SpringerLink
Log in

Nd:YAG laser versus traditional scalpel. A preliminary histological analysis of specimens from the human oral mucosa

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hyperplastic fibro-epithelial lesions are the most common tumor-like swellings in the mouth. The neodymium yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) laser appears to be useful for the surgical treatment of these lesions. Some controversies of laser surgery concern the accuracy of pathological diagnosis as well as the control of thermal damage on the target tissue. The aim of this study was to establish if the thermal changes induced by the Nd:YAG laser may affect the histopathological diagnosis and the evaluation of the resection margins. Furthermore, we compared the histological features of oral benign fibro-epithelial lesions excised through Nd:YAG laser and traditional scalpel. Twenty-six benign fibro-epithelial oral lesions from 26 patients, localized in the same oral subsites (cheek and buccal mucosa), were collected at the Unit of Oral Pathology and Oral Laser-assisted Surgery of the Academic Hospital of the University of Parma, Italy. Specimens were subclassified into three groups according to the tool used for the surgical excision. Group 1 included six specimens excised through Nd:YAG laser with an output power of 3.5 W and a frequency of 60 Hz (power density 488,281 W/cm2); Group 2 included nine specimens excised through Nd:YAG laser with an output power of 5 W and a frequency of 30 Hz; Group 3 included 11 specimens excised through a Bard-Parker scalpel blade no. 15c. Epithelial changes, connective tissue modifications, presence of vascular modifications, incision morphology and the overall width of tissue modification were evaluated. Differences between specimens removed with two different parameters of Nd:YAG laser were not significant with regard to stromal changes (p = 0.4828) and vascular stasis (p = 0.2104). Analysis of regularity of incision revealed a difference which was not statistically significant (p = 1.000) between group 1 and group 2. Epithelial and stromal changes were significantly more frequent in specimens with a mean size less than 7 mm (p < 0.0001). Nd:YAG laser induced serious thermal effects in small specimens (mean size less than 7 mm) independently from the frequency and power employed. The quality of incision was better and the width of overall tissue injuries was less in the specimens obtained with higher frequency and lower power (group 1: Nd:YAG laser at 3.5 W and 60 Hz).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rocca J-P: Les laser en odontologie. Editions CdP-Wolters Kluver France-Avril 2008

  2. Wenig BM (2008) Atlas of head and neck pathology, 2nd edn. Saundeish Elsevier, China

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fletcher Christopher DM (2007) Diagnostic histopathology of tumors, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingston–Elsevier, China

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clayman L, Kuo P (1997) Lasers in Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry. Thieme Medical Publishers, USA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Svelto O (1998) Principles of Lasers, 4th edn. Springer Sciences–Business Media Inc, USA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Niemz MH (2004) Laser-tissue interactions. Fundamental applications, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg Germany

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vesnaver A, Dovŝak DA (2006) Treatment of vascular lesions in the head and neck using Nd:YAG laser. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 34:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reimer SB, Sequin B, Hilde HD et al (2005) Evaluation of the effect of routine histologic processing on the size of skin samples obtained from dogs. Am J Vet Res 66:500–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Silveberg SG (2006) Surgical Pathology and cytopathology, 4th edn. Churchill Livingston–Elsevier, China

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yukna RA, Carr RL, Evans GH (2007) Histologic evaluation of an Nd:YAG laser-assisted new attachment procedure in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 27(6):577–587

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Howell R, Hammond R, Pryse-Davies J (1991) The histologic reliability of laser come biopsy of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 77:905–911

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis PL, Lasghari M (1994) A comparison of the cold knife, CO2 laser and electrosurgical loop conization in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Gynecol Surg 10:905–911

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spencer P, Coob CM, Weliczka DM, Glaros A, Morris P (1998) Change in temperature of subjacent bone during soft tissue laser ablation. J Periodontol 69:287–291

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parker S (2007) Laser and soft tissue: “loose” soft tissue surgery. Br Dent J (4):185–191. Feb202

  15. Fornaini C, Rocca JP, Bertrand MF, Merigo E, Nammour S, Vescovi P (2007) Nd:YAG and Diode laser in the surgical management of soft tissues related to orthodontic treatment. Photomed and Laser Surg 25(5):381–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nammour S, Dourov N (1992) Removal of benign tumors using CO2 laser. J Clin Laser Med Surg 4:109–113

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gutknecht N (2007) Proceedings of the 1st international workshop of Evidence-Based Dentistry on laser in dentistry. Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  18. Genovese MD, Olivi G (2008) Laser in paediatric dentistry: patient acceptance of hard and soft tissue therapy. Eur J Paediatr Dent 9(1):13–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor DL, Schafer S, Nordquist R, Payton ME, Dickley DT, Bartelas KE (1997) Comparison of a high power diode laser with the Nd:YAG laser using in situ wound strength analysis of healing cutaneous incisions. Laser Med Surg 21:248–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liboon J, Funkhouser W, Terris DJ (1997) A comparison of mucosal incisions made by scalpel, CO2 laser, electrocautery and constant-voltage electrocautery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116:379–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sinha UK, Gallagher LA (2003) Effects of steel scalpel, ultrasonic scalpel, CO2 laser and monopolar and bipolar electrosurgery on wound healing in Guinea pig oral mucosa. Laryngoscope 113(2):228–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. D’Arcangelo C, Di Nardo Di Maio F, Prosperi GD, Conte E, Baldi M, Caputi S (2007) A preliminary study of healing of diode laser versus scalpel incisions in rat oral tissue: a comparison of clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical results. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103(6):764–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of ENT/Dental/Ophthalmological and Cervico-Facial Sciences, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy

    Paolo Vescovi, Marco Meleti, Elisabetta Merigo, Carlo Fornaini, Maddalena Manfredi & Mauro Bonanini

  2. Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy

    Luigi Corcione

  3. Department of Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy

    Paolo Govoni

  4. Hopital Saint Roch, Nice, France

    Jean-Paul Rocca

  5. Sezione di Odontostomatologia c/o Clinica Odontostomatologica–Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Via A. Gramsci 14, 43100, Parma, Italy

    Paolo Vescovi

  6. Department of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium

    Samir Nammour

Authors
  1. Paolo Vescovi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luigi Corcione
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marco Meleti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elisabetta Merigo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Carlo Fornaini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maddalena Manfredi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mauro Bonanini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Paolo Govoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jean-Paul Rocca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Samir Nammour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Vescovi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vescovi, P., Corcione, L., Meleti, M. et al. Nd:YAG laser versus traditional scalpel. A preliminary histological analysis of specimens from the human oral mucosa. Lasers Med Sci 25, 685–691 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0770-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0770-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation