SpringerLink
Log in

Complications after frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy: a systematic review

  • Short Review
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stereotactic frame-based brain biopsy is one of the most used procedures to obtain brain tissue. This procedure is usually considered as mini-invasive, quick, efficient, and safe even if results of the different studies are widely heterogenous. The objective of this review of the literature is to describe and analyze the complications of stereotactic frame-based brain biopsy. About 132 articles were found after a research in the Medline database. We only considered English references published between 1994 and June 2019. Additional studies were found by using the references from articles identified in the original search. This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. After applying exclusion criteria, we eventually considered 25 relevant studies. The mortality rate varies from 0.7 to 4%. Overall morbidity ranges from 3 to 13%. Most of the complications are revealed by the following symptoms: neurological impairment (transient or permanent), seizure, and unconsciousness. Symptomatic hemorrhage range varies from 0.9 to 8.6%, whereas considering asymptomatic bleeding, the range may be up to 59.8%. Complications were clinically evident within minutes to a few hours after the biopsy. Corrective surgeries are very rare (< 1%). Complications occurring after a frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy are rare but with serious side effects. It rarely leads to death or to permanent neurological impairment. Description and classification of complications are often heterogeneous in the literature. The use of a grading scale could help comparisons between series from around the world. Future studies should establish a score that allows neurosurgeon to predict post-biopsy complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bai HX, Zou Y, Lee AM, Lancaster E, Yang L (2015) Diagnostic value and safety of brain biopsy in patients with cryptogenic neurological disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 831 cases. Neurosurgery 77:283–295; discussion 295. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernstein M, Parrent AG (1994) Complications of CT-guided stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain lesions. J Neurosurg 81:165–168. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1994.81.2.0165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burns JD, Cadigan RO, Russell JA (2009) Evaluation of brain biopsy in the diagnosis of severe neurologic disease of unknown etiology. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 111:235–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen C-C, Hsu P-W, Erich Wu T-W, Lee S-T, Chang C-N, Wei K, Chuang C-C, Wu C-T, Lui T-N, Hsu Y-H, Lin T-K, Lee S-C, Huang Y-C (2009) Stereotactic brain biopsy: single center retrospective analysis of complications. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 111:835–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.08.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dammers R, Haitsma IK, Schouten JW, Kros JM, Avezaat CJJ, Vincent AJPE (2008) Safety and efficacy of frameless and frame-based intracranial biopsy techniques. Acta Neurochir 150:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-007-1473-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Delattre J-Y (2017) Improving diagnosis and management of primary brain tumors. Curr Opin Neurol 30:639–642. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dhawan S, He Y, Bartek J, Alattar AA, Chen CC (2019) Comparison of frame-based versus frameless intracranial stereotactic biopsy: systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 127:607–616.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferreira MP, Ferreira NP, Pereira Filho AA, Pereira Filho GA, Franciscatto AC (2006) Stereotactic computed tomography–guided brain biopsy: diagnostic yield based on a series of 170 patients. Surg Neurol 65:S27–S32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2005.11.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Field M, Witham TF, Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD (2001) Comprehensive assessment of hemorrhage risks and outcomes after stereotactic brain biopsy. J Neurosurg 94:545–551. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2001.94.4.0545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman WA, Sceats DJ, Nestok BR, Ballinger WE (1989) The incidence of unexpected pathological findings in an image-guided biopsy series: a review of 100 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 25:180–184. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-198908000-00005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grossman R, Sadetzki S, Spiegelmann R, Ram Z (2005) Haemorrhagic complications and the incidence of asymptomatic bleeding associated with stereotactic brain biopsies. Acta Neurochir 147:627–631; discussion 631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-005-0495-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hakan T, Aker FV (2016) Evaluation of 126 consecutive stereotactic procedures: brain biopsy, diagnostic yield, accuracy, non-diagnostic results, complications and follow-up. Turk Neurosurg 26:890–899. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.13742-14.0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall WA (1998) The safety and efficacy of stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions. Cancer 82:1749–1755. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980501)82:9<1756::AID-CNCR23>3.0.CO;2-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamisch C, Kickingereder P, Fischer M, Simon T, Ruge MI (2017) Update on the diagnostic value and safety of stereotactic biopsy for pediatric brainstem tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 735 cases. J Neurosurg Pediatr 20:261–268. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.2.PEDS1665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamisch CA, Minartz J, Blau T, Hafkemeyer V, Rueß D, Hellerbach A, Grau SJ, Ruge MI (2019) Frame-based stereotactic biopsy of deep-seated and midline structures in 511 procedures: feasibility, risk profile, and diagnostic yield. Acta Neurochir 161:2065–2071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04020-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Josephson SA, Papanastassiou AM, Berger MS, Barbaro NM, McDermott MW, Hilton JF, Miller BL, Geschwind MD (2007) The diagnostic utility of brain biopsy procedures in patients with rapidly deteriorating neurological conditions or dementia. J Neurosurg 106:72–75. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2007.106.1.72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Karlsson B, Ericson K, Kihlström L, Grane P (1997) Tumor seeding following stereotactic biopsy of brain metastases. Report of two cases J Neurosurg 87:327–330. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1997.87.2.0327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kickingereder, Philipp P Diagnostic Value and Safety of Stereotactic Biopsy for Brainstem Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 1480 Cases | Neurosurgery | Oxford Academic. https://academic-oup-com.frodon.univ-paris5.fr/neurosurgery/article/72/6/873/2417702. Accessed 19 Mar 2019

  19. Kim JE, Kim DG, Paek SH, Jung H-W (2003) Stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions: reliability and its impact on the planning of treatment. Acta Neurochir 145:547–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-003-0048-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kongkham PN, Knifed E, Tamber MS, Bernstein M (2008) Complications in 622 cases of frame-based stereotactic biopsy, a decreasing procedure. Can J Neurol Sci J Can Sci Neurol 35:79–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kreth FW, Muacevic A, Medele R, Bise K, Meyer T, Reulen HJ (2001) The risk of haemorrhage after image guided stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain tumours--a prospective study. Acta Neurochir 143:539–545 discussion 545-546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kulkarni AV, Guha A, Lozano A, Bernstein M (1998) Incidence of silent hemorrhage and delayed deterioration after stereotactic brain biopsy. J Neurosurg 89:31–35. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.89.1.0031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Briscoe S, Littlewood A, Marshall C, Metzendorf M-I, Noel-Storr A, Rader T, Shokraneh F, Thomas J, Wieland L (2019) Chapter 4: Searching for and selecting studies. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019)., Cochrane

  24. Livermore LJ, Ma R, Bojanic S, Pereira EAC (2014) Yield and complications of frame-based and frameless stereotactic brain biopsy – the value of intra-operative histological analysis. Br J Neurosurg 28:637–644. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2014.887657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu Y, Yeung C, Radmanesh A, Wiemann R, Black PM, Golby AJ (2015) Comparative effectiveness of frame-based, frameless, and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided brain biopsy techniques. World Neurosurg 83:261–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2014.07.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Malone H, Yang J, Hershman DL, Wright JD, Bruce JN, Neugut AI (2015) Complications following stereotactic needle biopsy of intracranial tumors. World Neurosurg 84:1084–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.05.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mathon B, Amelot A, Mokhtari K, Bielle F (2019) Increasing the diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy using intraoperative histological smear. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 186:105544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McGirt MJ, Woodworth GF, Coon AL, Frazier JM, Amundson E, Garonzik I, Olivi A, Weingart JD (2005) Independent predictors of morbidity after image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy: a risk assessment of 270 cases. J Neurosurg 102:897–901. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2005.102.5.0897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nishihara M, Sasayama T, Kudo H, Kohmura E (2011) Morbidity of stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions. Kobe J Med Sci 56:E148–E153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Quick-Weller J, Lescher S, Baumgarten P, Dinc N, Bruder M, Weise L, Seifert V, Marquardt G (2016) Stereotactic biopsy of pineal lesions. World Neurosurg 96:124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Quick-Weller J, Lescher S, Bruder M, Dinc N, Behmanesh B, Seifert V, Weise L, Marquardt G (2016) Stereotactic biopsy of brainstem lesions: 21 years experiences of a single center. J Neuro-Oncol 129:243–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2166-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Reithmeier T, Lopez WO, Doostkam S, Machein MR, Pinsker MO, Trippel M, Nikkhah G (2013) Intraindividual comparison of histopathological diagnosis obtained by stereotactic serial biopsy to open surgical resection specimen in patients with intracranial tumours. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115:1955–1960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.05.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Roth J, Avneri I, Nimrod A, Kanner AA (2007) Stereotactic biopsy complicated by pneumocephalus and acute pulmonary edema. Surg Neurol 68:573–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2006.11.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sawin P (1998) Computed imaging-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy a risk analysis of 225 consecutive cases. Surg Neurol 49:640–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(97)00435-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shakal AAS, Mokbel EAH (2014) Hemorrhage after stereotactic biopsy from intra-axial brain lesions: incidence and avoidance. J Neurol Surg Part Cent Eur Neurosurg 75:177–182. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1325633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Weise LM, Bruder M, Eibach S, Seifert V, Byhahn C, Marquardt G, Setzer M (2013) Efficacy and safety of local versus general anesthesia in stereotactic biopsies: a matched-pairs cohort study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 25:148–153. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0b013e318274ce41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Woodworth GF, McGirt MJ, Samdani A, Garonzik I, Olivi A, Weingart JD (2006) Frameless image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy procedure: diagnostic yield, surgical morbidity, and comparison with the frame-based technique. J Neurosurg 104:233–237. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2006.104.2.233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yamada K, Goto S, Kochi M, Ushio Y (2004) Stereotactic biopsy for multifocal, diffuse, and deep-seated brain tumors using Leksell’s system. J Clin Neurosci 11:263–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2003.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the French Society of Neurosurgery and Cormedica for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, AP-HP, GHU La Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, F-75013, Paris, France

    Maximilien Riche, Aymeric Amelot, Matthieu Peyre, Laurent Capelle, Alexandre Carpentier & Bertrand Mathon

  2. Sorbonne University, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, F-75005, Paris, France

    Maximilien Riche, Aymeric Amelot, Matthieu Peyre, Alexandre Carpentier & Bertrand Mathon

  3. Brain and Spine Institute (ICM; INSERM, UMRS 1127; CNRS, UMR 7225), Paris, France

    Matthieu Peyre & Bertrand Mathon

Authors
  1. Maximilien Riche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aymeric Amelot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthieu Peyre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laurent Capelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alexandre Carpentier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bertrand Mathon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bertrand Mathon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethics and patient consent

All aspects of the study were approved by our institutional review board. As for all observational studies or literature review with retrospective analysis of routinely acquired data, a waiver for written informed consent was obtained.

Ethical publication statement

We confirm that we have read the journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riche, M., Amelot, A., Peyre, M. et al. Complications after frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev 44, 301–307 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01234-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01234-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation