Abstract
Productive failure is an instructional approach that requires learners to struggle as they attempt to generate solutions to problems before, rather than after, receiving direct instruction on a targeted concept. Studies demonstrate that productive failure prepares students for later learning of new, related knowledge. Our study explored the effectiveness of productive failure as an instructional intervention in health professions education with respect to (a) acquisition and application of a novel concept, and (b) learners’ preparation for future learning of new, related content. Forty year-one students enrolled in the Doctor of Pharmacy program at the University of Toronto were randomly assigned to a productive failure (i.e. attempt to generate solutions before receiving instruction) or direct instruction only learning condition. After a practice phase, participants completed a series of tests designed to measure knowledge acquisition, knowledge application, and preparation for future learning (new learning is required for successful problem solving). As expected, no difference in performance was seen between participants on the acquisition and application tests. However, participants in the productive failure condition outperformed those in the direct instruction condition on the preparation for future learning test. These results emphasize the role of struggle in learning and support the theory that engaging students in solving problems that are beyond their abilities can be a productive exercise in failure. The results suggest that productive failure assists learners in acquiring the conceptual knowledge needed to facilitate learning in the future.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10459-019-09895-4/MediaObjects/10459_2019_9895_Fig1_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bjork, E., & Bjork, R. (2014). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. Gernsbacher & J. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56–64). New York: Worth.
Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167267.
Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harward University Press.
Cockcroft, D. W., & Gault, M. H. (1976). Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron, 16, 31–41.
DeCaro, M. S., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). Exploring mathematics problems prepares children to learn from instruction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(4), 552–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.009.
Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 379–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802212669.
Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38, 1008–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12107.
Kapur, M. (2016). Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure, and unproductive success in Learning. Educational Psychologist, 51, 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155457.
Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 45–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.591717.
Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2012). Productive failure in learning from generation and invention activities. Instructional Science, 40, 645–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9235-4.
Leppink, J. (2017). When I say … time on task. Medical Education, 51, 1101–1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13298.
Mamede, S., van Gog, T., van den Berge, K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., van Saase, J. L. C. M., van Guldener, C., et al. (2010). Effect of availability bias and reflective reasoning on diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents. JAMA, 304(11), 1198–1203. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1276.
Mylopoulos, M., Brydges, R., Woods, N. N., Manzone, J., & Schwartz, D. L. (2016). Preparation for future learning: A missing competency in health professions education? Medical Education, 50, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12893.
Mylopoulos, M., Kulasegaram, K., & Woods, N. N. (2018). Develo** the experts we need: Fostering adaptive expertise through education. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 24(3), 674–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12905.
Mylopoulos, M., & Scardamalia, M. (2008). Doctors’ perspectives on their innovations in daily practice: Implications for knowledge building in health care. Medical Education, 42, 975–981. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03153.x.
Mylopoulos, M., & Woods, N. N. (2014). Preparing medical students for future learning using basic science instruction. Medical Education, 48, 667–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12426.
Mylopoulos, M., & Woods, N. N. (2017). When I say … adaptive expertise. Medical Education, 51(7), 685–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13247.
Saposnik, G., Redelmeier, D., Ruff, C. C., & Tobler, P. N. (2016). Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: A systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 16(1), 138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0377-1.
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207–217.
Schwartz, D., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475–5223. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1604_4.
Schwartz, D., Chase, C., Oppezzo, M., & Chin, D. (2011). Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases: The effects of telling first on learning and transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025140.
Schwartz, D., Lindgren, R., & Lewis, S. (2009). Constructivism in an age of non-constructivist assessments. In T. M. Duffy & S. Tobias (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure?. London: Routledge.
Schwartz, D., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 129–184. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2202_1.
Woods, N. N., & Mylopoulos, M. (2015). How to improve the teaching of clinical reasoning: From processing to preparation. Medical Education, 49, 952–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12823.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steenhof, N., Woods, N.N., Van Gerven, P.W.M. et al. Productive failure as an instructional approach to promote future learning. Adv in Health Sci Educ 24, 739–749 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09895-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09895-4