Log in

Fluorescence of aqueous solutions of commercial humic products

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Spectroscopy Aims and scope

We have studied the spectral luminescence characteristics of aqueous solutions of humic products obtained from different raw material sources, and their behavior as the excitation wavelength increases from 270 nm to 355 nm. We have identified differences in the spectral properties of industrial humic products from coalified materials, lignin-containing organic waste, and humic products from plant raw material (peat, sapropel, vermicompost). We have shown that humic products from plant raw material have spectral properties closer to those for humic substances in natural water or soil than humic products from coalified materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. S. Orlov, Humic Acids in Soils and the General Theory of Humification [in Russian], Izdat. MGU, Moscow (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. J. Stevenson, Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions, 2nd. Ed., Wiley, New York (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. I. Gorovaya, D. S. Orlov, and O. V. Shcherbenko, Humic Substances. Structure, Functions, Mechanism of Action, Protective Properties, and Ecological Role [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1995).

  4. K. H. Tan, Humic Matter in Soil and the Environment: Principles and Controversies, CRC Press, New York (2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. I. V. Perminova and D. M. Zhilin, “Humic substances in the Green Chemistry context,” in: Green Chemistry in Russia [in Russian], Izdat. Mosk. Univ., Moscow (2004), pp. 146–162.

  6. D. S. Orlov, Sorosov. Obrazovat. Zh., No. 3, 65–74 (1996).

  7. I. V. Perminova, Khimiya i Zhizn’, No. 1, 50–55 (2008).

  8. N. A. Kulikova, “Protective effect of humic substances for plants in aqueous and soil environments under abiotic stress conditions,” Dissertation in competition for the academic degree of Doctor of Biological Sciences, Moscow (2008).

  9. O. S. Yakimenko, Proceedings, Second International Scientific and Practical Conference on Earthworms and Soil Fertility, Vladimir, 17–20 March 2004, Izdat. X-PRESS, Vladimir (2004), pp. 249-252.

  10. J. C. Lobartini, K. H. Tan, J. A. Rema, A. R. Gingle, and D. S. Himmelsbach, Sci. Total Environ., 113, No. 1/3, 1–15 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. V. Patsaeva, V. V. Fadeev, E. M. Filippova, V. V. Chubarov, and V. I. Yuzhakov, Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 3, Fizika. Astronomiya, 32, No. 6, 71–75 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Z. Zsolnay, E. Baigar, M. Jimenez, B. Steinweg, and F. Saccomandi, Chemosphere, 38, No. 1, 45–50 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O. M. Gorshkova, S. V. Patsaeva, E. V. Fedoseeva, D. M. Shubina, and V. I. Yuzhakov, Voda: Khimiya i Ékologiya, No. 11, 31–39 (2009).

  14. A. S. Milyukov, S. V. Patsaeva, V. I. Yuzhakov, O. M. Gorshkova, and E. M. Prashchikina, Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 3, Fizika. Astronomiya, No. 6, 34–38 (2007).

  15. O. Donard, M. Lamotte, C. Belin, and M. Ewald, Marine Chemistry, 27, No. 1–2, 117–136 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Shubina, E. Fedoseeva, O. Gorshkova, S. Patsaeva, V. Terekhova, M. Timofeev, and V. Yuzhakov, EARSeL Proc., 9, No. 1, 13–21 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  17. O. S. Yakimenko and P. A. Volkov, Proceedings, Fourth International Conference on Humic Substances in the Biosphere, Moscow, 19–21 December 2007, Izdat. SPbGU, St. Petersburg (2007), pp. 548–552.

  18. N. Senesi, T. Miano, M. Provenzano, and G. Brunetti, Soil. Sci., 152, No. 4, 259–271 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. J. Mobed, S. L. Hemmingsen, J. L. Autry, and L. B. McGown, Env. Sci. & Technol., 30, No. 10, 3061–3065 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Alberts and M. Takács, Org. Geochem., 35, No. 3, 243–356 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Fu, F. Wu, and C. Liu, Chin. J. Geochem., 23, No. 4, 309–318 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. L. Hemmingsen and L. B. McGown, Appl. Spectrosc., 51, No. 7, 921–929 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. R. Malcolm and P. MacCarthy, Env. Sci. & Technol., 20, 904–911 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. M. Shubina, O. S. Yakimenko, S. V. Patsaeva, A. A. Izosimov, V. A. Terekhova, E. V. Fedoseeva, and V. I. Yuzhakov, Voda: Khimiya i Ékologiya, No. 2, 22–26 (2010).

  25. D. M. Shubina, O. S. Yakimenko, S. V. Patsaeva, A. A. Izosimov, V. A. Terekhova, E. V. Fedoseeva, and V. I. Yuzhakov,Voda: Khimiya i Ékologiya, No. 3, 21–25 (2010).

  26. D. S. Orlov and L. A. Grishina, Humus Chemistry Laboratory Manual [in Russian], Izdat. MGU, Moscow (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. F. Eaton, Pure Appl. Chem., 60, No. 7, 1107–1114 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Patsaeva.

Additional information

Translated from Zhurnal Prikladnoi Spektroskopii, Vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 943–950, November–December, 2011.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gosteva, O.Y., Izosimov, A.A., Patsaeva, S.V. et al. Fluorescence of aqueous solutions of commercial humic products. J Appl Spectrosc 78, 884–891 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-012-9548-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-012-9548-8

Keywords

Navigation