Log in

Curriculum, teaching and powerful knowledge

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the concept of ‘powerful knowledge’ and provides new perspectives on an important emergent theory for education. We claim that the key to attaining powerful knowledge is ‘epistemic access’ to the discipline, which is access of the generative principles of knowledge creation. We draw on 15 years teaching and researching a university science programme in which undergraduate ecology students are trained as researchers during the 3 years they attend university. Hence, there is close alignment between teaching students to do research and powerful knowledge. In addition, it has been suggested that the ‘power’ in powerful knowledge is realised in what is done with that knowledge, that its purpose is social since it allows the holder to make a better contribution to society. We argue that in addition to such an aspirational ‘outcome’, it can be part of the process of education and early acquisition of powerful knowledge can influence all subsequent formal and informal learning experiences as the student progresses though university. A model for powerful knowledge is presented in which there is the possibility of powerful action after graduation, but this remains in the theoretical realm while there is very little empirical evidence supporting such a hypothesis for ecology students. Powerful action also questions the limits of responsibility for a teacher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: a critical business. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. (2013). Powerful knowledge, esoteric knowledge, curriculum knowledge. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(2), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: theory, research, critique (Vol. 4). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Custers, E. J. (2010). Long-term retention of basic science knowledge: a review study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(1), 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Education Act (1989). Education Act 1989, New Zealand Legislation. Available from http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1989/0080/latest/DLM183668.html. Accessed 27 Apr 2017.

  • Freire, P. (2000 [1970]). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. Bergman Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, T. (2016). Teaching to enhance research. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(3), 461–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harland, T. (2017). The contemporary research university and the contest for deliberative space. In B. K. Daniel (Ed.), Big data and learning analytics in higher education: current theory and practice (pp. 73–86). Basel: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harland, T., & Pickering, N. (2011). Values in higher education teaching. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, T., Tidswell, T., Everett, D., Hale, L., & Pickering, N. (2010). Neoliberalism and the academic as critic and conscience of society. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(1), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harland, T., Wald, N., and Randhawa, H. (2016). Student peer review: enhancing formative feedback with a rebuttal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(5), 801–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, A., Healey, M., & Zetter, R. (2007). Linking teaching and research in disciplines and departments. York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, J. (2002). Hegemony: a realist analysis. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L. (2008). Critical pedagogy primer (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, W. (2009). Bounds of democracy: epistemological access in higher education. Cape Town: HSRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, N., & Harland, T. (2017). A framework for authenticity in designing a research-based curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(7), 751–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelahan, L. (2007). How competency based training locks the working class out of powerful knowledge: a modified Bernsteinian analysis. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(5), 637–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelahan, L. (2010). Why knowledge matters in curriculum: a social realist argument. Abington: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelahan, L. (2014). Babies and bathwater: revaluing the role of the academy in knowledge. In P. Gibbs & R. Barnett (Eds.), Thinking bout higher education (pp. 125–137). Cham: Springer International.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelahan, L. (2015). Not just skills: what a focus on knowledge means for vocational education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 750–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, C. (2013). Curriculum design and epistemic ascent. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(1), 128–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: from social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (2009). What are schools for? In H. Daniels, H. Lauder, & J. Porter (Eds.), Knowledge,values and educational policy: a critical perspective (pp. 10–18). Abington: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: a knowledge-based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 1(3), 229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony Harland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harland, T., Wald, N. Curriculum, teaching and powerful knowledge. High Educ 76, 615–628 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0228-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0228-8

Keywords

Navigation