Log in

The Problem of a Market-oriented University

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economy- and technology-driven theories dominate current explanations of social change. The political orientations of the European Union and many of its member states are increasingly based on the idea of knowledge economy where public organisations move towards market-orientation. Among the other producers of knowledge, universities are expected to become part of the innovation system where innovation stands for product making and the final goal is to contribute to the international competitiveness of the national economy.

This study focuses on the complicated role of public universities as adaptors of market forces logic. The focus of attention is on the reorientations that Finnish universities have made in terms of commodification. At the same time universities have elaborated new aggressive strategies in order to strengthen their scientific basis and to distance themselves from the demands for new managerialism. One of the key problems in this process is related to the difficulties to integrate the two traditional university functions into the third one, i.e. commercialisation. We make some observations concerning EU policies, but concentrate mostly on changes that have taken place during recent decades in Finland by analysing market-orientation in three Helsinki area universities.

In the context of current technology policy, all disciplines have been seen as potential contributors to market competition. However, social sciences produce knowledge that cannot be classified by using pure economic concepts. To sharpen our analysis of market-orientation we study three social science departments at the respective three universities. This analysis indicates the importance of scientific identity as a component of market-orientation. It also shows the importance of contextual issues and the tensions that arise between scientific and commercial orientations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Academy of Finland (2001). Annual Report.Helsinki.

  • Academy of Finland (2003). Scientific Research in Finland. A Review of Its Quality and Impact in the Early 2000s.Publications of the Academy of Finland 10/03.Helsinki.Acatiimi 2/2004

  • E. Allardt (1995) Suunnistuksia ja kulttuurisokkeja Otava Keuruu

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Allardt (1998) ArticleTitle‘Teknologiapolitiikka suomalaisen todellisuuden konstruoimisen välineenä’ Tiede & Edistys 2 85–95

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Amaral G. Jones B. Karseth (Eds) (2002) Governing Higher Education: Comparing National Perspectives Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Bell (1973) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. A Venture in Social Forecasting Basic Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Bertilsson (2002) ArticleTitle‘Disorganised knowledge or new forms of governance?’ Science Studies 2 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. and Schröder, G. (1999). Europe: The Third Way / Die Neue Mitte. (http:/www.labour.org.uk/views/index.html).

  • Cabinet programmes in Finland 1995; 1999; 2003.

  • M. Castells (2000) The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture NumberInSeriesVol. I Blackwell Publishers Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Castells P. Himanen (2001) Suomen tietoyhteiskuntamalli WSOY Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • B. R. Clark (1995) Places of Inquiry: Research and Advanced Education in Modern Universities University of California Press Berkeley & Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Cresson (1997) ArticleTitle‘Preface’ The IPTS Report 19 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Deem (2001) ArticleTitle‘Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurism in universities: is the local dimension still important?’ Comparative Education 37 IssueID1 27–20 Occurrence Handle10.1080/03050060020020408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Dickson (1999) ArticleTitle‘Britain excels in academic capitalism’ Nature Medicine 5 IssueID2 131–132 Occurrence Handle10.1038/5484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EFMD (1995). Strategic Audit. Helsinki School of Economics.

  • A. Eskola (1997) Jäähyväisluentoja Tammi, Hanki ja Jää Hämeenlinna

    Google Scholar 

  • Espoo (2002). Espoo strategia 2002–2004.

  • European Commission (1995). Green Paper on Innovation. December.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameEuropean Commission (1998) The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy European Communities Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001). Commission Recommendation for the 2001 Broad Guidelines of the Economic of the Member States and the Community.Brussels: 24.5.2001, COM (2001) 224 final.

  • European Commission (2003). Third European Report on Science and Technology Indicators 2003. Towards a Knowledge-Based Economy. Brussels.

  • H. Etzkowitz (1995) ArticleTitle‘The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of new university-industry linkages’ Research Policy 8 823–833

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Etzkowitz A. Webster P. Healey (1998) Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia State University of New York Press Albany N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Fulton (2002) ‘Higher education governance in the UK: Change and continuity’ A. Amaral G. Jones B. Karseth (Eds) Governing Higher Education: Comparing National Perspectives Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 205–229

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Gibbons et al. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies Sage London

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Helkama R. Myllyniemi K. Liebkind (1998) Johdatus Sosiaalipsykologiaan Edita Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Hellström S. Raman (2001) ArticleTitle‘ ȁ8The commodification of knowledge-about-knowledge: Knowledge management and the reification of epistemology’ Social Epistemology 15 IssueID3 139–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsingin kaupunki (1998). ‘Helsingin elinkeinopoliittinen ohjelma’, Helsingin kaupunginkanslia, talous- ja suunnitteluosasto, Julkaisusarja A,11/1998.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameHelsinki School of Economics (2001) Vuosikertomus Yliopistopaino Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsinki School of Economics (2002): Toiminnan perusta: arvot. (http://hkkk.fi/netcomm/venue/venue_index.asp?lan=FIN&level11=961).

  • Helsinki University of Technology (2001). Toiminta- ja taloussuunnitelma 2003-2006,http://www.hut.fi.Yksikot/kehittamisyksikko/TTS2003-2006/01.htm.

  • Helsinki University of Technology (2003). Lausunto yliopistolain muuttamisesta. 642/03/03. 27.10.2003.

  • M. Häyrinen-Alestalo (1999) ArticleTitle‘The university under the pressure of innovation policy – reflecting some European and Finnish experiences’ Science Studies 1 44–69

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Häyrinen-Alestalo (2001) ArticleTitle‘Is knowledge-based society a relevant strategy for civil society?’ Current Sociology 6 203–218

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Häyrinen-Alestalo K. Snell U. Peltola (2000) ‘Pushing universities to market their products: Redefinitions of academic activities in Finland’ R. Kalleberg F. Engelstad G. Brochmann A. Leira L. Mjoset (Eds) Comparative Perspectives on Universities and Production of Knowledge. Comparative Social Research 19 Jai Press Stamford 165–212

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Häyrinen-Alestalo E. Kallerud (2004) ‘Introduction: Towards a biotech society – nordic perspectives’ M. Häyrinen-Alestalo E. Kallerud (Eds) Mediating Public Concern in Biotechnology. A Map of Sites, Actors and Issues in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden Nifu Oslo 7–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Häyrinen-Alestalo, M., Pelkonen, A. and Snell, K. (2004). New Technologies Challenging Old Structures of Governance. STAGE Finnish Anchoring Case. Forthcoming.

  • M. Häyrinen-Alestalo K. Snell (2004) ‘Market orientations and mediation of public opinions in Finnish Biotechnology’ M. Häyrinen-Alestalo E. Kallerud (Eds) Mediating Public Concern in Biotechnology. A Map of Sites, Actors and Issues in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden Nifu Oslo 49–82

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Jacob (2001) ArticleTitle‘Managing the institutionalisation of mode 2 knowledge production’ Science Studies 14 IssueID2 83–100

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Jacob (2003) ArticleTitle‘Rethinking science and commodifying knowledge’ Policy Futures in Education 1 IssueID1 125–142 Occurrence Handle10.2304/pfie.2003.1.1.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jääskeläinen, K. and West, H. (1995). Helsinki Science Park. RITTS Project,SPRINT Programme, Phase One.

  • K. Kankaala E. Kaukonen P. Kutinlahti T. Lemola M. Nieminen J. Välimaa (2004) Yliopistojen kolmas tehtävä? Sitran julkaisusarja 264 Edita Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasanen, E. (2003). Autonomian aika. Rehtorin avajaispuhe. Helsinki School of Economics. (http://www.hkkk.fi/netcomm/search/frameWaker.asp?ArticleID=1466 &ElementID=3393&LAN=FIN&ArticleType=0).

  • H. Koski P. Rouvinen P. Ylä-Anttila (2001) Uuden talouden loppu? Taloustieto Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Lahti (1999) Kasvuyrityksen tai voittajayrityksen talousoppi Helsingin kauppakorkeakoulu Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Miettinen (2003) National Innovation System. Scientific Concept or Political Rhetoric Edita Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2003a). Koulutus ja tutkimus vuosina 2003-2008. Kehittämissuunnitelma.Koulutus- ja tiedepolitiikan osasto. 22.8.2003.

  • Ministry of Education (2003b). Ehdotus yliopistolaiksi. 49/010/2003, 17.9.2003

  • Ministry of Education (2004): Kota Data base. (http://www.csc.fi/kota/kota.html).

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameMinistry of Trade and Industry (1996) Teollisuuspoliittinen visio – maailmanpoliittisesta murroksesta kestävään kasvuun. Kauppa- ja Teollisuusministeriön julkaisuja 2 Edita Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Trade and Industry (2001). ‘Elinkeinopolitiikka uudessa taloudessa’, Kauppa- ja Teollisuusministeriön julkaisuja,6.

  • Ministry of Trade and Industry (2003). Toimintakertomus 2003. Helsinki. (www.ktm.fi/toimintakertomus_2003).

  • National Technology Agency of Finland (2002). Ylihuomisen kilpailukyky ratkaistaan tänään. Teknologiarahoituksen tulokset ja vaikutukset.Helsinki.

  • Nieminen, M. (2004). Academic Research in Change – Transformation of Finnish University Policy and University Research During the 1990s. Dissertation manuscript. University of Tampere.

  • Niiniluoto, I. (2003). Dynaaminen sivistysyliopisto. Rehtorin avajaispuhe 10.9.2003. University of Helsinki. (http://yliopistolehti.helsinki.fi/2003_12/avajaispuhe.html).

  • Niskanen, Pirjo (2000). Opportunities and Tensions in Public-Private Research Collaboration. The Case of Finnish Participation in EU Research Collaboration. Licentiate Thesis submitted in Department of Sociology, University of Helsinki.

  • H. Nowotny P. Scott M. Gibbons (2001) Rethinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in the Age of Uncertainty Polity Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002): Science, Technology and Industry Outlook. Paris.

  • J. Owen-Smith W.W. Powell (2002) ArticleTitle‘Standing on shifting terrain: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences’ Science Studies 15 IssueID1 3–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Patent Act 550/1967. Finland.

  • Pelkonen, A. (2001). Yliopistot innovaatiopolitiikan toteutta**a. Kaupalliset välittäjäorganisaatiot ja akateeminen tutkimus. Master’s Thesis submitted in University of Helsinki, Department of Sociology.

  • Pelkonen, A. (2003). ‘New technologies as capital region strategies in Finland’, in Riukulehto, S. (ed.), New Technologies and Regional Development. Seinäjoki Institute for Rural Research and Training. Series A: 6. Seinäjoki: University of Helsinki.

  • M. Reed (2002) ‘New managerialism, professional power and organisational governance in UK universities: A review and assessment’ A. amaral G.A. Jones B. Karseth (Eds) Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 163–186

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Sassen (2001) The Global City Princeton University Press New York, London, Tokyo, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameScience and Technology Policy Council (2000) Katsaus 2000: Tiedon ja osaamisen haasteet Tiede- ja teknologianeuvosto Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameScience and Technology Policy Council (2003) Osaaminen, innovaatiot ja kansainvälistyminen Edita Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Senker (2001) ArticleTitle‘Changing organisation of public-sector research in Europe – implications for benchmarking human resources in RTD’ Science and Public Policy 28 IssueID4 227–284

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Slaughter L. Leslie (1997) Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Snell (2001) ArticleTitle‘Weakening the connection between education and research: A study of three university departments’ Science Studies 1 26–44

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Sørensen N. Levold (1992) ArticleTitle‘Tacit networks, heterogeneous engineers and embodied technology’ Science, Technology & Human Values 17 IssueID1 13–35

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Touraine (1995) Critique of Modernity Mass., Blackwell Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi, O. and Pakkanen, P. (2002). Towards Excellence in Teaching. Publications of the Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council 18. University of Helsinki.

  • A. Tupasela (2000) ArticleTitle‘Intellectual property rights and licensing: can centralized technology transfer save public research?’ Science Studies 2 3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Tupasela (2002) ‘Meeting governmental demands? research groups as economic engines’. Technology, Society, Environment 2 Helsinki University of Technology Laboratory of Environmental Protection Publication Espoo 33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuunainen, Juha (2004). ‘Hybrid practices? Contributions to the debate on the mutation of science and university.’ Forthcoming.

  • University of Helsinki (1994). Helsingin yliopiston rehtorin asettaman varainhankintatyöryhmän muistio’, Helsingin yliopiston toimikuntien mietintöjä ja selvityksiä 6.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameUniversity of Helsinki (2000) Research Assessment Exercise 1999. Evaluation projects of the University of Helsinki 6 University of Helsinki Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Helsinki (2002a). Helsingin Yliopiston Toimintakertomus 2001.Helsinki.

  • University of Helsinki (2002b). Kampustyöryhmä, 11.3.2002. Helsinki.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameUniversity of Helsinki (2003) Strategic Plan for the Years 2004-2006 Yliopistopaino Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Whitle (1988) ArticleTitle‘Management sciences and management skills’ Organizational Studies 1 47–68

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Ziman (1996) ArticleTitle‘Postacademic science: Constructing knowledge with networks and norms’ Science Studies 1 67–80

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marja Häyrinen-Alestalo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Häyrinen-Alestalo, M., Peltola, U. The Problem of a Market-oriented University. High Educ 52, 251–281 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2749-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2749-1

Keywords

Navigation