Log in

Preparation of light weight constructional materials from chrome containing buffing dust solid waste generated in leather industry

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An alternative and environmentally benign method of disposing the buffing dust, generated from leather industry was carried out in the present investigation. The buffing dust (finished solid waste) was charred in a controlled oxygen atmosphere by coupled pyrolysis and the resultant material was gauged for the application of light weight cement blocks. The results confirmed that, at a flow rate of 1 LPM oxygen supplied for 30 min produced nanostructured fibrous carbon material which was further confirmed through SEM and EDX analyses. Iron nanoparticles were used to inhibit the conversion of trivalent chromium to hexavalent chromium in fibrous carbon before being utilized for making light weight cement block. The addition of iron nanoparticles supplements the mechanical strength by compositional bonding in cement block. The XRD results elucidate that the hexavalent chromium has reduced to trivalent chromium due to the addition of iron nanoparticles in the residue material. The as-prepared light weight cement blocks were fabricated (7 cm × 7 cm × 7 cm) for compression test, simultaneously cement block devoid of iron nanoparticles was prepared as a control. The compressive strength of the light weight cement block comprising of iron nanoparticles (20.7 kN/cm2) was found to be higher than the block without iron nanoparticles (3.82 kN/cm2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

cBD:

Charred buffing dust

LPM:

Litre per minute

BDL:

Below desirable limit

SEM:

Scanning electron microscopy

EDX:

Energy dispersive X-ray

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

EVM:

Expert group on vitamins and minerals

MET:

Minimum eliciting threshold

References

  1. Buljan J, Reich G, Ludvik J (2000) Mass balance in leather processing, US/RAS/92/120, Regional programme for pollution controlling the tanning industry

  2. Swarnalatha S, Ramani K, GeethaKarthi A, Sekaran G (2006) Starved air combustion—solidification/stabilization of primary chemical sludge from a tannery. J Hazard Mater 137:304–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sethuraman C, Srinivas K, Sekaran G (2013) Double pyrolysis of chrome tanned leather solid waste for safe disposal and products recovery. J Sci Ind Res 4(11):61–67

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ozgunay H, Colak S, Mutlu M, Akyuz F (2007) Characterization of leather industry wastes. J Environ Stud 16(6):867–873

    Google Scholar 

  5. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (2010) Scientific Opinion on the safety of trivalent chromium as a nutrient added for nutritional purposes to foodstuffs for particular nutritional uses and foods intended for the general population (including food supplements). EFSA J 8(12):1882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Swarnalatha S, Srinivasulu T, Srimurali M, Sekaran G (2008) Safe disposal of toxic chrome buffing dust generated from leather industries. J Hazard Mater 150:290–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mu C, Lin W, Zhang M, Zhu Q (2003) Towards zero discharge of chromium-containing leather waste through improved alkali hydrolysis. J Waste Manag 23:835–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leonard A, Lawverys RR (1980) Carcinogenicity and mutagenicity of chromium. Mutat Res 76:227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Love G (1983) Chromium-biological and analytical considerations. In: Burrows D (ed) Chromium: metabolism and toxicity. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sekaran G, Shanmugasundaram KA, Mariappan M (1998) Characteization and utilization of CTLW generated by the leather industry. J Hazard Mater 63:53–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fela K, Ciurowa KW, Konopka M, Wozny Z (2008) Present and prospective leather industry waste disposal. J Chem Techno1 3(3):53–55

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kolomaznik K, Adamek M, Andel I, Uhlirova M (2008) Leather waste-potential threat to human health, and a new technology of its treatment. J Hazard Mater 160:514–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Conner JR (1990) Chemical fixation and solidification of hazardouswastes. Van NostrandReinhad Publisher, New York, pp 26–30

    Google Scholar 

  14. Filibelix A, Buyukkamaci N, Senol H (2000) Solidification of tannery wastes. J Resour Conserv Recycling 29:251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Silveire BI, Dantas AEM, Blasques JEM, Santos RKP (2003) Effectiveness of cement based systems for stabilization and solidification of spent liquor inorganic fraction. J Hazard Mater 98:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yilmaz O, KantarliIC YukselM, Saglam M, Yanik J (2007) Conversion of leather wastes to useful products. J Resour Conserv Recycl 49:436–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh R, Misra V, Pratap R (2011) Synthesis, characterization and role of zero-valent iron nanoparticle in removal of hexavalent chromium from chromium-spiked soil. J Nanoparticle Res 13:4063–4073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh IB, Singh DR (2003) Effects of pH on Cr–Fe interaction during Cr(VI) removal by metallic iron. Environ Sci Technol 24:1041–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lenore SC, Arnold EG, Rhodes RT (1985) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, vol 1193, 17th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xu Y, Zhao D (2007) Reductive immobilization of chromate in water and soil using stabilized iron nano-particles. Water Res 41:2101–2108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun Y-P, Cao J, Zhang W-X, Wang HP (2006) Characterization of zero-valent iron nanoparticles. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 120:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nethercott J, Paustenbach D, Adams R et al (1994) A study of chromium induced allergic contact dermatitis with 54 volunteers: implications for environmental risk assessment. Occup Environ Med 51:371–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rudzki E, Zakrzewski Z, Prokopczyk G, Kozlowska A (1978) Contact sensitivity to trivalent chromium compounds. Derm Beruf Umwelt 26:83–85

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank CSIR, India for providing financial assistance through net work project SUSTRANS (ESC 0106) to carry out the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Sekaran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that, there is no conflict of interest financially and personally in the submission of this research article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sivaprakash, K., Maharaja, P., Pavithra, S. et al. Preparation of light weight constructional materials from chrome containing buffing dust solid waste generated in leather industry. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19, 928–938 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0494-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0494-z

Keywords

Navigation