Log in

Growth or steady state? A bibliometric focus on international comparative higher education research

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study combines a bibliometric approach with a content analysis of abstracts of articles to explore the patterns of international comparative higher education research in leading international journals. The overall data set covers 4,095 publications from the Web of Science for the period 1992–2012 and the amount of international comparative articles in this data set is analyzed utilizing a geographical coding. Contrary to a general proliferation of international and global trends in higher education, the results of the analysis most importantly reveal a relatively steady state of international comparative higher education research over the past 20 years. Further patterns examined show that international collaborative articles have a much higher share in international comparative research compared to non-comparative research, small-scale country clusters are preferred for comparison and there is a dense network of comparative clusters between Europe and the US. Finally, rationales for these patterns are discussed, as well as potential implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We have to note a potential limitation of our approach at this point: one could assume that there is research that just states in the abstract that it is international comparative without mentioning the countries that have been studied. As a matter of course, we have double-checked the occurrence of articles in our database explicitly labeling themselves as comparative research in their abstracts. Most of them are indeed not international comparative research. We found 848 articles in our overall database reaching from the 1980s up to 2012 that make use of the term comparative, but 735 are articles that compare issues in higher education within one country or mostly theoretical articles. 96 percent of the remaining articles were detected by our geo-coding, which affirms our strategy of a geographical coding and our approach in general.

  2. The results might also indicate that the choice of countries that are compared in higher education research is influenced by exogenous factors and opportunity structures (e.g. funding, established collaborations), and, furthermore, endogenous factors as speech communities (e.g. the US and Great Britain or Mexico and Spain) seem to have a certain influence on comparative clusters of countries. But to prove this, an integration of further data sources to the network analysis would be necessary.

References

  • Abdullah, D., Aziz, M. I. A., & Ibrahim, A. L. M. (2013). A “research” into international student-related research: (Re)Visualising our stand? Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9647-3.

  • Academic Cooperation Association, & European University Association (Eds.). (2008). Internationalisation of European higher education: An EUA/ACA handbook. Berlin: Raabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G., Bozeman, L. A., Janashia, N., & Rumbley, L. E. (2007). Higher education: A worldwide inventory of centers and programs. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I. (2013). Comparing university organizations across boundaries. Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9683-z.

  • Budd, J. M. (1990). Higher education literature: Characteristics of citation patterns. The Journal of Higher Education, 61(1), 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, J. M., & Magnuson, L. (2010). Higher education literature revisited: Citation patterns examined. Research in Higher Education, 51, 294–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, P.-C. (2012). Bibliometric characteristics of political science research in Germany. In A. Grove (Ed.), Proceedings of the 75th ASIS&T annual meeting on information, interaction, innovation, ASIST 2012 (49).

  • Chi, P.-C., & Dinkel, W. (2012). The increasing hardness of the “soft” sciences. A case study of referencing patterns in German language core journals in sociology and political science. In E. Archamboult, Y. Gingras & V. Lavière (Eds.), Proceedings of 17th international conference on science and technology indicators. (pp. 443–444). Montréal: Science-Metrix and OST.

  • Choi, S. (2011). Core-periphery, new clusters, or rising stars? International scientific collaboration among “advanced” countries in the era of globalization. Scientometrics, 90(1), 25–41. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0509-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, D. K., de Witt, H., Heyl, J. D., & Adams, T. (2012). The SAGE handbook of international higher education. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, A., Ruschenburg, T., & Weingart, P. (2005). Recent internationalization of global environmental change research in Germany and the US. Scientometrics, 62(5), 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flexner, A. (1930). Universities: American, English, German. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schlemmer, B. (2007). National research profiles in a changing Europe (1983–2003): An exploratory study of sectoral characteristics in the Triple Helix. Scientometrics, 70(2), 267–275. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-0203-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1957). Cosmopolitans and locals: Towards an analysis of latent social roles I. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(3), 281–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1958). Cosmopolitans and locals: Towards an analysis of latent social roles II. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(4), 444–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hantrais, L. (2009). International comparative research: theory, methods and practice. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 473–496). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. M., Blasi, B., Ćulum, B., Dragšić, Ž., Ewen, A., Horta, H., Nokkala, T., & Rios-Aguilar, C. (2013). The methodological illumination of a blind spot: Information and communication technology and international research team dynamics in a higher education research program. Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9692-y.

  • Horta, H., & Jung, J. (2013). Higher education research in Asia: A scientometric perspective. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(4), 398–419. doi:10.1111/hequ.12015.

  • Hutchinson, S. R., & Lovell, C. D. (2004). A review of methodological characteristics of research published in key journals in higher education: Implications for graduate research training. Research in Higher Education, 45(4), 383–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J. (2008). The evolution of a journal: Twenty years of higher education policy. Higher Education Policy, 21(2), 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarausch, K. H. (1985). Comparing higher education—historically? History of Education Quarterly, 25(1/2), 241–252.

  • Katz, S. J., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R., Marginson, S., & Naidoo, R. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook on globalization and higher education. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosmützky, A., & Nokkala, T. (2013). Challenges and trends in comparative higher education: An editorial. Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9693-x.

  • Krücken, G. (2012). Hochschulforschung. In Handbuch Wissenschaftssoziologie (pp. 265–276). Wiesbaden: Springer.

  • Krücken, G., & Kosmützky, A. (2012). Exploration and exploitation in higher education research: Some conceptual ideas. Belgrade, CHER conference 2012.

  • Kuh, G. D., Bean, J. P., Bradley, R. K., Coomes, M. D., & Hunter, D. E. (1986). Changes in research on college students published in selected journals between 1969 and 1983. The Review of Higher Education, 9(2), 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., & Bursky, M. (1980). Knowledge dissemination by publication in student affairs: Who publishes what where? Journal of College Student Personnel, 21(4), 387–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzhabekova, A., Hendel, D. D., & Chapman, D. (2012). Map** global research on international higher education. ASHE conference 2012, Las Vergas.

  • Kwon, K.-S., Park, H. W., So, M., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics, 90(1), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3–15. doi:10.3152/147154402781776961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. & Wagner, C. S. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608–1618. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 317–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C. S., Park, H.-W., & Adams, J. (2013). International collaboration in science: The global map and the network. El Profesional de la Informacion, 22(1), 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milam, J. H. (1991). The presence of paradigms in the core higher education journal literature. Research in Higher Education, 32(6), 651–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Boards. (2012). Science and Engineering Indicators. Washington DC: National Science Foundation.

  • Ogawa, Y. (2001). Journals in higher education: An international inventory. In P. G. Altbach & D. Engborg (Eds.), Higher education: A worldwide inventory of centers and programs (pp. 283–300). Phoenix: Oryx Press.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). Education at a glance, 2011 OECD indicators. [Paris]: OECD. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/id/10505703.

  • Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421–432. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034384.35498.7d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. M. (1992). Two decades of “Higher Education”. Higher Education, 23(2), 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, T., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2009). OECD Work on the Internationalization of Higher Education. An Insiders Perspective. In R. M. Bassett & A. Maldonado-Maldonado (Eds.), International organizations and higher education policy: thinking globally, acting locally? (pp. 64–81). New York [u.a.]: Routledge.

  • Silverman, R. J. (1985). Higher education as a maturing field? Evidence from referencing practices. Research in Higher Education, 23(2), 150–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, R. J. (1988). Author-field interaction following publication in “higher education” journals. Higher Education, 17, 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, N. (1976/2013). Comparative methods in the social sciences. New Orleans: Quid Pro Books.

  • Spring, J. H. (2009). Globalization of education an introduction. New York: Routledge. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/id/10258390.

  • Teichler, U. (1996). Comparative higher education: Potentials and limits. Higher Education, 32(4), 431–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2013). Opportunities and problems of comparative higher education research: The daily life of research. Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9682-0.

  • Tight, M. (2003). Researching higher education. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2007a). Bridging the divide: A comparative analysis of articles in higher education journals published inside and outside Noth America. Higher Education, 53, 235–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2007b). Research into higher education: An a-theoretical community of practice. Higher Education and Development, 23(4), 395–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2012). Researching higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric map**. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkwein, F. J., Carbone, D. A., & Volkwein, E. A. (1988). Research in higher education: Fifteen years of scholarship. Research in Higher Education, 28(3), 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., & Wong, S. K. (2011). Unseen science? Representation of BRICs in global science. Scientometrics, 90(3), 1001–1013. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0481-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, B. W., Passons, W. R., & Pritchard, M. C. (1969). Publishing patterns in the journal of college student personnel. Journal of College Student Personnel, 11(4), 403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziguras, C. (2011). Extra-national provision. In R. King, S. Marginson, & R. Naidoo (Eds.), Handbook on globalization and higher education (pp. 114–128). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Michael Borggräfe for his assistance on the data coding, Stefan Pump for his help with the setup of the database, and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Anna Kosmützky or Georg Krücken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kosmützky, A., Krücken, G. Growth or steady state? A bibliometric focus on international comparative higher education research. High Educ 67, 457–472 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9694-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9694-9

Keywords

Navigation