Log in

Alkaloid-based chemical defenses and diet in six species of Australian poison frogs in the genus Pseudophryne (Myobatrachidae)

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Poison frogs are well known for their ability to sequester alkaloids from their diet of leaf-litter arthropods for use in defense against predators and pathogens. Australian frogs in the genus Pseudophryne (Myobatrachidae) represent an understudied lineage of poison frogs, with a unique ability to both sequester dietary alkaloids and synthesize pseudophrynamine alkaloids. Herein, we describe the alkaloid profiles and diet of six species of Pseudophryne (P. guentheri [Boulenger, 1882], P. occidentalis [Parker, 1940], P. semimarmorata [Lucas, 1892], P. dendyi [Lucas 1892], P. bibronii [Günther, 1859], and P. coriacea [Keferstein, 1868]) to gain a better understanding of how alkaloid defenses and diet are related within and among species. We characterized and quantified alkaloids using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS), and assessed diet by way of dissection and examination of stomach contents using light microscopy. We found that alkaloid profiles varied significantly among species, with pumiliotoxins (dietary-derived) and pseudophrynamines (biosynthesized) being the most abundant alkaloids. Pseudophryne bibronii and P. dendyi contained mostly dietary-derived alkaloids, whereas P. coriacea, P. guentheri, P. semimarmorata, and P. occidentalis possessed mostly biosynthesized alkaloids. The stomachs of all the studied species were largely empty, containing mostly soil and few partially digested insects. Our data suggest that frogs eat minimally during the breeding season. Therefore, a decrease in dietary alkaloids may be compensated by the biosynthesized pseudophrynamines, which could allow Australian poison frogs to remain defended from predators during this vulnerable time period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We value DEI efforts and took this into account in completing this work. Our team includes representatives from three universities from two countries, as well as established researchers and undergraduate authors. We would like to thank P. Byrne and S. Keogh for discussions about this research, N. Mitchell and S. Macdonald for their assistance in Western Australia, as well as B. Symula and N. Clemann for assistance in eastern Australia. This work was supported by the Endeavour Fellowship to JPL offered by the Australian Department of Education and Training (ERF RDDH 151726 2015). Animals were collected under permits for New South Wales (SL101733), Victoria (10007622), and Western Australia (SF010838) with IACUC Approval 15-012 from the University of Mississippi and ACEC (A11490) from Western Sydney University.

Funding

JPL was supported by the Endeavour Fellowship offered by the Australian Department of Education and Training (ERF RDDH 151726 2015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MS and JPL wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors participated in the revision of this draft. JPL and RAS worked on the final version of the manuscript. MS and LP developed the diet analysis protocol, and MS dissected and documented stomach contents. VD and RAS performed the alkaloid analyses among frogs and analyzed patterns. JPL and KDLU developed the project. JPL collected the samples. All authors contributed to the final manuscript and approved of its publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Lawrence.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable

Consent to participate

All co-authors have consented to participate in the research and manuscript publication.

Consent for publication

All co-authors have approved the manuscript for publication.

Ethics approval

Animals were collected under permits for New South Wales (SL101733), Victoria (10007622), and Western Australia (SF010838) with IACUC Approval 15-012 from the University of Mississippi and ACEC (A11490) from Western Sydney University.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 192 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sague, M., Dudaitis, V., Plumert, L. et al. Alkaloid-based chemical defenses and diet in six species of Australian poison frogs in the genus Pseudophryne (Myobatrachidae). Evol Ecol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-023-10269-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-023-10269-x

Keywords

Navigation