Log in

THE PROCESS OF PHYSICS TEACHING ASSISTANTS’ PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explored the process of physics teaching assistants’ (TAs) PCK development in the context of teaching a new undergraduate introductory physics course. Matter and Interactions (M&I) has recently adopted a new introductory physics course that focuses on the application of a small number of fundamental physical principles to the atomic and molecular nature of matter. The purpose of this study is to describe how the PCK of physics TAs in the M&I course was developed and enacted. Data collection began during the TA preparation workshop that was held before the semester and continued during the recitation and laboratory classes that the TAs taught during the semester. Through a qualitative, multiple case study research design, data were collected from multiple sources: non-participant observations, digitally recorded video, semi-structured interviews, TAs’ written reflections, and researchers’ field notes. Data analysis consisted of cross-case and within-case analyses. Data were analyzed using a constant comparative method. After data analysis, 2 main themes emerged related to the development of TA’s PCK: (a) TAs’ PCK developed from propositional knowledge to personal practical knowledge and (b) the process of knowledge development consisted of 3 phases: accepting, actualizing, and internalizing. The results of this study will not only contribute to the quest to identify the nature of professional knowledge of science teaching but also help guide preparation for innovative introductory physics courses and other college level science courses in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85, 426–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, L., Recesso, A. & Seung, E. (2008). An evidential reasoning approach to analysis of science teaching practices using a web‐based video analysis tool. In L. Yew‐** & T. Aik‐Ling (Eds.), Science Education at the Nexus of Theory and Practice Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

  • Carter, K. (1990). Teachers’ knowledge and learning to teach. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 291–310). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabay, R. & Sherwood, B. (2007). Matter & interactions. In E. F. Redish & J. Cooney (Eds.), Research-based Reform of University Physics (Issue 1). Retrieved March 17, 2007 from http://www.compadre.org/per/per_reviews/media/volume1/MatterandInteractions-2007.pdf

  • Clarke, D. & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clermont, C. P., Krajcik, J. S. & Borko, H. (1993). The influence of an intensive in-service workshop on pedagogical content knowledge growth among novice chemical demonstrators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, K. F. & Jones, L. L. (1998). The subject matter knowledge of preservice science teachers. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 707–718). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, F. M. & Clandinin, D. J. (1985). Personal practical knowledge and the modes of knowing: Relevance for teaching and learning. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching the ways of knowing (pp. 174–198). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, O. & Van Driel, J. (2004). Exploring the development of student teachers’ PCK of the multiple meanings of chemistry topics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 277–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (1988). Curriculum in teacher education. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, A. (2002). Multiple perspectives for the study of teaching: Knowledge, reason, understanding, and being. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 1032–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddis, A. N. (1993). Transforming subject-matter knowledge: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in learning to reflect on teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 673–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teacher College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gess‐Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In J. Gess‐Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 51–94). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers

  • Halim, L. & Meerah, S. M. (2002). Science trainee teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching. Research in Science and Technological Education, 2, 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, A. & Berry, A. (2010). Constructing CoRes—a strategy for building PCK in pre-service science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 41, 341–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justi, R. & Van Driel, J. (2005). The development of science teachers’ knowledge on models and modelling: Promoting, characterising and understanding the process. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 549–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45, 169–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koballa, T., Upson, L., Minchew, C., Parlo, A. & Inyega, J. (2005). Using technology to support evidence-based science teaching and mentoring. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Colorado Springs, CO.

  • Leinhardt, G. (1988). Situated knowledge and expertise in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Teachers’ professional learning (pp. 146–168). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, L. & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellado, V. (1997). Preservice teachers’ classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science. Science Education, 6, 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munby, H., Russell, T. & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 877–904). New York: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicklow, J. W., Marikunte, S. S. & Chevalier, L. R. (2007). Balancing pedagogical and professional practice skills in the training of graduate teaching assistants. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 133, 89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding: The complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service education. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1281–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38, 261–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, G. W. & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 769–802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1952). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seung, E., Bryan, L. & Haugan, P. (2012). Examining physics graduate teaching assistants’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching a new physics curriculum. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 451–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D. & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J., De Jong, O. & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86, 572–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eulsun Seung.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table

Table 1 TAs’ PCK components and indicators

Appendix 2

Recitation Problem: RecH9.

Two hoops roll down an inclined board without slip**.

The smaller hoop has mass m and radius r. The larger hoop has mass M and radius R. R  >  r M  >  m

If they both start at rest from a height h, which one reaches the bottom first, or is it a tie?

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seung, E. THE PROCESS OF PHYSICS TEACHING ASSISTANTS’ PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 11, 1303–1326 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9378-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9378-4

Key words

Navigation