Log in

Survival of invasive aquatic plants after air exposure and implications for dispersal by recreational boats

  • INVASIVE SPECIES
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recreational boating is widely recognized as an important vector for overland transport of invasive aquatic plants. Since their dominant form of recruitment is vegetative reproduction, entangled fragments on boats and trailers can establish new populations. The effectiveness of recreational boats as transport vectors relies on the resistance of macrophytes to air exposure. During the summers of 2012 and 2013, we conducted five field experiments in northern Wisconsin to assess air tolerance of Eurasian water-milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and curly-leaf pondweed (Potamogeton crispus). We simulated conditions that these plants would experience when ensnared on boats and trailers by testing viability after drying of single stems, coiled stems, and vegetative buds (turions). Single stems of M. spicatum and P. crispus were viable for up to 18 and 12 h of air exposure, respectively. Coiling extended the viability of M. spicatum to 48 h of air exposure. Turions of P. crispus successfully sprouted after 28 days of drying. The fact that recreational boaters in the region typically visit multiple lakes within a few days suggests that most lakes are susceptible to introduction of viable plants, and so lake managers should continue to focus attention on boat cleaning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes, M. A., C. L. Jerde, D. Keller, W. L. Chadderton, J. G. Howeth & D. M. Lodge, 2013. Viability of aquatic plant fragments following desiccation. Invasive Plant Science and Management 6: 320–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boylen, C. W., E. W. Lawrence & J. D. Madsen, 1999. Loss of native aquatic plant species in a community dominated by Eurasian water-milfoil. Hydrobiologia 415: 207–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R. & D. M. Lodge, 1986. Effects of submerged macrophytes on ecosystem processes. Aquatic Botany 26: 341–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health, 2013. Invasive and exotic aquatic plants. Retrieved December 20, 2013 from [http://www.invasive.org/species/aquatic.cfm].

  • Evans, C. A., D. L. Kelting, K. M. Forrest & L. E. Steblen, 2011. Fragment viability and rootlet formation in Eurasian watermilfoil after desiccation. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 48: 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel, J. E. & J. Stelzleni-Schwent, 2000. Zooplankton community structure: the role of dispersal. Internationale Vereinigung fü rtheoretische und angewandte Limnologie 27: 3264–3268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsch, E. J. & D. J. Lewis, 2009. The effects of aquatic invasive species on property values: evidence from a quasi-experiment. Land Economics 85: 391–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerde, C., M. A. Barnes, E. K. DeBuysser, A. Noveroske, W. L. Chadderton & D. M. Lodge, 2012. Eurasian Water-milfoil fitness loss and invasion potential following desiccation during simulated overland transport. Aquatic Invasions 7: 135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jian, Y., B. Li, J. Wang & J. Chen, 2003. Control of turion germination in Potamogeton crispus. Aquatic Botany 75: 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. E. & J. T. Carlton, 1996. Post-establishment spread in large-scale invasions: dispersal mechanisms of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha. Ecology 77: 1686–1690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. E., A. Ricciardi & J. T. Carlton, 2001. Overland dispersal of aquatic invasive species: a risk assessment of transient recreational boating. Ecological Applications 11: 1789–1799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, L. M., R. T. Coffey & C. Howard-Williams, 1985. The role of recreational boat traffic in interlake dispersal of macrophytes: a New Zealand case study. Journal of Environmental Management 20: 263–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, J. C., 1992. The introduced aquatic macrophyte, Myriophyllum spicatum, as habitat for fish and their invertebrate prey. Impact of Eichornia and Hydrilla in the United States 194: 106–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keast, A., 1983. The introduced aquatic macrophyte, Myriophyllum spicatum, as habitat for fish and their invertebrate prey. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62: 1289–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, J. D., L. W. Eichler & C. W. Boylen, 1988. Vegetative spread of Eurasian watermilfoil in Lake George, New York. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 26: 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, J. D., J. W. Sutherland, J. A. Bloomfield, L. W. Eichler & C. W. Boylen, 1991. The decline of native vegetation under dense Eurasian watermilfoil canopies. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 29: 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlarnen, L. A., M. A. Barnes, C. L. Jerde & D. M. Lodge, 2012. Simulated overland transport of Eurasian watermilfoil: survival of desiccated plant fragments. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 50: 147–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., R. Zuniga & D. Morrison, 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52: 273–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riis, T., T. Madsen & R. S. Sennels, 2009. Regeneration and colonization and growth rates of all fragments in four common stream plants. Aquatic Botany 90: 209–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K. H. & C. M. Breen, 1980. Growth and reproduction of Potamogeton crispus in a South African lake. Ecology 68: 561–571.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rothlisberger, J. D., W. L. Chadderton, J. McNulty & D. M. Lodge, 2010. Aquatic invasive species transport via trailered boats: what is being moved, who is moving it, and what can be done. Fisheries 35: 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, G. M. & J. T. Carlton, 2003. Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D., 2009. The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annual Review Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40: 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Library, 2012. Invasive species. Retrieved February 5, 2013 from [http://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/aquatics/pondweed].

  • Vander Zanden, J. M. & J. D. Olden, 2008. A management framework for preventing the secondary spread of aquatic invasive species. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65: 1512–1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 2013a. Aquatic Invasive Species. Retrieved February 5, 2013 from [http://dnr.wi.gov/lakes/invasives].

  • Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 2013b. The Handbook of Wisconsin Boating Laws and Responsibilities. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, T. E. & J. D. Madsen, 2003. Seasonal biomass and carbohydrate allocation patterns in southern Minnesota curlyleaf pondweed populations. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 41: 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C. & K. Boyle, 2010. The effect of an aquatic invasive species (Eurasian water-milfoil) on lakefront property values. Ecological Economics 70: 394–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Lenhardt and A. Gemberling for assistance with collections and experiments, K. Morrison and T. Meinke for constructing the weather station, and A. Latzka and anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript. Logistical support was provided by the UW Trout Lake research station and financial support by a grant from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (AEPP-305-11).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lindsey Bruckerhoff.

Additional information

Guest editors: Sidinei M. Thomaz, Katya E. Kovalenko, John E. Havel & Lee B. Kats / Aquatic Invasive Species

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bruckerhoff, L., Havel, J. & Knight, S. Survival of invasive aquatic plants after air exposure and implications for dispersal by recreational boats. Hydrobiologia 746, 113–121 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-1947-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-1947-9

Keywords

Navigation