Log in

Assessment of the Excavatability of Rock Based on Rock Mass Quality: A Case Study from India

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During last five decades many attempts have been made to develop a means of assessing the excavatability of rock. These classifications have been used to select appropriate excavation systems and equipment used in civil and mining works. Empirical rating and seismic velocity systems are proposed for the rippability of a rock mass. In this paper rock mass classification systems i.e. rock mass rating system and tunnel quality index and revised excavatability graph are used for assessing the excavatability of rock. The aim of this study was to examine how the intact rock and rock mass properties influence the excavatability of rock surface excavation in granite and gneiss terrain. These methods allow the excavatability of rock to be assessed rapidly. After detailed study it is concluded that rock mass rating system gave a better assessment of rock mass quality than the tunnel quality index and revised excavatability model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdullatif OM, Cruden DM (1983) The relationship between rock mass quality and ease of excavation. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 28:183–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attewell PB (1993) The role of engineering geology in the design of surface and underground structure, chapter 5. In: Hudson JA (ed) Comprehensive rock engineering. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech 6(4):189–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1973) Engineering classification of jointed rock masses. Trans S Afr Inst Civ Eng 5(12):335–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1976) Rock mass classification in rock engineering. In: Bieniawski ZT (ed) Exploration for rock engineering, proceedings of the symposium, Cape Town, Balkema, vol 1, pp 97–106

  • British Standards Institution (1981) Code of practice for site investigations: BS 5930, London

  • Chowdhury I, Ray B, Ali A (2012) Geology and mineral resources of Odisha. Geological Survey of India, Miscellaneous Publication No. 30, Part-III, p 77

  • Deere DU (1964) Technical description of rock core for engineering purposes. Rock Mech Eng Geol 1(1):10–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowell RJ, Johnson, ST (1991) Cuttability assessment applied to drag tool tunnelling machines. In: 7th ISRM Congress, Aachen, p 195

  • Frankfin JA, Broch E, Walton G (1971) Logging the mechanical character of rock. Trans Inst Min Metall 80A:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjigeorgiou J, Scoble MJ (1990) Ground characterization for assessment of ease of excavation. In: Singhal RK, Verma M (eds) Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on mine planning and equipment selection, Calgary, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 323–331

  • Halden NM, Bowes DR, Dash B (1982) Structural evolution of migmatites in granulite facies terrane: precambrian crystalline complex of Angul, Odisha, India. Trans R Soc Edinb Earth Sci 73:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IS 11315 Part 2 (1987) Method for quantitative description of discontinuities in rock mass: part 2—spacing. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, p 8

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 11315 Part 8 (1987) Method for quantitative description of discontinuities in rock mass: part 8—seepage. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, p 8

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 9143 (1979) Method for the determination of unconfined compressive strength of rock materials. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO-14689-1 (2003) Geotechnical investigation and testing—identification and classification of rock-Part 1: identification and description. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (1978) Description of discontinuities in a rock mass. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 15:319–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (1981) Suggested methods for the rock characterization, testing and monitoring. In: Brown ET (ed) ISRM Commission on testing methods. Pergamon Press, Oxford

  • Jain P, Naithan AK, Singh TN (2016) Estimation of the performance of the tunnel boring machine (TBM) using uniaxial compressive strength and rock mass rating classification (RMR)—a case study from the Deccan Traps, India. J Geol Soc India 87:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpuz C (1990) A classification system for excavation of surface coal measures. Min Sci Technol 11:157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramadibrata S (1996) The influence of rock mass and intact rock properties on the design of surface mines with particular reference to the excavatability of rock, Ph.D. Thesis. Curtin University of Technology, p 496

  • Kristen HAD (1982) A classification system for excavation in natural materials. Civ Eng S Afr 24:293–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Minty EJ, Kearns GK (1983) Rock mass workability. In: Knight MJ, Minty EJ, Smith RB (eds) Collected case studies in engineering geology, hydrogeology and environmental geology. Geological Society of Australia, Special Publication, vol 11, pp 59–81

  • Naithani AK (2007) RMR—a system for characterizing rock mass classification—a case study from Garhwal Himalaya, Uttarakhand. J Geol Soc India 70:627–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Naithani AK, Bhatt AK, Krishna Murthy KS (2009) Geological and geotechnical investigations of Loharinag—Pala hydropower project, Garhwal Himalaya, Uttarakhand. J Geol Soc India 73(6):821–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naithani AK, Nawani PC, Singh LG, Rawat DS (2014) Engineering geological and geotechnical investigations of dam of the Bunakha hydroelectric project (180 MW), Chukha Dzong, Bhutan Himalaya. J Nepal Geol Soc 47:77–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Naithani AK, Singh LG, Jain Prasnna (2017a) Rock mass characterization and support design for underground additional surge pool cavern—a case study, India. Geomater Sci Res Publ 7:64–82. https://doi.org/10.4236/gm.2017.72006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naithani AK, Jain JK, Prasnna Jain, Singh LG, Rabi Bhusan (2017b) Engineering geological investigations of a nuclear building foundation—a case study from atomic power project, India. Geosci Res 2(1):14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawani PC (2011) Engineering geological investigations for underground excavations. J Eng Geol 35:103–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmstrom A (1982) The volumetric joint count—a useful and simple measure of the degree of rock jointing. In: Proceedings 4th international congress of international association of engineering geology, New Delhi, pp V.221–V.228

  • Pantelidis L (2010) A critical review of highway slope instability risk assessment systems. Bull Eng Geol Env 70(3):395–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettifer GS, Fookes PG (1994) A revision of the graphical method for assessing the excavatability of rock. Q J Eng Geol 27:145–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar A, Nanda JK, Paul DK, Bishui PK, Gupta SN (1989) Late Proterozoic alkaline magmatism in the Eastern Ghats belt: Rb-Sr isotopic study of the Koraput complex, Odisha. Indian Miner 43:265–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddique T, Pradhan SP, Vishal V, Mondal MEA, Singh TN (2017) Stability assessment of Himalayan road cut slopes along National Highway 58, India. Environ Earth Sci 76:759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7091-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh B, Goel RK (2011) Engineering rock mass classification. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RN, Denby B, Egretli I, Pathon AG (1986) Assessment of ground rippability in opencast mining operations. Min Dept Mag Univ Nottm 38:21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RN, Denby B, Egretli I (1987) Development of a new rippability index for coal measures excavations. In: Proceedings of the 28th U.S. symposium on rock mechanics, Tucson, Arizona, Balkema, pp 935–943

  • Smith HJ (1986) Estimating rippability by rock mass classification. In: Proceedings of the 27th U.S. symposium on rock mechanics, Tuscaloosa, Albama, AIME, New York, pp 443–448

  • Tsiambaos G, Saroglou H (2010) Excavatability assessment of rock masses using the Geological Strength Index (GSI). Bull Eng Geol Environ 69:13–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0235-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver JM (1975) Geological factors significant in the assessment of rippability. Civ Eng S Afr 17:313–316

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is a part of sponsored project by M/s TPL, so we sincerely thank the management of TPL for the same. Authors are thankful to Director NIRM for the permission to send the manuscript for publication and encouragement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. Naithani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naithani, A.K., Rawat, D.S., Singh, L.G. et al. Assessment of the Excavatability of Rock Based on Rock Mass Quality: A Case Study from India. Geotech Geol Eng 36, 4015–4027 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0554-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0554-3

Keywords

Navigation