SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating tradeoffs between sanctuary for migrating waterbirds and recreational opportunities in a restored wetland complex

  • RIVER FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wetland restoration in highly modified landscapes involves balancing target ecosystem functions and values with constraints of landscape and stakeholder context. Often, a restored wetland complex cannot meet all target conditions simultaneously, and tradeoffs must be understood, evaluated, and quantified. We examined the tradeoff between providing migratory bird sanctuary and increasing public recreational opportunities within a restored floodplain wetland complex along the Illinois River. We surveyed the distribution and behavior of waterbirds in response to a gradient of spatial and temporal disturbances from waterbird hunting activities. Using ArcMap and spatial interpolation of waterbird densities as a novel approach to quantify sanctuary area, we estimated that approximately 42% of Emiquon Preserve functioned as sanctuary across disturbance intensities, hunter distribution, and time periods during autumn migration. Waterbird abundance did not increase with short-term temporal sanctuary or decreased hunting intensity. Disturbance distance around hunting locations was 752.1 m, overall, and increased 38.4 m for each additional hunting party. Exclusion distance around hunting locations was greater in areas with greater mean disturbance frequency. We question the effectiveness of short-term temporal sanctuary for waterbirds at the expense of recreational opportunities and advocate our analytical approach to quantify sanctuary area and disturbance buffers without experimentally causing disturbances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, J. T., J. T. Takekawa, K. L. Kruse, D. L. Orthmeyer, J. L. Yee, C. R. Ely, D. H. Ward, K. S. Bollinger & D. M. Mulcahy, 2004. Using radio telemetry to monitor cardiac response of free-living tule greater white-fronted geese (Anser albifrons elgasi) to human disturbance. Wilson Bulletin 116: 146–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, W. S., E. B. Webb, D. C. Kesler, A. H. Raedeke, L. W. Naylor & D. D. Humburg, 2014. Landscape effects on mallard habitat selection at multiple spatial scales during the non-breeding period. Landscape Ecology 29: 989–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belanger, L. & J. Bedard, 1995. Hunting and waterfowl. In Knight, R. L. & K. Gutzwiller (eds), Wildlife and Recreationists: Coexistence through Management and Research. Island Press, Washington, D.C.: 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellrose, F. C., 1954. The value of waterfowl refuges in Illinois. Journal of Wildlife Management 18: 160–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellrose, F. C. & T. D. Crompton, 1970. Migrational behavior of mallards and black ducks as determined from banding. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 30: 167–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, D. T., L. L. Anthony, R. Harcourt & G. Ross, 2003. Testing a key assumption of wildlife buffer zones: is flight initiation distance a species-specific trait? Biological Conservation 110: 97–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, D. T., E. Fernandez-Juricic, P. A. Zollner & S. C. Garity, 2005. Inter-specific variation in avian responses to human disturbances. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 943–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bregnballe, T. & J. Madsen, 2004. Tools in waterfowl reserve management: effects of intermittent hunting adjacent to a shooting-free core area. Wildlife Biology 10: 261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. & M. Gochfeld, 1991. Human activity influence and diurnal and nocturnal foraging of Sanderlings (Calidris alba). The Condor 93: 259–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casazza, M. L., P. S. Coates, M. R. Miller, C. T. Overton & D. R. Yparraguirre, 2012. Hunting influences the diel patterns in habitat selection by northern pintails Anas acuta. Wildlife Biology 18(1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C., L. Larson, A. Dayer, R. Stedman & D. Decker, 2015. Are wildlife recreationists conservationists? Linking hunting, birdwatching, and pro-environmental behavior. The Journal of Wildlife Management 79: 446–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox Jr, R. R. & A. D. Afton, 1997. Evening flights of female northern pintails from a major roost site. The Condor 98: 810–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. E., A. D. Afton & R. R. Cox Jr, 2009. Habitat use by female mallards in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Journal of Wildlife Management 73: 701–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, L. M. & R. Houtman, 1989. The influence of distance to refuge on flight initiation distance in the gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis). Canadian Journal of Zoology 67: 233–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, J. L., T. A. Sanders & P. F. Dohert, 2010. Mallard response to experimental walk-in and shooting disturbance. Journal of Wildlife Management 74: 1815–1824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elphick, C. S., 2008. Landscape effects on waterbird densities in California rice fields: taxonomic differences, scale-dependence, and conservation implications. Waterbirds 31: 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. M. & K. R. Day, 2002. Hunting disturbance on a large shallow lake: the effectiveness of waterfowl refuges. Ibis 144: 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Juricic, E., P. Venier, D. Renison & D. T. Blumstein, 2005. Sensitivity of wildlife to spatial patterns of recreationist behavior: a critical assessment of minimum approaching distances and buffer areas for grassland birds. Biological Conservation 125: 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A. D. & J. Madsen, 1997. Behavioral and distributional effects of hunting disturbance on waterbirds in Europe: implications for refuge design. Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, J. A., W. J. Sutherland & A. R. Watkinson, 1996. A method to quantify the effects of human disturbance on animal populations. Journal of Animal Ecology 33: 786–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, H. K., M. A. Weston, G. S. Maguire, K. K. Miller & B. A. Christie, 2011. Towards ecologically meaningful and socially acceptable buffer: response distances of shorebirds in Victoria, Australia, to human disturbance. Landscape and Urban Planning 103: 326–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goss-Custard, J. D., P. Triplet, F. Sueur & A. D. West, 2006. Critical thresholds of disturbance by raptors and people in foraging wading birds. Biological Conservation 127: 88–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M. J., H. M. Hagy, J. A. Nyman & J. D. Stafford, 2013. Management of wetlands for wildlife. In Davis, C. A. & J. T. Anderson (eds), Wetland Techniques: Vol. 3: Applications and Management. Springer, Dodrecht: 121–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagy, H. M., A. P. Yetter, K. W. Stodola, M. M. Horath, C. S. Hine, M. P. Ward, T. J. Benson, R. V. Smith & J. D. Stafford, 2014. Stopover duration of mallards during autumn in the Illinois River valley. Journal of Wildlife Management 78: 747–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagy, H. M., C. S. Hine, M. M. Horath, A. P. Yetter, R. V. Smith & J. D. Stafford, 2016. Waterbirds as indicators of floodplain wetland Restoration. Hydrobiologia (in Review).

  • Havera, S. P., 1999. Waterfowl of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publication 21, Champaign, Illinois: 628 pp.

  • Havera, S. P., L. R. Boens, M. M. Georgi & R. T. Shealy, 1992. Human disturbance of waterfowl on Keokuk Pool, Mississippi River. Wildlife Society Bulletin 20: 290–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, C. S., H. M. Hagy, A. P. Yetter, M. M. Horath, R. V. Smith & J. D. Stafford, 2013. Waterbird and wetland monitoring at the Emiquon Preserve: Final Report 2007–2013. INHS Technical Report 2013 (20).

  • Jessop, J. E., 2014. Tradeoffs among ecosystem services in restored wetlands. Thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

  • Joensen, A. H. & J. Madsen, 1985. Waterfowl and raptors wintering in wetlands of western Greece, 1983–85. Natura Jutlandica 21: 169–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. D., 2007. Measuring habitat quality: a review. The Condor 109: 489–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. L., 1993. Waterbird behavioral responses to human disturbances. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21: 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. L. & K. J. Gutzwiller (eds), 1995. Wildlife and Recreationists: Coexistence Through Management and Research. Island Press, Washington, D.C.: 372 pp.

  • Knight, R. L. & S. A. Temple, 1995. Wildlife and recreationists: coexistence through management. In Knight, R. L. & K. J. Gutzwiller (eds), Wildlife and Recreationists: Coexistence Through Management and Research. Island Press, Washington, D.C.: 327–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, J. D., J. B. Davis, R. M. Kaminski, A. D. Afton & E. J. Penny, 2015. Mallard use of a managed public hunting area. Journal of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 2: 281–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laundré, J. W., L. Hernandez & W. J. Ripple, 2010. Landscape of fear: ecological implication of being afraid. The Open Ecology Journal 3: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, J., 1995. Impacts of disturbance on migratory waterfowl. Ibis 137(s1): 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, J., 1998a. Experimental refuges for migratory waterfowl in Danish wetlands I: baseline assessment of the disturbance effects of recreational activities. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 386–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, J., 1998b. Experimental refuges for migratory waterfowl in Danish wetlands II: tests of hunting disturbance effects. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 398–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migoya, R., G. A. Baldassarre & M. P. Losito, 1994. Diurnal activity budgets and habitat functions of northern pintail wintering in Sinaloa, Mexico. Wildfowl 45: 134–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. R., R. J. Fleskes, D. L. Orthmeyer, W. E. Newton & D. S. Gilmer, 1995. Survival of adult female northern pintails in Sacramento Valley, California. Journal of Wildlife Management 9: 478–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolet, B. A., R. M. Bevan, M. Klaassen, O. Langvoord & Y. G. J. T. van der Heijden, 2002. Habitat switching by Bewick’s swans: maximization of average long-term energy gain. Journal of Animal Ecology 71: 979–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neal, B. J., J. D. Stafford & R. P. Larkin, 2012. Stopover duration of fall-migrating dabbling ducks. Journal of Wildlife Management 76: 285–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neal, B. J., J. D. Stafford & R. P. Larkin, 2014. Migrating ducks in inland North America ignore major rivers as leading lines. Ibis 157: 154–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, J. D., D. P. Braun & R. S. Unnasch, 2003. Are we conserving what we say we are? Measuring ecological integrity within protected areas. BioScience 53: 851–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearse, A. T., S. J. Dinsmore, R. M. Kaminski & K. J. Reinecke, 2007. Evaluation of an aerial survey to estimate abundance of wintering ducks in Mississippi. Journal of Wildlife Management 72: 1413–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearse, A. T., R. M. Kaminski, K. J. Reinecke & S. J. Dinsmore, 2012. Local and landscape associations between wintering dabbling ducks and wetland complexes in Mississippi. Wetlands 32: 859–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pease, M. L., R. K. Rose & M. J. Butler, 2005. Effects of human disturbances on the behavior of wintering ducks. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33: 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, C. T. & C. K. Miller, 1997. Recommendations for protecting raptors from human disturbance: a review. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25: 634–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. A. & P. A. Cranswick, 2003. Large-scale monitoring of the effects of human disturbance on waterbirds: a review and recommendations for survey design. Ornis Hungarica 12: 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers Jr, J. A. & S. T. Schwikert, 2002. Buffer-zone distances to protect foraging and loafing waterbirds from disturbance by personal watercraft and outboard-powered boats. Conservation Biology 16: 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers Jr., J. A. & H. Smith, 1995. Set-back distances to protect nesting bird colonies from human disturbance in Florida. Conservation Biology 9: 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers Jr., J. A. & H. Smith, 1997. Buffer zone distances to protect foraging and loafing waterbirds from human disturbance in Florida. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25: 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Jaen, M. C. & T. M. Aide, 2005. Restoration success: how is it being measured? Ecology 13: 569–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schummer, M. L., R. M. Kaminski, A. H. Raedeke & D. A. Graber, 2010. Weather-related indices of autumn-winter dabbling duck abundance in middle North America. Journal of Wildlife Management 74: 94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedinger, J. S. & M. P. Herzog, 2012. Harvest and dynamics of duck populations. Journal of Wildlife Management 76: 1108–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokos, C. K., P. K. Birtsas, J. W. Connelly & K. G. Papaspyropaulos, 2013. Hunting migratory birds: hunting intolerant or harvest tolerant? Wildlife Biology 19: 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. James, E. A., M. L. Schummer, R. M. Kaminski, E. J. Penny & L. W. Burger, 2013. Effect of weekly hunting frequency on duck abundances in Mississippi Wildlife Management Areas. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 4: 144–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, J. D., A. T. Pearse, C. S. Hine, A. P. Yetter & M. M. Horath, 2007. Factors associated with hunter success for ducks on state-owned lands in Illinois, USA. Wildlife Biology 16: 113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, J. D., M. M. Horath, A. P. Yetter, C. S. Hine & S. P. Havera, 2010. Wetland use by mallards during spring and fall in the Illinois and Central Mississippi River Valleys. Waterbirds 30: 394–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unnasch, R. S., D. P. Braun, P. J. Comer & G. E. Eckert, 2008. The ecological integrity assessment framework: a framework for assessing the ecological integrity of biological and ecological resources of the National Park System. Report to the National Park Service, Ft. Collins, CO.

  • van Gils, J. A., I. W. Schenk, O. Bos & T. Piersma, 2003. Incompletely informed shorebirds that face a digestive constraint maximize net energy gain when exploiting patches. American Naturalist 161: 777–793.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Gils, J. A., P. Edelarr, G. Escudero & T. Piersma, 2004. Carrying capacity models should not use fixed prey density thresholds: a plea for using more tools of behavioral ecology. Oikos 104: 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yetter, A. P., M. M. Horath, C. S. Hine, R. S. Smith & J. D. Stafford, 2011. Illinois waterfowl surveys and investigations: final report. Illinois Natural History Survey Technical Report 2011 (41).

  • Zedler, J. B. & M. K. Leach, 1998. Managing urban wetlands for multiple use: research, restoration, and recreation. Urban Ecosystems 2: 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Blodgett, J. Walk, J. Beverlin, M. Lemke, T. Hobson, and others at The Nature Conservancy for supporting this project and allowing access to Emiquon Preserve. We thank M. Cruce of Cruce Aviation for providing flight service for this project. We thank several anonymous reviewers and guest editors M. Lemke, M. Lemke, and J. Walk for their helpful suggestions which have improved this manuscript. We are grateful to The Nature Conservancy and the Illinois Department of Natural Resources Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration program for providing funding.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Randolph V. Smith

    Present address: Illinois Department of Natural Resources, 1 Natural Resources Way, Springfield, IL, 62702, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Forbes Biological Station – Bellrose Waterfowl Research Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, P.O. Box 590, Havana, IL, 62644, USA

    Heath M. Hagy, Michelle M. Horath, Aaron P. Yetter, Christopher S. Hine & Randolph V. Smith

Authors
  1. Heath M. Hagy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michelle M. Horath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aaron P. Yetter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christopher S. Hine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Randolph V. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heath M. Hagy.

Additional information

Guest editors: Michael J. Lemke, A. Maria Lemke & Jeffery W. Walk / Large-Scale Floodplain Restoration in the Illinois River Valley

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hagy, H.M., Horath, M.M., Yetter, A.P. et al. Evaluating tradeoffs between sanctuary for migrating waterbirds and recreational opportunities in a restored wetland complex. Hydrobiologia 804, 103–118 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2711-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2711-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation