Log in

Fuzzy measures of the incidence of relative poverty and deprivation: a multi-dimensional perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Statistical Methods and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present a methodology for the study of multi-dimensional aspects of poverty and deprivation. The conventional poor/non-poor dichotomy is replaced by defining poverty as a matter of degree, determined by the place of the individual in the income distribution. The fuzzy poverty measure proposed is in fact also expressible in terms of the generalised Gini measure. The same methodology facilitates the inclusion of other dimensions of deprivation into the analysis: by appropriately weighting indicators of deprivation to reflect their dispersion and correlation, we can construct measures of non-monetary deprivation in its various dimensions. These indicators illuminate the extent to which purely monetary indicators are insufficient in themselves in capturing the prevalence of deprivation. An important contribution of the paper is to identify rules for the aggregation of fuzzy sets appropriate for the study of poverty and deprivation. In particular, we define a ‘composite’ fuzzy set operator which takes into account whether the sets being aggregated are of a ‘similar’ or a ‘dissimilar’ type. These rules allow us to meaningfully combine income and the diverse non-income deprivation indices at the micro-level and construct what we have termed ‘intensive’ and ‘extensive’ indicators of deprivation. We note that mathematically the same approach can be carried over to the study of persistence of poverty and deprivation over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anand S, Sen AK (1997) Concepts of human development and poverty: a multidimensional perspective. Human Development Papers, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), New York

  • Atkinson AB (2003) Multidimensional deprivation: contrasting social welfare and counting approaches. J Econ Inequal 1:51–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson AB, Bourguignon F (1982) The comparison of multidimensional distributions of economic status. Rev Econ Stud 49:183–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson AB, Cantillon B, Marlier E, Nolan B (2002) Social indicators: the EU and social inclusion. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Betti G, Verma V (1999) Measuring the degree of poverty in a dynamic and comparative context: a multi-dimensional approach using fuzzy set theory. Proceedings of the ICCS-VI, Lahore, Pakistan, vol 11, pp 289–301

  • Betti G, D’Agostino A, Neri L (2002) Panel regression models for measuring multidimensional poverty dynamics. Stat Methods Appl 11:359–369

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Betti G, Cheli B, Lemmi A, Verma V (2006a) Multidimensional and longitudinal poverty: an integrated fuzzy approach. In: Lemmi A, Betti G (eds) Fuzzy set approach to multidimensional poverty measurement. Springer, New York, pp 111–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Betti G, Cheli B, Verma V (2006b) On longitudinal analysis of poverty conceptualised as a fuzzy state. Society for the study of economic inequality working papers series, ECINEQ WP 2006–32

  • Bourguignon F, Chakravarty SR (2003) The measurement of multidimensional poverty. J Econ Inequal 1:25–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerioli A, Zani S (1990) A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. In: Dagum C, Zenga M (eds) Income and wealth distribution, inequality and poverty, studies in contemporary economics. Springer, Berlin, pp 272–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheli B (1995) Totally fuzzy and relative measures in dynamics context. Metron 53:83–205

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheli B, Betti G (1999) Totally fuzzy and relative measures of poverty dynamics in an Italian pseudo panel, 1985–1994. Metron 57:83–104

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheli B, Lemmi A (1995) A totally fuzzy and relative approach to the multidimensional analysis of poverty. Econ Notes 24:115–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappero-Martinetti E (1994) A new approach to evaluation of well-being and poverty by fuzzy set theory. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia 53:367–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappero-Martinetti E (2000) A multidimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen’s functioning approach. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali 108:207–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch J, Silber J (2005) Measuring multidimensional poverty: an empirical comparison of various approaches. Rev Income Wealth 51:145–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duclos JY, Sahn D, Younger SD (2001) Robust multidimensional poverty comparisons. Université Laval, Canada

  • Giorgi L, Verma V (2002) European social statistics: income, poverty and social exclusion, 2nd report. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

  • Hagenaars AJM (1986) The perception of poverty. North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Klasen S (2000) Measuring poverty and deprivation in South Africa. Rev Income Wealth 46:33–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ, Yuan B (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm SC (1977) Multidimensional egalitarism. Q J Econ 91:1–13

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Maasoumi E (1986) The measurement and decomposition of multidimensional inequality. Econometrica 54:771–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maasoumi E, Nickelsburg G (1988) Multivariate measures of well-being and an analysis of inequality in the Michigan data. J Bus Econ Stat 6:326–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan B, Whelan CT (1996) Resources, deprivation and poverty. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Qizilbash M (2006) Philosophical accounts of vagueness, fuzzy poverty measures and multidimensionality. In: Lemmi A, Betti G (eds) Fuzzy set approach to multidimensional poverty measurement. Springer, New York, pp 9–28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ram R (1982) Composite indices of physical quality of life, basic needs fulfilment and income. A principal component representation. J Dev Econ 11:227–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen AK (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeeding T, Saunders P, Coder J, Jenkins SP, Fritzell J, Hagenaars AJM, Hauser R, Wolfson M (1993) Poverty, inequality and family living standards impacts across seven nations: the effect of non-cash subsidies for health, education and housing. Rev Income Wealth 39:229–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeten P (1981) First things first: meeting basic human needs in the develo** countries. World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend P (1979) Poverty in the United Kingdom. Allen Lane, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui K (1985) Multidimensional generalisation of the relative and absolute inequality indices: the Atkinson-Kolm-Sen approach. J Econ Theory 67:251–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma V, Betti G (2005) Sampling errors for measures of inequality and poverty. Invited paper in classification and data analysis—book of short papers, pp. 175–179. CLADAG, Parma, 6–8 June 2005

  • Vero J, Werquin P (1997) Reexamining the measurement of poverty: how do young people in the stage of being integrated in the labour force manage (in French). Economie et Statistique 8–10:143–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan CT, Layte R, Maitre B, Nolan B (2001) Income, deprivation and economic strain: an analysis of the European Community Household Panel. Eur Sociol Rev 17:357–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianni Betti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Betti, G., Verma, V. Fuzzy measures of the incidence of relative poverty and deprivation: a multi-dimensional perspective. Stat. Meth. & Appl. 17, 225–250 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-007-0062-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-007-0062-8

Keywords

Navigation