Abstract
A deep eutectic solvent composed of choline chloride (ChCl) and urea has been recently introduced as a promising cellulose compatible medium that enables e.g. fibre spinning. This paper clarifies the influence of such a solvent system on the structure and chemical composition of the cellulosic pulp fibres. Special emphasis was placed on the probable alterations of the chemical composition due to the dissolution of the fibre components and/or due to the chemical derivatisation taking place during the DES treatment. Possible changes in fibre morphology were studied with atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Chemical compositions of pulp fibres were determined from the carbohydrate content, and by analysing the elemental content. Detailed structural characterisation of the fibres was carried out using spectroscopic methods; namely X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, solid state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Raman Spectroscopy. No changes with respect to fibre morphology were revealed and negligible changes in the carbohydrate composition were noted. The most significant change was related to the nitrogen content of the pulp after the DES treatment. Comprehensive examination using spectroscopic methods revealed that the nitrogen originated from strongly bound ChCl residuals that could not be removed with a mild ethanol washing procedure. According to Raman spectroscopic data and methylene blue adsorption tests, the cationic groups of ChCl seems to be attached to the anionic groups of pulp by electrostatic forces. These findings will facilitate the efficient utilisation of DES as a cellulose compatible medium without significantly affecting the native fibre structure.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10570-017-1587-0/MediaObjects/10570_2017_1587_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10570-017-1587-0/MediaObjects/10570_2017_1587_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10570-017-1587-0/MediaObjects/10570_2017_1587_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10570-017-1587-0/MediaObjects/10570_2017_1587_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10570-017-1587-0/MediaObjects/10570_2017_1587_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10570-017-1587-0/MediaObjects/10570_2017_1587_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10570-017-1587-0/MediaObjects/10570_2017_1587_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10570-017-1587-0/MediaObjects/10570_2017_1587_Fig8_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10570-017-1587-0/MediaObjects/10570_2017_1587_Fig9_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott AP, Capper G, Davies DL et al (2003) Novel solvent properties of choline chloride/urea mixtures. Chem Commun 99:70–71. https://doi.org/10.1039/b210714g
Abbott AP, Bell TJ, Handa S, Stoddart B (2006) Cationic functionalisation of cellulose using a choline based ionic liquid analogue. Green Chem 8:784–786. https://doi.org/10.1039/B605258D
Agarwal UP, Reiner RS, Ralph SA (2010) Cellulose I crystallinity determination using FT-Raman spectroscopy: univariate and multivariate methods. Cellulose 17:721–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9420-z
Akutsu H (1981) Direct determination by Raman scattering of the conformation of the choline group in phospholipid bilayers. Biochemistry 20:7359–7366. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00529a006
Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Fridlund B, Gram A et al (2003) Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of > 10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:10158–10163. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1733835100
Beamson G, Briggs D (1993) Cellulose spectra in high resolution XPS of organic polymers: the scienta ESCA300 database. J Chem Educ 70:A25. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed070pA25.5
Cai J, Zhang L (2005) Rapid dissolution of cellulose in LiOH/urea and NaOH/urea aqueous solutions. Macromol Biosci 5:539–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200400222
Edwards HG, Farwell DW, Webster D (1997) FT Raman microscopy of untreated natural plant fibres. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 53A:2383–2392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-1425(97)00178-9
Ekman K, Eklund V, Fors J et al (1984) Regenerated cellulose fibers from cellulose carbamate solutions. Lenzing Ber 57:38–40
Eronen P, Österberg M, Jääskeläinen A-S (2009) Effect of alkaline treatment on cellulose supramolecular structure studied with combined confocal Raman spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy. Cellulose 16:167–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-008-9259-8
Ershova O, da Costa EV, Fernandes AJS et al (2012) Effect of urea on cellulose degradation under conditions of alkaline pul**. Cellulose 19:2195–2204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9791-4
Fu F, Xu M, Wang H et al (2015) Improved synthesis of cellulose carbamates with minimum urea based on an easy scale-up method. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3:1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00219
Gierlinger N, Schwanninger M, Reinecke A, Burgert I (2006) Molecular changes during tensile deformation of single wood fibers followed by Raman microscopy. Biomacromolecules 7:2077–2081. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060236g
Harper RJ Jr, Stone RL (1986) Cationic cotton plus easy care. Text Chem Color 18:33–35
Ho TTT, Zimmermann T, Hauert R, Caseri W (2011) Preparation and characterization of cationic nanofibrillated cellulose from etherification and high-shear disintegration processes. Cellulose 18:1391–1406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9591-2
Johansson LS, Campbell JM (2004) Reproducible XPS on biopolymers: cellulose studies. Surf Interface Anal 36:1018–1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.1827
Johansson L, Tammelin T, Campbell JM et al (2011) Experimental evidence on medium driven cellulose surface adaptation demonstrated using nanofibrillated cellulose. Soft Matter 7:10917. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1sm06073b
Keuleers R, Desseyn HO, Rousseau B, Van Alsenoy C (1999) Vibrational analysis of urea. J Phys Chem A 103:4621. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp984180z
Kim JY, Choi H-M (2014) Cationization of periodate-oxidized cotton cellulose with choline chloride. Cellul Chem Technol 48:25–32
Lahtinen P, Liukkonen S, Pere J et al (2014) A Comparative study of fibrillated fibers from different mechanical and chemical pulps. BioResources 9:2115–2127
Larsson PT, Hult E, Wickholm K et al (1999) CPrMAS 13 C-NMR spectroscopy applied to structure and interaction studies on cellulose I. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 15:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-2040(99)00044-2
Lewandowska AE, Soutis C, Savage L, Eichhorn SJ (2015) Carbon fibres with ordered graphitic-like aggregate structures from a regenerated cellulose fibre precursor. Compos Sci Technol 116:50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.05.009
Lobo HR, Singh BS, Shankarling GS (2012) Deep eutectic solvents and glycerol: a simple, environmentally benign and efficient catalyst/reaction media for synthesis of N- aryl phthalimide derivatives. Green Chem Lett Rev 5:487–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2012.669500
Palit D, Moulik SP (2000) Adsorption of methylene blue on cellulose from its own solution and its mixture with methyl orange. Indian J Chem Sect A Inorg Phys Theor Anal Chem 39:611–617
Park JH, Oh KW, Choi HM (2013) Preparation and characterization of cotton fabrics with antibacterial properties treated by crosslinkable benzophenone derivative in choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents. Cellulose 20:2101–2114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9957-8
Samanta AK, Kar TR, Mukhopadhyay A et al (2015) Studies on dyeing process variables for salt free reactive dyeing of glycine modified cationized cotton muslin fabric. J Inst Eng Ser E 96:31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40034-015-0062-4
Segal L, Eggerton FV (1961) Some aspects of the reaction between urea and cellulose. Text Res J 31:460–471
Sirviö JA, Visanko M, Liimatainen H (2015) Deep eutectic solvent system based on choline chloride-urea as a pre-treatment for nanofibrillation of wood cellulose. Green Chem 17:3401–3406. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5GC00398A
Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R et al (2012) NREL/TP-510-42618 analytical procedure—determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in Biomass. Lab Anal Proced 17
Suchy M, Hakala T, Kangas H et al (2009) Effects of commercial cellobiohydrolase treatment on fiber strength and morphology of bleached hardwood pulp. Holzforschung 63:731–736. https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2009.104
Suopajärvi T, Sirviö JA, Liimatainen H (2017) Nanofibrillation of deep eutectic solvent-treated paper and board cellulose pulps. Carbohydr Polym 169:167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.009
Swerin A, Odberg L, Lindstrbm T, Pulp S (1990) Deswelling of hardwood kraft pulp fibers by cationic polymers. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 5:188–196
Tenhunen T, Hakalahti M, Kouko J et al (2016) Method for forming pulp fiber yarns developed by a design driven process. BioResources 11:2492–2503. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.1.2492-2503
Wang S, Peng X, Zhong L et al (2015) Choline chloride/urea as an effective plasticizer for production of cellulose films. Carbohydr Polym 117:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.113
Wen Q, Chen JX, Tang YL et al (2015) Assessing the toxicity and biodegradability of deep eutectic solvents. Chemosphere 132:63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.02.061
Wiley JH, Atalla R (1987) Band assignments in the Raman-spectra of celluloses. Carbohydr Res 160:113–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(87)80306-3
Willberg-Keyriläinen P, Hiltunen J, Ropponen J (2017) Production of cellulose carbamate using urea-based deep eutectic solvents. Cellulose. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1465-9
Willför S, Pranovich A, Tamminen T et al (2009) Carbohydrate analysis of plant materials with uronic acid-containing polysaccharides-A comparison between different hydrolysis and subsequent chromatographic analytical techniques. Ind Crops Prod 29:571–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.11.003
Xu GC, Ding JC, Han RZ et al (2016) Enhancing cellulose accessibility of corn stover by deep eutectic solvent pretreatment for butanol fermentation. Bioresour Technol 203:364–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.002
Yin C, Li J, Xu Q et al (2007) Chemical modification of cotton cellulose in supercritical carbon dioxide: synthesis and characterization of cellulose carbamate. Carbohydr Polym 67:147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.05.010
Zhang Q, De Oliveira Vigier K, Royer S, Jerome F (2012) Deep eutectic solvents: syntheses, properties and applications. Chem Soc Rev 41:7108–7146. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35178a
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation (TEKES) for funding the work via Design Driven Value Chains in the World of Cellulose 2.0 project. The Academy of Finland (Project ID 300367) is acknowledged for enabling the research mobility of T.T. to the University of Exeter, UK. Unto Tapper (VTT) is thanked for the SEM imaging, Atte Mikkelson, Ritva Heinonen and Marita Ikonen (VTT) for the chemical analysis and Robertus Nugroho (Aalto University) for the AFM imaging.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tenhunen, TM., Lewandowska, A.E., Orelma, H. et al. Understanding the interactions of cellulose fibres and deep eutectic solvent of choline chloride and urea. Cellulose 25, 137–150 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1587-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1587-0