Log in

Efficacy of an out-patient pain management programme for people with joint hypermobility syndrome

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS) is common in patients presenting to rheumatologists and can cause a range of symptoms leading to physical and psychological distress. Chronic musculoskeletal pain in patients with JHS often responds poorly to analgesics, and a pain management approach may be helpful. Since patients with JHS often have beliefs and experiences different to those of other chronic pain patients, they could fare better in JHS-specific programmes. Here, we report on the outcomes of patients in a JHS cognitive behavioural pain management programme. Patients fulfilling the Brighton criteria for JHS, who had suffered pain for at least 3 months, were assessed by a psychologist and physiotherapist for suitability for this programme. Those accepted took part in a programme of 8 days spread over 6 weeks, delivered by a multidisciplinary team and incorporating a cognitive behavioural approach. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 1- and 5-month post-programme using validated outcome measures. Outcome measures at baseline and 1-month were available for 87 patients (96 % female, mean age 35 years). There were significant improvements in self-efficacy, pain catastrophising, depression, anxiety, frustration, impact of pain and average pain intensity (all P < 0.001). Although by 5 months all these outcomes had regressed towards pre-programme levels there remained significant improvements compared to baseline in all except average pain intensity. This open study shows that patients with JHS experienced significant benefits after attending a JHS-specific pain management programme, which were still evident 5 months later. Longer-term controlled studies are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grahame R, Bird HA, Child A (2000) The revised (Brighton 1998) criteria for the diagnosis of benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS). J Rheumatol 27(7):1777–1779

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tinkle BT, Bird HA, Grahame R, Lavallee M, Levy HP, Sillence D (2009) The lack of clinical distinction between the hypermobility type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and the joint hypermobility syndrome (a.k.a. hypermobility syndrome). Am J Med Gene 149A(11):2368–2370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grahame R, Hakim AJ (2006) Joint hypermobiilty syndrome is highly prevalent in general rheumatology clinics, its occurrence and clinical presentation being gender, age and race-related. Ann Rheum Dis 65(Suppl ii):263

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grahame R (2008) Hypermobility: an important but often neglected area within rheumatology. Nat Clin Practice 4(10):522–524

    Google Scholar 

  5. Voermans NC, Knoop H, Bleijenberg G, Van Engelen BG (2010) Pain in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is common, severe, and associated with functional impairment. J Pain Symptom Manage 40(3):370–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rahman A, Holman AJ (2010) Fibromyalgia and hypermobility. In: Hakim AJ, Keer R, Grahame R (eds) Hypermobility, fibromyalgia and chronic pain. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rombaut L, Malfait F, De Paepe A, Rimbaut S, Verbruggen G, De Wandele I, Calders P (2011) Impairment and impact of pain in female patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a comparative study with fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 63(7):1979–1987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eccleston C, Williams AC, Morley S (2009) Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Online) 2, CD007407

    Google Scholar 

  9. Williams AC, Eccleston C, Morley S (2012) Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11, CD007407. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007407.pub3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Coughlan GM, Ridout KL, Williams AC, Richardson PH (1995) Attrition from a pain management programme. Br J Clin Psychol Br Psychol Soc 34(Pt 3):471–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nicholas MK (2007) The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain 11(2):153–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sullivan MJL, Bishop S, Pivik J (1995) The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 7:524–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pincus T, Williams AC, Vogel S, Field A (2004) The development and testing of the depression, anxiety, and positive outlook scale (DAPOS). Pain 109(1–2):181–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cleeland CS (1989) Measurement of pain by subjective report. In: Chapman CR, Loeser JD (eds) Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. Raven, New York, pp 391–403

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miles CL, Pincus T, Carnes D, Homer KE, Taylor SJ, Bremner SA, Rahman A, Underwood M (2011) Can we identify how programmes aimed at promoting self-management in musculoskeletal pain work and who benefits? A systematic review of sub-group analysis within RCTs. Eur J Pain (London England) 15(8):775.e1–775.e11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anisur Rahman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rahman, A., Daniel, C. & Grahame, R. Efficacy of an out-patient pain management programme for people with joint hypermobility syndrome. Clin Rheumatol 33, 1665–1669 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2539-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2539-9

Keywords

Navigation