SpringerLink
Log in

Post-colectomy assessment of gastrointestinal function: a prospective study on colorectal cancer patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anatomical changes after intestinal resection and the effects of adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer may lead to gastrointestinal disturbances. The aim of our study was to assess gastrointestinal function using validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires that are able to reliably quantify patients’ symptoms.

Methods

Two hundred and eighty-nine colorectal cancer patients underwent HRQoL assessment preoperatively and at 3,6 and 12 months postoperatively. They were evaluated with the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) [“global” and “symptoms” scales and questions 3 (“bloating”), 4 (“excessive gas”), 6 (“gurgling noises”), 7 (“frequent bowel movements (BMs)”), 30 (“urgent BMs”), 31 (“diarrhea”), 32 (“constipation”), 36 (“uncontrolled stools”)] and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) modules QLQ-C30 (symptom scales: “constipation” and “diarrhea”) and QLQ-CR29 (symptom scales: “defecation problems,” “incontinence,” and “bloating”).

Results

GIQLI “global” and “symptom” indices and the majority of single-item scores and the EORTC QLQ-C30 “constipation” and “diarrhea” subscales showed significant postoperative improvement (p < 0.05). Females and younger age (<70 years) patients appeared to have worse postoperative gastrointestinal function. Rectal cancer patients had more “urgent BMs,” “uncontrolled stools” and worse “global” and “symptom” scores at 3 months and more “diarrhea” at 3 and 6 months than colon cancer patients (p < 0.03). Right colectomy patients had less “excessive passage of gas,” “constipation,” and “uncontrolled stools” than left colectomy patients (3 months, p < 0.01). Anterior resection patients faced more gastrointestinal difficulties, especially in the first 6 months after surgery. Adverse effects related to stage and adjuvant treatment were predominant only at baseline (p < 0.05). GIQLI “diarrhea” and “constipation” scores were correlated with the respective EORTC QLQ-C30 domains (p = 0.0001).

Conclusions

Overall, gastrointestinal function is improved after colorectal cancer surgery. However, women and younger patients are at higher risk of postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127:2893–2917

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schoetz DJ Jr (1991) Postcolectomy syndromes. World J Surg 15:605–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ho YH, Low D, Goh HS (1996) Bowel function survey after segmental colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 39:307–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beckwith PS, Wolff BG, Frazee RC (1992) Ileorectostomy in the older patient. Dis Colon Rectum 35:301–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Papa MZ, Karni T, Koller M et al (1997) Avoiding diarrhea after subtotal colectomy with primary anastomosis in the treatment of colon cancer. J Am Coll Surg 184:269–272

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S et al (1995) Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82:216–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwarz R, Hinz A (2001) Reference data for the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 in the general German population. Eur J Cancer 37:1345–1351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Forgione A, Leroy J, Cahill RA et al (2009) Prospective evaluation of functional outcome after laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. Ann Surg 249:218–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwenk W, Neudecker J, Haase O et al (2004) Comparison of EORTC quality of life core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) in patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:554–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF et al (2006) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 243:143–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fayers PM, Aaronson N, Bjordal K (1999) The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual, 2nd edn. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gujar S, Conroy T, Fleissner C et al (2007) Assessing quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer: an update of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire. Eur J Cancer 43:1564–1573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Whistance RN, Conroy T, Chie W et al (2009) European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group. Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 45:3017–3026

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng J, Shi D, Goodman KA et al (2011) Early results of quality of life for curatively treated rectal cancers in Chinese patients with EORTC QLQ-CR29. Radiat Oncol 6:93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ (2001) The impact of recurrent cancer on quality of life. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:349–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schulze T, Wust P, Gellermann J et al (2006) Influence of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy combined with hyperthermia on the quality of life in rectum cancer patients. Int J Hyperth 22:301–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Siassi M, Hohenberger W, Lösel F, Weiss M (2008) Quality of life and patient’s expectations after closure of a temporary stoma. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1207–1212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sloan JA (2002) Asking the obvious questions regarding patient burden. J Clin Oncol 20:4–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sloan J, Symonds T, Vargas-Chanes D, Fridley B (2003) Practical guidelines for assessing the clinical significance of health-related quality of life changes within clinical trials. Drug Inf J 37:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A (1992) New grading and scoring for anal incontinence. Evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 35:482–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al (1999) Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1525–1532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Herschbach P (2002) The ‘Well-being paradox’ in quality-of-life research. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 52:141–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ho YH, Wong J, Goh HS (1993) Level of anastomosis and anorectal manometry in predicting function following anterior resection for adenocarcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis 8:170–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Horgan FG, O’Connel PR, Shinkwin CA, Kirwan WO (1989) Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 76:783–786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Dapoigny M, Trolese JK, Bommelaer G, Toumut R (1988) Myoelectric spiking activity of right colon, left colon and rectosigmoid of healthy humans. Dig Dis Sci 33:1007–1012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (1991) Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg 78:1431–1433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. The SCOTIA Study Group (1995) Single-stage treatment for malignant left-sided colonic obstruction: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing subtotal colectomy with segmental resection following intraoperative irrigation. Subtotal colectomy versus on-table irrigation and anastomosis. Br J Surg 82:1622–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Colorectal Unit, 1st Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippocration Hospital, University of Athens Medical School, 7 Semitelou Street, 11528, Athens, Greece

    G. E. Theodoropoulos, I. G. Papanikolaou, T. Karantanos & G. Zografos

Authors
  1. G. E. Theodoropoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. G. Papanikolaou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Karantanos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Zografos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. E. Theodoropoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Theodoropoulos, G.E., Papanikolaou, I.G., Karantanos, T. et al. Post-colectomy assessment of gastrointestinal function: a prospective study on colorectal cancer patients. Tech Coloproctol 17, 525–536 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1008-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1008-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation