Abstract
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has grown on the corporate agenda and is at the heart of today’s corporate culture. While much research has examined CSR strategies and effects, the effects of post-crisis CSR communication have received relatively little academic attention. Therefore, this paper uses two experimental studies to examine several key contingency factors that influence consumers’ responses to post-crisis CSR initiatives. Results suggest that consumers demonstrate more favorable responses when a company launches a CSR initiative congruent with the crisis issue, or when the crisis is the result of an accident rather than a transgression. Further, the congruence between the crisis issue and the pre-crisis CSR initiative moderates the consistency effects between pre- and post-crisis initiatives. Such findings should be understood by considering the mediating role of corporate CSR motives’ consumer attributions, which was evidenced in this study. This study theoretically contributes to an improved understanding of the underlying mechanism of the post-crisis CSR information process and managerially contributes to the strategic development of effective post-crisis CSR initiatives given a particular situation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barone, M. J., Miyazaki, A. D., & Taylor, K. A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 248–262.
Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59, 46–53.
Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 69–83.
Cho, S., & Kim, Y. C. (2012). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a halo effect in issue management: Public response to negative news about pro-social local private companies. Asian Journal of Communication, 22(4), 372–385.
Cho, S. H., & Gower, K. K. (2006). Framing effect on the public’s response to crisis: Human interest frame and crisis type influencing responsibility and blame. Public Relations Review, 32(4), 420–422.
Coombs, T. W., & Holladay, S. J. (1996). Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study of crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 8, 279–295.
De Matos, C. A., & Rossi, C. A. V. (2007). Consumer reaction to product recalls: Factors influencing product judgment and behavioral intentions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(1), 109–116.
Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Letting people off the hook: When do good deeds excuse transgressions? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1618–1634.
Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. A. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.
Forehand, M. R., & Grier, S. (2003). When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349–356.
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1–31.
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24, 191–205.
Groza, M. D., Pronschinske, M. R., & Walker, M. (2011). Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 639–652.
Gupta, S., & Pirsch, J. (2006). The company-cause-customer fit decision in cause-related marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(6), 314–326.
Hastie, R. (1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 44–56.
Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [white paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
Janssen, C., Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2015). Corporate crises in the age of corporate responsibility. Business Horizons, 58(2), 183–192.
Kim, J., Kim, H. J., & Cameron, G. T. (2009). Making nice may not matter: The interplay of crisis type, response type, and crisis issue on perceived organizational responsibility. Public Relations Review, 35, 86–88.
Kim, S. (2013). Does corporate advertising work in a crisis? An examination of inoculation theory. Journal of Marketing Communications, 19(4), 293–305.
Kim, S., & Choi, S. M. (2014). Is corporate advertising effective in a crisis? The effects of crisis type and evaluative tone of news coverage. Journal of Promotion Management, 20, 97–114.
Kim, Y. (2011). The double-edged sword of corporate social responsibility campaigns: Examining the effects of congruence and identification in product-failure and moral crises. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
Klein, J., & Dawar, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product-harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 203–217.
Lange, D., & Washburn, N. T. (2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 300–326.
Lin, C. P., Chen, S. C., Chiu, C. K., & Lee, W. Y. (2011). Understanding purchase intention during product-harm crises: Moderating effects of perceived corporate ability and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 455–471.
Lynn, M. (2015). Corporate social responsibility has become a racket—and a dangerous one. The Telegraph. Retrieved April 5, 2015 from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/11896546/Corporate-Social-Responsibility-has-become-a-racket-and-a-dangerous-one.html.
MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48–65.
Piliavin, J. A., & Charng, H. W. (1990). Altruism: A review of recent theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 27–65.
Pracejus, J. W., & Olsen, G. D. (2004). The role of brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 635–640.
Rifon, N. J., Choi, S. M., Trimble, C. S., & Li, H. (2004). Congruence effects in sponsorship: The mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 29–42.
Seeger, M. W., & Ulmer, R. R. (2001). Virtuous responses to organizational crisis: Aaron Feuerstein and Milt Cole. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 369–376.
Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 936–960.
Snyder, P., Hall, M., Robertson, J., Jasinski, T., & Miller, J. S. (2006). Ethical rationality: A strategic approach to organizational crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(4), 371–383.
Speed, R., & Thompson, P. (2000). Determinants of sports sponsorship response. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 226–238.
Tang, Z., Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2012). How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR-financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1274–1303.
Till, B. D., & Busler, M. (2000). The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent, and brand beliefs. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 1–13.
Till, B. D., & Nowak, L. I. (2000). Toward effective use of cause-related marketing alliances. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(7), 472–484.
Tombs, S., & Smith, D. (1995). Corporate social responsibility and crisis management: The democratic organisation and crisis prevention. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 3(3), 135–148.
Vanhamme, J., Swaen, V., Berens, G., & Janssen, C. (2015). Playing with fire: Aggravating and buffering effects of ex ante CSR communication campaigns for companies facing allegations of social irresponsibility. Marketing Letters, 26(4), 565–578.
Vassilikopoulou, A., Siomkos, G., Chatzipanagiotou, K., & Pantouvakis, A. (2009). Product-harm crisis management: Time heals all wounds? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(3), 174–180.
Vergne, J., & Durand, R. (2010). The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: Conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 736–759.
Vermeulen, G. A. M., & Barkema, H. G. (2002). Pace, rhythm and scope: Process dependence in building a profitable multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 637–653.
Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 77–91.
Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (1998). A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: From skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 226–238.
Yoon, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377–390.
Zenisek, T. J. (1979). Corporate social responsibility: A conceptualization based on organizational literature. Academy of Management Review, 4(3), 359–368.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Study 1
Part A: Crisis Description
[Accident Crisis]
Last year was one of the toughest years for Company A, an information technology corporation. The company specializes in desktop and notebook computers, servers, network management software, printers, digital cameras, and calculators, as well as other technology-related products. However, CNN was the first to report that Company A was involved in polluting the Sierra Mac River last year. The pollution ultimately resulted from the spilling of phenol, an addictive chemical. Company A claimed that it had discovered a malfunctioning pipeline linking the phenol storage tank and the production line for phenolic rosins a few days before the accident. Company A replaced the pipeline, but the preparatory pipeline accidentally ruptured, and 30 tons of phenol poured into the Sierra Mac River that flows near Company A. The State was not set to file charges against Company A in view of the event’s accidental nature.
[Transgression Crisis]
Last year was one of the toughest years for Company A, an information technology corporation. The company specializes in desktop and notebook computers, servers, network management software, printers, digital cameras, and calculators, as well as other technology-related products. However, CNN was the first to report that Company A was involved in polluting the Sierra Mac River last year. The pollution ultimately resulted from the spilling of phenol, an addictive chemical. A few days before the accident occurred, Company A routinely inspected the pipeline linking the phenol storage tank with the production line for phenolic rosins, and inspectors found a crack in the pipeline. The company chose not to immediately repair the decrepit facilities, and continued using it for the next few days. Consequently, the pipeline ruptured and 30 tons of phenol poured into the Sierra Mac River that flows near Company A. The State was set to file charges in this event.
Part B: Abstract from Company A’s Corporate Responsibility Report
[Congruence]
Since dealing with the tremendous environmental disaster to the Sierra Mac River last year, as a company we have made every effort to be a more socially responsible corporation. For example, we have launched our latest environmental project to help water conservation. We have established an environmental defense fund and donated to Waterkeeper, a non-profit organization committed to protecting, improving, and enhancing the ecological, recreational, and community values of local rivers and their watersheds.
[Incongruence]
Since dealing with the tremendous environmental disaster to the Sierra Mac River last year, as a company we have made every effort to be a more socially responsible corporation. For example, we have launched our latest charity project to help underprivileged families. We have established poverty funds and donated to One Community, a non-profit organization committed to promoting children’s education among underprivileged families and improving the quality of their lives.
Study 2
Part A: Abstract from DreamTech, Inc.’s Corporate Responsibility Report, Published at the End of 2014
Since our company was founded, we have made every effort to be a socially responsible corporation. Our corporate social responsibility activities have long focused on environmental responsibility. For example, we launched our environmental care project to help with water conservation. We have established [an environmental defense fund and donated to “Waterkeeper Foundation,” a non-profit organization committed to protecting, improving, and enhancing the ecological, recreational, and community values of local rivers and their watersheds in develo** countries].
[a children’s education fund and donated to “Children’s Rights Foundation,” a non-profit organization committed to hel** promote children’s education among underprivileged families in develo** countries, and improving the quality of their lives].
Part B: News Story
CNN Report—On March 28, 2015, the Sierra Mac River received an influx of the toxic chemical phenol, an addictive chemical. The source of the phenol was traced back to a pipeline belonging to DreamTech Electro-Materials, Inc. Officials from DreamTech admitted to reporters that a few days before the accident occurred, their personnel had routinely inspected the pipeline that links the phenol storage tank with the production line for phenolic rosins. Their internal report identified a crack in the pipeline, but for reasons that company officials did not go into, the company took no immediate action to address the issue, and continued using it for the next few days. It would appear that as a consequence, the pipeline ruptured, and 30 tons of phenol waste poured into the Sierra Mac River that flows near the company.
Part C: Abstract from the Corporate Social Responsibility Page on DreamTech, Inc.’s Corporate Website Accessed Today
Since the phenol spill into the Sierra Mac River was first reported last month, DreamTech has made every effort to clean up the waste, and has doubled all inspections of factory facilities and workplace supervision. Additionally, we have recommitted to being a more socially responsible corporation in our community. For example, our latest charity project involves establishing [a watershed protection fund aimed at sustaining and enhancing watershed functions that affect the plant, animal, and human communities within the Sierra Mac River’s watershed boundaries].
[a child welfare fund aimed at providing protection, education, healthcare, and opportunities to disadvantaged children and their families within the Sierra Mac River’s watershed boundaries].
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, S., Choi, S.M. Congruence Effects in Post-crisis CSR Communication: The Mediating Role of Attribution of Corporate Motives. J Bus Ethics 153, 447–463 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3425-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3425-y