Abstract
Introduction Research has consistently shown that many people with spinal cord injury (SCI) do not return to work (RTW), despite evidence that being employed is associated with better quality of life, participation and physical and psychological well-being. While some factors associated with RTW outcome have been identified, very little is known about what influences people’s own decisions about their employment following SCI. This qualitative study sought to identify factors that influenced decisions about whether and when to RTW for people with SCI. Methods Participants were recruited through rehabilitation and support services in Aotearoa/New Zealand, and sampling sought to capture variation in the population, particularly with regard to pre-injury occupation, physical impairment, age, ethnicity and education. In-depth interviews were conducted which were audio-taped and transcribed. Interviews were analysed using rigorous methods drawn from grounded theory. Results Thirteen participants took part in the research. Findings identified four main themes that synthesised experiences about what influenced decisions about employment after SCI: (1) ability to work (given work demands and current resources); (2) presence of responsibilities or pressures that compete with work; (3) access to a suitable job; and (4) whether work was of enough benefit to the individual to be worth pursuing. Conclusions Findings illustrate the complexity of decisions about working after SCI, and provide a framework that health and vocational professionals may find useful to inform discussions with their clients. Findings also provide a basis for further research into interventions to support people to make informed decisions about employment after SCI.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Grint K. The sociology of work: introduction. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2005.
Krause JS. Adjustment to life after spinal cord injury: a comparison among three participant groups based on employment status. Rehabil Couns Bull. 1992;35(4):218–29.
Hammell K. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(2):124–39.
Murphy GC, Young AE, Brown DJ, King NJ. Explaining labor force status following spinal cord injury: the contribution of psychological variables. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35(6):276–83.
Yasuda S, Wehman P, Targett P, Cifu DX, West M, Yasuda S, et al. Return to work after spinal cord injury: a review of recent research. Neurorehabilitation. 2002;17(3):177–86.
Hess DW, Ripley DL, McKinley WO, Tewksbury M. Predictors for return to work after spinal cord injury: a 3-year multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(3):359–63.
Crisp R. Return to work after spinal cord injury. J Rehabil. 1990;56(1):28–35.
Murphy GC, Brown DJ, Athanasou J, Foreman P, Young AE. Labour force participation and employment among a sample of Australian patients with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1997;35(4):238–44.
Tomassen PC, Post MW, van Asbeck FW. Return to work after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2000;38(1):51–5.
Krause JS. Years to employment after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(9):1282–9.
Krause N, Frank JW, Dasinger LK, Sullivan TJ, Sinclair SJ. Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work related injury and illness: challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40:464–84.
McKee-Ryan FM, Song Z, Wanberg CR, Kinicki AJ. Psychological and physical well-being during unemployment: a meta-analytic study. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(1):53–76.
Young A, Murphy G. Vocationally orientated rehabilitation service requests: the case of employed persons experiencing a spinal cord injury. Aust J Career Dev. 2003;12(1):17–24.
Chapin MH, Kewman DG. Factors affecting employment following spinal cord injury: a qualitative study. Rehabil Psychol. 2001;46(4):400–16.
Ville I, Winance M. To work or not to work? The occupational trajectories of wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(7):423–36.
Cheek J, Shoebridge J, Willis E, Zadoroznyi M. Society and health: social theory for health workers. Melbourne: Addison Wesley Longman; 1996.
Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for develo** grounded theory. 2nd ed. California: SAGE; 1998.
World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001.
Polkinghorne DE. Language and meaning: data collection in qualitative research. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52(2):137–45.
Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research: rigour and qualitative research. BMJ. 1995;311:109–12.
Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. California: Sage; 2002.
Patel S, Greasley K, Watson P. Barriers to rehabilitation and return to work for unemployed chronic pain patients: a qualitative study. Eur J Pain. 2007;11:831–40.
Maticka-Tyndale E, Adam BD, Cohen JJ. To work or not to work: combination therapies and HIV. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(10):1353–72.
Kennedy F, Haslam C, Munir F, Pryce J. Returning to work following cancer: a qualitative exploratory study into the experience of returning to work following cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2007;16:17–25.
Main DS, Nowels CT, Cavender TA, Etschmaier M, Steiner JF. A qualitative study of work and work return in cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2005;14:992–1004.
Alaszewski A, Alaszewski H, Potter J, Penhale B. Working after stroke: survivors’ experiences and perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of the return to paid employment. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1858–69.
Lawthers AG, Pransky GS, Peterson LE, Himmelstein JH. Rethinking quality in the context of persons with disability. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(4):287–99.
Malec J, Moessner A. Replicated positive results for the VCC model of vocational intervention after ABI within the social model of disability. Brain Inj. 2006;20(3):227–36.
Fadyl JK, McPherson KM. Approaches to vocational rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury—a review of the evidence. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(3):195–212.
Perriam A. Wheels in work. Australia New Zealand spinal cord society conference 2008. Christchurch: Australia New Zealand Spinal Cord Society; 2008.
Malec J, Buffington A, Moessner A, Degiorgio L. A medical/vocational case coordination system for persons with brain injury: an evaluation of employment outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:1007–15.
Statistics New Zealand Te Tari Tatau. Household economic survey (income): year ended June 2008. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand Te Tari Tatau; 2008.
Work and Income New Zealand Te Hiranga Tangata. Sickness benefit information. 2009 [Internet; cited 2009 01 July]; available from: http://www.workandincome.govt.nz/manuals-and-procedures/deskfile/main_benefits_rates/sickness_benefit_tables.htm.
Acknowledgments
Appreciation is extended to participants for contributing their time and sharing their experiences; to AUT University for funding the research; to Arron Perriam and Sridhar Atresh for their support and facilitation of recruitment efforts; to Marta Leete for her input as an external reader during analysis; and to the NRC-SANN writing clinic for feedback on a draft of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fadyl, J.K., McPherson, K.M. Understanding Decisions About Work After Spinal Cord Injury. J Occup Rehabil 20, 69–80 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9204-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9204-1