Abstract
Microbes are generally thought of as unicellular organisms, but we know that many microbes live as parts of biofilms—complex, surface-attached microbial communities numbering millions of cells. Some authors have recently argued in favour of reconceiving biofilms as biological entities in their own right. In particular, some have claimed that multispecies biofilms are evolutionary individuals (Doolittle in Biol Philos 28:351–378, 2013; Ereshefsky and Pedroso in PNAS USA 112(33): 10126–10132 2015). Against this view, I defend the conservative consensus that selection acts primarily upon microbial cells.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A complication here lies in distinguishing programmed cell death from accidental death caused by competition for resources. Ratcliff et al. argue that they saw the evolution of multicellular yeast floccules on the grounds that they exhibit sterile cells which apoptose in order to enhance the fitness of the group (Ratcliff et al 2012). But a different interpretation is that the cells in question merely starve to death as the surrounding cells obscure their access to scarce resources.
Claessen et al are content to judge that some bacteria have lost the ability to survive and divide in a unicellular, planktonic state (Claessen et al 2014). Some authors write that a species will only be considered multicellular if its life cycle includes a multicellular stage necessarily (Fisher et al 2013). A problem with this view is that it makes a presupposition about what counts as a life cycle. From the point of view of view of a cell, the life cycle is complete once the cell has divided. If you argue that cells in a filament dont complete division, then you are assuming that physical attachment is enough to make two cells into one life. Although Anabaena always form chains, any cell separated from a chain will still divide. We can simplify matters if we rule that spore formation, but not cell fission, qualifies as completion of the life cycle. But this only makes it obvious that some circularity lies in defining multicellularity according to a life cycle.
Cells, especially, cancerous cells, may occasionally attempt to proliferate at the expense of the rest. But they lack any means for passing their traits on to future generations—there is no heritability.
It might be noted that analogous processes of shuffling during sexual reproduction are not thought to prevent the traits of sexual organisms from being heritable, even though we know that epistasis is significant. However, if those same epistatic effects were occurring between genes in organisms that had an unlimited number of parents, with no mechanisms for controlling which genes could pair with which and no mechanisms of developmental canalisation, then we might think again.
With many thanks to Kim Sterelny for this point.
This is not a problem that is specific to the biofilm case: adaptive hypotheses are generally flimsy constructions on which to rest arguments, although the problems are certainly exacerbated in contexts where there is potentially more than one hierarchical level of selection in play (Clarke Forthcoming). Methods are available for subjecting adaptive hypotheses to tests (e.g., Orzack and Sober 2001) but as far as I know these have not been applied to biofilm traits.
Note that this falls short of demonstrating that the relevant traits are social adaptations—i.e. were selected in virtue of their benefits to the recipient (Mitri and Foster 2013).
Ecologists term this ‘protocooperation’ to indicate that the interaction is not essential.
In fact Elias & Banin suggest that multispecies biofilms tend to exhibit one of three spatial architectures: a collection of neighbouring clonal microcolonies; co-aggregation in which cells of two species are mixed throughout the colony (‘interdigitated cellular mosaics’ (Katharios-Lanwermeyer et al. 2014); and finally layered structures, in which different species occupy different layers (Elias and Banin 2012, 997). They note that these structures will have very different consequences for the ability of the different species to interact, especially in high flow conditions where diffusibles may not accumulate. There is some evidence, on the other hand, that the structure may be determined by the type of interactions between cells (Momeni et al 2013). In addition, more specific morphologies have been described for particular co-aggregations, such as ‘corncob-like structures’ and ‘rosettes’ (Katharios-Lanwermeyer et al 2014).
References
Ackerman M (2013) Microbial individuality in the natural environment. ISME J 7:465–467
Alexander M (1971) Microbial ecology. Wiley, New York
Asally M, Kittisopikul M, Rué P, Du Y, Hu Z, Çağatay T, Robinson AB, Lu H, Garcia-Ojalvo J, Süel GM (2012) Localized cell death focuses mechanical forces during 3D patterning in a biofilm. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(46):18891–18896
Bamford CV, d’Mello A, Nobbs AH, Dutton LC, Vickerman MM, Jenkinson HF (2009) Streptococcus gordonii modulates Candida albicans biofilm formation through intergeneric communication. Infect Immun 77(9):3696–3704
Barton LL, Northup DE (2011) Microbial ecology. Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey
Bos R, Van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ (1999) Physico-chemistry of initial microbial adhesive interactions–its mechanisms and methods for study. FEMS Microbiol Rev 23(2):179–230
Boyle KE, Heilmann S, van Ditmarsch D, Xavier JB (2013) Exploiting social evolution in biofilms. Curr Opin Microbiol 16(2):207–212
Brockhurst MA, Buckling A, Racey D, Gardner A (2008) Resource supply and the evolution of public-goods cooperation in bacteria. BMC Biol 6(1):20
Burmølle M, Webb JS, Rao D, Hansen LH, Sørensen SJ, Kjelleberg S (2006) Enhanced biofilm formation and increased resistance to antimicrobial agents and bacterial invasion are caused by synergistic interactions in multispecies biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(6):3916–3923
Burmølle M, Ren D, Bjarnsholt T, Sørensen SJ (2014) Interactions in multispecies biofilms: Do they actually matter? Trends Microbiol 22(2):84–91
Celiker H, Gore J (2012) Cellular cooperation: insights from microbes. Trends Cell Biol 23(1):9–15
Chuang JS, Rivoire O, Leibler S (2009) Simpson’s Paradox in a Synthetic Microbial System. Science 323(5911):272–275
Claessen D, Rozen DE, Kuipers OP, Sogaard-Andersen L, van Wezel GP (2014) Bacterial solutions to multicellularity: a tale of biofilms, filaments and fruiting bodies. Nat Rev Mic 12:115–124
Clarke E (2013) The multiple realizability of biological individuals. J Philos 110(8):413–435
Clarke E (Forthcoming) Adaptation, multilevel selection and organismality: A clash of perspectives. In Richard Joyce (Editor) The Routledge Handbook of Evolution and Philosophy
Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scott HM (1995) Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 49:711–745
Coyte KZ, Schluter J, Foster KR (2015) Science 350(6261):663–666
Crespi B, Foster K, Ubeda F (2014) First principles of Hamiltonian medicine. Philsop Trans R Soc B 369(1642):20130366
Damuth J, Heisler IL (1988) Alternative formations of multi-level selection. Biol Philos 3:407–430
Davidson CJ, Surette MG (2008) Individuality in Bacteria. Annu Rev Genet 42:253–268
Davies J, Davies D (2010) Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 74(3):417–433
de la Fuente-Núñez C, Reffuveille F, Fernández L, Hancock RE (2013) Bacterial biofilm development as a multicellular adaptation: antibiotic resistance and new therapeutic strategies. Curr Opin Microbiol 16:580–589
Diggle SP, Griffin AS, Campbell GS, West SA (2007) Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Nature 450(7168):411–414
Doolittle WF (2013) Microbial neopleomorphism. Biol Philos 28:351–378
Doolittle WF, Zhaxybayeva O (2010) Metagenomics and the units of biological organization. Bioscience 60(2):102–112
Driscoll WW, Pepper JW (2010) Theory for the evolution of diffusible external goods. Evolution 64(9):2682–2687
Dupré JA O’Malley M (2009) Varieties of living things: life at the intersection of lineage and metabolism. Philosophy & Theory in Biology 1
Dworkin M (1996) Recent advances in the social and developmental biology of the myxobacteria. Microbiol Rev 60:70–102
Ehrlich G, Ahmed A, Earl J, Hiller N, Costerton J, Stoodley P, Post C, De Meo P, Hu F (2010) The distributed genome hypothesis as a rubric for understanding evolution in situ during chronic bacterial biofilm infectious processes. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 59:269–279
Elias S, Banin E (2012) Multi-species biofilms: living with friendly neighbors. FEMS Microbiol Rev 36(5):990–1004
Ereshefsky M, Pedroso M (2013) Biological individuality: the case of biofilms. Biol Philos. 28(2):331–349
Ereshefsky M, Pedroso M (2015) Rethinking evolutionary individuality. PNAS USA 112(33):10126–10132
Espinosa-Urgel E (2009) Multicellularity, neoplasias and biofilms. Res Microbiol 160(1):85–86
Federle MJ (2009) Autoinducer-2-based chemical communication in bacteria: complexities of interspecies signaling. Contrib Microbiol 16:18–32
Fisher RM, Cornwallis CK, West SA (2013) Group formation, relatedness, and the evolution of multicellularity. Curr Biol 23(12):1120–1125
Foster KR, Bell T (2012) Competition, not cooperation, dominates interactions among culturable microbial species. Curr Biol 22(19):1845–1850
Frank SA (1998) Foundations of social evolution. Princeton University Press, USA
Godfrey-Smith P (2006) Local interaction, multilevel selection, and evolutionary transitions. Biol Theory 1(4):372–380
Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Godfrey-Smith P (2012) Varieties of population structure and the levels of selection. Br J Philos Sci 59(1):25–50
Godfrey-Smith P (2013) Darwinian individuals. In: Bouchard F, Huneman P (eds) From groups to individuals: perspectives on biological associations and emerging individuality. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 17–36
Goodnight C (2013) On multilevel selection and kin selection: contextual analysis meets direct fitness. Evolution 67(6):1539–1548
Goodnight CJ, Schwartz JM, Stevens L (1992) Contextual analysis of models of group selection, soft selection, hard selection and the evolution of altruism. Am Nat 140:743–761
Griffin AS, West SA, Buckling A (2004) Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria. Nature 430(7003):1024–1027
Haber M (2013) Colonies are individuals: revisiting the superorganism revival. In: Bouchard F, Huneman P (eds) From groups to individuals: evolution and emerging individuality. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 195–217
Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P (2004) Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:95–108
Hansen SK, Rainey PB, Haagensen JAJ, Molin S (2007) Evolution of species interactions in a biofilm community. Nature 445:533–536
Kåhrström CT (2013) Biofilms: survival of the wrinkliest. Nat Rev Microbiol 11(3):148–149
Katharios-Lanwermeyer S, ** C, Jakubovics NS, Rickard AH (2014) Mini-review: microbial coaggregation: ubiquity and implications for biofilm development. Biofouling 30(10):1235–1251
Kiers ET, Duhamel M, Beesetty Y, Mensah JA, Franken O, Verbruggen E, Fellbaum CR, Kowalchuk GA, Mm Hart, Bago A, Palmer TA, West SA, Vandenkoornhuyse P, Jansa J, Bucking H (2011) Reciprocal rewards stabilise cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science 333(6044):880–882
Kolenbrander PE, Palmer RJ Jr, Periasamy S, Jakubovics NS (2010) Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell-cell distance. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:471–480
Kolter R (2005) Surfacing views of biofilm biology. Trends Microbiol 13(1):1–2
Kreft JU (2004) Biofilms promote altruism. Microbiology 150(8):2751–2760
Kuboniwa M, Tribble GD, James CE, Kilic AO, Tao L, Herzberg MC, Shizukuishi S, Lamont RJ (2006) Streptococcus gordonii utilizes several distinct gene functions to recruit Porphyromonas gingivalis into a mixed community. Mol Microbiol 60(1):121–139
Lawrence JR, Korber DR, Hoyle BD, Costerton JW, Caldwell DE (1991) Optical sectioning of microbial biofilms. J Bacteriol 173(20):6558–6567
Lewontin R (1970) The units of selection. Ann Rev Eco Syst 1:1–18
Luppens SB, Kara D, Bandounas L, Jonker MJ, Wittink FR, Bruning O, Breit TM, Ten Cate JM, Crielaard W (2008) Effect of Veillonella parvula on the antimicrobial resistance and gene expression of Streptococcus mutans grown in a dual-species biofilm. Oral Microbiol Immunol 23(3):183–189
Lyons NA, Kolter R (2015) On the evolution of bacterial multicellularity. Curr Opin Microbiol 24:21–28
Marsh & Bowden (2000) Microbial community interactions in biofilms. In: Allison, D. G., Gilbert, P., Lappin-Scott, H. M. & Wilson, M. (eds). Community Structure and Co-operation in Biofilms (Vol. Society for Microbiology Symposium 59), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 167–198
Mitri S, Foster KR (2013) The Genotypic view of Social Interactions in Microbial Communities. Annu Rev Genet 47:247–273
Mitri S, Xavier JB, Foster KR (2011) Social Evolution in Multispecies Biofilms. PNAS 108(Supplement 2):10839–10846
Molin S, Tolker-Nielsen T (2003) Gene transfer occurs with enhanced efficiency in biofilms and induces enhanced stabilisation of the biofilm structure. Curr Opin Biotech 14(3):255–261
Momeni B, Brileya KA, Fields MW, Shou W (2013) Strong inter-population cooperation leads to partner intermixing in microbial communities. Elife 2:e00230
Morris JJ, Lenski RE, Zinser ER (2012) The Black Queen Hypothesis: evolution of dependencies through adaptive gene loss. MBio 3(2):e00036–12
Nadall CD, Xavier JB, Foster KR (2009) The sociobiology of biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33(1):206–224
Nikolaev & Plakunov (2007) Biofilm—“City of Microbes” or an Analogue of Multicellular Organisms? Microbiology 76(2):125–138
O’Malley MA, Dupré J (2007) Size doesn’t matter: towards a more inclusive philosophy of biology. Biol Philos 22(2):155–191
O’Rourke D, FitzGerald CE, Traverse CC, Cooper VS (2015) There and back again: consequences of biofilm specialization under selection for dispersal. Front Genetics 6:18
O’Toole G, Kaplan HB, Kolter R (2000) Biofilm Formation as Microbial Development. Annu Rev Microbiol 54:49–79
Ochman H, Moran NA (2001) Genes lost and genes found: evolution of bacterial pathogenesis and symbiosis. Science 292(5519):1096–1099
Okasha S (2006) Evolution and the levels of selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Oliveira NM, Martinez-Garcia E, Xavier J, Durham WM, Kolter R, Kim W, Foster KR (2015) Biofilm formation as a response to ecological competition. PLoS Biol 13(7):e1002191
O’Malley M (2014) Philosophy of microbiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Orzack SH, Sober E (2001) Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press, New York
Parsek MR, Greenberg EP (2005) Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms. Trends Microbiol 13:27–33
Penn AS, Conibear TC, Watson RA, Kraaijeveld AR, Webb JS (2012) Can Simpson’s paradox explain co-operation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms? FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 65(2):226–235
Periasamy S, Kolenbrander PE (2009) Mutualistic biofilm communities develop with Porphyromonas gingivalis and initial, early, and late colonizers of enamel. J Bacteriol 191(22):6804–6811
Poltak SR, Cooper VS (2011) Ecological succession in long-term experimentally evolved biofilms produces synergistic communities. ISME J 5(3):369–378
Ratcliff WC, Denison RF, Borrello M, Travisano M (2012) Experimental evolution of multicellularity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(5):1595–1600
Redfield RJ (2001) Do bacteria have sex? Nat Rev Genet 2(8):634–639
Ren D, Madsen JS, Sørensen SJ, Burmølle M (2015) High prevalence of biofilm synergy among bacterial soil isolates in cocultures indicates bacterial interspecific cooperation. ISME J 9:81–89
Rendueles O, Ghigo JM (2012) Multi-species biofilms: how to avoid unfriendly neighbors. FEMS Microbiol Rev 36(5):972–989
Rickard AH, Gilbert P, High NJ, Kolenbrander PE, Handley PS (2003) Bacterial coaggregation: an integral process in the development of multi-species biofilms. Trends Microbiol 11(2):94–100
Roditi LDV, Boyle KE, Xavier JB (2013) Multilevel selection analysis of a microbial social trait. Mol Syst Biol 9(1):684
Rokas A (2008) The origins of multicellularity and the early history of the genetic toolkit for animal development. Annu Rev Genet 42:235–251
Sauer K, Camper AK, Ehrlich GD, Costerton JW, Davies DG (2002) Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. J Bacteriol 184(4):1140–1154
Schwering M et al (2013) Multi-species biofilms defined from drinking water microorganisms provide increased protection against chlorine disinfection. Biofouling 29:917–928
Shapiro JA (1988) Bacteria as multicellular organisms. Sci Am 258:82–89
Singer SW, Erickon BK, VerBerkmoes NC, Hwang M, Shah MB, Hettich RL, Banfield JF, Thelen MP (2010) Posttransalational modification and sequence variation of redox-active proteins correlate with biofilm life cycle in natural microbial communities. ISME J 4:1398–1409
Sober E, Wilson DS (1998) Unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behaviour. Harvard University Press, USA
Stewart PS, Franklin MJ (2008) Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol 6(3):199–210
Stoodley P, Sauer K, Davies DG, Costerton JW (2002) Biofilms as complex differentiated communities. Annu Rev Microbiol 56:187–209
Taylor PD, Day T, Wild G (2007) Evolution of cooperation in a finite homogeneous graph. Nature 447(7143):469–472
Taylor TB, Rodrigues AM, Gardner A, Buckling A (2013) The social evolution of dispersal with public goods cooperation. J Evol Biol 26(12):2644–2653
Traverse CC, Mayo-Smith LM, Poltak SR, Cooper VS (2013) Tangled bank of experimentally evolved Burkholderia biofilms reflects selection during chronic infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(3):E250–E259
van Gestel J, Weissing FJ, Kuipers OP, Kovács ÁT (2014) Density of founder cells affects spatial pattern formation and cooperation in Bacillus subtilis biofilms. ISME J 8(10):2069–2079
Veening JW, Smits WK, Kuipers OP (2008) Bistability, Epigenetics and Bet-Hedging in Bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 62:193–210
Waters CM, Bassler BL (2005) Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21:319–346
Watnick P, Kolter R (2000) Biofilm, city of Microbes. J Bacteriol 182(10):2675–2679
Werndl C (2013) Do microbes question standard thinking in the philosophy of biology? Analysis 73(2):380–387
Werner GD, Strassmann JE, Ivens AB, Engelmoer DJ, Verbruggen E, Queller DC, Noë R, Johnson NC, Hammerstein P, Kiers ET (2014) Evolution of microbial markets. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(4):1237–1244
West SA, Griffin AS, Gardner A, Diggle SP (2006) Social evolution theory for microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 4(8):597–607
West SA, Diggle SP, Buckling A, Gardner A, Griffin AS (2007) The social lives of microbes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Systematics 38:53–77
Wilking JN, Zaburdaev V, De Volder M, Losick R, Brenner MP, Weitz DA (2012) Liquid transport facilitated by channels in Bacillus subtilis biofilms. PNAS 110(3):848–852
Wolfaardt GM, Lawrence JR, Robarts RD, Caldwell SJ, Caldwell DE (1994) Multicellular organization in a degradative biofilm community. Appl Environ Microbiol 60(2):434–446
Wolska KI (2003) Horizontal DNA transfer between bacteria in the environment. Acta Microbiol Pol 52(3):233–243
Xu DQ, Thompson J, Cisar JO (2003) Genetic loci for coaggregation receptor polysaccharide biosynthesis in Streptococcus gordonii 38. J Bacteriol 185:5419–5430
Yamada M, Ikegami A, Kuramitsu HK (2005) Synergistic biofilm formation by Treponema denticola and Porphyromonas gingivalis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 250(2):271–277
Acknowledgments
Very many thanks to Marc Ereshefsky and Maureen O’Malley who gave me invaluable feedback on earlier drafts of this paper, in addition to two referees, the young folk at All Souls College, and the audience at Philosophy of Biology in the UK 2014. I also received invaluable feedback and experience from Kevin Foster, Sara Mitri, Isabel Frost and Sarah Hammarlund as well as patient guidance from Kim Sterelny.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clarke, E. Levels of selection in biofilms: multispecies biofilms are not evolutionary individuals. Biol Philos 31, 191–212 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9517-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9517-3