Log in

The crucial first year: a longitudinal study of students’ motivational development at a Swiss Business School

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Switzerland, every student graduating from grammar school can begin to study at a university. This leads to high dropout rates. Although students’ motivation is considered a strong predictor of performance, the development of motivation during students’ transition from high school to university has rarely been investigated. Additionally, little is known about the relation of motivational aspects with other influences on study performance. The present longitudinal study addresses this research gap and examines the development of economics and management students’ study motivation. It encompasses four waves of data collected throughout the first year, using quantitative online surveys. In total, the sample consists of 820 students. Data is analysed using latent change modelling. Results indicate that students start at a higher level of intrinsic motivation compared to extrinsic motivation. The variability of the starting value of the two constructs is also differing. The analysis also shows a gradual decline in students’ motivation. Above all, the transition from secondary to higher education seems to be a driver for this decline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Allison, P. D. (1987). Estimation of linear models with incomplete data. Sociol Methodol, 17(1), 71–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, P., & D’Annunzio-Green, N. (2009). A smooth transition?: education and social expectations of direct entry students. Act Learn High Educ, 10(1), 7–25. doi:10.1177/1469787408100190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brahm, T., & Gebhardt, A. (2011). Motivation deutschsprachiger Studierender in der „Bologna-Ära“. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 6(2), 15–29

  • Brahm, T., & Jenert, T. (2015). On the assessment of attitudes towards studying—development and validation of a questionnaire. Learn Individ Differ, 43(October 2015), 233–242. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broussard, S. C., & Garrison, M. E. B. (2004). The relationship between classroom motivation and academic achievement in elementary-school-aged children. Fam Consum Sci Res J, 33(2), 106–120. doi:10.1177/1077727x04269573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruinsma, M. (2004). Motivation, cognitive processing and achievement in higher education. Learn Instr, 14(6), 549–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesamt für Statistik BFS (2015). Bildungssystem Schweiz - Indikatoren - Umfeld des Bildungssystems - Maturitätsquote .http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/themen/15/17/blank/01.indicator.405102.4061.html. Accessed 2015-09-28

  • Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshouta, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personal Individ Differ, 29(6), 1057–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busse, V. (2013). Why do first-year students of German lose motivation during their first year at university? Stud High Educ, 38(7), 951–971. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.602667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemp Educ Psychol, 27(2), 270–295. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cauley, K. M., & McMillan, J. H. (2010). Formative assessment techniques to support student motivation and achievement. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(1), 1–6. doi:10.1080/00098650903267784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, H., Tett, L., Cree, V. E., Hounsell, J., & McCune, V. (2008). ‘A real rollercoaster of confidence and emotions’: learning to be a university student. Stud High Educ, 33(5), 567–581. doi:10.1080/03075070802373040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coertjens, L., Donche, V., De Maeyer, S., Vanthournout, G., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). Longitudinal measurement invariance of Likert-type learning strategy scales: are we using the same ruler at each wave? J Psychoeduc Assess, 30(6), 577–587. doi:10.1177/0734282912438844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coutts, R., Gilleard, W., & Baglin, R. (2011). Evidence for the impact of assessment on mood and motivation in first-year students. Stud High Educ, 36(3), 291–300. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.523892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creß, U. (1999). Personale und situative Einflussfaktoren auf das selbstgesteuerte Lernen Erwachsener. Regensburg: S. Roderer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. Learn Individ Differ, 8(3), 165–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq, 11(4), 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodeen, H. M. (2003). Effectiveness of valid mean substitution in treating missing data in attitude assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 505–513. doi:10.1080/02602930301674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donche, V., De Maeyer, S., Coertjens, L., Van Daal, T., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). Differential use of learning strategies in first-year higher education: the impact of personality, academic motivation, and teaching strategies. Br J Educ Psychol, 83(2), 238–251. doi:10.1111/bjep.12016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donders, A. R. T., van der Heijden, G. J. M. G., Stijnen, T., & Moons, K. G. M. (2006). Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. J Clin Epidemiol, 59(10), 1087–1091. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. Am Psychol, 41(10), 1040–1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J, 8(3), 430–457. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engels, J. M., & Diehr, P. (2003). Imputation of missing longitudinal data: a comparison of methods. J Clin Epidemiol, 56(10), 968–976. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00170-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazey, D. M. A., & Fazey, J. A. (1998). Perspectives on motivation: the implications of effective learning in higher education. In S. Brown, S. Armstrong, & G. Thomson (Eds.), Motivating students (pp. 59–72). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazey, D. M. A., & Fazey, J. A. (2001). The potential for autonomy in learning: perceptions of competence, motivation and locus of control in first-year undergraduate students. Stud High Educ, 26(3), 345–361. doi:10.1080/03075070120076309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, T., & Parker, S. (2012). Navigating change: a typology of student transition in higher education. Stud High Educ, 39(5), 1–20. doi:10.1080/03075079.2012.721351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiser, C. (2010). Datenanalyse mit MPlus. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung . Wiesbaden VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ghisletta, P., & McArdle, J. J. (2012). Latent curve models and latent change score models estimated in R. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J, 19(4), 651–682. doi:10.1080/10705511.2012.713275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grätz-Tümmers, J. (2003). Arbeitsprobleme im Studium. Marburg: Philipps-Universität.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, K. J. (2012). Intercept centering and time coding in latent difference score models. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J, 19(1), 137–151. doi:10.1080/10705511.2012.634734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. J Educ Psychol, 92(2), 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilä, A., Niemivirta, M., Nieminen, J., & Lonka, K. (2011). Interrelations among university students’ approaches to learning, regulation of learning, and cognitive and attributional strategies: a person oriented approach. High Educ, 61(5), 513–529. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9346-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, D. T., & Granade, J. B. (2004). The influence of sociocultural theory on our theories of engagement and motivation. In D. M. McInerney & S. V. Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited . Greenwich: Information Age.Vol. 4, pp. 223-248, Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, P. A., & Newstead, S. E. (2000). The nature and development of student motivation. Br J Educ Psychol, 70(2), 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenert, T., & Brahm, T. (2013). How business students’ attitudes towards their university and studying develop during the first year: a qualitative longitudinal study. In EARLI, München, 2013

  • Jenert, T.; Brahm, T.; Gommers, L., & Kühner, P. (under review). How do they find their place? Learning, Culture and Social Interaction.

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based learning. Educ Psychol, 41(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knewstubb, B. (2014). The learning–teaching nexus: modelling the learning–teaching relationship in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 1–16, doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.934802.

  • Krause, K.-L., & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493–505. doi:10.1080/02602930701698892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyndt, E., Coertjens, L., van Daal, T., Donche, V., Gijbels, D., & Van Petegem, P. (2015). The development of students’ motivation in the transition from secondary to higher education: a longitudinal study. Learn Individ Differ, 39, 114–123. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lejk, M., Wyvill, M., & Farrow, S. (1997). Group learning and group assessment on undergraduate computing courses in higher education in the UK: results of a survey. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(1), 81–91. doi:10.1080/0260293970220106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, J. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annu Rev Psychol, 60(1), 577–605. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. (2009). Formative computer-based assessment in higher education: the effectiveness of feedback in supporting student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 181–192. doi:10.1080/02602930801956075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2015). MPlus: the comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers, Version 7.3. Muthen & Muthen, Los Angeles, CA.

  • Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud High Educ, 31(2), 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314. doi:10.1080/02602930701293231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Komulainen, E., Litmanen, T., & Hirsto, L. (2010). Students’ approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching–learning environment in different disciplines. Br J Educ Psychol, 80(2), 269–282. doi:10.1348/000709909x476946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educ Psychol, 37(2), 91–105. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3702_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Götz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2005). Academic Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). User’s Manual.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. Int J Educ Res, 31(6), 459–470. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prat-Sala, M., & Redford, P. (2010). The interplay between motivation, self-efficacy, and approaches to studying. Br J Educ Psychol, 80, 283–305. doi:10.1348/000709909x480563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2004). Family correlates of trajectories of academic motivation during a school transition: a semiparametric group-based approach. J Educ Psychol, 96(4), 743–754. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. Classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol, 25(1), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78, doi:10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68.

  • Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Res High Educ, 44(4), 409–432. doi:10.1023/a:1024232915870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U., & Pekrun, R. (1996). nd selbstegesteuerten Lernens. In F. E. Weinert (Ed.), Psychologie des Lernens und der Instruktion (pp. 249–278). Göttingen et al. : Hogrefe.

  • Schumann, S. (2011). Leistungs- und Herkunftseffekte beim Hochschulzugang in der Schweiz. Ein Vergleich zwischen Absolventinnen und Absolventen mit gymnasialer Maturität und mit Berufsmaturität. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 57(2), 246–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shim, S. S., Kiefer, S. M., & Wang, C. (2013). Help seeking among peers: the role of goal structure and peer climate. J Educ Res, 106(4), 290–300. doi:10.1080/00220671.2012.692733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urdan, T., & Schoenfelder, E. M. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. J Sch Psychol, 44(5), 331–349. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017.

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educ Psychol, 41(1), 19–31. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanthournout, G., Coertjens, L., Gijbels, D., Donche, V., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). Assessing students’ development in learning approaches according to initial learning profiles: a person-oriented perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(1), 33–40. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2002). Structural equation modeling: applications using Mplus: methods and applications. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemp Educ Psychol, 25, 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. H. (2006). Predicting student attitudes and grades from perceptions of instructors’ attitudes. Teach Psychol, 33(2), 91–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. High Educ, 45(4), 477–501. doi:10.1023/a:1023967026413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partly funded by the starting grant of the University of St. Gallen/Switzerland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taiga Brahm.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Means and standard deviations
Table 5 Intercorrelations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brahm, T., Jenert, T. & Wagner, D. The crucial first year: a longitudinal study of students’ motivational development at a Swiss Business School. High Educ 73, 459–478 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0095-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0095-8

Keywords

Navigation