Introduction

Alum sludge (AS), a by-product of water treatment plants, is considered hazardous waste and the conventional disposal by landfill is not feasible. The disposal of solid wastes, especially alum sludge (AS), has become urgent to minimize environmental threats [1,2,3]. However, treated alum sludge (TAS) possesses high contents of SiO2 and Al2O3, which are the fundamental constituents of cement. So, the feasibility of reusing AS, as a pozzolanic material, with Portland cement (PC) due to their capacity for reacting with calcium hydroxide formed during the hydration of PC has gained interest among concrete researchers [4]. Recently, few studies have investigated the feasibility of using calcined water treatment sludge (WTS) as supplementary cementitious material in cement-based materials due to high pozzolanic activity and evaluated its influence on the mechanical properties of cement. The results indicated that the inclusion of drinking water sludge ash (DWSA) with Portland cement induced the formation of aluminum-bearing hydrates, such as ettringite and calcium aluminate hydrates (C–A–H) [5,6,7].

Over the past few years, nanotechnology was utilized widely in almost all fields of our life to provide novel applications, especially in the construction sector. Nanoparticles’ incorporation to cement materials to inspire new types of building materials with high efficiency and resistance under drastic environmental conditions used in diverse applications are being devoted much attention [8, 9].

Nano silica, nano iron, nano alumina, nanofibers, nano titania, and carbon nanotubes are the most widely used nanoparticles [21]. The produced samples were left at 75–80 °C for 3 h and then maintained in a desiccator (containing soda lime and CaCl2) until the time of testing was reached.

Some important physical properties were followed via assessments of total porosity (TP), bulk density (BD), and water absorption (WA) values at definite time intervals According to ASTM (C140 and C150) [22]. Equations 1, 2, and 3 are used to calculate BD, TP, and WA, respectively.

$$ {\text{BD}}\;\left( {{\text{g/cm}}^{{3}} } \right)\; = \;\frac{{{\text{W}}3}}{{ {\text{W}}1 - {\text{W}}2}}, $$
(1)
$$ {\text{TP}}\;{\text{\% }}\; = \;\frac{{{\text{W}}1 - {\text{W}}3}}{{{\text{W}}1 - {\text{W}}2}}\; \times \;100, $$
(2)
$$ {\text{WA}}\;\left( {\text{\% }} \right)\; = \;\frac{{{\text{W}}1 - {\text{W}}3}}{{{\text{W}}3}}\; \times \;100, $$
(3)

where W1, W2, and W3 are the weights of saturated, suspended, and dried (at 105 °C overnight) samples, respectively.

The samples used for the thermal stability test were treated for 28 days under water, dried at 80 °C for 1 day, and then fired at 300, 600, and 800 °C for 3 h. The fired samples were cooled in two ways: the first group of specimens was left to cool gradually, while the second group cooled rapidly by immersing in tap water. The compressive strength was measured for each set of cooled specimens [23].

X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA/DTG), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques were applied for some selected specimens to identify the textural properties and phases formed during the hydration process.

Results and discussion

Physicomechanical aspects

Compressive strength (CS)

The mechanical properties of the treated specimens were evaluated via the determination of the compressive strength (CS) values at different periods of hydration. The CS values of hardened composites prepared by replacing PC with 0, 5, 10, and 15% of activated alum sludge waste (AAS) (Mixes A, B, C, and D, respectively) are represented in Fig. 6. The CS values showed a general continuous development with an increasing hydration period for all tested mixes. In general, this continuous increase in the strength values is ascribed to the hydration of different phases present in Portland cement clinker and formation of hydration products mainly as (calcium silicate hydrates, C–S–H), (calcium aluminate hydrates, C–A–H), AFm (alumino ferrite monosulfate hydrate, 3CaO.(Al, Fe)2O3.CaSO4.nH2O and AFt (alumino ferrite trisulfate, or ettringite C63H32) and calcium aluminosilicate hydrate (C-(A)-SH) [24].

Fig. 6
figure 6

Compressive strength versus age of hydration for hardened cement pastes (Mixes A–D)

Pastes prepared by replacing PC with 5 and 10% of AAS (mass %) (Mixes B and C; respectively) recorded the highest compressive strength (values at each testing hydration time relative to the control (neat PC) paste (Fig. 6). The reported higher strength values for these composites are linked to the existence of excessive amounts of nearly amorphous and illcrystalline CSH as the main product, obtained via the pozzolanic interaction between AAS waste (alumina and silica phases) and calcium hydroxide, obtained from cement clinker hydration. These hydrates fill up the pores present along with the matrix as well as act as binding centers between the remaining present unhydrated grains.

On the contrary, by increasing the AAS waste to 15% (Mix D), the CS values become comparable or even lower after 28 days than that of blank (Mix A). This decrease in the CS can be ascribed to the dilution effect of PC as a result of its replacement with high percentages of AAS waste, which in turn reduces the amount of Ca(OH)2 liberated as a secondary hydration product from C3S and β-C2S phases that required activating the AAS waste [25]. The CS results affirmed that the optimum replacement ratio of PC by AAS is 10%; this conclusion has been reported previously by many researchers [26].

Figure (7ad) clarifies the effect of additions of 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0% CFs NPs on the CS values of neat PC pastes (Mixes ACFs1–ACFs3, BCFs1–BCFs3, CCFs1–CCFs3 and DCFs1–DCFs3). The addition of different doses of CFs NPs to PC or PC replaced by different masses of AAS waste promotes notable enhancement in the compressive strength values compared to those of their references (Mixes A–D) during all hydration intervals (Figs. 7ad). These results are imputed to the nanoparticle characteristics of CF spinel, such as great specific surface area 66 m2/g, nano dimension 50 nm and, finally, the good distribution of it along with the cement matrix that enables it to fill the nano- and micropores existing among different hydration products, giving rise to dense and compact structure with higher strength values than those of their control (Mix A). Besides, CFs nanoparticles act as active nucleation centers that accelerate the hydration process of cement grains to generate new and additional amounts of different hydrated phases, namely, CSHI (poorly crystalline foils or platelets which have a C/S molar ratio of 0.8–1.5), CSHII (fibrous structure with a C/S molar ratio of 1.5–2.0), calcium aluminate hydrates (C3AH6), calcium aluminosilicate hydrate (Ca-(A)-SH), and calcium ferrosilicate hydrate (like ilvaite, CaFe2+Fe3+Si2O7O(OH), (CFSH)) [27].

Fig. 7
figure 7

Compressive strength values of different hardened cement composites

As a general observation, as the amount of addition of CFs NPs increases (from 0.5 to 2%), its enforcement effect increases for all tested mixes, which is reflected as an increase in the CS values. This enhancement is ascribed to the filling effect of the CFs NPs that promoted reduction in the porosity of the cement matrix. Furthermore, the high alkalinity (pH ~ 12) of the composite matrix induced the partial ionization of CFs NPs into Cu2+ and ferric anion. These ions interact with Ca(OH)2 in the presence of amorphous SiO2 present in the AAS waste, generating an excessive amount of new hydrates [suchas copper silicate hydrate Cu2Si2O7(OH)4.nH2O (CuSH), calcium ferrosilicate hydrate (such as ilvaite, CaFe2+Fe3+Si2O7O(OH), (CFSH)) that strongly participate in the upgrade of the CS values at all intervals of hydration [26]. These findings will be supported by the XRD analysis performed for some selected composites.

In conclusion, the results affirmed that 90% PC–10% AAS–2% CFs composite (Mix CCFs3) could be considered the optimum choice for general construction application, as it displayed the highest CS values as compared to all other tested nanocomposites at almost all testing ages. Undoubtedly, from the economic and environmental point of view, this composite (90PC–10AAS–2 CFs) offers many benefits, as replacement of PC by 10% AAS helps in reducing waste disposal costs (landfill tax), offering an alternative use for recycled water-treated plant sludge, without prejudging on either cost or quality as well as protecting the environment by saving energy and diminishing the amount of harmful gases (CO2 and NOx) and other air pollutants emitted from the cement industry.

Bulk density

The results of bulk density (g/cm3) of various mixes are graphically represented in Fig. 8a–e. The bulk density (BD) values indicate a continuous increase from 1 to 28 days of hydration for all the tested composites. These findings could be ascribed to the stuffing of pores over time with the accumulated hydration products, which promoted the formation of a dense and compact structure. Figure (8a) reveals that the BD values of Mixes B and C are higher and/or comparable to that of blank (Mix A), while the BD values of Mix D are lower and/or comparable to the control (Mix A). These results are in agreement with the CS results. The increase in the BD values in the case of composites made from Mixes B and C is assigned to the excessive amount of hydration products formed from the pozzolanic reaction between calcium hydroxide, liberated from cement clinker hydration, and AAS waste as mentioned previously. These products are stacked in most of the available spaces (pores) along the hardened cement matrix, promoting depletion in the total porosity (as will be discussed) and raising the BD values of the hardened composites. In the case of composite made from Mix D, the additionally formed hydration products from the pozzolanic interaction between the available CH and AAS are less than in the case of Mixes B and C for the previously mentioned factors mentioned in the compressive strength section. So, this mix showed DB values lower than (Mixes B and C), but still comparable to that of the blank (Mix A). The main observation is that the bulk density values of hardened nanocomposites (containing CFs NPs) are higher than that of their control (Mixes A, B, C, and D), and the densification effect (high bulk density values) increases as the CFs NPs content increases Fig. 8b–e. This finding is certainly owing to the activation impact of CFs NPs, as CFs act as foreign nucleation centers that accelerates the hydration process and promotes the formation of an extra amount of C-S-H gel [calcium silicate hydrate (3CaO.2SiO2.3H2O], CASH, CAH [calcium aluminate hydrate 3CaO.Al2O3.6H2O], CFSH [calcium ferrosilicate hydrate, such as ilvaite, CaFe2+Fe3+Si2O7O(OH)], and copper silicate hydrate Cu2Si2O7(OH)4.nH2O (CuSH). These extra products are accumulated in the available pore-forming more compact and dense structure with higher BD.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Bulk density values of all hardened composites

Total porosity

The results of total porosity for different composites are represented in Fig. 9a–e. As Fig. 9a displays, the values of TP% showed a gradual decrease with the progress of the hydration process (from 1 to 28 days) for (Mixes A–D). This dwindling is assigned to the stacking of different hydrates formed within the available spaces along with the composite matrix. Also, the TP values for (Mixes B and C) are lower than that of the control (Mix A), while for Mix D its TP values are comparable to the blank. These results are correlated with the BD and CS results and the explanation has been previously mentioned in these sections. Moreover, the presence of CFs NPs promoted a notable reduction in the total porosity for all prepared nanocomposites as compared to their control, and as the admixing amount of CFs increases, the reduction in the TP % increases Fig. 9b–e. The decrease in the TP % by the incorporation of CFs NPs is ascribed to the reduction in the available pores present along with the hardened matrix, owing to the CFs NPs acting as a filler as well as an activator that promote the formation of an extra amount of hydration products (namely: C–S–H gel, CASH, CAH, CFSH, and CuSH) that fill up the majority of the present pores.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Total Porosity values of all hardened composites

Water absorption

Figure 10a displays the water absorption data obtained for Mixes A–D. The outcomes of this test are: (1) WA values of all tested composites decreased with curing age; (2) blended composites made from Mixes B and C displayed lower WA percentages as compared to neat PC (Mix A), while Mix D showed comparable or slightly higher value after 28 days; (3) incorporation of CFs NPs within the PC–AAS pastes induced the reduction in TP%, which caused declines in the water absorption values for all prepared nanocomposites, and (4) the declining effect of CFs increased with its incorporation content along with the composite matrix from 1 to 28 days, and the WA values decreased (Fig. 10b–e). These outcomes agreed with the results of CS, BD, and TP results; the explanation of these outcomes has been mentioned previously.

Fig.10
figure 10

Water Absorption values of different hardened cement composites

The finding of CS, BD, TP, and WA tests shows that the nanocomposite 90PC–10AAS–2CFs has the optimum composition for application, as it presents optimum physical characteristics compared to all tested mixes during nearly all testing periods (86.94 Mpa, CS; 2.33 g/cm3, BD; 35.12%, TP; and 12.99%, WA after 28 days of hydration).

Thermal resistivity (TR)

The influence of exposing the hardened composites made from (PC, PC–AAS, and PC–AAS–CFs) hydrated for 28 days to higher temperatures (300, 600, and 800 °C) was investigated. The CS values for different composites after firing at different temperatures for 3 h duration and left for slow cooling in air are graphically represented in Fig. 11a–d.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Compressive strength values for different fired cement composites after slow cooling in air

The main findings obtained are: (i) all composites showed a marked increase in the CS values upon heating up to 300 °C compared to their recorded values after 28 days of hydration, followed by a notable diminishing upon heating to 600 and 800 °C, (ii) all PC–AAS composites showed higher compressive strength values compared to that of neat PC cement (Mix A) at all testing temperatures, (iii) all composites admixed with CFs showed higher CS values compared to their controls (Mixes A–D) after firing at different temperatures, and (iv) as the amount of CFs increase the firing resistance increases (Figs. 11a–d). These outcomes could be explained as follows: the high upgrading in the CS values after exposure to 300 °C could be credited to the hydrothermal reaction (internal autoclaving) that occurs between the H2O vapor molecules generated from the evaporation of physically adsorbed water inside different pores along with the hardened cement matrix and the residual unreacted cement grains [27]. The obvious enhancement in the thermal stability of different nanocomposites (especially Mix DCFs3) at 300 °C is assigned to the perfect dispersion of CFs NPs within the composite matrix and its effectiveness to induce the formation of large quantities of various hydration products via its nucleation effect and activation of the internal autoclaving. These products are stuck in the available spaces (macro and micropores) along the hardened composite, promoting the formation of the hardened matrix that has good resistance to fire deterioration [28]. Evidently, the noticed decrease in the CS values for all composites upon exposure to 600 °C is mainly ascribed to the thermal degradation of nearly all fundamental products such as CSH (I and II), CAH, CASHs, AFm, Aft, CFSH, and CH [27]. Finally, the enormous depletion in CS values for all tested composites after firing at 800 °C is assigned to the complete thermal degradation for all binding centers, as well as the induction of several cracks along with the composite matrix [18].

The CS values for different composites after exposure to 300, 600, and 800 °C for 3 h and cooled suddenly (by cold water) are represented in (Fig. 12a–d). Clearly, the CS values for these composites are lower than their analogs fired at the same temperatures and cooled in the air (slowly). Also, all composites showed a continuous deterioration in CS with increase in the firing temperature (from 300 up to 800 °C) (Fig. 12a–d). The significant reduction in CS is ascribed to the formation of several cracks as well as enlargement of the already generated crack (micro-cracks induced during the firing) because of the thermal shock that occurred during the rapid cooling process [24]. All examined composites show a continuous notable depression in the compressive strength with increase in the heating temperature from 300 to 600 °C and then reached zero at 800 °C. However, the degree of loss in strength in the case of blended samples with or without CFs NPs is higher than that of neat Portland cement pastes with or without CFs NPs.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Compressive strength values for different fired cement composites after suddenly cooling

Figure 13a–d demonstrates the percentage relative compressive strength (RCS) (relative to their CS after 28 days) for all fired specimens after some time. The calculated RCS percentages values are 125.16, 125.4, 125.53 and 128.79 for Mixes A–D, respectively, 125.26, 125.31 and 125.43 for Mixes ACFs1–ACFs3), respectively, 125.46, 125.58 and 125.61 for Mixes BCFs1–BCFs3, respectively, 126.37, 126.39 and 126.41 for Mixes CCFs1–CCFs3, respectively, and 134.81, 135.22 and 136.07 for Mixes DCFs1–DCFs3, respectively, after firing at 300°C and cooled slowly (Fig. 13ad). Evidently, these findings show the nanocomposite containing 85% PC–15% AAS waste–2% CFs to be the best selection for thermal application, as it presents the highest residual strength (highest % RCS), which is a perfect result from the economic and environmental point of views.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Relative residual compressive strength values for different fired cement composites after slow cooling in air

Figure 14a–d displays the percentage relative compressive strength (relative to their CS after 28d) for different composites after firing and rapid cooling. The RCS% values for these composites after firing at 300 °C and rapidly cooled are 95.17, 95.29, 95.79 and 91.12 for Mixes A–D, respectively, 96.75, 97.45 and 97.62 for Mixes ACFs1–ACFs3, respectively, 96.77, 97.51, and 97.63 for Mixes BCFs1–BCFs3); respectively, 96.85, 97.54 and 97.99; (Mixes CCFs1-CCFs3, respectively, and 96.12, 96.59 and 97.60 for Mixes DCFs1–DCFs3, respectively. These finding support the positive impact of CFs on upgrading the fire resistance for different PC–AAS blended pastes.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Relative residual compressive strength values for different fired cement composites after suddenly cooling

Phase composition

X-ray diffraction (XRD)

The XRD patterns of composites made from 100 PC, 95PC–5AAS, 90PC–10 AAS, PC–2 CFs, 95PC–5AAS–2 CFs and 90 PC–10 AAS–2CFs after 7 and 28 days of hydration are displayed in Figs. 15 and 16, respectively. The main indication of the XRD patterns is the formation of CSH and CH as major products, as their characteristic peaks appeared in XRD patterns of all mixes [29] (Fig. 15). The indicative peaks of unreacted portion C3S, β-C2S, and quartz could also be distinguished. Besides, the peaks characteristic of the calcite phase (CaCO3) is also identified, due to the reaction of the created lime (CH) with atmospheric CO2 gas [30]. The inclusion of 2% CF NPs along these composites (Mixes ACFs3, BCFs3, and CCFs3) induced the formation of extra amounts of CAH, CASH, CSH (I), and CSH (II). Besides, CuFe2O4 nanoparticles dissociate and undergo a pozzolanic reaction with Ca(OH)2 liberated from clinker hydration causing the creation of new phases, namely ilvaite, CaFe2+Fe3+Si2O7O(OH), (CFSH) and CuSH. The indicative peaks of these products are well displayed in the patterns. The accumulation of these products is contributed strongly to the development of compressive strength. The XRD analysis supports the previously reported CS results, which revealed that the nanocomposites presented high mechanical characteristics (high CS) than their controls (composites without CFs NPs). Evidently, the XRD pattern is a qualitative technique as it detects only the crystalline portion of any material. So, it can be used to detect the phase change during the progress of the hydration process or by the addition of different admixtures as nanomaterials. Figure (16) display the XRD patterns of selected samples after 28 days; clearly, the same phases were identified for all tested samples.

Fig. 15
figure 15

XRD patterns of hardened composites made from (Mix A–C), and nanocomposites made from (Mix ACFs3–CCFs3) at 7 days of hydration

Fig. 16
figure 16

XRD patterns of hardened composites made from Mixes (A–C), and nanocomposites made from Mixes (ACFs3–CCFs3) at 28 days of hydration

Differential thermogravimetric analysis

Figures 17, 18, 19, and 20 illustrate the differential thermogravimetric analysis (TG/DTA) obtained for PC, PC–2CFs, PC–10 AAS and PC–10 AAS–2 CFs (Mixes A, ACFs3, C and CCFs3, respectively) after 7 - and 28 days of hydration. Figure 17a, b indicates the presence of four endothermic peaks at temperature zones of ~ 70–180, ~ 505 0.720, and 760 °C, for neat PC sample hydrated for 7 and 28 days, respectively. The first endothermic peak presented at the range of 70–180 °C refers to the removal of physically adsorbed (nonbounded water) as well as the amorphous parts of CSHs, ettringite (3CaO.Al2O3.3CaSO4.32H2O), and monosulfate (3CaO. (Al,Fe)2O3.CaSO4.nH2O) [31] after 7 and 28 days of hydration, respectively. The endothermic peak located at 505 °C, is assigned to the thermal destruction of Ca(OH)2 [32, 33]. The % mass loss of the first peak is 6.9 and 7.2, while for the second peak 2.1 and 2.8 after 7 and 28 days of hardening, respectively. These values affirmed the development of the hydration process of PC and the formation of extra quantities of CSHs, ettringite, and AFm (monosulphate), and CH as the main hydration products [27]. The presence of double peaks appearing at 720 and 760 ascertain the partial carbonation of the formed hydration products during the handling of the specimens. The double peaks account for the existence of carbonates with different degrees of crystallinity, and the values of the percentage mass loss of these peaks are correlated to the degree of crystallinity as well as the degree of carbonation [29].

Fig. 17
figure 17

TG/DTA thermograms of hardened neat PC pastes (Mix A) at (a) 7 days and (b) 28 days of hydration

Fig. 18
figure 18

TG/DTA thermograms of hardened neat PC pastes containing 2% CFs NPs (Mix ACFs3) at (a) 7 days and (b) 28 days of hydration

Fig. 19
figure 19

TG/DTA thermograms of hardened blended specimens made from PC–10%ASAA (Mix C) (a) 7 days and (b) 28 days hydration

Fig. 20
figure 20

TGA/DTG thermograms of hardened specimens made from PC–10%ASAA–2% CFs NPs (Mix CCFs3) at (a) 7 days and (b) 28 days of hydration

Figure 18a and b displays the TG/DTA data of PC–2CFs nanocomposite (Mix ACFs3). The TG/DTA results of this composite are identical with that of neat PC (Mix A), but with a notable increase in the %total mass loss (especially for peaks present at ~ 70–180 °C and ~ 506 °C). The entire % mass reduction of the diverse hydration yields are 16.9 to 18.5% (for PC) and 17.5, 18.9 (for PC–2% CFs) after 7 and 28 days, respectively. This finding is due to the catalytic acceleration effect of CFs NPs that act as nucleation centers for the hydration process to create additional supplemental hydration products, which participate in mechanical aspects of boosting. The TG/DTA data agreed with the compressive strength results mentioned previously in this study.

Figure 19a and b demonstrates the TG/DTA thermograms of the hardened specimens made from PC–10 AAS (Mix C). The same main endothermic peaks, as well as the same behavior as neat PC (Mix A), are observed. The values of mass loss (%) of the first peak (at ~ 70–180 °C) are 7.0 and 7.1, while the value for the second endothermic peak (at about 505 °C) is 2.2–2.9 after 7–28 days, respectively. These values are correlated to both the quantity and the degree of crystallinity of the formed products. The peak detected at ~ 740 °C is referred to as the decomposition of different carbonates formed as a result of specimen carbonation during handling processes. Obviously, the total % mass losses for all the formed products are 18.2 and 19 after 7 and 28 days, respectively, which are higher than that of neat PC (16.9 and 18.5). The notable increase in the percentage of total mass loss is correlated to the formation of extra amounts of nearly amorphous and illcrystalline CSH as the main hydration product, formed from the pozzolanic reaction between CH, liberated from PC hydration, and amorphous silica and alumina phases present in AAS waste. These findings are corroborated with the compressive strength results.

Figure 20a and b displays the TG/DTA curves for PC–10 AAS–2.0 CFs nanocomposite (Mix CCFs3) after 7- and 28-day hydration. This nanocomposite shows the same peaks as in the case of the PC–10AAS composite. The first endothermic peak found at 70–180 °C referred to the removal of evaporable water and decomposition of CSH and sulfoaluminates in addition to the thermal ruptures for secondary hydration yields such as gehlenite hydrate (C2ASH8) and hydrocalumite (C4AH13), and the mass loss% for this peak is 6.9 and 7.8 after 7 and 28 days of hydration, respectively. The mass loss% for the second endothermic peak characteristic for decomposition of CH (located at ~ 500 °C) is 2.4 and 3.1 after 7 and 28 days, respectively. The observed increase in the mass loss% values of these two peaks is explained in terms of the continuity of the hydration reaction. It is observed from the figure that the total mass reduction percentages are 18.6 and 19.3% after 7 and 28 days, respectively, and these percentages are relatively higher when matched with the corresponding data of all tested specimens (Mixes A, ACFs3, C, and CCFs3). The notable increase in %total mass loss of these nanocomposites is ascribed to the reinforcing effect of the dispersed CFs NPs as mentioned previously. Also, the TG/DTA results agreed with all previously mentioned results (CS, TP, BD, and WA).

Morphology and textural characteristics

The morphology and the textural characteristics for Mix A specimens treated for 7 and 28 days are presented in Fig. 21a and b, respectively. After 7 days, the SEM images reflect the formation of the noncompact matrix and along with it some pores and a small amount of hydration products, mainly as CSH with illcrystalline and fibrous structure can be detected. Also, small amounts of CH as hexagonal plates dispersed along with the matrix and a small amount of calcite, besides a large amount of unreacted clinker grains can be well distinguished (Fig. 21a). After 28 days, the SEM image displayed a dense matrix composed of excessive amounts of microcrystalline and fibrous CSH as well as CH that displayed as stacked hexagonal crystals. Also, a very small amount of calcite can be observed in the matrix due to the side reaction of CO2 with CH formed during handling of the sample (Fig. 21b). Besides, there are void spaces still present in the matrix available for the deposition of new hydration products.

Fig. 21
figure 21

SEM micrographs of PC-hardened cement pastes (Mix A): (a) after 7 days, (b) after 28 days, (c) after firing at 300 °C and (d) after firing at 800 °C

Figure 21c displays the morphology of the hardened samples of Mix A exposed to firing at 300 °C, followed by slow cooling in air. The SEM images reflect the presence of a compact structure possessing a large amount of nearly amorphous fibrous C–S–H as the major hydration products interlocked with the hexagonal plates of CH. These microstructure features confirm the internal autoclaving reaction of unreacted PC grains that leads to the formation of an extra amount of hydration products (CSH, CH, CAHs, CASHs), promoting the formation of a dense structure with good mechanical characteristics (high CS values). This outcome agrees with the obtained data of CS, BD, TP, and WA results. The microstructure obtained for the PC specimen (Mix A), exposed to a higher temperature (800 °C) and gradual cooling, illustrates the presence of several micro-cracks, and no hydration product could be distinguished since nearly all of them were decomposed. Certainly, the decomposition of the formed hydration products and the formation of micro-cracks are the main factors that cause the deterioration of these specimens. The very low CS values presented by these specimens agreed with the obtained SEM data (Fig. 21d).

Figure 22a and b represents the SEM images of hardened specimens made from 90 PC + 10AAS + 2 CFs (Mix CCFs3) after 7 and 28 days, respectively. The findings of the SEM micrographs of these nanocomposites are: (1) The SEM image of the specimen after 7 days is less dense and contains less amount of hydration products and a great part of unreacted clinker grains compared to its SEM image after 28 days of hydration. (2) Replacing PC with 10% AAS induces the formation of excess amounts of hydration products (namely, CSH, CAH, CASH), and all these products enhance the microstructure and the mechanical characteristics of these nanocomposites after 7 and 28 days compared to that of neat PC as indicated by the SEM images of this nanocomposite (Fig. 22a and b). (3) SEM micrographs of these specimens ascertain the filling effect of the nanoparticles to the existing pores as well as activation rule of CFs NPs, as it causes the formation of excessive products as its rule as active site and via its reaction and formation of a diverse product that appeared in the micrographs like; micro rods and fibrous crystals of CSHs, plates of CASHs, fine crystals of CFSH, CuSH and fibers of AFt (3CaO·Al2O3·3CaSO4·32H2O); all formed hydration products are diffused with little hexagonal crystals of CH. The formation of additional hydration products and/or the formation of new products (CFSH and CuSH) is the main factor for the obtained dense and hard matrix for this nanocomposite Fig. 22a and b [27].

Fig. 22
figure 22

SEM micrographs of PC-hardened cement pastes (Mix CCFs3): (a) after 7 days, (b) after 28 days, (c) after firing at 300 °C and (d) after firing at 800 °C

Figures 22c and d displays the SEM images of specimens made from Mix CCFs3 after firing at 300°C and 800°C and cooling in air. The images revealed microstructure upturn for these nanocomposites, which correlates with the rule of both AAS and CFS NPs. Figure 22c displays the SEM images of CCFs3 hardened sample fired at 300 °C and slowly cooled in air. The SEM images reflect the presence of a highly compact structure compared to the neat cement (Mix A) exposed to the same conditions, and the micro composition of this composite revealed the existence of an excess amount of nearly amorphous fibrous C–S–H as the major hydration products, diffused with few hexagonal plates of CH. Also, some plates of CAHs, CASHs as well as fine crystals of CFSH and CuSH could be distinguished along the matrix. The formation of these products (especially fine crystals of CFSH and CuSH that fill up the micropores and mesopores of the hardened paste) promoted the formation of a dense structure with good mechanical characteristics (high CS values). The microstructure obtained for specimen made from Mix CCFs3, exposed to firing at 800 °C for 3 h and gradual cooling, revealed the complete decomposition of nearly all formed products, simulating the formation of micro-cracks and less dense and porous microcomposition. Clearly, the existence of CFs nanoparticles reduces the degree of porosity of the fired specimens when compared to neat cement (Mix A) exposed to the same condition (Fig. 22d).

Conclusion

The effect of the addition of small ratios of CuFe2O4 spinel nanoparticles on the physical, mechanical, microstructure, and deterioration characteristics of eco-friendly blended composites prepared from PC and AAS waste were investigated in this article. The main findings of this investigation can be summarized as follows:

  1. 1.

    The obtained results of all performed tests indicated the suitability of utilization of PC–AAS waste composite as an eco-friendly construction material.

  2. 2.

    Partial replacing of PC by AAS waste up to 10 mass% boosts the physicomechanical properties (CS, TP, BD, and WA %) of the hardened composites, while replacing PC by 15% AAS waste has no enhancing effect on its physical and mechanical properties.

  3. 3.

    Inclusion of CuFe2O4 spinel nanoparticles up to 2 mass% in PC pastes blended with different ratios of AAS waste motivates the formation of hardened nanocomposites with improved physicomechanical characteristics and thermal stability.

  4. 4.

    The results affirmed that 90% PC–10% AAS waste–2% CFs composite could be considered the optimum choice for general construction application, as it displayed the highest CS values as compared to all other tested nanocomposites at almost all ages of hydration.

  5. 5.

    From the economic and environmental point of view, composite containing 90 PC–10 AAS–2 CFs offers many benefits, as replacement of PC by 10% AAS helps in reducing waste disposal costs (landfill tax), offering an alternative use for recycled water-treated plant sludge, without prejudging on either cost or quality, as well as protecting the environment by saving energy and diminishing the amount of harmful gases (CO2 and NOx) and other air pollutants emitted from the cement industry.

  6. 6.

    Nanocomposite with composition 85% PC–15% AAS waste–2% CFs presents the best thermal stability (highest RCS%), and is considered a perfect result from the economic and environmental point of view to use this nanocomposite for construction exposed to high temperatures.

  7. 7.

    TGA/DTG and XRD techniques affirmed the catalytic activity of CuFe2O4 spinel NPs, as they demonstrated the presence of an excessive amount of CSHs, AFt, AFm, CASHs, CAHs, CuSH, and CFSH in the presence of these NPs.

  8. 8.

    The SEM images affirmed that inclusion of 2% CFs NPs in PC–10 AAS composite during exposure to elevated temperature (300 °C) reinforced its microstructure and mechanical characteristics via promoting the formation of excessive amounts of diverse hydration products as CSHs (I and II) as rod crystals, fibers of ettringite, plates of CASHs, hexagonal sheets of CH and CuSH gels. However, upon firing at 800 °C, thermal degradation for most hydration products and micro/micro-cracks appeared but with less extent compared with neat PC.