Abstract
Some species face greater anthropogenic threats than others, and have increased need for scarce conservation resources. Yet how resources are allocated for conservation remains little known. I examined the distribution of research effort, an index of resource allocation, across Felidae (the cat family), a diverse, widely-distributed, and threatened taxon. I performed complete searches of the published literature for all cat species from 1986 to 2007, collecting a total of 2,462 papers, of which 926 represented in situ studies. Threat status, as ranked by a World Conservation Union report in 1996, was significantly correlated with geographical range size, with narrowly distributed species tending to be more at risk. Unlike in many other taxa, threat status was not correlated with body size. The number of total and in situ publications (“research effort”) per species was significantly and positively related to body size, but not to threat status or geographical range size. Research effort, rather than being distributed according to actual threat status, is highly skewed towards large species. However, the ratio of the number of studies on the 10 smallest cat species to the number on the 10 largest species has increased significantly since 1986. Yet many species remain severely understudied; I identify 14 cat species that are threatened and have <10 in situ publications each. These species critically require a greater share of the conservation research effort.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldus RD (2006) A man-eating lion (Panthera leo) from Tanzania with a toothache. Eur J Wildl Res 52:59–62. doi:10.1007/s10344-005-0008-0
Berger J (1996) Population constraints associated with the use of black rhinos as an umbrella species for desert herbivores. Conserv Biol 11:69–78. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95481.x
Cardillo M, Bromham L (2001) Body size and risk of extinction in Australian mammals. Conserv Biol 15:1435–1440. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00286.x
Carter MF, Hunter WC, Pashley DN, Rosenbery KV (2000) Setting priorities for landbird conservation in the United States: the partners in flight approach. Auk 117:541–548. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2000)117[0541:SCPFLI]2.0.CO;2
Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR (2006) Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:19374–19379. doi:10.1073/pnas.0609334103
Clark JA, May RM (2002) Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science 297:191–192. doi:10.1126/science.297.5579.191b
Dinerstein E (1999) Preface. In: Ricketts TH, Dinerstein E, Olson D, Colby J (eds) Terrestrial ecoregions of North America. A conservation assessment. Island Press. Washington, D.C, p xxi
Dunn EH (2002) Using decline in bird populations to identify needs for conservation action. Conserv Biol 16:1632–1637. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01250.x
Fazey I, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2005) What do conservation biologists publish? Biol Conserv 124:63–67. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.013
Fisher DO, Owens PF (2004) The comparative method in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:391–398. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.05.004
Halpern BS, Pyke CR, Fox HE, Haney JC, Schlaepfer MA, Zaradic P (2006) Gaps and mismatches between global conservation priorities and spending. Conserv Biol 20:56–64. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00258.x
Harris G, Pimm SL (2008) Range size and extinction risk in forest birds. Conserv Biol 22:163–171. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00798.x
Hockley NJ, Edwards-Jones G, Healey JR (2007) Maximizing the efficiency of conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 22:286–287. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.02.012
IUCN (2004) Red list of threatened species. International Union for the Conservation of Nature (World Conservation Union), Gland
Jackson RM, Roe JD, Wangchuk R, Hunter DO (2006) Estimating snow leopard population abundance using photography and capture–recapture techniques. Wildl Soc Bull 34:772–781. doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[772:ESLPAU]2.0.CO;2
Johnson A, Vongkhamheng C, Hedemark M, Saithongdam T (2006a) Effects of human-carnivore conflict on tiger (Panthera tigris) and prey populations in Lao PDR. Anim Conserv 9:421–430. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00049.x
Johnson WE et al (2006b) The late Miocene radiation of modern Felidae: a genetic assessment. Science 311:73–77. doi:10.1126/science.1122277
Johst K, Brandl R (1997) Body size and extinction risk in a stochastic environment. Oikos 78:612–617. doi:10.2307/3545624
Karanth KU (2003) Tiger ecology and conservation in the Indian subcontinent. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 100:169–189
Karanth KU, Nichols JD (1998) Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852–2862
Karanth KU, Nichols JD (2002) Monitoring tigers and their prey. Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore
Karanth KU, Chundawat RS, Nichol JD, Kumar NS (2004a) Estimation of tiger densities in the tropical dry forests of Panna, Central India, using photographic capture–recapture sampling. Anim Conserv 7:285–290. doi:10.1017/S1367943004001477
Karanth KU, Nichols JD, Kumar NS, Link WA, Hines JE (2004b) Tigers and their prey: predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:4854–4858. doi:10.1073/pnas.0306210101
Karanth KU, Nichols JD, Kumar NS, Hines JE (2006) Assessing tiger population dynamics using photographic capture–recapture sampling. Ecology 87:2925–2937. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2925:ATPDUP]2.0.CO;2
Kareiva P, Levin SA (2002) The importance of species: perspectives on expendability and triage. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Kochin BF, Levin PS (2003) Lack of concern deepens oceans’ problems. Nature 424:723. doi:10.1038/424723a
Lawler JJ et al (2006) Conservation science: a 20-year report card. Front Ecol Environ 4:473–480. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[473:CSAYRC]2.0.CO;2
McBride MF, Wilson KA, Bode M, Possingham HP (2007) Incorporating the effects of socioeconomic uncertainty into priority setting for conservation investment. Conserv Biol 21:1463–1474
McIntyre S, Barrett GW, Kitching RL, Recher HF (1992) Species triage-seeing beyond wounded rhinos. Conserv Biol 6:604–606. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06040604.x
Meir E, Andelman S, Possingham HP (2004) Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world? Ecol Lett 7:615–622. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00624.x
Mittermeier RA, Myers N, Thomsen JB, da Fonseca GAB, Olivieri S (1998) Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv Biol 12:516–520. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003516.x
Morris DJ (1960) An analysis of animal popularity. Int Zoo Yearb 2:60–61. doi:10.1111/j.1748-1090.1960.tb02723.x
Murdoch W, Polasky S, Wilson KA, Possingham HP, Kareiva P, Shaw R (2007) Maximizing return on investment in conservation. Biol Conserv 139:375–388. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.011
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. doi:10.1038/35002501
Nowak RM (1999) Walker’s mammals of the world, sixth edn. The John’s Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Nowell K, Jackson P (1996) Wild cats: status survey and conservation action plan. International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland
Olson DM, Dinerstein E (1998) The global 200: a representation approach to conserving the Earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conserv Biol 12:502–515. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003502.x
Packer C, Ikanda D, Kissui B, Kushnir H (2005) Lion attacks on humans in Tanzania—understanding the timing and distribution of attacks on rural communities will help to prevent them. Nature 436:927–928. doi:10.1038/436927a
Payne JL, Finnegan S (2007) The effect of geographic range on extinction risk during background and mass extinction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:10506–10511. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701257104
Regan HM et al (2008) Species prioritization for monitoring and management in regional multiple species conservation plans. Divers Distrib 14:462–471. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00447.x
Robbins CS, Sauer JR, Greenberg RS, Droege S (1989) Population declines in North American birds that migrate to the Neotropics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:7658–7662. doi:10.1073/pnas.86.19.7658
Salom-Perez R, Carrillo E, Saenz JC, Mora JM (2007) Critical condition of the jaguar Panthera onca population in Corcovado National Park, Costa Rica. Oryx 41:51–56. doi:10.1017/S0030605307001615
Seidensticker J, Christie S, Jackson P (1999) Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human-dominated landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Silver SC et al (2004) The use of camera traps for estimating jaguar Panthera onca abundance and density using capture/recapture analysis. Oryx 38:148–154. doi:10.1017/S0030605304000286
Siriwardena GM, Baillie SR, Buckland ST, Fewster RM, Marchant JH, Wilson JD (1998) Trends in the abundance of farmland birds: a quantitative comparison of smoothed common birds census indices. J Appl Ecol 35:24–43. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00275.x
Stattersfield AJ, Crosby MJ, Long AJ, Wege DC (1998) Endemic bird areas of the world. Smithsonian, Washington, DC
Surinova M (1971) An analysis of the popularity of animals. Int Zoo Yearb 11:165–167. doi:10.1111/j.1748-1090.1971.tb01895.x
Thorne JH, Cameron D, Quinn JF (2006) A conservation design for the central coast of California and the evaluation of mountain lion as an umbrella species. Nat Areas J 26:137–148. doi:10.3375/0885-8608(2006)26[137:ACDFTC]2.0.CO;2
Tisdell C, Swarna Nantha H (2007) Comparison of funding and demand for the conservation of the charismatic koala with those for the critically endangered wombat Lasiorhinus krefftii. Biodivers Conserv 16:1261–1281. doi:10.1007/s10531-006-6735-z
Tisdell C, Wilson C, Swarna Nantha H (2005) Association of public support for survival of wildlife species with their likeability. Anthrozoos 18:160–174. doi:10.2752/089279305785594216
Tisdell C, Swarna Nantha H, Wilson C (2007) Endangerment and likeability of wildlife species: how important are they for payments proposed for conservation? Ecol Econ 60:627–633. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.01.007
Trolle M, Kery M (2003) Estimation of ocelot density in the pantanal using capture–recapture analysis of camera-trap** data. J Mammal 84:607–614. doi:10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084<0607:EOODIT>2.0.CO;2
USFWS (1983) Endangered and threatened species listing and recovery priority guidelines. Fed Regist 48:43098–43105
Van Bommel L, de Vaate MDB, de Boer WF, de Iongh HH (2007) Factors affecting livestock predation by lions in Cameroon. Afr J Ecol 45:490–498. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.2007.00759.x
Wilson DE, Reeder DM (2005) Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference, 3rd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Wilson KA, McBride MF, Bode M, Possingham HP (2006) Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature 440:337–340. doi:10.1038/nature04366
Wilson KA et al (2007) Conserving biodiversity efficiently: what to do, where, and when. PLoS Biol 5:1850–1861. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050223
Woodroffe R, Ginsberg J (1998) Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science 280:2126–2128. doi:10.1126/science.280.5372.2126
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by a David H. Smith Conservation Research Fellowship. The quality of the manuscript was greatly improved by comments from C. Nelson, O. Helmy, M. Runkin, and L. Bean.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brodie, J.F. Is research effort allocated efficiently for conservation? Felidae as a global case study. Biodivers Conserv 18, 2927–2939 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9617-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9617-3