Abstract
Tools to diagnose fungal infection are microscopic examination, antigen or antibody-based detection tests, molecular diagnostics, and culture, with culture being the “gold standard” for species-level identification. Although these methods are commonly used in concert and yield concordant results, in some cases tissue is not available for culture, and/or different methodologies yield discrepant results. These discrepancies may be clinically significant, causing confusion and inappropriate or delayed initiation of antifungals. This study evaluates the correlation between microscopic examination and the results of laboratory studies, and identifies clinical scenarios and specimen characteristics associated with tissue sent for microscopic examination without concomitant laboratory studies. We performed an 18-year retrospective review at a tertiary-care, academic medical center in the Midwest United States of all fungal infection diagnoses made by microscopic examination. Only 16% of samples with fungal infection diagnosed by microscopic examination had a concomitant sample submitted for laboratory studies. Of these cases, 36% had no growth on culture and/or had a negative laboratory study. Among cases in which fungal infections were diagnosed and laboratory studies were positive, the accuracy of histopathologic identification was 95%. The most common cause for incorrect morphologic diagnoses was misidentification of Aspergillus spp. and Mucorales. Our results underscore the importance of educating pathologists with regard to appropriate terminology and increasing knowledge of mycology, particularly in relation to organisms forming hyphae in tissue. Species-level diagnosis of fungi cannot be made by microscopic examination of tissue alone. Anatomic pathology reports should recommend correlation with laboratory studies, and provide a differential diagnosis based on morphology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gavaldà J, Meije Y, Fortún J et al (2014) Invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Microbiol Infect 20(Suppl 7):27–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12660
Tortorano AM, Richardson M, Roilides E et al (2014) ESCMID and ECMM joint guidelines on diagnosis and management of hyalohyphomycosis: Fusarium spp., Scedosporium spp. and others. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12465
Hope WW, Castagnola E, Groll AH et al (2012) ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: Prevention and management of invasive infections in neonates and children caused by Candida spp. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:38–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12040
McCarty TP, Pappas PG (2016) Invasive candidiasis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 30:103–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2015.10.013
Theel ES, Doern CD (2013) β-d-Glucan testing is important for diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. J Clin Microbiol 51:3478–3483. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01737-13
Leeflang MM, Debets-Ossenkopp YJ, Wang J et al (2015) Galactomannan detection for invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD007394. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007394.pub2
Arvanitis M, Mylonakis E (2015) Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis: recent developments and ongoing challenges. Eur J Clin Invest 45:646–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12448
Powers-Fletcher MV, Hanson KE (2016) Nonculture diagnostics in fungal disease. Infect Dis Clin North Am 30:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2015.10.005
Saubolle MA (2007) Laboratory aspects in the diagnosis of coccidioidomycosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1111:301–314
Kamei K, Unno H, Nagao K et al (1994) Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis caused by the basidiomycetous fungus schizophyllum commune. Clin Infect Dis 18:305–309. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/18.3.305
Sangoi AR, Rogers WM, Longacre TA et al (2009) Challenges and pitfalls of morphologic identification of fungal infections in histologic and cytologic specimens : a ten-year retrospective review at a single institution. Am J Clin Pathol 131:364–375. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCP99OOOZSNISCZ
Shah AA, Hazen KC (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of histopathologic and cytopathologic examination of Aspergillus species. Am J Clin Pathol 139:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPO8VTSK3HRNUT
Tarrand JJ, Lichterfeld M, Warraich I et al (2003) Diagnosis of invasive septate mold infections: A correlation of microbiological culture and histologic or cytologic examination. Am J Clin Pathol 119:854–858. https://doi.org/10.1309/EXBV-YAUP-ENBM-285Y
Leroux S, Ullmann AJ (2013) Management and diagnostic guidelines for fungal diseases in infectious diseases and clinical microbiology: critical appraisal. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:1115–1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12426
Guarner J, Brandt ME (2011) Histopathologic diagnosis of fungal infections in the 21st century. Clin Microbiol Rev 24:247–280. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00053-10
Park BJ, Pappas PG, Wannemuehler KA et al (2011) Invasive non-Aspergillus mold infections in transplant recipients, United States, 2001–2006. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1855–1864. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1710.110087
Douglas AP, Chen SC, Slavin MA (2016) Emerging infections caused by non-Aspergillus filamentous fungi. Clin Microbiol Infect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2016.01.011
Klont RR, Meis JFGM, Verweij PE (2001) Uncommon opportunistic fungi: New nosocomial threats. Clin Microbiol Infect 7:8–24. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0691.2001.00054.x
Schwarz J (1982) The diagnosis of deep mycoses by morphologic methods. Hum Pathol 13:519–533
Funding
The authors have no funding to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this study.
Ethical approval
For this type of retrospective study, formal consent is not required.
Informed consent
Informed consent was not required for this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kung, V.L., Chernock, R.D. & Burnham, CA.D. Diagnostic accuracy of fungal identification in histopathology and cytopathology specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37, 157–165 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-017-3116-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-017-3116-3