Abstract
Purpose
The selective treatment of internal mammary lymph nodes (IMNs) in breast cancer is controversial. The purpose of this research was to determine the subpopulation patients with high risk of internal mammary lymph nodes metastasis who received extended radical mastectomy without any preoperative treatment from 1956 to 2003 in China.
Patients and methods
1,679 Chinese patients were underwent extended radical mastectomy (ERM) between 1956 and 2003. Four individual variables were selected (tumor site, tumor size, the number of ALNs involvement, patient age),then classified by following standards: tumor site(lateral, central, medial),tumor size(T1:≤2 cm; T2:2 < T ≤ 5 cm, T3:>5 cm), ALNs(0,1–3,4–6, ≥7), age(≤35 y, 36–50 y, >50 y). Chi-square and binary logistic regression were used to analysis relationship of these variable and IMMs.
Results
The four individual variables were significantly associated with IMNs metastasis using univariate analysis. However, three individual variables except for tumor size independently impact the IMNs metastasis using multivariate analysis. The incidence of IMNs metastasis in patients with 4–6 and ≥7 positive ALNs was 28.1%, 41.5%. Within subgroup patients with medial tumor and positive ALNs, the incidence of IMNs metastasis was 23.6% for patients with 1–3 positive ALNs, and 47.5% for 4–6 positive ALNs, 38.7% for patients with ≥7 positive ALNs. The incidence of IMNs metastasis was 25.4% for patients with T3 tumor and younger than 35 y.
Conclusion
Patients with following conditions had high risk of IMNS metastasis: (1) patients with 4 or more positive ALNs. (2) patients with medial tumor and positive ALNs.(3) patients with T3 tumor and younger than 35 y. (4) patients with T2 tumor and positive ALNs.(5) patients with T2 tumor and medial tumor .The incidences of IMNS metastasis for those patients were more than 20%.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Handley R (1996) Natural history of breast cancer. In: Harris J, Lippman ME, Morrow M et al (eds) Diseases of the Breast. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, p 384
Veronesi U, Marubini E, Mariani L et al (1999) The dissection of internal mammary nodes does not improve the survival of breast cancer patients: 30-year results of a randomized trial. Eur J Cancer 35:1320–1325
Singletary SE, Allred C, Ashley P et al (2002) Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3628–36
Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Greco M et al (1985) Prognosis of breast cancer patients after mastectomy and dissection of internal mammary nodes. Ann Surg 202:702–707
Li KYY, Shen Z-Z (1984) An analysis of 1242 cases of extended radical mastectomy. Breast: Dis Breast 10:10–19
Gaffney DK, Tsodikov A, Wiggins CL (2003) Diminished survival in patients with inner versus outer quadrant breast cancers. J Clin Oncol 21:467–472
Lacour J, Bucalossi P, Cacers E et al (1976) Radical mastectomy versus radical mastectomy plus internal mammary dissection: Five year results of an international cooperative study. Cancer 37:206–214
Hojris I, Overgaard M, Christensen JJ, Overgaard J (1999) Morbidity and mortality of ischaemic heart disease in high-risk breast-cancer patients after adjuvant postmastectomy systemic treatment with or without radiotherapy: Analysis of DBCG 82b and 82c randomised trials. Lancet 354(9188):1425–1430
Overgaard M, Hansen PS, Overgaard J, Rose C, Andersson M, Bach F, Kjaer M, Gadeberg CC, Mouridsen HT, Jensen MB, Zedeler K, Andersson M (1997) Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 337(14):949–955
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, O., Wang, L., Shen, K. et al. Breast cancer subpopulation with high risk of internal mammary lymph nodes metastasis: analysis of 2,269 Chinese breast cancer patients treated with extended radical mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 107, 379–387 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9561-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9561-4