SpringerLink
Log in

Vulnerability of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest stands to storms and consequences for silviculture

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The form and magnitude of storm damage and stand disclosure patterns were assessed in 332 randomly chosen pure and regular stands of spruce (Picea abies L.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) after storm lothar, within a region of the Swiss Midlands. This data was analysed in relation to maximal wind speed, measured with Doppler radar techniques and other influential factors such as relief, allometric characteristics, silvicultural history, and neighbourhood. In addition, storm damage, assessed from aerial photographs over an extended perimeter (about 70,000 ha) was considered. A storm of the magnitude of lothar (December 26 1999), with an average maximal wind speed of 45 m s−1 (160 km h−1) appears to have a highly chaotic wind field structure, with great spatial and temporal variation of wind gusts. Wind speeds were not a significant predictor for damage in spruce stands and only weakly influential for beech. The consequences of this high randomness were analysed to estimate the return time of such a storm at the stand level. It lies between 86 and 113 years for spruce, 357 and 408 for beech. Only a few independent variables were significant and the overall explanatory strength of the model was unexpectedly low (R 2=0.07 for spruce and 0.30 for beech). Among the more reliable predisposing factors were mixture and aspect combined with gradient. An admixture of 10% or more broadleaved tree species or wind-firm conifers like Douglas fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco] significantly reduced the vulnerability of spruce stands (by a factor of more than three). On wind-exposed aspects, damage was more than twice the average. Steeper slopes caused a significant reduction in susceptibility (by a factor of six for slopes over 50%, in comparison to gentle slopes <20%). Other factors such as height to diameter ratio of trees or time since last thinning did not appear to be significant predictors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angelier A, Francois D (2004) Sapin et douglas face aux vents forts: comprendre les facteurs de risque et adapter notre sylviculture. Rendez-Vous Techniques ONF 3:35–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock J, Vinkler I, Duplat P, Renaud JP (2004) Stabilité au vent des hêtraies: les enseignements de la tempête de 1999 dans le nord-est de la France. Rendez-Vous Techniques ONF 3:29–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosshard W (1967) Erhebungen über die Schäden der Windstürme 1967. Schweiz Z Forstwes 118:806–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger H (1941) Beitrag zur Frage der reinen oder gemischten Bestände. Mitt Schweiz Anst forstl Versuchswes 22:164–203

    Google Scholar 

  • BUWAL WSL (2001) Lothar der Orkan 1999. Ereignisanalyse. Eidg. Forschungsanstalt WSL, Birmensdorf & Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft BUWAL, Bern

  • Coutts MP (1983) Root architecture and tree stability. Plant soil 71:171–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremer KW, Borough CJ, McKinnell FH, Carter PR (1982) Effect of stocking and thinning on wind damage in plantations. New Zealand J Forestry Sci 12(2):244–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Drouineau S, Laroussinie O, Birot Y, Terrasson D, Formery T, Roman-Amat B (2000) Joint evaluation of storms, forest vulnerability and their restoration. European Forest Institute, Discussion Paper 9

  • Dunham RA, Cameron AD (2000) Crown, stem and wood properties of wind-damaged and undamaged Sitka spruce. For Ecol Manage 135:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dvořak L, Bachmann P, Mandallaz D (2001) Sturmschäden in ungleichförmigen Beständen. Schweiz Z Forstwes 152:445–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H, Klötzli F (1972) Waldgesellschaften und Waldstandorte der Schweiz. Mitt Schweiz Anst Forstl Versuchswesen 48:589–930

    Google Scholar 

  • Flury P (1930) Untersuchungen über Zuwachs, Massen- und Geldertrag reiner und gemischter Bestände. Mitt Eidg Anst Forstl Versuchswes 16:453–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster DR, Boose ER (1992) Patterns of forest damage resulting from catastrophic wind in central New England, USA. J Ecol 80:79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foudhil H, Brunet Y, Caltagirone JP (2003) The Venfor-project : a k-ɛ model for simulating wind flow heterogeneous forest canopies. In: Ruck B et al. (eds), Wind effects on trees: Proceedings of the international Conference, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, 16–18 sept, pp 175–181

  • Gardiner BA (1994) Wind and wind forces in a plantation of spruce forest. Boundary Layer Meteorol 67:161–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner BA, Stacey GR, Belcher RE, Wood CJ (1997) Field and wind tunnel assessments of the implications of respacing and thinning for tree stability. Forestry 70(3):233–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue E (1955) Studies of phenomena of waving plants (``Honami”) caused by wind. J Agric Meteorol (Tokyo) 11:18–22 and 87–89 (in japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe MJ (1973) Thigmomorphogenesis: the response of plant growth and development to mechanical stimulation. Planta 114:143–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennel R (1965) Untersuchungen über die Leistung von Fichte und Buche im Rein-und Mischbestand. Allg Forst u J Ztg 136:149–161 and 173–189

  • König A (1995) Sturmgefährdung von Beständen im Altersklassenwald: Ein Erklärungsmodell. Sauerländer’s, Frankfurt a.M.

  • Liu Q, Hytteborn H (1991) Gap structure, disturbance and regeneration in a primeval Picea abies forest. J Veg Sci 2:391–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmander P, Helles F (1987) Windthrow probability as a function of stand caracteristics and shelter. Scan J For Res 2:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüpke Bv, Spellmann H (1997) Aspekte der Stabilität und des Wachstums von Mischbeständen aus Fichte und Buche als Grundlage für waldbauliche Entscheidungen. Forstarchiv 68:167–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüpke Bv, Spellmann H (1999) Aspects of stability, growth and natural regeneration in mixed Norway spruce-beech stands as a basis of silvicultural decisions. In: Olsthoorn AFM, Bartelink HH, Gardiner JJ (eds) Managment of mixed-species forest: silviculture and economics. IBN Scientific Contributions 15. Institute of Forestry and Nature Research, Wageningen, pp 245–267

  • Mayer H, Schindler D (2002) Forstmeteorologische Grundlagen zur Auslösung von Sturmschäden im Wald in Zusammenhang mit dem Orkan ``Lothar”. Allg Forst u J-Ztg 173(11–12):200–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitscherlich G (1974) Sturmgefahr und Sturmsicherung. Schw Z Forstwes 125:199–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen CCN (1990) Einflüsse von Pflanzenabstand und Stammzahlhaltung auf Wurzelform, Wurzelbiomasse, Verankerung sowie auf die Biomassenverteilung im Hinblick auf die Sturmfestigkeit der Fichte. Schriften Forstl Fak Uni Göttingen u.d. Nieders Forstl Vers Anstalt 100:1–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen CCN (1991) Zur Verankerungsökologie der Fichte–Ökologische und waldbauliche Einflüsse auf die Verankerungskomponenten und den Verankerungsprozess. Forst und Holz 46:178–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver HR, Mayhead GJ (1974) Wind measurements in pine forests during a destructive gale. Forestry 47:185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto HJ (2000) Expériences sylvicoles après des ouragans catastrophiques: regards dans le passé en Basse-Saxe. Rev For Fr 52:223–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson P (1975) Windthrow in forest: its causes and the effects of forestry measures. Orig Schwed Rapp Upps Inst Skogsprod 36, 294S

  • Preuhsler T (1991) Sturmschäden in einem Fichtenbestand der Münchener Schotterebene. Allg ForstZ 46(21):1098–1103

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine CP (2003) Wind-driven gap formation and gap expansion in spruce forests of upland Britain. In: Ruck B et al. (eds), Wind effects on trees, Proceedings of the international Conference, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, 16–18 sept, pp 101–108

  • Quine CP, Bell PD (1998) Monitoring of windthrow occurrence and progression in spruce forests in Britain. Forestry 71(2):87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine CP, Gardiner BA (1998) Forest gales: a replacement for the windthrow hazard classification. Rep For Res, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, pp 26–31

  • Redde N (2002) Risiko von Sturm- und Folgeschäden in Abhängigkeit vom Standort und von waldbaulichen Eingriffen bei der Umwandlung von Fichtenbeständen. Ber. Forschungszentrum Waldökosysteme Uni Göttingen, Reihe A, Bd. 179. 171S

  • Rodgers M, Casey A, McMenamin C, Hendrick E (1995) An experimental investigation of the effects of dynamic loading on coniferous trees planted on wet mineral soils. In: Coutts MP, Grace J (eds) Wind and trees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 204–219

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Runkle JR (1982) Patterns of disturbance in some old-growth mesic forests of eastern north America. Ecology 63:1533–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid W, Wüest M, Dobbertin M, Schütz JP (2001) The winter storm lothar: an integrated view on Doppler radars, ground winds an forest damage in northern Switzerland. Preprints 30th International Conference. Radar Meteor, Munich, Germany. Amer Meteor, 394–396

  • Schmid-Haas P, Bachofen H (1991) Die Sturmgefährdung von Einzelbäumen und Beständen. Schweiz Z Forstwes 142(6):477–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraner M, Wüest M, Schmid W (2002) Untersuchungen des Lothar-Sturms mit Dopplerradar. Unveröffentlichter Arbeitsbericht z. H. des BUWAL

  • Schütz JP (1989) Zum Problem der Konkurrenz in Mischbeständen. Schweiz. Z. Forstwes 140(12):1069–1083

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz JP (1999) Close-to-nature silviculture: is this concept compatible with species diversity? Forestry 72(4):359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz JP (2003) Die situative Durchforstung: ein an der Extensivierung der Kosten orientiertes Durchforstungskonzept. In: Brang P (ed), Biologische Rationalisierung im Waldbau: Tagungsband Jahrestagung der Sektion Waldbau im Deutschen Verband forstl. Forschungsanst, Birmensdorf 10–12 Sept, pp 4–13

  • Schütz JP, Götz M (2003) Ursächliche Zusammenhänge zwischen LOTHAR-Sturmschäden und Eigenschaften des Windfeldes sowie Bestandes- und standörtlichen Faktoren, im Perimeter des Dopplerradars der ETH Hönggerberg am Fallbeispiel von Fichten- und Buchenreinbeständen. Schlussbericht Projekt LOTHAR. Professur Waldbau, Zürich

  • Sernander R (1936) [The primitive forests of Granskär and Fiby; Study of the part played by storm-gaps and dwarf trees in the regeneration of the Swedish spruce forest] Acta phytogeogr. Suec, 8

  • Stacey GR, Belcher RE, Wood CJ, Gardiner BA (1994) Wind-flows and forces in a model spruce forest. Boundary Layer Meteorol 69:311–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes A, Fitter AH, Coutts MP (1995) Responses of young trees to wind: effect on root growth. In: Coutts MP, Grace J (eds) Wind and trees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 264–275

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Valinger E, Fridman E (1997) Modelling probability of snow and wind damages in Scots pine stands using tree characteristics. For Ecol Manage 97:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White RG, White MF, Mayhead GJ (1976) Measurement of the motion of trees in two dimensions. University of Southampton Technical Report, p 86

  • Wüest M (2001) Dealiaising wind information from Doppler radar for operational use. Dissertation ETH, No. 14378

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out within the framework of a large research project financially supported by the Swiss agency for the environment forests and landscape (BUWAL).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chair Silviculture, Department of Environmental Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland

    Jean-Philippe Schütz & Michael Götz

  2. Institute for Atmospheric and Climatic Sciences, Department of Environmental sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland

    Willi Schmid

  3. Chair Forest Engineering, Department of environmental sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland

    Daniel Mandallaz

  4. Brüggliäcker 37, 8050, Zürich, Switzerland

    Jean-Philippe Schütz

Authors
  1. Jean-Philippe Schütz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Götz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Willi Schmid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel Mandallaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Philippe Schütz.

Additional information

Communicated by Hans Pretzsch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schütz, JP., Götz, M., Schmid, W. et al. Vulnerability of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest stands to storms and consequences for silviculture. Eur J Forest Res 125, 291–302 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-006-0111-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-006-0111-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation