SpringerLink
Log in

Improved method to estimate undifferenced satellite fractional cycle biases using network observations to support PPP ambiguity resolution

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fixing ambiguities is beneficial to improve accuracy and convergence time of precise point positioning (PPP). In recent years, several methods have been proposed to estimate fractional cycle biases (FCBs) to realize ambiguity-fixed PPP. Existing single-difference models are mostly for GPS-only ambiguity-fixed PPP. However, the use of a single-difference model to achieve fixed ambiguities in GPS + GLONASS PPP is complicated because GLONASS uses frequency division multiple access modulation. This study presents an improved method to estimate undifferenced FCBs using network observations. The periodic feature of a trigonometric function is utilized to eliminate the integer ambiguity. Therefore, the proposed method avoids the difficulty of ambiguity fixing in undifferenced FCBs estimation at the network. Thus, it is a very simple method. GPS + GLONASS observation data of the Chinese reference station network are used to achieve ambiguity fixing for GPS-only and GPS + GLONASS PPP using the estimated FCBs. Experimental results show that the FCBs estimated with the proposed method can satisfy the accuracy requirement for ambiguity-fixed PPP. The root-mean-squares of the resolutions of GPS-only ambiguity-fixed PPP in the N, E, and U directions can reach 0.8, 0.9, and 2.5 cm, respectively, which are comparable with existing ambiguity-fixed resolutions in PPP. The resolutions of fixed ambiguity in GPS + GLONASS PPP can reach 0.7, 0.7, and 2.0 cm, which is an improvement by approximately 13, 22, and 20%, respectively, compared to the fixed solution of GPS-only PPP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blewitt G (1989) Carrier phase ambiguity resolution for the Global Positioning System applied to geodetic baselines up to 2000 km. J Geophys Res Solid Earth (1978–2012) 94(B8):10187–10203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang S, Wenting Y, Weiwei S, Yidong L, Yibin Y, Rui Z (2013) GLONASS pseudorange inter-channel biases and their effects on combined GPS/GLONASS precise point positioning. GPS Solut 17(4):439–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins P, Bisnath S, Lahaye F, Héroux P (2010) Undifferenced GPS ambiguity resolution using the decoupled clock model and ambiguity datum fixing. Navigation 57(2):123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong D, Bock Y (1989) Global Positioning System network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California. J Geophys Res Solid Earth (1978–2012) 94(B4):3949–3966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabor MJ, Nerem RS (1999) GPS carrier phase ambiguity resolution using satellite-satellite single difference. In: Proceedings of ION GPS 1999, Institute of Navigation, Nashville, TN, Sept. 14–17, pp 1569–1578

  • Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Liu J (2008) Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in Precise Point Positioning (PPP) with daily observations. J Geod 82(7):389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng J, Teferle F, Meng X, Dodson A (2010a) Towards PPP-RTK: ambiguity resolution in real-time precise point positioning. Adv Space Res 47:1664–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng J, Meng X, Dodson A, Teferle F (2010b) Integer ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning: method comparison. J Geod 84(9):569–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng J, Shi C, Ge M, Dodson AH, Lou Y, Zhao Q, Liu J (2012) Improving the estimation of fractional-cycle biases for ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning. J Geod 86(8):579–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouba J (2003) A guide to using International GPS Service (IGS) products, IGS report, International GPS Service

  • Kozlov D, Tkachenko M, Tochilin A (2000) Statistical characterization of hardware biases in GPS + GLONASS receivers. In: Proceedings of ION GPS 2000, Institution of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, Sept. 19–22, pp 817–826

  • Laurichesse D, Mercier F, Berthias JP, Broca P, Cerri L (2009) Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP and satellite precise orbit determination. Navigation 56(2):135–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leick A, Li J, Beser Q, Mader G (1995) Processing GLONASS carrier phase observations-theory and first experience. In: Proceedings of ION GPS 1995, Institution of Navigation, Kansas City, MO, Sept. 12–15, pp 1041–1047

  • Leick A, Rapoport L, Tatarnikov D (2015) GPS satellite surveying, 4th edn. J. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Zhang X (2012) Improving the estimation of uncalibrated fractional phase offsets for PPP ambiguity resolution. J Navig 65(03):513–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melbourne WG (1985) The case for ranging in GPS-based geodetic systems. In: Proceedings of 1st international symposium on precise point positioning with the global positioning system. 15–19 April, Rockville, pp 373–386

  • Reussner N, Wanninger L (2011) GLONASS Inter-frequency Biases and Their Effects on RTK and PPP Carrier-phase Ambiguity Resolution. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2011, Institution of Navigation, Portland OR, Sept. 20–23, pp 712–716

  • Sleewaegen J, Simsky A, De Wilde W, Boon F, Willems T (2012) Demystifying GLONASS inter-frequency carrier phase biases. InsideGNSS 7(3):57–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation. J Geod 70(1):65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P, Joosten P, Tiberius C (1999) Geometry-free ambiguity success rates in case of partial fixing. In: Proceedings of ION NTM, Jan. 25–27, San Diego, CA, pp 25–27

  • Wang J, Feng Y (2013) Reliability of partial ambiguity fixing with multiple GNSS constellations. J Geod 87(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanninger L (2012) Carrier phase inter-frequency biases of GLONASS receivers. J Geod 86(2):139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wübbena G (1985) Software developments for geodetic positioning with GPS using TI-4100 code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of 1st international symposium on precise point positioning with the global positioning system. 15–19 April, Rockville, pp 403–412

  • Yi W, Song W, Lou Y, Shi Y, Yao Y (2016) A method of undifferenced ambiguity resolution for GPS + GLONASS precise point positioning. Sci Rep. doi:10.1038/srep26334

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102(B3):5005–5017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the IGS for providing high-quality combined GPS/GLONASS precise orbit and clock corrections. This study was supported by State Key Research and Development Program (2016YFB0501802), the National Natural Science Funds (Grant No. 41374034, Grant No. 41404010), and also by Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Map** and Remote Sensing (Grant No. 15P01). We thank all the anonymous reviewers for their constructive and valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center of GNSS, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, China

    Wenting Yi, Weiwei Song, Yidong Lou, Chuang Shi & Hailin Guo

  2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Geospatial Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China

    Wenting Yi, Weiwei Song, Yidong Lou & Chuang Shi

  3. School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China

    Yibin Yao

  4. National Geomatics Center of China, Bei**g, 100830, China

    Ming Chen & Junli Wu

Authors
  1. Wenting Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Weiwei Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yidong Lou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chuang Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yibin Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hailin Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ming Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Junli Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiwei Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yi, W., Song, W., Lou, Y. et al. Improved method to estimate undifferenced satellite fractional cycle biases using network observations to support PPP ambiguity resolution. GPS Solut 21, 1369–1378 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-017-0616-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-017-0616-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation