Abstract
DNA barcodes analyzed by using relevant techniques provide an imperative approach towards validation of prevailing taxa and putative species. Here, molecular methods were used for assessment of 246 barcodes belonging to 81 fish species from northern Western Ghats of India, using, Barcode gap analysis, barcode index number, automatic barcode gap discovery, Poisson tree processes and general mixed Yule-coalescent, these methods had their potential to discriminate 97.53%, 93.90% 95.06%, 93.82% and 92.59% of species respectively. But, some of them tended to estimate the inconsistent number of species leading to discrepancies between the morphological concept and inference from molecular phylogenetic reconstructions. So, we took a standard approach to recognize those methods that produced consistent results, three of five such methods were identified that revealed three hidden cryptic species complexes in Monopterus indicus, Parambassis ranga and Systomus sarana. Further, to validate these three genetically diverged species, we used diagnostic character based approach along with nine unidentified species through BLOG and WEKAs SMO classifier. Those methods were unable to identify these species, which might be due to the limited number of specimens used for the analysis. This is the first effort to generate the DNA barcode reference library of freshwater fishes from northern Western Ghats of India, one of the world’s biodiversity hotspots. These barcodes when analyzed through the defined workflow, will provide valuable measures to prove the efficiency of molecular species delimitation methods in taxonomic discrimination which aid conservation of biodiversity.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10531-018-1604-0/MediaObjects/10531_2018_1604_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10531-018-1604-0/MediaObjects/10531_2018_1604_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10531-018-1604-0/MediaObjects/10531_2018_1604_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10531-018-1604-0/MediaObjects/10531_2018_1604_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10531-018-1604-0/MediaObjects/10531_2018_1604_Fig5_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data accessibility
BOLD http://www.boldsystems.org/: “DNA Barcoding of fishes from northern Western Ghats of India” (FNWG). GenBank accession numbers: KX946584 and KX946829.
References
Astrin JJ, Stüben PE, Misof B et al (2012) Exploring diversity in cryptorhynchine weevils (Coleoptera) using distance-, character- and tree-based species delineation. Mol Phylogenet Evol 63:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.11.018
CEPF (2007) Ecosystem profile for the Western Ghats. http://cepf.net/Documents/final.westernghatssrilanka_westernghats.ep.pdf
Chakraborty M, Ghosh SK (2014) An assessment of the DNA barcodes of Indian freshwater fishes. Gene 537:20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.12.047
Chen W, Ma X, Shen Y et al (2015) The fish diversity in the upper reaches of the Salween River, Nujiang River, revealed by DNA barcoding. Sci Rep 5:17437. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17437
Chitale VS, Behera MD, Roy PS (2014) Future of endemic flora of biodiversity Hotspots in India. PLoS ONE 9(12):e115264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115264
Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland, MA
Dahanukar N, Raghavan R (2013) Freshwater fishes of the Western Ghats : checklist v1.0 August 2013. Min—Newsl FFSG 1:6–16
Dahanukar N, Raut R, Bhat A (2004) Distribution, endemism and threat status of freshwater fishes in the Western Ghats of India. J Biogeogr 31:123–136. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.01016.x
Dahanukar N, Raghavan R, Ali A, Abraham R, Shaji CP (2011) The status and distribution of freshwater fishes of the Western Ghats. In: Molur S, Smith KG, Daniel BA, Darwall WRT (eds) The status and distribution of freshwater biodiversity in the Western Ghats India. IUCN, Zoo Outreach Organisation, Cambridge, Coimbatore, pp 21–48
Dahanukar N, Paingankar M, Raut RN, Kharat SS (2012) Fish fauna of Indrayani River, northern Western Ghats, India. J Threat Taxa 4(1):2310–2317. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o2771.2310-7
Dahanukar N, Raghavan R, Ali A, Britz R (2016) Amblyceps accari, a new species of torrent catfish (Teleostei: Amblycipitidae) from the Western Ghats of India. Zootaxa 4109:218–226. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4109.2.6
Dettai A, Lautredou AC, Bonillo C et al (2011) The actinopterygian diversity of the CEAMARC cruises: barcoding and molecular taxonomy as a multi-level tool for new findings. Deep Res Part II 58:250–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.05.021
Drummond AJ, Rambaut A (2007) BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol 7:214. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-214
Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO et al (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev 81:163–182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006950
Dumas P, Barbut J, Le RuB, Silvain J (2015) Phylogenetic molecular species delimitations unravel potential new species in the pest genus Spodoptera Guenée, 1852 (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). PLoS ONE 10(4):e0122407. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122407
Esselstyn JA, Evans BJ, Sedlock JL et al (2012) Single-locus species delimitation: a test of the mixed Yule-coalescent model, with an empirical application to Philippine round-leaf bats. Proc R Soc B 279:3678–3686. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0705
Ezard T, Fujisawa T, Barraclough TG (2009) Splits: species limits by threshold statistics. R package version 1.0-14/r31. http://R-Forge.R-project.org/projects/splits/
Fontaneto D, Flot JF, Tang CQ (2015) Guidelines for DNA taxonomy, with a focus on the meiofauna. Mar Biodivers. 45:433–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-015-0319-7
Fujisawa T, Barraclough TG (2013) Delimiting species using single-locus data and the generalized mixed Yule coalescent approach: a revised method and evaluation on simulated data sets. Syst Biol 62:707–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt033
Gernhard T (2008) The conditioned reconstructed process. J Theor Biol 253:769–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.04.005
Hajibabaei M (2012) The golden age of DNA metasystematics. Trends Genet 28:535–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2012.08.001
Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explorations 11(1):10–18
Hamilton CA, Hendrixson BE, Brewer MS, Bond JE (2014) An evaluation of sampling effects on multiple DNA barcoding methods leads to an integrative approach for delimiting species: a case study of the North American tarantula genus Aphonopelma (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Theraphosidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 71:79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.11.007
Hartvig I, Czako M, Kjær ED, Nielsen LR, Theilade I (2015) The Use of DNA Barcoding in Identification and Conservation of Rosewood (Dalbergia spp.). PLoS ONE 10(9):e0138231. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138231
Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci 270:313–321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM (2004) Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes. PLoS Biol 2(10):e312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312
Henriques JM, José G, Ashikaga FY (2015) Use of DNA barcode in the identification of fish species from Ribeira de Iguape Basin and coastal rivers from São Paulo State (Brazil). DNA Barcodes 3:118–128. https://doi.org/10.1515/dna-2015-0015
Hogg ID, Hebert PDN (2004) Biological identification of springtails (Hexapoda: Collembola) from the Canadian Arctic, using mitochondrial DNA barcodes. Can J Zool 82:749–754. https://doi.org/10.1139/z04-041
Hubert N, Hanner R, Holm E, Mandrak NE, Taylor E, Burridge M et al (2008) Identifying canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes. PLoS ONE 3(6):e2490. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002490
Irfan FI, Gunawickrama KBS (2011) Osteological variation of the olive barb Puntius sarana (Cyprinidae) in Sri Lanka. J Natl Sci Found Sri Lanka 39:121–128
Ivanova NV, Zemlak TS, Hanner RH, Hebert PDN (2007) Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Notes 7:544–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01748.x
Jadhav BV, Kharat SS, Raut RN et al (2011) Freshwater fish fauna of Koyna River, northern Western. J Threat Taxa 3:1449–1455
Jayaram KC (2009) Catfishes of India. Narendra Publishing House, Dehli
Jayaram KC (2010) The freshwater fishes of the Indian region, 2nd edn. Narendra Publishing House, Delhi
Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. Mamm Protein Metab. 3(21):132
Katwate U, Raut R, Advani S (2012) An overview of fish fauna of Raigad District, northern Western Ghats, India. J Threat Taxa 4(5):2569–2577
Katwate U, Jadhav S, Kumkar P et al (2016) Pethia sanjaymoluri, a new species of barb (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from the northern Western Ghats, India. J Fish Biol 88:2027–2050. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12980
Kekkonen M, Hebert PDN (2014) DNA barcode-based delineation of putative species: efficient start for taxonomic workflows. Mol Ecol Resour 14:706–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12233
Kekkonen M, Mutanen M, Kaila L, Nieminen M, Hebert PDN (2015) Delineating species with DNA barcodes: a case of taxon dependent method performance in moths. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0122481. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122481
Kharat SS, Paingankar M, Dahanukar N (2012) Freshwater fish fauna of Krishna river at Wai, northern Western Ghats, India. J Threat Taxa. 4:2644–2652
Khedkar GD, Jamdade R, Naik S, David L, Haymer D (2014) DNA barcodes for the fishes of the Narmada, one of India’s longest rivers. PLoS ONE 9(7):e101460. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101460
Knight JDM, Rai A, Souza RKPD et al (2016) Hypselobarbus bicolor, a new species of large barb (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from the Western Ghats of India. Zootaxa 4184:316–328. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4184.2.4
Kumkar P, Katwate U, Raghavan R, Dahanukar N (2016) Balitora chipkali, a new species of stone loach (Teleostei: Balitoridae) from the northern Western Ghats of India, with a note on the distribution of B. laticauda. Zootaxa 4138:155–170. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4138.1.7
Kumkar P, Kharat SS, Sawant NS, Katwate U, Dahanukar N (2017) Freshwater fish fauna of Hiranyakeshi river, the northern Western Ghats, India. J Threat Taxa 9(5):10178–10186. https://doi.org/10.11609/jot.3126.9.5.10178-10186
Lakra WS, Verma MS, Goswami M et al (2011) DNA barcoding Indian marine fishes. Mol Ecol Resour 11:60–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02894.x
Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SYW, Guindon S (2012) Partition finder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol 29:1695–1701. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss020
Lang AS, Bocksberger G, Stech M (2015) Phylogeny and species delimitations in European Dicranum (Dicranaceae, Bryophyta) inferred from nuclear and plastid DNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol 92:217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.06.019
Larson ER, Castelin M, Williams BW et al (2016) Phylogenetic species delimitation for crayfishes of the genus Pacifastacus. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1915
Lim H, ZainalAbidin M, Pulungan CP, de Bruyn M, Mohd Nor SA (2016) DNA barcoding reveals high cryptic diversity of the freshwater halfbeak genus Hemirhamphodon from Sundaland. PLoS ONE 11(9):e0163596. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163596
Mercy TVA (2009) Status of standardized breeding and propagation technology of indigenous ornamental fishes of Western Ghats of India. J World Aquac 35:40–42
Meyer CP, Paulay G (2005) DNA barcoding: error Rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol 3(12):e422. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030422
MoEF (2001) India: state of the environment 2001. Biodiversity. Ministy of Environment & Forests, Govt. of India, pp 77–95. http://atmoef.nic.in/soer/2001/ind_bio.pdf
Molur S, Smith KG, Daniel BA, Darwall WRT (2011) The status and distribution of freshwater biodiversity in the Western Ghats, India. IUCN, Cambridge
Moritz C, Cicero C (2004) DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PLoSBiol 2(10):e354. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020354
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG et al (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412
Pereira LHG, Maia GMG, Hanner R et al (2011) DNA barcodes discriminate freshwater fishes from the Paraíba do Sul River Basin, São Paulo, Brazil. Mitochondrial DNA 22:71–79. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2010.532213
Platt JC (1998) Sequential minimal optimization: a fast algorithm for training support vector machines. Adv Kernel Methods pp 185–208
Pons J, Barraclough TG, Gomez-Zurita J et al (2006) Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Syst Biol 55:595–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150600852011
Puckridge M, Andreakis N, Appleyard SA, Ward RD (2013) Cryptic diversity in flathead fishes (Scorpaeniformes: Platycephalidae) across the Indo-West Pacific uncovered by DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour 13:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12022
Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S, Achaz G (2012) ABGD, automatic barcode gap discovery for primary species delimitation. Mol Ecol 21:1864–1877. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05239.x
Rach J, Desalle R, Sarkar IN et al (2008) Character-based DNA barcoding allows discrimination of genera, species and populations in Odonata. Proc R SocLond B 275:237–247. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1290
Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN (2013) A DNA-based registry for all animal species: the barcode index number (BIN) system. PLoS ONE 8(7):e66213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066213
Reid GM (2010) Taxonomy and the survival of threatened animal species: a matter of life and death. Systema Naturae (edsPolaszek A). The Linnean Ark, CRC Press, London and New York, pp 29–52
Rosso JJ, Mabragaña E, González Castro M, Díaz de Astarloa JM (2012) DNA barcoding Neotropical fishes: recent advances from the Pampa Plain, Argentina. MolEcolResour. 12:999–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12010
Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K (2006) A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for “barcoding” identification. J Hered 97:581–594. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esl036
Sahu RK (2011) Mega Biodiversity in India.pp 31. http://www.vigyanprasar.gov.in. http://ebookbrowse.com/mega-bd-h-p-n-p-san-zoo-pdf-d59753477
Sajan S (2015) Studies on the stock dynamics and reproductive biology of Sahyadriadenisonii (Day 1865) an endangered ornamental fish of the Western Ghats of India. Ph.D. Thesis. Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, Kerala, India
Shaji CP, Easa PS, Gopalakrishnan A (2000) Freshwater fish diversity of Western Ghats. In: Ponniah AG, Gopalakrishnan A (eds) Endemic fish diversity of Western Ghats. National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow, pp 33–35
Shantakumar M, Vishwanath W (2006) Inter-Relationship of Puntius Hamilton-Buchanan (Cyprinidae : Cyprininae) found in Manipur, India. Zoos’ Print J 21:2279–2283
Shen Y, Guan L, Wang D, Gan X (2016) DNA barcoding and evaluation of genetic diversity in Cyprinidae fish in the midstream of the Yangtze River Yanjun. Ecol Evol 6(9):2702–2713. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2060
Sloan S, Jenkins CN, Joppa LN et al (2014) Remaining natural vegetation in the global biodiversity hotspots. Biol Conserv 177:12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.05.027
Suchard MA, Rambaut A (2009) Many-core algorithms for statistical phylogenetics. Bioinformatics 25:1370–1376. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp244
Sun S, Li Q, Kong L et al (2016) DNA barcoding reveal patterns of species diversity among northwestern Pacific molluscs. Sci Rep. 6:33367. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33367
Tang CQ, Humphreys AM, Fontaneto D, Barraclough TG (2014) Effects of phylogenetic reconstruction method on the robustness of species delimitation using single-locus data. Methods Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12246
Tewari VP, Sukumar R, Kumar R, Gadow KV (2014) Forest observational studies in India: past developments and considerations for the future. For Ecol Manage 316:32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.050
Van Velzen R, Weitschek E, Felici G, Bakker FT (2012) DNA Barcoding of recently diverged species: relative performance of matching methods. PLoS ONE 7(1):e30490
Venkataraman K, SwarnaLatha SS (2008) Intellectual property rights, traditional knowledge and biodiversity of India. JIPR 13:326–335
Vidthayanon C (2012) Parambassis ranga. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2012-1.RLTS.T180994A1686402.en
Weitschek E, Van Velzen R, Felici G, Bertolazzi P (2013) BLOG 2.0: a software system for character-based species classification with DNA Barcode sequences. What it does, how to use it. Mol Ecol Resour 13:1043–1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12073
Weitschek E, Fiscon G, Felici G et al (2014) Supervised DNA barcodes species classification: analysis, comparisons and results. BioData Min 7:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-7-4
Yang Z, Landry J-F, Hebert PDN (2016) A DNA barcode library for North American Pyraustinae (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae). PLoS ONE 11(10):e0161449. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161449
Yule U (1925) A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of II.—a mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr. J. C. Willis, F.R.S. Source Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B. 213:21–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/92117
Zhang J, Kapli P, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A (2013) A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements. Bioinformatics 29:2869–2876. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt499
Zou S, Fei C, Song J, Bao Y, He M, Wang C (2016) Combining and comparing coalescent, distance and character-based approaches for barcoding microalgaes: a test with Chlorella-like species (Chlorophyta). PLoS ONE 11(4):e0153833. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153833
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the DBT-Interdisciplinary Program of Life Sciences for Advanced Research and Education (No. BT/PR 4572/INF/22/147/2012), New Delhi, India for financial support and encouragement and Shivaji University, Kolhapur for providing fellowship (GJRF) to one of the authors (TSP). Authors are thankful to Amrut Bhosale, Rupesh Yadav, Dr. Omkar Yadav, Asif Tamboli and Suhas Kadam for their help rendered during field visits and sequencing work. Authors are thankful to Dr. Manoj Lekhak for valuable suggestions in manuscript corrections.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Mark James Kennard.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patil, T.S., Jamdade, R.A., Patil, S.M. et al. DNA barcode based delineation of freshwater fishes from northern Western Ghats of India, one of the world’s biodiversity hotspots. Biodivers Conserv 27, 3349–3371 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1604-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1604-0