Abstract
There are many theories about organizations that are mutually inconsistent with each other, which explain phenomena to very similar extents. Most of them ignore the ethical dimension completely. In this paper I put forth the basic principles for a theory of decision-making in organizations, which integrates ethics in the core of the theory. It is based on the work of Juan Antonio Pérez López [1991, Teoría de la Acción humana en las organizaciones (Ediciones Rialp, Madrid), 1993, Fundamentos de la Dirección de Empresas (Ediciones Rialp, Madrid)] and is essentially a humanistic view of the interrelationships between people and its implications for organizational decision-making. I will first show that in any relationship between two people, the learning of the two is crucial for such a relationship to last; and then I will expand on the different aspects of that learning. This analysis will then be applied to the organizational context as a basis for organizational decision-making, Second, it applies the previous analysis to the organizational context as a basis for organizational decision making, showing how any decision in an organization needs to be analyzed on the basis of three criteria (short-run effectiveness, development of distinctive competence, and unity and identification with the organization) and how ethics is included in the last two.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson C. (1997) Values-based Management. Academy of Management Executive, 11(4):25–46
Argandoña, A.: 2007, ‹Integrating Ethics Into Action Theory and Organizational Theory’, Journal of Business Ethics, DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9340-x
Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D., Donaldson L. (1997) Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. Academy of Management Review, 22:20–47
DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. (1991) Introduction, in Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Donaldson L. (2002) Damned by Our Own Theories: Contradictions Between Theories and Management Education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(1):96–106
Elster J. 1983. Explaining Technical Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
Elster J. (1994) ‹Functional Explanation in Social Science’, in Martin M., McIntyre L. (eds) Readings in the Philosophy of Social Sciences. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Ferraro F., Pfeffer J., Sutton R. (2005) Economics Language and Assumptions: How Theories May Become Self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1):8–24
Frederick R. E. (2002) An Outline of Ethical Relativism and Ethical Absolutism, in Frederick R. E. (ed) A Companion to Business Ethics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 65–80
Frey, B.: 2003, ‹Corporate Governance: What Can We Learn from Public Governance?’ Working Paper, Institute for Empirical Economic Research, University of Zurich
Frey, B. and S. Meier: 2002, ‹Pro-social Behavior, Reciprocity or Both?’, CESIFO, Munich, Working Paper No. 750
George W. W. (1999) Mission Driven, Values Centered. Executive Excellence, 16(8):6 August
George W. W. (2001) Medtronic’s Chairman William George on How Mission-driven Companies Create Long-term Shareholder Value. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4):39–47
George, W. W.: 2003, Authentic Leadership: Rediscovering the Secrets to Creating Lasting Value (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco)
Ghoshal S. (2005) Bad Management Theories are Destroying Good Management Practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1):75–91
Grossman S., Hart O. (1983) An Analysis of the Principal-agent Problem. Econometrica, 51(1):7–45
Holmström B. (1979) Moral Hazard and Observability. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1):74–91
Jensen M. (1983) Organization Theory and Methodology. The Accounting Review, LVIII(2):319–339
Jensen M. (2000) ‹Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Objective Function’, in Beer M., Nohria N. (eds) Breaking the Code of Change. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Also in Journal of Corporate Finance, Fall 2001
Jensen M., Meckling B. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3:305–360
Lowenstein G. (1996) Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996. 65(2):272–292 March
March J., Olsen J. (1975) The Uncertainty of the Past: Organizational Learning under Ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research, 3:147–171
Marschak J., Radner R. (1972) Economic Theory of Teams. The Cowless Foundation, New Haven and London
McGregor D. (1966) Leadership and Motivation. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Melé D. (2003) The Challenge of Humanistic Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1):77–88
Meyer J., Rowan B. (1977) Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83:340–363
Nilakant V., Rao H. (1994) Agency Theory and Uncertainty in Organizations: An Evaluation. Organization Studies, 15(5):649–672
O’Donoghue T., Rabin M. (1999) Doing it Now or Later. American Economic Review, 89(1):103–124 March
Pérez López J. A. (1991) Teoría de la Acción humana en las organizaciones. Rialp, Madrid, Ediciones
Pérez López J. A. (1993) Fundamentos de la Dirección de Empresas. Ediciones Rialp, Madrid
Rosanas, J. M.: 2004, Bounded Rationality, Value Systems and Time Inconsistency of Preferences as Rational Foundations for the Concept of Trust, IESE Business School, Working Paper no. 567
Rosanas J. M., Velilla M. (2003) Loyalty and Trust as the Ethical Bases of Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 44:49–59
Ross S. (1973) The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem. American Economic Review, 63(2):134–139
Scott R. (1987) Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, New York
Selznick P. (1957) Leadership in Administration. University of California Press, Berkeley Los Angeles and London
Selznick P. (1996) Institutionalism, ‹Old’ and ‹New’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41:270–277
Sen A. (1977) Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6:317–344
Senge P. (2000) The Puzzles and Paradoxes of How Living Companies Create Wealth. in Beer M., Nohria N. (eds) Breaking the Code of Change. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, pp. 59–81
Simon H.: 1947, First Edition, 1997 Fourth Edition. Administrative Behavior (The Free Press, New York)
Yariv, L.: 2002, ‹I’ll See It When I Believe It – A Simple Model of Cognitive Consistency’, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper, No. 1352
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Josep M. Rosanas is professor of Accounting and Control and “Crèdit Andorrà” Chair of Markets, Organizations and Humanism, IESE Business School, University of Navarra, Spain. He is a Ph.D. in Accounting and Information Systems (Northwestern University, 1977), Doctor in Industrial Engineering (Polytechnical University of Catalonia, 1981) MBA (IESE, University of Navarra, 1971) and Nuclear Engineer (Polytechnic University of Catalonia, 1969). He is the author of several books and articles related with management control and ethics and has been consultant to many organizations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosanas, J.M. Beyond Economic Criteria: A Humanistic Approach to Organizational Survival. J Bus Ethics 78, 447–462 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9341-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9341-9