Log in

A comparison of multiscale methods for elliptic problems in porous media flow

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Computational Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We review and perform comparison studies for three recent multiscale methods for solving elliptic problems in porous media flow; the multiscale mixed finite-element method, the numerical subgrid upscaling method, and the multiscale finite-volume method. These methods are based on a hierarchical strategy, where the global flow equations are solved on a coarsened mesh only. However, for each method, the discrete formulation of the partial differential equations on the coarse mesh is designed in a particular fashion to account for the impact of heterogeneous subgrid structures of the porous medium. The three multiscale methods produce solutions that are mass conservative on the underlying fine mesh. The methods may therefore be viewed as efficient, approximate fine-scale solvers, i.e., as an inexpensive alternative to solving the elliptic problem on the fine mesh. In addition, the methods may be utilized as an alternative to upscaling, as they generate mass-conservative solutions on the coarse mesh. We therefore choose to also compare the multiscale methods with a state-of-the-art upscaling method – the adaptive local–global upscaling method, which may be viewed as a multiscale method when coupled with a mass-conservative downscaling procedure. We investigate the properties of all four methods through a series of numerical experiments designed to reveal differences with regard to accuracy and robustness. The numerical experiments reveal particular problems with some of the methods, and these will be discussed in detail along with possible solutions. Next, we comment on implementational aspects and perform a simple analysis and comparison of the computational costs associated with each of the methods. Finally, we apply the three multiscale methods to a dynamic two-phase flow case and demonstrate that high efficiency and accurate results can be obtained when the subgrid computations are made part of a preprocessing step and not updated, or updated infrequently, throughout the simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aarnes, J.E.: On the use of a mixed multiscale finite element method for greater flexibility and increased speed or improved accuracy in reservoir simulation. Multiscale Model. Simul. 2(3), 421–439 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Aarnes, J.E., Krogstad, S., Lie, K.A.: A hierarchical multiscale method for two-phase flow based upon mixed finite elements and nonuniform coarse grids. Multiscale Model. Simul. 5(2), 337–363 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Aarnes, J.E., Krogstad, S., Lie, K.A.: Multiscale mixed/mimetic methods on corner-point grids. Comput. Geosci. doi:10.1007/s10596-007-9072-8 (2008)

  4. Aarnes, J.E., Lie, K.A.: Toward reservoir simulation on geological grid models. In: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery. EAGE, Cannes, France (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arbogast, T.: Numerical subgrid upscaling of two-phase flow in porous media. In: Numerical treatment of multiphase flows in porous media (Bei**g, 1999). Lecture Notes in Phys., vol. 552, pp. 35–49. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Arbogast, T.: Implementation of a locally conservative numerical subgrid upscaling scheme for two-phase Darcy flow. Comput. Geosci. 6(3-4), 453–481 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Arbogast, T.: Analysis of a two-scale, locally conservative subgrid upscaling for elliptic problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 42(2), 576–598 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Arbogast, T., Minkoff, S.E., Keenan, P.T.: An operator-based approach to upscaling the pressure equation. In: V.N.B. et al. (ed.) Computational Methods in Water Resources XII, vol. 1, pp. 405–412. Southampton, U.K. (1998)

  9. Brezzi, F.: Interacting with the subgrid world. In: Numerical analysis 1999 (Dundee), pp. 69–82. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brezzi, F., Fortin, M.: Mixed and hybrid finite element methods. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, vol. 15. Springer-Verlag, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brezzi, F., Jr., J.D., Marini, L.D.: Two families of mixed elements for second order elliptic problems. Numer. Math. 47, 217–235 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, A., Hou, T.: A mixed multiscale finite element method for elliptic problems with oscillating coefficients. Math. Comp. 72(242), 541–576 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, Y., Durlofsky, L.J.: Adaptive local-global upscaling for general flow scenarios in heterogeneous formations. Transp. Porous Media 62(2), 157–182 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, Y., Durlofsky, L.J., Gerritsen, M., Wen, X.H.: A coupled local-global upscaling approach for simulating flow in highly heterogeneous formations. Adv. Water Resour. 26(10), 1041–1060 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Christie, M.A., Blunt, M.J.: Tenth SPE comparative solution project: A comparison of upscaling techniques. SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 4(4), 308–317 (2001). http://www.spe.org/csp/

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deutsch, C.V., Journel, A.G.: GSLIB: Geostatistical software library and user’s guide, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Durlofsky, L.J.: Numerical calculations of equivalent gridblock permeability tensors for heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour. Res. 27(5), 699–708 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Efendiev, Y., Ginting, V., Hou, T., Ewing, R.: Accurate multiscale finite element methods for two-phase flow simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 220(1), 155–174 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Gautier, Y., Blunt, M.J., Christie, M.A.: Nested gridding and streamline-based simulation for fast reservoir performance prediction. Comput. Geosci. 3(3–4), 295–320 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Hou, T.Y., Wu, X.H.: A multiscale finite element method for elliptic problems in composite materials and porous media. J. Comput. Phys. 134(1), 169–189 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Hughes, T., Feijoo, G., Mazzei, L., Quincy, J.: The variational multiscale method - a paradigm for computational mechanics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 166, 3–24 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Jenny, P., Lee, S.H., Tchelepi, H.A.: Multi-scale finite-volume method for elliptic problems in subsurface flow simulation. J. Comput. Phys. 187(1), 47–67 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Jenny, P., Lee, S.H., Tchelepi, H.A.: Adaptive multiscale finite-volume method for multiphase flow and transport in porous media. Multiscale Model. Simul. 3(1), 50–64 (2004/05)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Jenny, P., Lee, S.H., Tchelepi, H.A.: Adaptive fully implicit multi-scale finite-volume methods for multi-phase flow and transport in heterogeneous porous media. J. Comput. Phys. 217(2), 627–641 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Kippe, V., Aarnes, J., Lie, K.A.: Multiscale finite-element methods for elliptic problems in porous media flow. In: CMWR XVI – Computational Methods in Water Resources. Copenhagen, Denmark, June, 2006 (2006). http://proceedings.cmwr-xiv.org/

  26. Lunati, I., Jenny, P.: Multiscale finite-volume method for compressible multiphase flow in porous media. J. Comput. Phys. 216(2), 616–636 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Matache, A.M., Schwab, C.: Homogenization via p-FEM for problems with microstructure. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spectral and High Order Methods (ICOSAHOM 1998) (Herzliya), vol. 33, pp. 43–59 (2000)

  28. Raviart, P.A., Thomas, J.M.: A mixed finite element method for 2nd order elliptic problems. In: Mathematical aspects of finite element methods (Proc. Conf., Consiglio Naz. delle Ricerche (C.N.R.), Rome, 1975). Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 606, pp. 292–315. Springer, Berlin (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sangalli, G.: Capturing small scales in elliptic problems using a residual-free bubbles finite element method. Multiscale Model. Simul. 1(3), 485–503 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Stüben, K.: Multigrid, chap. Algebraic Multigrid (AMG): An Introduction with Applications. Academic (2000)

  31. Wen, X.H., Durlofsky, L.J., Chen, Y.: Efficient 3D imple mentation of local-global upscaling for reservoir simulation. SPE J. 11(4), 443–453 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Knut-Andreas Lie.

Additional information

The research is funded by the Research Council of Norway under grant nos. 152732 and 158908.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kippe, V., Aarnes, J.E. & Lie, KA. A comparison of multiscale methods for elliptic problems in porous media flow. Comput Geosci 12, 377–398 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-007-9074-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-007-9074-6

Keywords

Navigation