Log in

Seismic fragility curves for greek bridges: methodology and case studies

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focusses on the estimation of seismic fragility curves for all common bridge types found in modern greek motorways. At first a classification scheme is developed in order to classify the existing bridges into a sufficient number of classes. A total of 11 representative bridge classes resulted, based on the type of piers, deck, and pier-to-deck connection. Then an analytical methodology for deriving fragility curves is proposed and applied to the representative bridge models. This procedure is based on pushover analysis of the entire bridge and definition of damage states in terms of parameters of the bridge pushover curves. The procedure differentiates the way of defining damage according to the seismic energy dissipation mechanism in each bridge, i.e. bridges with yielding piers of the column type and bridges with bearings (with or without seismic links) and non-yielding piers of the wall type. The activation of the abutment-backfill system due to closure of the gap between the deck and the abutments is also taken into account. The derived fragility curves are subjected to a first calibration against empirical curves based on damage data from the US and Japan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Applied Technology Council [ATC] (1985) Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Report ATC-13, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA

  • ATC (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Rep. No. SSC 96–01: ATC-40, 1, Redwood City, CA

  • Athanassiadou C, Karakostas C, Kappos AJ, Lekidis V (2004) Inelastic strength and displacement design spectra based on greek earthquake records. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. Vancouver, CD ROM Proceedings, Paper no. 2519

  • Basöz NI, Kiremidjian AS, King SA, Law KH (1999) Statistical analysis of bridge damage data from the 1994 Northridge, CA, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 15(1): 25–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardone D, Perrone G, Dolce M (2007) Seismic risk assessment of highway bridges. In: Proceedings 1st US–Italy seismic bridge workshop. IUSS Press Ltd, Pavia (Italy)

  • Choi E, DesRoches R, Nielson B (2004) Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones. Eng Struct 26(2): 187–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Computers and Structures Inc (2005) SAP2000: linear and non linear static and dynamic analysis and design of three-dimensional structures. Berkeley, California

  • Dutta A, Mander JB (1998) Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges, INCEDE-MCEER center-to-center. In: Proceedings of the center-to-center workshop on earthquake engineering frontiers in transport systems, Tokyo, Japan, pp 311–325

  • EQE International (2000) Seismic risk assessment tool: specification document. Prepared for Egnatia Odos A.E. Report no. 460-01-RS-01, Issue 1

  • Erduran E, Yakut A (2004) Drift based damage functions for reinforced concrete columns. Comput Struct 82(2–3): 121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P (1999) Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 28(9): 979–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA-NIBS (2004) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology—earthquake model: HAZUS®MH Technical Manual, Washington, DC

  • FHWA [Federal Highway Administration] (1995) Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridges. Rep. no. FHWA-PD-96-001, Office of Engineering, Bridge Division, Washington, DC

  • Gardoni P, Khalid MM, Kiureghian AD (2003) Probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility estimates for RC bridges. J Earthquake Eng 7(1): 79–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang H, Jernigan JB, Lin YW (2000) Evaluation of seismic damage to memphis bridges and highway systems. J Bridg Eng ASCE 5(4): 322–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappos AJ, Moschonas IF, Paraskeva T, Sextos AG (2006) A methodology for derivation of fragility curves for bridges with the aid of advanced analysis tools. In: 1st European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, Paper no. 275

  • Kappos AJ, Potikas P, Sextos AG (2007) Seismic assessment of an overpass bridge accounting for non- linear material and soil response and varying boundary conditions. In: Proceedings of the conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering (COMPDYN), Rethymno, Greece, Paper no. 1580

  • Karakostas CZ, Athanassiadou CJ, Kappos AJ, Lekidis VA (2007) Site-dependent design spectra and strength modification factors, based on records from Greece. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 27(11): 1012–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karim KR, Yamazaki F (2001) Effect of earthquake ground motions on fragility curves of highway bridge piers based on numerical simulation. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 30(12): 1839–1856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupoi A, Franchin P, Pinto PE, Monti G (2005) Seismic design of bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 34(4–5): 327–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie KR, Stojadinovic B (2007) R-factor parameterized bridge damage fragility curves. J Bridg Eng ASCE 12(4): 500–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander JB, Basöz N (1999) Seismic fragility curve theory for highway bridges. In: Proceedings of the 5th US conference on lifeline earthquake engineering, TCLEE No. 16, ASCE, 1999, pp 31–40

  • Monti G, Nistico N (2002) Simple probability-based assessment of bridges under scenario earthquakes. J Bridg Eng ASCE 7(2): 104–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Paraskeva T, Kappos A (2007) Seismic assessment of an over-cross bridge using modal pushover analysis and dynamic time-history analysis. In: Proceedings of the conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering (COMPDYN), Rethymno, Greece, Paper no. 1376

  • Paraskeva T, Kappos A, Sextos A (2006) Extension of modal pushover analysis to seismic assessment of bridges. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 35(10): 1269–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SETRA [Service d’ Etudes Techniques des Routes et Autoroutes] (1998) Typologie IQOA—Valise de formation IQOA Ponts. Ministère de l’ Equipement, des Transports, etc, France

  • Sextos A, Pitilakis K, Kappos A (2003) Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil–structure interaction phenomena. Part 1: methodology and analytical tools. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 32(4): 602–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Kim HK, Kim SH (2000) Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development. J Eng Mech ASCE 126(12): 1287–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis F. Moschonas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moschonas, I.F., Kappos, A.J., Panetsos, P. et al. Seismic fragility curves for greek bridges: methodology and case studies. Bull Earthquake Eng 7, 439–468 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-008-9077-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-008-9077-2

Keywords

Navigation