Log in

Experimentally induced helper dispersal in colonially breeding cooperative cichlids

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ‘benefits of philopatry’ hypothesis states that helpers in cooperatively breeding species derive higher benefits from remaining home, instead of dispersing and attempting to breed independently. We tested experimentally whether dispersal options influence dispersal propensity in the cooperatively breeding Lake Tanganyika cichlids Neolamprologus pulcher and N. savoryi. Cooperative groups of these fishes breed in densely packed colonies, surrounded by unoccupied, but apparently suitable breeding habitat. Breeding inside colonies and living in groups seems to benefit individuals, for example by early detection and deterrence of predators. We show that despite a slight preference of both species for habitat with a higher stone cover, 40% of the preferred habitat remained unoccupied. On average, the colonies contained a higher number of (1) predators of adults, juveniles and eggs, (2) shelter competitors, and (3) other species including potential food competitors, compared to the outside colony habitat. Apparently, habitat differences cannot explain why these cichlids breed in colonies. Accordingly, dispersal may not be limited by a lack of suitable breeding shelters, but by the relatively higher risk of establishing an outside- compared to a within-colony breeding territory. To test whether cichlids prefer within- to outside-colony breeding territories, we provided breeding shelters inside the colony and at the colony edge and studied helper dispersal. As expected, significantly more shelters were occupied within the colony compared to the edge. New breeding pairs with several helpers occupied these shelters. We conclude that although breeding habitat is plentiful outside the colonies, helpers delay dispersal to obtain a higher quality breeding position within the group or colony eventually, or they disperse in groups. Our results suggest that (1) group augmentation and Allee effects are generally important for dispersal decisions in cooperatively breeding cichlids, consistent with the ‘benefits of philopatry hypothesis’, and (2) habitat saturation cannot fully explain delayed dispersal in these species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allee WC (1951) The social life of animals. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold KE (2000) Group mobbing behaviour and nest defence in a cooperatively breeding Australian bird. Ethology 106:385–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balshine S, Leach B, Neat F, Reid H, Taborsky M, Werner N (2001) Correlates of group size in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Neolamprologus pulcher). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:134–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balshine-Earn S, Neat FC, Reid H, Taborsky M (1998) Paying to stay or paying to breed? Field evidence for direct benefits of hel** behavior in a cooperatively breeding fish. Behav Ecol 9:432–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmüller R, Heg D, Peer K, Taborsky M (2005a) Extended safe havens and between-group dispersal of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Behaviour 142:1643–1667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmüller R, Heg D, Taborsky M (2005b) Helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid stay and pay or disperse and breed, depending on ecological constraints. Proc Royal Soc Lond B 272:325–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth DJ (1992) Larval settlement patterns and preferences by domino damselfish Dascyllus albisella Gill. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 155:85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth DJ, Wellington G (1998) Settlement preferences in coral-reef fishes: effects on patterns of adult and juvenile distributions, individual fitness and population structure. Austr J Ecol 23:274–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brichard P (1997) Atlas der Tanganjikasee cichliden, Band 1. Bede-Verlag, Ruhmannsfelden

    Google Scholar 

  • Brichard P (1999) Atlas der Tanganjikasee cichliden, Band 2. Bede-Verlag, Ruhmannsfelden

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer L, Heg D, Taborsky M (2005) Experimental evidence for helper effects in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Behav Ecol 16:667–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buston P (2003) Forcible eviction and prevention of recruitment in the clown anemonefish. Behav Ecol 14:576–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choe JC, Crespi BJ (1997) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Courchamp F, Clutton-Brock T, Grenfell B (1999a) Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends Ecol Evol 14:405–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Courchamp F, Grenfell B, Clutton-Brock T (1999b) Population dynamics of obligate cooperators. Proc Royal Soc Lond B 266:557–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courchamp F, Grenfell BT, Clutton-Brock TH (2000) Impact of natural enemies on obligately cooperative breeders. Oikos 91:311–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2002) Statistical computing. An introduction to data analysis using S-plus. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Danchin E, Heg D, Doligez B (2001) Public information and breeding habitat selection. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal: individual, population, and community. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 243–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierkes P, Heg D, Taborsky M, Skubic E, Achmann R (2005) Genetic relatedness in groups is sex-specific and declines with age of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Ecol Lett 8:968–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duplessis MA (1992) Obligate cavity roosting as a constraint on dispersal of green (red-billed) woodhoopoes – consequences for philopatry and the likelihood of inbreeding. Oecologia 90:205–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST (1995) An evolutionary theory of the family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:8092–8099

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Field J, Shreeves G, Sumner S (1999) Group size, queuing and hel** decisions in facultatively eusocial hover wasps. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:378–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gashagaza MM (1988) Feeding activity of a Tanganyikan cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi. Afr Study Monogr 9:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldizen AW, Putland DA, Robertson KA (2002) Dispersal strategies in Tasmanian native hens (Gallinula mortierii). Behav Ecol 13:328–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene CM, Stamps JA (2001) Habitat selection at low population densities. Ecology 82:2091–2100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchwell BJ, Komdeur J (2000) Ecological constraints, life history traits and the evolution of cooperative breeding. Anim Behav 59:1079–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heg D, Bachar Z (2006) Cooperative breeding in the Lake Tanganyika cichlid Julidochromis ornatus. Environ Biol Fish 76:265–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heg D, Bachar Z, Brouwer L, Taborsky M (2004) Predation risk is an ecological constraint for helper dispersal in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Proc Royal Soc Lond B271:2367–2374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heg D, Bachar Z, Taborsky M (2005a) Cooperative breeding and group structure in the Lake Tanganyika cichlid Neolamprologus savoryi. Ethology 111:1017–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heg D, Brouwer L, Bachar Z, Taborsky M (2005b) Large group size yields group stability in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher. Behaviour 142:1615–1641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heg D, Bergmüller R, Bonfils D, Otti O, Bachar Z, Burri R, Heckel G, Taborsky M (2006) Cichlids do not adjust reproductive skew to the availability of independent breeding options. Behav Ecol 17:419–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinsohn R, Dunn P, Legge S, Double M (2000) Coalitions of relatives and reproductive skew in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs. Proc Royal Soc Lond B 267:243–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig WD, Dickinson JL (2004) Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig WD, Pitelka FA, Carmen WJ, Mumme RL, Stanback MT (1992) The evolution of delayed dispersal in cooperative breeders. Quart Rev Biol 67:111–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler U (1998) Zur Struktur und Evolution des Sozialsystems von Neolamprologus multifasciatus (Cichlidae, Pisces), dem kleinsten Schneckenbuntbarsch des Tanganjikasees. Shaker Verlag, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  • Komdeur J (1992) Importance of habitat saturation and territory quality for evolution of cooperative breeding in the seychelles warbler. Nature 358:493–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komdeur J (1994) Experimental evidence for hel** and hindering by previous offspring in the cooperative-breeding seychelles warbler Acrocephalus sechellensis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komdeur J, Edelaar P (2001) Male seychelles warblers use territory budding to maximize lifetime fitness in a saturated environment. Behav Ecol 12:706–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konings A (1998) Tanganyika cichlids in their natural habitat. Cichlid, El Paso

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo T (1986) Feeding habits of Lamprologus savoryi (Teleostei: Cichlidae) with reference to its social behaviour. Physiol Ecol 23:1–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kudo SI, Ishibashi E, Makino S (1995) Reproductive and subsocial behaviour in the ovoviviparous leaf beetle Gonioctena sibirica (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Ecol Entomol 20:367–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurki H, Vuorinen I, Bosma E, Bwebwa D (1999) Spatial and temporal changes in copepod zooplankton communities of Lake Tanganyika. Hydrobiol 407:105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuwamura T (1997) The evolution of parental care and mating systems among Tanganyikan cichlids. In: Kawanabe H, Hori M, Nagoshi M (eds) Fish communities in Lake Tanganyika. Kyoto University Press, Kyoto, pp 59–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligon JD, Ligon SH, Ford HA (1991) An experimental study of the bases of male philopatry in the cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus. Ethology 87:134–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limberger D (1983) Pairs and harems in a cichlid fish, Lamprologus brichardi. Z Tierpsychol 62:115–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Macedo RH, Bianchi CA (1997) Communal breeding in tropical guira cuckoos Guira guira: sociality in the absence of a saturated habitat. J Avian Biol 28:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruett-Jones SG, Lewis MJ (1990) Sex ratio and habitat limitation promote delayed dispersal in superb fairy-wrens. Nature 348:541–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasa OAE (1987) The dwarf mongoose: a study of behavior and social structure in relation to ecology in a small, social carnivore. Adv Study Behav 17:121–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skubic E, Taborsky M, McNamara JM, Houston AI (2004) When to parasitize? A dynamic optimization model of reproductive strategies in a cooperative breeder. J Theor Biol 227:487–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey PB, Koenig WD (1990) Cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey PB, Ligon JD (1987) Territory quality and dispersal options in the acorn woodpecker, and a challenge to the habitat-saturation model of cooperative breeding. Am Nat 130:654–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey PB, Ligon JD (1991) The benefits-of-philopatry hypothesis for the evolution of cooperative breeding – variation in territory quality and group size effects. Am Nat 137:831–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps JA (1988) Conspecific attraction and aggregation in territorial species. Am Nat 131:329–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps JA (2001) Habitat selection by dispersers: integrating proximate and ultimate approaches. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal: individual, population, and community. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 230–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens PA, Sutherland WJ (1999) Consequences of the Allee effect for behaviour, ecology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 14:401–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stiver KA, Dierkes P, Taborsky M, Balshine S (2004) Dispersal patterns and status change in a co-operatively breeding cichlid: evidence from microsatellite analyses and behavioural observations. J Fish Biol 65:91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiver KA, Fitzpatrick J, Desjardins JK, Balshine S (2006) Sex differences in rates of territory joining and inheritance in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish. Anim Behav 71:449–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweatman HPA (1983) Influence of conspecifics on choice of settlement sites by larvae of two pomacentrid fishes (Dascyllus aruanus and D. reticulatus) on coral reefs. Mar Biol 75:222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweatman HPA (1985) The influence of adults of some coral reef fishes on larval recruitment. Ecol Monogr 55:469–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky M (1984) Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi: their costs and benefits. Anim Behav 32:1236–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky M (1994) Sneakers, satellites, and helpers: parasitic and cooperative behavior in fish reproduction. Adv Study Behav 23:1–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taborsky M, Limberger D (1981) Helpers in fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:143–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts EA, Reeve HK (2003) Benefits of foundress associations in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus: increased productivity and survival, but no assurance of fitness returns. Behav Ecol 14:510–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner NY, Balshine S, Leach B, Lotem A (2003) Hel** opportunities and space segregation in cooperatively breeding cichlids. Behav Ecol 14:749–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank C. Kapasa, H. Phiri, R. Shapola, L. Makasa, D. Sinyinza and C. Lukwesa from the Department of Fisheries, Zambia Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives for their continuous support of our project. We thank the members of the Lake Tanganyika Diving Expeditions 2002 and 2003 for their assistance. We are grateful to Rolf Eggler, Susanne Maurer and Peter Stettler for logistical support and Ralph Bergmüller and anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript. The project was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF grant 3100-064396 to M.T.). D.H. is supported by SNF grant 3100A0-108473. The experiments conducted in this study comply with the current laws of the country, Zambia, in which they were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Heg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heg, D., Heg-Bachar, Z., Brouwer, L. et al. Experimentally induced helper dispersal in colonially breeding cooperative cichlids. Environ Biol Fish 83, 191–206 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-007-9317-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-007-9317-3

Keywords

Navigation