SpringerLink
Log in

The Paradox of the Contented Female Worker: Why Are Women Satisfied with Lower Pay?

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although women in general are aware of and concerned about the gender wage gap, individual women do not report significantly greater dissatisfaction with their pay, which has been termed “the paradox of the contented female worker” (Crosby 1982). The current study proposes a model of the factors leading to pay satisfaction to explain this paradox based on Major’s (Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 26:293–355, 1994) work on entitlement. In general, support was found for the hypothesized relationships. The results of this study indicate that although women have lower pay, they do not necessarily feel entitled to higher pay, and thus are not dissatisfied with pay. Women also tended to select female referents who are lower paid, which may account for some of their lower feelings of entitlement. Additionally, although men and women did not differ in the value placed on pay, value of pay was found to relate negatively to pay satisfaction. Based on these findings, researchers interested in pay satisfaction are encouraged to investigate additional personal and situational characteristics that affect referent choice and perceptions of fair pay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alksnis, C., Desmarais, S., & Curtis, J. (2008). Workforce segregation and the gender wage gap: Is ‘women’s’ work valued as highly as ‘men’s’? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1416–1441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Bar Association. (2009). Lawyer demographics. Downloaded August 29, 2013 from http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/marketresearch/PublicDocuments/Lawyer_Demographics.authcheckdam.pdf.

  • Auster, E. R. (1988). Behind closed doors: Sex bias at professional and managerial levels. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1, 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, E. C. (2012). Worse off but happier? The affective advantages of entering the workforce during an economic downturn. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, 73.

  • Blanton, H., George, G., & Crocker, J. (2001). Contexts of system justification and system evaluation: Exploring the social comparison strategies of the (not yet) contented female worker. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4 , 126–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F. D., & Ferber, M. A. (1985). Women in the labor market: The last twenty years. In L. Larwood, A. H. Stromberg, & B. A. Gutek (Eds.), Women and work: An annual review (Vol. 1). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2007). The gender pay gap: Have women gone as far as they can? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., & Aldag, R. J. (1995). The study of work values: A call for a more balanced perspective. In T. Borg & P. H. Mohler (Eds.), Trends and perspectives in empirical social research. New York: DeGruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2001). Unequal pay, unequal response? Pay referents and their implications for pay level satisfaction. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 879–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, T. (2005). The paradox of the contented female worker in a traditionally female industry. Sociological Spectrum, 25, 677–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, C. L., & Priestner, K. J. (2001). Statistical Profile of the State Bar of Texas Membership (2000-01). Downloaded July 26, 2013 from http://www.texasbar.com/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Archives&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=11533.

  • Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychology Review, 83, 85–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Gieter, S., Hofmans, J., De Cooman, R., & Pepermans, R. (2009). Measurement invariance of the Pay Satisfaction Questionnaire across gender: Explaining the ‘contented female worker paradox’ more thoroughly. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 843–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Hauw, S., & De Vos, A. (2010). Millennials’ career perspective and psychological contract expectations: Does the recession lead to lowered expectations? Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A. (1984). Factor analysis and construct validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felicio, D. M., & Miller, C. T. (1994). Social comparison in medical school: What students say about gender and similarity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1984). Many sides of the coin: The psychology of money usage. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 501–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Lewis, A. (1986). The economic mind: The social psychology of economic behavior. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D. E., & Lawrence, B. S. (2010). Women’s and men’s career referents: How gender composition and comparison level shape career expectations. Organization Science, 21, 1159–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golding, J., Resnick, A., & Crosby, F. (1983). Work satisfaction as a function of gender and job status. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1, 286–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P. S. (1974). An examination of referents used in the evaluation of pay. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 12, 170–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M. E., & Welbourne, T. M. (1999). Gainsharing and women’s and men’s relative pay satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1027–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & McCarty, C. L. (1990). Comparable worth: A matter of justice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 8, 265–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, H. G., III, & Judge, T. A. (2000). Compensation attitudes. In S. L. Rynes & B. Gerhart (Eds.), Compensation in organizations (pp. 61–103). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, H. G., III, & Schwab, D. P. (1985). Pay satisfaction: Its multidimensional nature and measurement. International Journal of Psychology, 20, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogue, M., & Yoder, J. D. (2003). The role of status in producing depressed entitlement in women’s and men’s pay allocations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 330–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogue, M. A., DuBois, C. L. Z., & Fox-Cardamone, L. (2010). Gender differences in pay expectations: The roles of job intention and self-view. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. A. (1989). Relative deprivation and the gender wage gap. Journal of Social Issues, 45, 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Bretz, R. D. (1992). Effects of work values on job choice decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). Dispositional source of job satisfaction: A review and theoretical extension. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 67–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Livingston, B. A. (2008). Is the gap more than gender? A longitudinal analysis of gender, gender role orientation, and earnings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 994–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., Podsakoff, N. P., Shaw, J. C., & Rich, B. L. (2010). The relationship between pay and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurgensen, G. E. (1978). Job preferences (What makes a job good or bad?). Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keaveny, T. J., & Inderrieden, E. J. (2000). Gender differences in pay satisfaction and pay expectations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 12, 363–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumboltz, J. D., Blando, J. A., Kim, H., & Reikowski, D. J. (1994). Embedding work values in stories. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 57–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C. T., & Ambrose, M. L. (1992). Personal and situational determinants of referent choice. Academy of Management Review, 17, 212–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C. T., & Olekalns, M. (2012). Negotiating the gender divide: Lessons from the negotiation and organizational behavior literatures. Journal of Management, 38, 1387–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E. (1965). Managers’ perceptions of their subordinates’ pay and of their superiors’ pay. Personnel Psychology, 18, 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E. (1971). Pay and organizational effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1987). Social comparison and outcome evaluation in group contexts. In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation (pp. 105–127). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. (1987). Gender, justice, and the psychology of entitlement. In P. Shaver & C. Hendricks (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 124–148). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. (1989). Gender differences in comparisons and entitlement: Implications for comparable worth. Journal of Social Issues, 45, 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: the role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 293–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., & Deaux, K. (1982). Individual differences in justice behavior. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 43–76). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., & Konar, E. (1984). An investigation of sex differences in pay expectations and their possible causes. Academy of Management Journal, 4, 777–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., McFarlin, D. B., & Gagnon, D. (1984). Overworked and underpaid: On the nature of gender differences in personal entitlement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1399–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maraist, C., Davison, H. K., Brief, A. P., Dietz, M. A., & O’Shea, D. P. (1999). Does pay matter? The effects of work on subjective well-being. Poster presented at the 14th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial-Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, Georgia.

  • Martin, J. (1981). Relative deprivation: A theory of distributive justice for an era of shrinking resources. Research in Organizational Behavior, 3, 53–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milkovich, G. T., & Anderson, P. H. (1972). Management compensation and secrecy policies. Personnel Psychology, 25, 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, C. W., & Kim, S.-W. (2008). The contented female worker: Still a paradox? Advances in Group Processes, 25, 117–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, C. W., & Wallace, J. E. (1996). Justice and the paradox of the contented female worker. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 338–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Association for Law Placement. (2009). Law firm diversity demographics show little change, despite economic downturn. Washington, DC: NALP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. (1981). Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, M. C., Corcoran, M. E., & Courant, P. N. (2005). Pay differences among the highly trained: Cohort difference in the male–female earnings gap in lawyers’ salaries. Social Forces, 84, 853–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostroff, C., & Atwater, L. E. (2003). Does whom you work with matter? Effects of referent group gender and age composition on managers’ compensation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 725–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, J. (1994). The paradox of the contented female worker: An assessment of alternative explanations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, J., Bromet, E. J., Schwartz, J. E., Dew, M. A., & Curtis, E. C. (1993). The work environments of male and female professionals: Objective and subjective characteristics. Work and Occupations, 20, 68–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N., & Eddleston, K. A. (2008). The paradox of the contented female business owner. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, P. L., & BeVier, C. A. (1998). Response rates in HRM/OB survey research: Norms and correlates, 1990–1994. Journal of Management, 24, 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B., & Minette, K. A. (2004). The importance of pay in employee motivation: Discrepancies between what people say and what they do. Human Resource Management, 43, 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., Jenkins, G. D., & Gupta, N. (1999). Positive and negative affect, signal sensitivity, and pay satisfaction. Journal of Management, 25, 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (2009). Gender, pay and work satisfaction at a UK University. Gender, Work and Organization, 16, 621–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Bar of Texas. (2001a). 2001 Corporate/In-House Counsel Income Report. Downloaded July 26, 2013 from http://www.texasbar.com/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Archives&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=11528.

  • State Bar of Texas. (2001b). 2001 Government Attorney Income Report. Downloaded July 26, 2013 from http://www.texasbar.com/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Archives&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=11529.

  • State Bar of Texas. (2001c). 2001 Private Practitioner Income Report. Downloaded July 26, 2013 from http://www.texasbar.com/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Archives&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=11531.

  • Stevenson, M. H. (1984). Determinants of low wages for women workers. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, T. L. P. (1992). The meaning of money revisited. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1987). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). Usual weekly earnings of wage and salary workers: Third quarter 2010.

  • Weinberg, D. H. (2004, May). Evidence from Census 2000 about earnings by detailed occupation for men and women. Downloaded August 29, 2013 from http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/censr-15.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, University of Mississippi, University, MS, 38677-1848, USA

    H. Kristl Davison

Authors
  1. H. Kristl Davison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Kristl Davison.

Additional information

I would like to thank Art Brief, Mike Burke, Ron Landis, Rob Folger, and Janet Ruscher for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davison, H.K. The Paradox of the Contented Female Worker: Why Are Women Satisfied with Lower Pay?. Employ Respons Rights J 26, 195–216 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-014-9238-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-014-9238-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation