Log in

Formulation, characterization and treatment of metalworking oil-in-water emulsions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of colloidal dispersion systems such as emulsions and suspensions depends greatly on their formulation. A proper characterization of the system oil–water–surfactant for emulsions used in metalworking operations may extend emulsion life and lower process costs. The behavior of an oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion formulated in our laboratory is described in this study. The base oil was selected from a list of mineral, synthetic, animal and vegetable oils according to their tribological properties. Three different surfactants (anionic, cationic and non-ionic) were used to stabilize the emulsion for subsequent O/W emulsion formulation. The effect of concentration of the three emulsifiers on the interfacial properties and emulsion stability is reported. It has been found that the type and concentration of emulsifier are key parameters with respect to O/W emulsion performance. Elastohydrodynamic film thickness measurements and extreme pressure tests were also conducted in order to determine how the O/W emulsion formulation affects its lubricating properties. The disposal of waste O/W emulsions has increasingly become an expensive challenge to industry and their treatment is described in this work using several techniques, such as coagulation, centrifugation, ultrafiltration and vacuum evaporation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aranberri I, Beverley KJ, Binks BP, Clint JH, Fletcher PDI (2002) How do emulsions evaporate? Langmuir 18:3471–3475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker DC, Johnston GJ, Spikes HA, Bünemann TF (1993) EHD film formation and starvation of oil-in-water emulsions. Tribol Trans 36:565–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bataller H, Lamaallam S, Lachaise J, Graciaa A, Dicharry C (2004) Cutting fluid emulsions produced by dilution of a cutting fluid concentrate containing a cationic/nonionic surfactant mixture. J Mater Process Technol 152:215–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benito JM, Ríos G, Pazos C, Coca J (1998) Methods for the separation of emulsified oil from water: a state-of-the-art review. In: Trends in chemical engineering, vol 4. Research Trends, Trivandrum, India, pp 203–231

  • Benito JM, Ríos G, Gutiérrez B, Pazos C, Coca J (1999) Integrated process for the removal of emulsified oils from effluents in the steel industry. Sep Sci Technol 34:3031–3043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benito JM, Ríos G, Ortea E, Fernández E, Cambiella A, Pazos C, Coca J (2002) Design and construction of a modular pilot plant for the treatment of oil-containing wastewaters. Desalination 147:5–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cambiella A, Benito JM, Pazos C, Coca J, Ratoi M, Spikes HA (2006a) The effect of emulsifier concentration on the lubricating properties of oil-in-water emulsions. Tribol Lett 22:53–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cambiella A, Benito JM, Pazos C, Coca J (2006b) Centrifugal separation efficiency in the treatment of waste emulsified oils. Chem Eng Res Des 84:69–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cambiella A, Benito JM, Pazos C, Coca J, Hernández A, Fernández JE (2007a) Formulation of emulsifiable cutting fluids and extreme pressure behaviour. J Mater Process Technol 184:139–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cambiella A, Benito JM, Pazos C, Coca J (2007b) Interfacial properties of oil-in-water emulsions designed to be used as metalworking fluids. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 305:112–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clint JH (2001) Adhesion and components of solid surface energies. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 6:28–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clint JH, Wicks AC (2001) Adhesion under water: surface energy considerations. Int J Adhes Adhes 21:267–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández E, Benito JM, Pazos C, Coca J, Ruiz I, Ríos G (2005a) Regeneration of an oil-in-water emulsion after use in an industrial copper rolling process. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 263:363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández E, Benito JM, Pazos C, Coca J (2005b) Ceramic membrane ultrafiltration of anionic and nonionic surfactant solutions. J Membr Sci 246:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannopoulos D, Kolaitis DI, Togkalidou A, Skevis G, Founti MA (2007a) Quantification of emissions from the co-incineration of cutting oil emulsions in cement plants–Part I: NOx, CO and VOC. Fuel 86:1144–1152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giannopoulos D, Kolaitis DI, Togkalidou A, Skevis G, Founti MA (2007b) Quantification of emissions from the co-incineration of cutting oil emulsions in cement plants–Part II: trace species. Fuel 86:2491–2501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greeley M, Rajagopalan N (2004) Impact of environmental contaminants on machining properties of metalworking fluids. Tribol Int 37:327–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez G, Cambiella A, Benito JM, Pazos C, Coca J (2007) The effect of additives on the treatment of oil-in-water emulsions by vacuum evaporation. J Hazard Mat 144:649–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston GJ, Wayte R, Spikes HA (1991) Measurement and study of very thin lubricant films in concentrated contacts. Tribol Trans 34:187–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo A, Cambiella A, Benito JM, Pazos C, Coca J (2006) Ultrafiltration of oil-in-water emulsions with ceramic membranes: influence of pH and crossflow velocity. J Membr Sci 278:328–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller J, Cen Y, Davis RH (1997) Crossflow microfiltration of oily water. J Membr Sci 129:221–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen MJ (1978) Adsorption of surface-active agents at interfaces: the electrical double layer. In: Rosen MJ (ed) Surfactants and interfacial phenomena. Wiley, New York, pp 26–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabaté J, Pujolà M, Llorens J (2002) Comparison of polysulfone and ceramic membranes for the separation of phenol in micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. J Colloid Interface Sci 246:157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadros TF, Vincent B (1983) Liquid/liquid interfaces. In: Becher P (ed) Encyclopedia of emulsion technology: basic theory, vol 1. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Tounissou P, Hebrant M, Tondre C (1996) On the behavior of micellar solutions in tangential ultrafiltration using mineral membranes. J Colloid Interface Sci 183:491–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, **ng W, Xu N, Wong FS (2005) Effects of inorganic electrolytes on zeta potentials of ceramic microfiltration membranes. Sep Purif Technol 42:117–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support by the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (MEC, Spain) and the European Commission (projects Ref.: PPQ2001-3442-C02-01 and CTQ2004-01413, European Regional Development Fund) is gratefully acknowledged. This study was co-financed by the Consejería de Educación y Ciencia del Principado de Asturias (Plan I+D+i 2001-2004, Ref.: COF04-50, and PCTI Asturias 2006-2009, Ref.: EQP06-024).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Coca.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benito, J.M., Cambiella, A., Lobo, A. et al. Formulation, characterization and treatment of metalworking oil-in-water emulsions. Clean Techn Environ Policy 12, 31–41 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-009-0219-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-009-0219-2

Keywords

Navigation