Abstract
The article uses the concept of organisational status to explore how universities respond to intensifying competition. Although status is not a novel phenomenon in higher education, recent insights show that the concerns with vertical positioning, both nationally and internationally, are gaining prominence with a growing number of universities worldwide. As global competition becomes as fierce as ever, universities’ efforts to maintain or advance their position vis-à-vis each other are becoming more salient. The paper draws from extant literature to identify three mechanisms of organisational status construction—categories, intermediaries and affiliations—and offers a set of propositions as to how universities of different status rank are expected to act when seeking to maintain or advance their status. Such activities, it is argued, shape status hierarchies, which, in turn, affect the scope of organisational action. The article contributes to the discussions on competition in higher-education literature and, more broadly, to the theory of organisational action in the tradition of sociological institutionalism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2014). The spin-off of elite universities in non-competitive, undifferentiated higher education systems: an empirical simulation in Italy. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1270–1289.
Abrams, D., Hogg, M. A., & Marques, J. M. (2004). A social psychological framework for understanding social inclusion and exclusion. In D. Abrams, M. A. Hogg, & J. M. Marques (Eds.), Social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 1–24). Psychology Press.
Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2008). Meta-organizations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Altbach, P. G., & Salmi, J. (2011). The road to academic excellence: the making of world-class research universities. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
Baum, J. A. C., & Lant, T. K. (2003). Hits and Misses: Managers’ (Mis)Categorization of Competitors in the Manhattan Hotel Industry. In J. A. C. Baum & O. Sorenson (Eds.), Geography and Strategy (pp. 119–156). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Baum, J. A. C., & Oliver, C. (1991). Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 187–218.
Benjamin, B. A., & Podolny, J. M. (1999). Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(3), 563–589.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City: Anchor Books.
Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: the case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.
Bleiklie, I. (2003). Hierarchy and specialisation: on the institutional integration of higher education systems. European Journal of Education, 38(4), 341–355.
Boliver, V. (2015). Are there distinctive clusters of higher and lower status universities in the UK? Oxford Review of Education, 41(5), 608–627.
Bowman, N. A., & Bastedo, M. N. (2009). Getting on the front page: organizational reputation, status signals, and the impact of U.S. News and World Report on student decisions. Research in Higher Education, 50(5), 415–436.
Brankovic, J. (2014). Positioning of private higher education institutions in the Western Balkans: emulation, differentiation and legitimacy building. In J. Brankovic, M. Kovacevic, P. Maassen, B. Stensaker, & M. Vukasovic (Eds.), The re-institutionalization of higher education in the Western Balkans: The interplay between European ideas, domestic policies, and institutional practices (pp. 121–144). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Brint, S., & Karabel, J. (1991). Institutional origins and transformations: the case of American community colleges. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 337–360). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bromley, P., & Meyer, J. W. (2015). Hyper-organization: global organizational expansion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brunsson, N., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2000). Constructing organizations: the example of public sector reform. Organization Studies, 21(4), 721–746.
Chan, W. W. Y. (2004). International cooperation in higher education: theory and practice. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 32–55.
Chatterji, A. K., & Toffel, M. W. (2010). How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9), 917–945.
Chen, Y.-R., Peterson, R. S., Phillips, D. J., Podolny, J. M., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Introduction to the special issue: bringing status to the table—attaining, maintaining, and experiencing status in organizations and markets. Organization Science, 23(2), 299–307.
Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Colman, T. (2008). Wine politics: how governments, environmentalists, mobsters, and critics influence the wines we drink. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cotter, M., & Snyder, W. S. (1998). How guide books affect restaurant behavior. Journal of Restaurant & Foodservice Marketing, 3(1), 69–75.
Delmestri, G., & Greenwood, R. (2016). How Cinderella became a queen: theorizing radical status change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(4), 507–550.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
Epstein, C. F. (1970). Encountering the male establishment: sex-status limits on women’s careers in the professions. American Journal of Sociology, 75(6), 965–982.
Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2016). Engines of anxiety: academic rankings, reputation, and accountability. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Fiske, S. T. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: status, power, and subordination. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
Fligstein, N. (1996). Markets as politics: a political-cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 656–673.
Frank, R. H. (1986). Choosing the right pond: human behavior and the quest for status. New York: Oxford University Press.
Frank, R. H., & Cook, P. J. (1995). The winner-take-all society: why the few at the top get so much more than the rest of us. New York: Penguin Books.
Geiger, R. L. (2004). Knowledge and money: research universities and the paradox of the marketplace. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Grove, J. (2013). Leru pulls out of EU’s U-Multirank scheme. Times Higher Education (THE). https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/leru-pulls-out-of-eus-u-multirank-scheme/2001361.article. Accessed 20 September 2016.
Gunn, A., & Mintrom, M. (2013). Global university alliances and the creation of collaborative advantage. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(2), 179–192.
Hannan, M. T. (2010). Partiality of memberships in categories and audiences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 159–181.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.
Hannan, M. T., Pólos, L., & Carroll, G. R. (2007). Logics of organization theory: audiences, codes, and ecologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hasse, & Krücken, G. (2013). Competition and actorhood: a further expansion of the neo-institutional agenda. Sociologia Internationalis, 51(2), 181–205.
Havergal, C. (2016). Some Russell Group universities ‘could opt out of the TEF’. Times Higher Education (THE). https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/some-russell-group-universities-could-opt-out-tef. Accessed 2 September 2016.
Hay, C. (2010). The political economy of price and status formation in the Bordeaux en primeur market: the role of wine critics as rating agencies. Socio-Economic Review, 685–707.
Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the resha** of higher education: the battle for world-class excellence. Dordrecht: Springer.
Henderson, B. B., & Kane, W. D. (1991). Caught in the middle: faculty and institutional status and quality in state comprehensive universities. Higher Education, 22(4), 339–350.
Horta, H. (2009). Global and national prominent universities: internationalization, competitiveness and the role of the State. Higher Education, 58(3), 387–405.
Jensen, M., Kim, B. K., & Kim, H. (2011). The Importance of Status in Markets: A Market Identity Perspective (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1750271). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1750271. Accessed 5 August 2016.
Kaplan, A. (2014). European management and European business schools: insights from the history of business schools. European Management Journal, 32(4), 529–534.
Kellogg, K. C. (2011). Challenging operations: medical reform and resistance in surgery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kovács, B., & Hannan, M. T. (2010). The consequences of category spanning depend on contrast. In G. Hsu, G. Negro, & Ö. Koçak (Eds.), Categories in markets: origins and evolution (pp. 175–201). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Krücken, G., & Meier, F. (2006). Turning the university into an organizational actor. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, & H. Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and organization: world society and Organizational change (pp. 241–257). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kyvik, S. (2004). Structural changes in higher education systems in Western Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 29(3), 393–409.
Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 167–195.
Ma, W. (2008). The University of California at Berkeley: an emerging global research university. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 65–81.
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: the self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398.
Malter, D. (2014). On the causality and cause of returns to organizational status evidence from the Grands Crus Classés of the Médoc. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(2), 271–300.
Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39.
Marginson, S. (2013). The impossibility of capitalist markets in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 28(3), 353–370.
Marginson, S. (2015). Global stratification in higher education. In S. Slaughter & B. J. Taylor (Eds.), Higher education, stratification, and workforce development: competitive advantage in Europe, the US, and Canada (pp. 13–34). Dordrecht: Springer.
Martins, L. L. (2005). A model of the effects of reputational rankings on organizational change. Organization Science, 16(6), 701–720.
Meredith, M. (2004). Why do universities compete in the ratings game? An empirical analysis of the effects of the U.S. News and World Report college rankings. Research in Higher Education, 45(5), 443–461.
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.
Meyer, J. W. (2008). Reflections on institutional theories of organizations. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 788–808). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The ‘actors’ of modern society: the cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–120.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. (1987). Ontology and rationalization in the Western cultural account. In G. M. Thomas, J. W. Meyer, F. O. Ramirez, & J. Boli (Eds.), Institutional structure: constituting state, Society, and the individual (pp. 12–37). London: SAGE.
Mohrman, K., Ma, W., & Baker, D. (2008). The research university in transition: the emerging global model. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 5–27.
Monks, J., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (1999). The Impact of US News and World Report College Rankings on Admission Outcomes and Pricing Decisions at Selective Private Institutions (Working Paper No. 7227). National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w7227. Accessed 10 August 2016.
Morphew, C., & Huisman, J. (2002). Using institutional theory to reframe research on academic drift. Higher Education in Europe, 27(4), 491–506.
Musselin, C. (2010). The market for academics. New York: Routledge.
Musselin, C. (2014). Research issues and institutional prospects for higher education studies. Studies in Higher Education, 39(8), 1369–1380.
Negro, G., Koçak, Ö., & Hsu, G. (2010). Research on categories in the sociology of organizations. In G. Negro, Ö. Koçak, & G. Hsu (Eds.), Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution (pp. 3–35). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Phillips, D. J., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Middle-status conformity: theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 379–429.
Phillips, D. J., Turco, C. J., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2013). Betrayal as market barrier: identity-based limits to diversification among high-status corporate law firms. American Journal of Sociology, 118(4), 1023–1054.
Piazza, A., & Castellucci, F. (2014). Status in organization and management theory. Journal of Management, 40(1), 287–315.
Podolny, J. M. (1993). A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4), 829–872.
Podolny, J. M. (1994). Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 458–483.
Podolny, J. M. (2010). Status signals: a sociological study of market competition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Podolny, J. M., & Phillips, D. J. (1996). The dynamics of organizational status. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(2), 453–471.
Pratt, J., & Burgess, T. (1974). Polytechnics: a report. London: Pitman Publishing.
Rao, H. (1994). The social construction of reputation: certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895-1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 29–44.
Rao, H., Davis, G. F., & Ward, A. (2000). Embeddedness, social identity and mobility: why firms leave the NASDAQ and join the New York Stock Exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 268–292.
Robertson, S. L. (2012). World-class higher education (for whom?). Prospects, 42(3), 237–245.
Rodriguez-Pomeda, J., & Casani, F. (2016). Legitimating the world-class university concept through the discourse of elite universities’ presidents. Higher Education Research & Development, 0(0), 1–15.
Sauder, M. (2006). Third parties and status position: how the characteristics of status systems matter. Theory and Society, 35(3), 299–321.
Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: tight coupling and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 63–82.
Sauder, M., Lynn, F., & Podolny, J. M. (2012). Status: insights from organizational sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 267–283.
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. London: SAGE.
Sharkey, A. J. (2014). Categories and organizational status: the role of industry status in the response to organizational deviance. American Journal of Sociology, 119(5), 1380–1433.
Shin, J. C., Toutkoushian, R. K., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2011). University rankings: theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2011). Social dominance theory. In P. A. M. V. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology: volume one (pp. 418–438). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Snyder, W., & Cotter, M. (1998). The Michelin Guide and restaurant pricing strategies. Journal of Restaurant & Foodservice Marketing, 3(1), 51–67.
Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284–297.
Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315–349.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Teather, D. C. B. (2004). Consortia: international networking alliances of universities. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Teixeira, P., Jongbloed, B. B., Dill, D. D., & Amaral, A. (2004). Markets in higher education: rhetoric or reality? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Washington, M., & Zajac, E. J. (2005). Status evolution and competition: theory and evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 282–296.
Wedlin, L. (2006). Ranking business schools: forming fields, identities and boundaries in international management education. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Werron, T. (2015). Why do we believe in competition? A historical-sociological view of competition as an institutionalized modern imaginary. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 16(2), 186–210.
Werron, T., & Ringel, L. (In press). Rankings in a comparative perspective. Conceptual remarks. In S. Lessenich (Ed.), Geschlossene Gesellschaften. Verhandlungen des 38. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie. Essen: DGS.
Zhao, W., & Zhou, X. (2010). Status inconsistency and product valuation in the California wine market. Organization Science, 22(6), 1435–1448.
Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1398–1438.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Dominik Antonowicz, Gary Barron, Meta Gorup, Jeroen Huisman, Renze Kolster, Georg Krücken, Jelle Mampaey, Leopold Ringel, Marco Seeber, Daniel Semper, Tobias Werron and two anonymous reviewers for having read previous versions of the paper and invaluably contributing to its improvement. All errors are my own.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding information
The author acknowledges the financial support from the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO), grant number G.OC42.13N.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brankovic, J. The status games they play: unpacking the dynamics of organisational status competition in higher education. High Educ 75, 695–709 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0169-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0169-2