Log in

Assessing social vulnerability of villages in Mt. Kasigau area, Kenya, using the analytical hierarchy process

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research assesses the social vulnerability of five villages (Jora, Kiteghe, Makwasinyi, Bungule, and Rukanga) in Mt. Kasigau, Kenya. Our goal was to develop a social vulnerability model by adopting a vulnerability conceptual framework that conceptualizes vulnerability into three major components: exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity and using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Employing the AHP, the three components of vulnerability were decomposed into its constituent components and structured into a hierarchical format where each component was represented by different societal and environmental criterions and stressors. Next, we performed a pairwise comparison at each level of the hierarchy to obtain local priorities. Finally, we aggregated the local priorities from the bottom up to obtain global priorities of the social vulnerability of each village. The results from this study revealed that Makwasinyi was the most vulnerable village followed by Bungule, Kiteghe, Jora, and Rukanga respectively. Further, the results suggested that adaptive capacity and exposure played a critical role in determining the social vulnerability compared to sensitivity. Considering this, reducing social vulnerability in the area should focus much on improving the adaptive capacity of the people and reducing their exposure specifically in Makwasinyi village.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger, W. N. (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Development, 27(2), 249–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcantara-Ayala, I. (2002). Geomorphology, natural hazards, vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in develo** countries. Geomorphology, 47(2–4), 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. (2010). Case studies in qualitative research. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (3rd ed., pp. 81–98). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J., & Eyles, J. (1997). Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: Establishing ‘Rigour’ in interview analysis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22(4), 505–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann, J., Cardona, O. D., Carreno, M. L., Barbat, A. H., Pelling, M., Schneiderbauer, S., et al. (2013). Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: The MOVE framework. Natural Hazards, 67(2), 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (1994). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters (1st ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (2014). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge.

  • Brunelli, M. (2014). Introduction to the analytic hierarchy process. Springer.

  • Burgess, N. D., Butynski, T. M., Cordeiro, N. J., Doggart, N. H., Fjeldsa, J., Howell, K. M., et al. (2007). The biological importance of the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania and Kenya. Biological Conservation, 134(2), 209–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Cutter, S. L., Emrich, C. T., & Shi, P. (2013). Measuring social vulnerability to natural hazards in the Yangtze River Delta region, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 4(4), 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. E., Moser, S. C., Ratick, S. J., Dow, K., Meyer, W. B., Emani, S., et al. (1998). Assessing the vulnerability of coastal communities to extreme storms: The case of Revere, MA., USA. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 3(1), 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L. (1996). Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards. Progress in Human Geography, 20(4), 529–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., et al. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., & Emrich, C. T. (2006). Moral hazard, social catastrophe: The changing face of vulnerability along the hurricane coasts. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(1), 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., & Finch, C. (2008). Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(7), 2301–2306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., Mitchell, J. T., & Scott, M. S. (2000). Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4), 713–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Galvan, X., Perez-Garcia, R., Izquierdo, J., & Mora-Rodriguez, J. (2010). An analytic hierarchy process for assessing externalities in water leakage management. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 52(7–8), 1194–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, K. (1992). Exploring differences in our common future(s): The meaning of vulnerability to global environmental change. Geoforum, 23(3), 417–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, K. (2010). Interviewing. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (3rd ed., pp. 101–137). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, H., & Luers, A. L. (2006). Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 365–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, P., Mourato, S., & Moreira, M. (2016). Social vulnerability assessment of flood risk using GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis. A case study of Vila Nova de Gaia (Portugal). Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 7(4), 1367–1389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussel, H. M. (2007). Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change, 17(2), 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín, G. C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 293–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Kenya (2010). Kenya population and housing census. Nairobi, Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved March 20, 2018, from http://kenya.opendataforafrica.org/KEPOPHUS2015/population-and-housing-census-of-kenya-2009.

  • Griffith, D. A., Morris, E. S., & Thakar, V. (2016). Spatial autocorrelation and qualitative sampling: The case of snowball type sampling designs. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(4), 773–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., Dangayach, G. S., Singh, A. K., & Rao, P. N. (2015). Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for evaluating sustainable manufacturing practices in Indian electrical panel industries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 208–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, M. A., Medley, K. E., & Maingi, J. K. (2015). Biophysical analysis of afromontane forest community types at Mount Kasigau, Kenya. African Journal of Ecology, 53(4), 454–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, W. (2008). Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications—A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1), 211–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, C., & Lee, B. (2008). The real life guide to accounting research: A behind the scenes view of using qualitative research methods. Amsterdam: Elsevier/CIMA Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M. A., Schoon, M. L., Ke, W., & Borner, K. (2006). Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 240–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalibo, H. W., & Medley, K. E. (2007). Participatory resource map** for adaptive collaborative management at Mt. Kasigau, Kenya. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82(3), 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamau, P. N. (2017). The political ecology of human–elephant relations: Comparing local perceptions of elephants around Chyulu Hills and Mount Kasigau in Southern Kenya. Journal of Political Ecology, 24(1), 801–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, R. A. (2010). Seeing with clarity: Undertaking observational research. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (3rd ed., pp. 241–258). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiker, G. A., Bridges, T. S., Varghese, A., Seager, T. P., & Linkov, I. (2005). Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 1(2), 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, C., Hayes, M., & Philips, T. (1998). How to reduce drought risk. A guide prepared by the preparedness and mitigation working group of the Western Drought Coordination Council, National Drought Mitigation Center, Lincoln, Nebraska. Retrieved March 10, 2018, from https://drought.unl.edu/archive/Documents/NDMC/Planning/risk.pdf.

  • Lawal, O., & Arokoyu, S. B. (2015). Modelling social vulnerability in sub-Saharan West Africa using a geographical information system. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 7(1), 155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiter, M., Levy, J., Mutiti, S., Boardman, M., Wojnar, A., & Deka, H. (2013). Drinking water quality in the Mount Kasigau region of Kenya: A source to point-of-use assessment. Environmental Earth Sciences, 68(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luers, A. L. (2005). The surface of vulnerability: An analytical framework for examining environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 15(3), 214–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications—Two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(8), 4126–4148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masud, A., & Ravindran, A. (2008). Multiple criteria decision making. In A. Ravindran (Ed.), Operations research and management science handbook (pp. 1–35). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, P., & Dietz, T. (2008). Structure, agency and environment: Toward an integrated perspective on vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medley, K. E., & Kalibo, H. W. (2005). An ecological framework for participatory ethnobotanical research at Mt. Kasigau, Kenya. Field Methods, 17(3), 302–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medley, K. E., & Kalibo, H. W. (2007). Global localism: Recentering the research agenda for biodiversity conservation. Natural Resources Forum, 31(2), 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, G. A., & Martins, H. (2006). Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management, 230(1–3), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng-Tsung, L., Kuo-Huan, T., Kun-Lung, L., Wen-Hong, L., & Hao-Tang, J. (2015). Assessment of social vulnerability to climate change and its disaster prevention in **tung County. In Proceedings of the 2015 AASRI international conference on circuits and systems.

  • Mu, E., & Pereyra-Rojas, M. (2018). Practical decision making using super decisions v3: An introduction to the analytic hierarchy process. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Fonseca, G. A., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(6772), 853–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark, W. D. (2002). Conserving biodiversity in East African forests: A study of the Eastern Arc Mountains (Vol. 155). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouma, Y. O., & Tateishi, R. (2014). Urban flood vulnerability and risk map** using integrated multi-parametric AHP and GIS: Methodological overview and case study assessment. Water, 6(6), 1515–1545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panahi, M., Rezaie, F., & Meshkani, S. A. (2014). Seismic vulnerability assessment of school buildings in Tehran City Based on AHP and GIS. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 14(4), 969–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, R., & Ganesh, L. S. (1995). Energy resource allocation incorporating qualitative and quantitative criteria: An integrated model using goal programming and AHP. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 29(3), 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, D. C., & Blaschke, T. (2013). Spatial vulnerability assessment of floods in the coastal regions of Bangladesh. Risk, 6(1), 21–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, D. C., & Blaschke, T. (2015). Spatial vulnerability assessment of floods in the coastal regions of Bangladesh. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 6(1), 21–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, K. U., Dulal, H. B., Johnson, C., & Baptiste, A. (2013). Understanding livelihood vulnerability to climate change: Applying the livelihood vulnerability index in Trinidad and Tobago. Geoforum, 47, 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanidis, S., & Stathis, D. (2013). Assessment of flood hazard based on natural and anthropogenic factors using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Natural Hazards, 68(2), 569–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thokala, P., Devlin, N., Marsh, K., Baltussen, R., Boysen, M., Kalo, Z., et al. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making—An introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA emerging good practices task force. Value in Health, 19(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., et al. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8074–8079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. C., Jhan, H. T., Ting, K. H., Tsai, H. C., Lee, M. T., Hsu, T. W., et al. (2016). Application of social vulnerability indicators to climate change for the southwest coastal areas of Taiwan. Sustainability, 8(12), 1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. Y., Yarnal, B., & Fisher, A. (2002). Vulnerability of coastal communities to sea-level rise: A case study of Cape May County, New Jersey, USA. Climate Research, 22(3), 255–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, N., & Huang, H. (2013). Social vulnerability for public safety: A case study of Bei**g, China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 58(19), 2387–2394.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was partial funded by The W. K. McClure Scholarship Program of the University of Tennessee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Njoroge Gathongo.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants that were interviewed and participated in the focus group discussion sessions.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gathongo, N., Tran, L. Assessing social vulnerability of villages in Mt. Kasigau area, Kenya, using the analytical hierarchy process. GeoJournal 85, 995–1007 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10004-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10004-6

Keywords

Navigation