Abstract
Much of the world’s biodiversity is located within countries with develo** economies. We therefore examine how well develo** nations and their scientists are represented in three international conservation biology journals (Conservation Biology, Biological Conservation, Biodiversity and Conservation). We found: (1) that 28% of studies were from lower income countries and only 15% of all papers had primary authors from these nations. Of papers from lower income countries, although 80% had at least one local author, only 47% had primary authors from the country where the study was conducted. (2) Lower income countries had more research with a strong applied focus compared to research from high-income countries. (3) In lower income countries research was often funded by international sources but the primary authors of these studies were from affluent nations. (4) The three journals differed in how well they represented lower income nations and their scientists, reflecting their editorial policies for including research from lower income nations. The main reason for the large discrepancy in a country’s output of conservation research is due to the difference in a nation’s ability to invest in science. However, a brief survey of authors suggests that there is a large amount of information available in lower income and non-English speaking countries that is not easily accessible to the international conservation community. Journals may therefore need to consider altering their policies if we are to improve the representation of research by scientists in lower income nations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Berger A. Hoylman T. Weber (2001) ArticleTitlePerturbation of vast ecosystems in the absence of adequate science: Alaska’s Arctic refuge Conservation Biology 15 539–541
Conservation Biology 2002. Journal of the Society of Conservation Biology, http://www.conbio.org/ SCB/Publications/ConsBio/.
J.G. Colvin (1992) ArticleTitleA code of ethics for research in the 3rd-world Conservation Biology 6 309–311
Biological Conservation 2002. http://www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon.
Biodiversity and Conservation 2002. http://www.kluweronline.com/issn/0960–3115.
S.R. Dovers C.D. Mobbs (1997) An alluring prospect? Ecology, and the requirements of adaptive management N. Klomp I. Lunt (Eds) Frontiers in Ecology: Building the Links Elsevier Oxford UK 39–52
W.M. Getz L. Fortmann D. Cumming J. du Toit J. Hilty R. Martin M. Murphree N. Owen-Smith A.M. Starfield M.I. Westphal (1999) ArticleTitleConservation – sustaining natural and human capital: villagers and scientists Science 283 1855–1856
J. Ginsberg (1999) ArticleTitleGlobal conservation priorities Conservation Biology 13 5
Conservation International 2000. Megadiversity data tables. http://www.conservation.org/xp/ CIWEB/home.
M.F. Kinnaird T.G. O’Brien (2001) ArticleTitleWho’s scratching whom? Reply Conservation Biology 15 1459–1460
C. Kremen I. Raymond K. Lance (1998) ArticleTitleAn interdisciplinary tool for monitoring conservation impacts in Madagascar Conservation Biology 12 549–563
C.L. Long Y.L. Zhou (2001) ArticleTitleIndigenous community forest management of **uo people’s swidden agroecosystems in southwest China Biodiversity and Conservation 10 753–767
R.M. May (1997) ArticleTitleThe scientific wealth of nations Science 275 793–796
R.M. May (1998) ArticleTitleThe scientific investments of nations Science 281 49–51
N. Myers R.A. Mittermeier C.G. Mittermeier G.A.B. da Fonseca J. Kent (2000) ArticleTitleBiodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities Nature 403 853–858
S.L. Pimm M. Ayres A. Balmford G. Branch K. Brandon T. Brooks et al. (2001) ArticleTitleEnvironment – Can we defy nature’s end? Science 293 2207–2208
J.R. Prendergast R.M. Quinn J.H. Lawton (1999) ArticleTitleThe gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves Conservation Biology 13 484–492
A.S. Pullin T.M. Knight (2001) ArticleTitleEffectiveness in conservation practice: pointers from medicine and public health Conservation Biology 15 50–54
M.P. Ramanujam D. Kadamban (2001) ArticleTitlePlant biodiversity of two tropical dry evergreen forests in the Pondicherry region of South India and the role of belief systems in their conservation Biodiversity and Conservation 10 1203–1217
J.P. Rodriguez (2001) ArticleTitleExotic species introductions into South America: an underestimated threat? Biodiversity and Conservation 10 1983–1996
D. Sheil (2001) ArticleTitleConservation and biodiversity monitoring in the tropics: realities, priorities, and distractions Conservation Biology 15 1179–1182
Z.K. Shinwari S.S. Gilani (2003) ArticleTitleSustainable harvest of medicinal plants at Bulashbar Nullah Astore (Northern Pakistan) Journal of Ethnopharmacology 84 289–298
C.S. Silori B.K. Mishra (2001) ArticleTitleAssessment of livestock grazing pressure in and around the elephant corridors in Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary, south India Biodiversity and Conservation 10 2181–2195
B. Soto S.M. Munthali C. Breen (2001) ArticleTitlePerceptions of the forestry and wildlife policy by the local communities living in the Maputo Elephant Reserve Mozambique Biodiversity and Conservation 10 1723–1738
D. Tilman (2000) ArticleTitleCauses, consequences and ethics of biodiversity Nature 405 208–211
InstitutionalAuthorNameUNEP (1992) United Nations Environment Program Convention on Biological Diversity Nairobi Kenya
World Bank 2001. World Development Indicators. World Bank, Washington, DC.
T. Whitten D. Holmes K. MacKinnon (2001) ArticleTitleConservation biology: a displacement behavior for academia? Conservation Biology 15 1–3
B.E. Young K.R. Lips J.K. Reaser R. Ibanez A.W. Salas J.R. Cedeno et al. (2001) ArticleTitlePopulation declines and priorities for amphibian conservation in Latin America Conservation Biology 15 1213–1223
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fazey, I., Fischer, J. & Lindenmayer, D. Who does all the research in conservation biology?. Biodivers Conserv 14, 917–934 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-7849-9
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-7849-9