Abstract
Biological invasions can expose native predators to novel prey which may be less nutritious or detrimental to predators. The introduction and subsequent spread of cane toads (Bufo marinus) through Australia has killed many anuran-eating snakes unable to survive the toad’s toxins. However, one native species, the keelback snake (Tropidonophis mairii), is relatively resistant to toad toxins and remains common in toad-infested areas. Is the keelback’s ability to coexist with toads a function of its ancestral Asian origins, or a consequence of rapid adaptation since cane toads arrived in Australia? And does the snake’s feeding preference for frogs rather than toads reflect an innate or learned behaviour? We compared keelback populations long sympatric with toads with a population that has encountered toads only recently. Unlike toad-vulnerable snake species, sympatry with toads has not affected keelback toxin tolerances or feeding responses: T. mairii from toad-sympatric and toad-naïve populations show a similar sensitivity to toad toxin, and a similar innate preference for frogs rather than toads. Feeding responses of neonatal keelbacks demonstrate that learning plays little or no role in the snake’s aversion to toads. Thus, behavioural aversion to B. marinus as prey, and physiological tolerance to toad toxins are pre-existing innate characteristics of Australian keelbacks rather than adaptations to the cane toad’s invasion of Australia. Such traits were most likely inherited from ancestral keelbacks that adapted to the presence of bufonids in Asia. Our results suggest that the impact of invasive species on native taxa may be strongly influenced by the biogeographic histories of the species involved.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernays EA (1993) Aversion learning and feeding. In: Papaj DR, Lewis AC (eds) Insect learning: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 1–17
Blumstein DT (2006) The multipredator hypothesis and the evolutionary persistence of antipredator behavior. Ethology 112:209–217
Breeden K (1963) Cane toad (Bufo marinus). Wildl Aust 1:31
Brodie ED, Brodie ED Jr (1990) Tetrodotoxin resistance in garter snakes: an evolutionary response of predators to dangerous prey. Evolution 44:651–659
Brodie ED, Brodie ED Jr (1999) Costs of exploiting poisonous prey: evolutionary trade-offs in a predator-prey arms race. Evolution 53:626–631
Brodie ED Jr, Ridenhour BJ, Brodie ED (2002) The evolutionary response of predators to dangerous prey: hotspots and coldspots in the geographic mosaic of coevolution between garter snakes and newts. Evolution 56:2067–2082
Carroll SP, Loye JE, Dingle H, Mathieson M, Famula TR, Zalucki MP (2005) And the beak shall inherit—evolution in response to invasion. Ecol Lett 8:944–951
Cogger HG (2000) Reptiles and amphibians of Australia, 6th edn. Reed New Holland, Sydney
Cogger H, Heatwole H (1981) The Australian reptiles: origins, biogeography, distribution patterns and island evolution. In: Keast A, Junk W (eds) Ecological biogeography of Australia. The Hague, Boston, pp 1332–1373
Cooper CB, Hochachka WM, Dhondt AA (2007) Contrasting natural experiments confirm competition between house finches and house sparrows. Ecology 88:864–870
Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD (2000) Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife: threats to biodiversity and human health. Science 287:443–449
Dickman CR (1992) Predation and habitat shift in the house mouse, Mus domesticus. Ecology 73:313–322
Drummond H, Garcia MC (1995) Congenital responsiveness of garter snakes to a dangerous prey abolished by learning. Anim Behav 49:891–900
Endler JA (1980) Natural selection on colour patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34:76–91
Erspamer V, Erspamer GF, Mazzanti G, Endean R (1984) Active peptides in the skins of one hundred amphibian species from Australia and Papua New Guinea. Comp Biochem Physiol C 77:99–108
Fritts TH, Rodda GH (1998) The role of introduced species in the degradation of island ecosystems: a case history of Guam. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:113–140
Futuyma DJ, Moreno G (1988) The evolution of ecological specialization. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:207–233
Georges A (2009) Wildlife worries spread. Canberra Times, Canberra
Glenn S, Holway D (2008) Consumption of introduced prey by native predators: Argentine ants and pit-building ant lions. Biol Invasions 10:273–280
Greer AE (1997) The biology and evolution of Australian snakes. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chip** Norton
King RB, Ray JM, Stanford KM (2006) Gorging on gobies: beneficial effects of alien prey on a threatened vertebrate. Can J Zool 84:108–115
Kozubikova E, Filipova L, Kozak P, Duris Z, Martins M, Dieguez-Uribeondos J, Oidtmann B, Petrusek A (2009) Prevalence of the crayfish plague pathogen Aphanomyces astaci in invasive American crayfishes in the Czech Republic. Conserv Biol 23:1204–1213
Krueger CC, May B (1991) Ecological and genetic effects of salmonid introductions in North America. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:66–77
Launchbaugh KL, Provenza FD (1994) The effect of flavor concentration and toxin dose on the formation and generalization of flavor aversions in lambs. J Anim Sci 72:10–13
Llewelyn J, Phillips BL, Shine R (2009a) Sublethal costs associated with the consumption of toxic prey by snakes. Aust Ecol 34:179–184
Llewelyn J, Schwarzkopf L, Alford R, Shine R (2009b) Something different for dinner? Responses of a native Australian predator (the keelback snake) to an invasive prey species (the cane toad). Biol Invasions, published online July 14th 2009
Llewelyn J, Webb JK, Schwarzkopf L, Alford R, Shine R (in press) Behavioural responses of carnivorous marsupials (Planigale maculata) to toxic invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus). Aust Ecol. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02067.x
Maerz JC, Karuzas JM, Madison DM, Blossey B (2005) Introduced invertebrates are important prey for a generalist predator. Divers Distrib 11:83–90
Malnate EV, Underwood G (1988) Australasian snakes of the genus Tropidonophis. Proc Acad Natl Sci Phila 140:59–201
Meyer K, Linde H (1971) Collection of toad venoms and chemistry of toad venom steroids. In: Bucherl W, Buckley EE (eds) Venomous animals and their venoms. Academic Press, New York, pp 521–556
Mooney HA, Cleland EE (2001) The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5446–5451
Phillips BL, Shine R (2004) Adapting to an invasive species: toxic cane toads induce morphological change in Australian snakes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:17150–17155
Phillips BL, Shine R (2006) An invasive species induces rapid adaptive change in a native predator: cane toads and black snakes in Australia. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273:1545–1550
Phillips BL, Brown GP, Shine R (2003) Assessing the potential impact of cane toads on Australian snakes. Conserv Biol 17:1738–1747
Phillips BL, Brown GP, Webb JK, Shine R (2006) Invasion and the evolution of speed in toads. Nature 439:803
Phillips BL, Greenlees MJ, Brown GP, Shine R (2009) Predator behaviour and morphology mediates the impact of an invasive species: cane toads and death adders in Australia. Anim Conserv, published online July 29th 2009
Pockley D (1965) The free and the caged. Blackwoods Mag 1965:439–466
Rayward A (1974) Giant toads: a threat to Australian wildlife. Wildlife 17:506–507
Schoonhoven LM, Meerman J (1978) Metabolic cost of changes in diet and neutralization of allelochemics. Entomol Exp Appl 24:489–493
Shettleworth SJ (1998) Cognition, evolution, and behavior. Oxford University Press, New York
Shine R (1989) Constraints, allometry, and adaptation: food habits and reproductive biology of Australian brownsnakes (Preudonaja: Elapidae). Herpetologica 45:195–207
Shine R (1991) Strangers in a strange land: ecology of the Australian colubrid snakes. Copeia 1991:120–131
Shine R, Brown GP (2008) Adapting to the unpredictable: reproductive biology of vertebrates in the Australian wet-dry tropics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:363–373
Short J, Kinnear JE, Robley A (2002) Surplus killing by introduced predators in Australia-evidence for ineffective anti-predator adaptations in native prey species? Biol Conserv 103:283–301
Skelhorn J, Rowe C (2006) Predator avoidance learning of prey with secreted or stored defences and the evolution of insect defences. Anim Behav 72:827–834
Straughan IR (1969) The Hyla bicolor complex (Anura, Hylidae) in north Queensland. Proc R Soc Queensland 80:43–54
Strauss SY, Lau JA, Carroll SP (2006) Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecol Lett 9:357–374
Tyler MJ (1987) Frog and cane toad skin secretions. In: Covacevich J, Davie P, Pearn J (eds) Toxic plants and animals: a guide for Australia. Queensland Museum, Brisbane, pp 329–339
Tyler MJ, Davies M (1978) Species-groups within the Australopapuan hylid frog genus Litoria Tschudi. Aust J Zool 26:619
Urban MC, Phillips BL, Skelly DK, Shine R (2007) The cane toad’s (Chaunus [Bufo] marinus) increasing ability to invade Australia is revealed by a dynamically updated range model. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 274:1413–1419
Webb JK, Brown GP, Child T, Greenlees MJ, Phillips BL, Shine R (2008) A native dasyurid predator (common planigale, Planigale maculata) rapidly learns to avoid a toxic invader. Aust Ecol 33:821–829
Yoshida T, Jones LE, Ellner SP, Fussmann GF, Hairston JNG (2003) Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator-prey system. Nature 424:303–306
Acknowledgments
We thank Rickard Abom, Lauren Hodgson and Tori Llewelyn for their assistance collecting keelbacks, and Ligia Pizzatto for her help running feeding trials. The work was funded by the Australian Research Council, and was approved by the JCU Animal Ethics Committee (approval #A1114) and the USYD Animal Ethics Committee (approval #L04/12-2002/3/3681).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Llewelyn, J., Phillips, B.L., Brown, G.P. et al. Adaptation or preadaptation: why are keelback snakes (Tropidonophis mairii) less vulnerable to invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) than are other Australian snakes?. Evol Ecol 25, 13–24 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-010-9369-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-010-9369-2