrated solar power application. Int J Thermofluids. 2023;20: 100431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Henein SM, Rehim AAA. The performance response of a heat pipe evacuated tube solar collector using MgO/MWCNT hybrid nanofluid as a working fluid. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2022;33: 101957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.101957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tong Y, Lee H, Kang W, Cho H. Energy and exergy comparison of a flat-plate solar collector using water, Al2O3nanofluid, and CuOnanofluid. App Ther Eng. 2019;159: 113959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113959.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Malika M, Sonawane SS. The sono-photocatalytic performance of a Fe2O3 coated TiO2 based hybrid nanofluid under visible light via RSM. Colloids Surf a Physico chem Eng Asp. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ekiciler R, Arslan K, Turgut O. Application of nanofluid flow in entropy generation and thermal performance analysis of parabolic trough solar collector: experimental and numerical study. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2023;148:7299–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12187-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lattieff FA, Mahdi MA, Majdi JM, Talebizadehsardari P, Yaïci W. Performance analysis of a solar cooling system with equal and unequal adsorption/desorption operating time. Energies. 2021;14:6749. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206749.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Smaisim, Fadhil G, Hussein A, Abdullah W, Abed, Azher M. Enhancement of heat transfer from solar thermal collector using nanofluid. Open Eng. 2022;12:968–76. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2022-0337.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tuncer AD, Aytaç I, Variyenli HI, Khanlari A, Mantıc S, Karart A. Improving the performance of a heat pipe evacuated solar water collector using a magnetic NiFe2O4/water nanofluid. Ther Sci Eng Pro. 2023;45:102107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.102107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fedele L, Colla L, Bobbo S, Barsion S, Agresti F. Experimental stability analysis of different water based nanofluids. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2011;6:300. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-6-300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2024R373), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study's conception and design. The first draft of the manuscript was written by RV, and the individual contributions of ALL authors are given below: LS was involved in formal analysis, MA helped with methodology and writing, IH, SP, and AHS helped with investigation, KM participated in review and editing, VM and MAK helped with writing and language help, and RV participated in original draft preparation, supervision, and validation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Venkatesh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare relevant to this article's content.

Ethics approval

This is an observational study. Influences of alumina, nickel, and alumina/nickel oxide nanofluid on thermal behavior of solar collector; Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Selvam, L., Aruna, M., Hossain, I. et al. Impact of hybrid nanofluid on thermal behavior of flat-plate solar collector: performance study. J Therm Anal Calorim 149, 5047–5057 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-12994-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-12994-z

Keywords

Navigation