SpringerLink
Log in

Deficits in the electroretinogram in neovascular age-related macular degeneration and changes during photodynamic therapy

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the deficits in four electroretinography (ERG) modalities in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). To describe the changes in these parameters during a course of verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT).

Methods

Pattern (PERG), multifocal (mfERG) (19 segment simplified test protocol), flash ERG and flicker ERG were performed in patients with active neovascular AMD before PDT and compared to fellow eye controls using paired t-tests. Changes in ERG parameters during the 12 month treatment course were visualised using 95% confidence intervals of the median difference. The statistical significance of any changes was quantified using Wilcoxon signed ranks tests.

Results

Fifty patients were recruited and followed. At presentation all ERG amplitudes were reduced with greater reductions in focal as opposed to global test protocols (P < 0.05). Over the 12 month course of PDT, PERG P50 amplitude showed a general downward trend and latency remained unchanged. mfERG p1 amplitude density showed an upward trend at six months before returning to baseline by 12 months. mfERG ring 2 amplitude density was significantly increased at 12 months compared to baseline (P = 0.010). Flicker ERG latency was significantly increased at six months compared to baseline (P = 0.015).

Discussion

The simplified mfERG protocol was tolerated by this patient group, however, they found the full test protocol demanding. Large deficits in the retinal ERG function occur in neovascular AMD and involve retinal locations adjacent to as well as overlying choroidal neovascularisation (CNV). After PDT there is an improvement in electro-retinal function in retinal locations overlying the CNV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rubin GS, Bressler NM (2002) Effects of Verteporfin therapy on contrast sensitivity – Results from the treatment of age-related macular degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) investigation – TAP Report No. 4. Retina 22:536–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. TAP Study Group (1999) Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation in age-related macular degeneration with verteporfin-TAP Report 1. Arch Ophthalmol 117:1329–1345

    Google Scholar 

  3. TAP Study Group (2001) Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation in age-related macular degeneration with Verteporfin-TAP Report 2. Arch Ophthalmol 119:198–207

    Google Scholar 

  4. TAP Study Group (2002) Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation in age-related macular degeneration with Verteporfin-TAP Report 3. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1443–1454

    Google Scholar 

  5. TAP Study Group (2002) Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation in age-related macular degeneration with Verteporfin-TAP Report 5. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1307–1314

    Google Scholar 

  6. TAP Study Group (2003) Improvement after Verteporfin therapy. Arch Ophthalmol 121:415

    Google Scholar 

  7. Celesia GG, Cone S, Kaufman D (1986) Effects of age and sex on pattern electroretinograms and and visual evoked potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 64:29

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson GR, Ortega JD, Girkin C et al (2002) Ageing-related changes in the multifocal electroretinogram. J Opt Soc Am A 19:185–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson GR, Leon-Ortega J, Rosenstiel CE et al (2001) Age-related changes in the multifocal electroretinogram of central vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42(4):381

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wright C, William D, Drasdo N et al (1985) The influence of age on the electroretinogram and visual evoked potential. Doc Ophthalmol 59:365–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Seiple W, Vajaranant T, Szlyk J et al (2003) Multifocal electroretinography as a function of age: the importance of normative values for older adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:1783–1792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heinemann-Vernaleken B, Palmowski A, Allgayer R et al (2001) Comparison of different high resolution multifocal electroretinogram recordings in patients with age-related maculopathy. Graef Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239:556–561

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang S, Wu D, Jiang F et al (2001) The multifocal electroretinogram in age-related maculopathies. Doc Ophthalmol 101:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li J, Tso MOM, Lam TT (2001) Reduced amplitude and delayed latency in foveal response of multifocal electroretinogram in early age related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 85(3):287–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jurklies B, Weismann M, Husing J et al (2002) Monitoring retinal function in neovascular maculopathy using multifocal electroretinography- early and long-term correlation with clinical findings. Graef Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240:244–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moschos MM, Panayotidis D, Theodossiadis G et al (2004) Assessment of macular function by multifocal electroretinogram in age-related macular degeneration before and after photodynamic therapy. J Fr Ophthalmol 27:1001–1006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Palmowski AM, Allgayer R, Heinemann-Vernaleken B et al (2002) Influence of photodynamic therapy in choroidal neovascularization on focal retinal function assessed with the multifocal electroretinogram and perimetry. Ophthalmology 109:1788–1792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang L, ** C, Wen F et al (2003) The changes of multifocal electroretinography in the early stage of photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularisation. Doc Ophthalmol 107(2):165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lai TYY, Chan W, Lam D (2004) Transient reduction in retinal function revealed by multifocal electroretinogram after photodynamic therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 137:826–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Neveu MM, Tufail A, Dowler JG, Holder GE (2006) A comparison of pattern and multifocal electroretinography in the evaluation of age-related macular degeneration and its treatment with photodynamic therapy. Doc Ophthalmol 113(2):71–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Michels S, Schmidt-Erfurth U (2003) Sequence of early vascular events after photodynamic therapy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:2147–2154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marmor M, Hood DC, Keating D et al (2003) Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). Doc Ophthalmol 106:105–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hagan RP, Fisher AC, Brown MC (2006) Examination of short binary sequences for mfERG recording. Doc Ophthalmol 113(1):21–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Heinemann-Vernaleken B, Palmowski AM, Allgayer R, Jurklies B (1999) Comparison of different high resolution multifocal ERG (MF-ERG) recordings in age related macular degeneration (AMD). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40(4):3773

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jurklies B, Weismann M, Bornfeld N (2000) Multifocal ERG in age-related macular degeneration with hard and soft drusen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(4):4749

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jurklies B, Weismann M, Bornfeld N (1999) Multifocal electretinography in age-related macular degeneration- changes in amplitude of the 1st order kernel. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40(4):1668

    Google Scholar 

  27. Parks S, Keating D, Evans AL (2000) Peripheral retinal dysfunction in Age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(4):847

    Google Scholar 

  28. Holopigian K, Seiple W, Greenstein V et al (1997) Relative effects of aging and age-related macular degeneration on peripheral visual function. Optom Vis Sci 74:152–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmidt-Erfurth UM, Elsner H, Terai N et al (2004) Effects of verteporfin on central visual field function. Ophthalmology 111:931–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jurklies B, Sutter E (2001) Reply to G. Rudolph and P. Kalpadakis: the role of fixation for reliable mfERG results. Graef Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240:876

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rudolph G, Kalpadakis P (2002) The role of fixation for reliable mfERG results. Graef Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240:874–875

    Google Scholar 

  32. Elsner H, Schmidt-Erfurth UM (2004) Analysis of fixation results after photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularisations. Ophthalmologe 99:620–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mennel S, Meyer CH (2005) Transient visual disturbance after photodynamic therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 139:748–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rogers AH, Martidis A, Greenberg PB et al (2002) Optical coherence tomography findings following photodynamic therapy of choroidal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol 134:566–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Royal Liverpool University Hospital Research and Development Fund and the St. Paul’s Eye Appeal for their financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Engineering, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, UK

    Alison M. Mackay, Malcolm C. Brown, Richard P. Hagan & Anthony C. Fisher

  2. Unit of Ophthalmology, Department of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Prescot Street, Liverpool, UK

    Ian Grierson

  3. St. Paul’s Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK

    Simon P. Harding

Authors
  1. Alison M. Mackay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Malcolm C. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard P. Hagan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anthony C. Fisher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ian Grierson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Simon P. Harding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon P. Harding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mackay, A.M., Brown, M.C., Hagan, R.P. et al. Deficits in the electroretinogram in neovascular age-related macular degeneration and changes during photodynamic therapy. Doc Ophthalmol 115, 69–76 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-007-9056-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-007-9056-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation