Abstract
A noticeable push toward using agricultural crops for ethanol production and for undertaking research to expand the range of possible biofuels began to dominate discussions of agricultural science and policy in the United States around 2005. This paper proposes two complementary philosophical approaches to examining the philosophical questions that should be posed in connection with this turn of events. One stresses a critique of underlying epistemological commitments in the scientific models being developed to determine the feasibility of various biofuels proposals. The second begins with a broader set of questions about the philosophical goals of agriculture, then queries the place that a turn to biofuels might have within the philosophy of agriculture. Both are portrayed as viable and important. The paper itself is a preliminary stage-setting reflection on the need for these two types of philosophical inquiry.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brasier K. J. (2002) Ideology and Discourse: Characterization of the 1996 Farm Bill by Agricultural Interest Groups. Agriculture and Human Values, 19, 239–253
Burkhardt J. (1988) Biotechnology, Ethics and the Structure of Agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values, 5, 53–60
Burkhardt J. (2001) Agricultural Biotechnology and the Future Benefits Argument. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 14, 135–145
Comstock G. (1989) Genetically Engineered Herbicide Resistance, Part I. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2, 263–306
Comstock G. (2000) Vexing Nature: On the Ethical Case Against Agricultural Biotechnology. Dordrecht, NL: Springer
Davis J. S. (1935) Agrarian Fundamentalism. In: N. E. Himes, (ed), Economics, Sociology and the Modern World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp.3–22
Farrell A. E., Plevin R. J., Turner B. T., Jones A. D., O’Hare M., Kammen D. M. (2006) Ethanol Can Contribute to Energy and Environmental Goals. Science, 311, 506–508
Feenberg A. (2002), Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press
Ferris, J. and S. Joshi, “Agriculture as a Source of Fuel Prospects and Impacts, 2007 to 2017,” Michigan State University Working Paper (2007)
Finlay M. R. (2003) Old Efforts at New Uses: A Brief History of Chemurgy and the American Search for Biobased Materials. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 7(3&4), 33–46
Green, M., R. Griffen, and B. Stout, Economic Life-Cycle Analysis for Ethanol Production (vol/issue 83/3566, ASAE Tech. Paper, 1983), 35pp
Ihde D. (1990), Technology and the Life World, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
Ihde D. (1998), Expanding Hermeneutics: Visualism in Science, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press
Kim S., Dale B. (2005), Life cycle assessment of various crop** systems utilized for producing biofuels: Bioethanol and biodiesel. Biomass and Bioenergy, 29, 426–439
Mariola M. (2005), Losing Ground: Farmland Preservation, Economic Utilitarianism, and the Erosion of the Agrarian Ideal Agriculture and Human Values, 22, 209–223
Ofoli, R. Y. and B. A. Stout, Ethel alcohol production for fuel: Energy balance. in ASAE National Energy Symposium, (vol/issue 4/81, ASAE Publ., 1981), pp. 292–298
Ogg, C., Corn Ethanol Production vs. Environmental Remedies. Presentation at the Farm Foundation Biofuel, Food and Feeds Tradeoff Conference, St. Louis, MO, April 12–13 (2007)
Pacala S., Socolow R. (2004), Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies. Science, 305, 968–972
Pimentel D., Patzek T. (2005), Ethanol Production Using Corn, Switchgrass, and Wood; Biodiesel Production Using Soybean and Sunflower. Natural Resources Research, 14, 65–76
Sagoff M. (2007), Can Environmentalists Keep Two Ideas in Mind and Still Function? Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 27(1&2): 2–7
Samson R., S. Mani, R. Boddey, S. Sokhansanj, D. Quesada, S. Urquiaga, V. Reis, C. Ho Lem (2005), The Potential of C4 Perennial Grasses for Develo** a Global BIOHEAT Industry, Critical Reviews in the Plant Sciences, 24, 461–495
Sarewitz D. (2004), How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse Environmental Science & Policy. 7, 385–403
Stone G. D. (2002), Both Sides Now: Fallacies in the Genetic Modification Wars; Implications for Develo** Countries, and Anthropological Perspectives. Current Anthropology, 43, 611–640
Stout, B. A., “Biomass Energy Profiles,” FAO; Agricultural Services Bulletin 54 (1983) 132 pp
Tilman D., Hill J., Lehman. C. (2006), Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High Diversity Grassland Biomass. Science, 314, 1598–1600
Thompson P. B. (1987), Agricultural Biotechnology and the Rhetoric of Risk: Some Conceptual Issues. The Environmental Professional, 9, 316–326
Thompson P. B. (1998), Agricultural Ethics: Research, Teaching and Public Policy, Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press
Thompson P. B. (2000), Agrarianism as Philosophy In: Thompson P., Hilde T, (eds), The Agrarian Roots of Pragmatism. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt U. Press, pp. 25–50
Thompson P. B. (2001), The Resha** of Conventional Farming: A North American Perspective. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 14, 217–229
Thompson P. B. (2003), Value Judgments and Risk Comparisons: The Case of Genetically Engineered Crops Plant Physiology, 132, 10–16
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, P.B. The Agricultural Ethics of Biofuels: A First Look. J Agric Environ Ethics 21, 183–198 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-007-9073-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-007-9073-6