Log in

Product Market Cooperation, Profits and Welfare in the Presence of Labor Union

  • Published:
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is believed that cooperation between the final goods producers hurts consumers and reduces social welfare but increases profits. We show that these results may not hold in the presence of a unionized labor market. The effects of product market cooperation on consumers, profits and social welfare may depend on the union’s disagreement utility, its bargaining power and the degree of product market cooperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An important factor that differentiates national unionization structures is the degree of wage setting centralization (Flanagan 1999 and Wallerstein 1999). An industry-wide wage setting is more relevant in Germany and Scandinavia, while firm-specific wage setting is more relevant in Japan and North America. Iversen (1998) shows an index of centralization of wage bargaining in different countries.

  2. The “efficient bargaining” model, which stipulates that the firms and unions bargain over wages and employment, is an alternative to the right-to-manage model. See, Layard et al. (1991) for arguments in favor of right-to-manage models.

  3. We ignore the case of λ = 1 to avoid indeterminacy in our maximization problem, since, in this situation, the firms may prefer to shutdown one plant. The case of λ = 1 should be considered separately.

  4. If α = 1, the equilibrium wages are independent of λ.

  5. We use ‘The Mathematica 4’ (see Wolfram 1999) for the figures of this paper.

  6. If α = 1, the equilibrium wages are independent of λ.

References

  • Brod A, Shivakumar R (1999) Advantageous semi-collusion. J Ind Econ, 47, pp 221–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabuig V, Gonzalez-Maestre M (2002) Union structure and the incentives for innovation. Eur J Polit Econ 18:177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson C (1988) Multiunit bargaining in oligopolistic industries. J Lab Econ 6:397–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon A, Petrakis E (2002) A generalised wage rigidity result. Int J Ind Organ 20:285–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell J, Shapiro C (1990) Horizontal mergers: an equilibrium analysis. Am Econ Rev 80:107–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Fershtman C, Gandal N (1994) Disadvantageous semicollusion. Int J Ind Organ 12:141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan RJ (1999) Macroeconomic performance and collective bargaining: an international perspective. J Econ Lit 37:1150–1175

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn H, Wolinsky A (1988) Bilateral monopolies and incentives for merger. Rand J Econ 19:408–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen T (1998) Wage bargaining, central bank independence and the real effects of money. Int Organ 52:469–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layard R, Nickell S, Jackman R (1991) Unemployment, macroeconomic performance and the labour market. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • López MC, Naylor RA (2004) The Cournot-Bertrand profit differential: a reversal result in a differentiated duopoly with wage bargaining. Eur Econ Rev 48:681–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A (2008) Unionised labour market and strategic production decision of a multinational. Econ J 118:1621–1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symeonidis G (2008) Downstream competition, bargaining and welfare. J Econ Manage Strategy 17:247–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein M (1999) Wage-setting institutions and pay inequality in advanced industrial societies. Am J Polit Sci 43:649–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram S (1999) The mathematica book, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Wolfram Media

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

I thank an anonymous referee for helpful comments and suggestions. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arijit Mukherjee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mukherjee, A. Product Market Cooperation, Profits and Welfare in the Presence of Labor Union. J Ind Compet Trade 10, 151–160 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-009-0063-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-009-0063-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation