Abstract
For the quantitative evaluation of the impact of mining on a groundwater system, it is necessary to constrain the hydrogeological and mechanical properties. However, the in situ estimation of the mechanical properties of rock such as compressibility and porosity, is often difficult. Additionally, determining the hydraulic properties such as hydraulic conductivity, of rock by conventional methods is often expensive. The response of the groundwater level to external loading such as Earth tides and barometric pressure, couples the hydrogeological and mechanical processes of rocks, thus providing a way to infer these properties in the field. This study compared aquifer parameters inferred from tidal and barometric responses with those inferred from conventional hydraulic tests and rock mechanics tests in three groundwater monitoring wells at a site in China. The results show that the hydraulic conductivity inferred from a tidal response is similar to that of a pum** test. The compressibility values calculated for the three wells are all higher than those determined by experiment, and the porosity values calculated are all lower than those determined by experiment, but the differences between the calculated and experimentally measured values are lower than one order of magnitude. Considering the costs and convenience of the water-level response method, this method is a good choice for obtaining the properties of an aquifer, especially those in areas of tectonic activity and those affected by anthropogenic perturbations.
Résumé
Pour l’évaluation quantitative de l’impact de l’exploitation minière sur un système hydrogéologique, il est nécessaire de contraindre les propriétés hydrogéologiques et mécaniques. Cependant, l’estimation in situ des propriétés mécaniques de la roche (telles que la compressibilité et la porosité) est souvent difficile. En outre, la détermination des propriétés hydrauliques (telles que la conductivité hydraulique) de la roche par des méthodes conventionnelles est souvent coûteuse. La réponse du niveau piézométrique aux chargements externes (telles que les marées terrestres et la pression barométrique) couple les processus hydrogéologiques et mécaniques des roches, fournissant ainsi un moyen de déduire ces propriétés sur le terrain. Cette étude a comparé les paramètres de l’aquifère déduits des réponses aux marées et à la pression barométrique avec ceux déduits d’essais hydrauliques et des essais de mécanique des roches classiques dans trois piézomètres sur un site en Chine. Les résultats montrent que la conductivité hydraulique déduite d’une réponse à la marée est similaire à celle d’un essai de pompage. Les valeurs de compressibilité calculées pour les trois puits sont toutes supérieures à celles déterminées in-situ tandis que les valeurs de porosité calculées sont toutes inférieures à celles déterminées in-situ, mais les différences entre les valeurs calculées et celles mesurées expérimentalement sont inférieures à un ordre de grandeur. Compte tenu des coûts et de la commodité de la méthode de réponse des niveaux piézométriques, cette méthode est un bon choix pour obtenir les propriétés d’un aquifère, en particulier celles des zones d’activité tectonique et celles affectées par des perturbations anthropiques.
Resumen
Para la evaluación cuantitativa del impacto de la minería en un sistema de aguas subterráneas, es necesario limitar las propiedades hidrogeológicas y mecánicas. Sin embargo, la estimación in situ de las propiedades mecánicas de la roca (como la compresibilidad y la porosidad) suele ser difícil. Además, la determinación de las propiedades hidráulicas (como la conductividad hidráulica) de la roca mediante métodos convencionales suele ser costosa. La respuesta del nivel de las aguas subterráneas a la carga externa (como las mareas terrestres y la presión barométrica) acopla los procesos hidrogeológicos y mecánicos de las rocas, lo que permite inferir esas propiedades sobre el terreno. En este estudio se compararon los parámetros del acuífero inferidos a partir de las respuestas de las mareas y la presión barométrica con los inferidos a partir de las pruebas hidráulicas convencionales y las pruebas de mecánica de rocas en tres pozos de monitoreo de aguas subterráneas en un sitio de China. Los resultados muestran que la conductividad hidráulica inferida a partir de una respuesta de marea es similar a la de una prueba de bombeo. Los valores de compresibilidad calculados para los tres pozos son todos más altos que los determinados por el experimento, y los valores de porosidad calculados son todos más bajos que los determinados por el experimento, pero las diferencias entre los valores calculados y los medidos experimentalmente son inferiores a un orden de magnitud. Teniendo en cuenta los costos y la conveniencia del método de respuesta al nivel del agua, este método es una buena opción para obtener las propiedades de un acuífero, especialmente las que se encuentran en zonas de actividad tectónica y las afectadas por perturbaciones antropogénicas.
摘要
为了定量评估采矿对地下水系统的影响, 有必要确定水文地质和力学参数。但是, 通常难以对岩石的力学参数(例如可压缩性和孔隙度)进行原位估计。另外, 通过常规方法确定岩石的水力性质(例如渗透系数)通常是昂贵的。地下水位对外部负荷(例如潮汐和大气压力)的响应将岩石的水文地质和力学过程联系了起来, 从而提供了一种估算野外这些参数的方法。本研究将潮汐和气压响应估算的含水层参数与常规水力测试和岩石力学测试推断出的参数, 在**某地的三口地下水监测井中进行了比较。结果表明,由潮汐响应推断出的水力传导率与抽水试验结果相似。从三口井计算的可压缩性值均高于通过实验确定的可压缩性值,并且所计算的孔隙率值均低于通过实验确定的结果,但计算出的值与实验测量值之间的差异小于一个数量级。考虑到水位响应方法的成本和便利性,该方法是获得含水层参数一种好方法,特别是在构造活动区域和受人为扰动影响地区。
Resumo
Para a avaliação quantitativa do impacto da mineração em um sistema de águas subterrâneas, é necessário obter as propriedades hidrogeológicas e mecânicas. No entanto, a estimativa in situ das propriedades mecânicas da rocha (como compressibilidade e porosidade) é muitas vezes difícil. Além disso, determinar as propriedades hidráulicas (como a condutividade hidráulica) da rocha por métodos convencionais é muitas vezes custoso. A resposta do nível das águas subterrâneas à carga externa (como marés terrestres e pressão barométrica) acopla-se aos processos hidrogeológicos e mecânicos de rochas; fornecendo, assim, uma maneira de inferir essas propriedades a campo. Este estudo comparou parâmetros de aquífero inferidos, a partir de respostas barométricas e de marés, com os inferidos, a partir de testes hidráulicos convencionais e testes de mecânica de rochas em três poços de monitoramento de águas subterrâneas em uma área na China. Os resultados mostram que a condutividade hidráulica inferida a partir de uma resposta das marés é semelhante à de um teste de bombeamento. Os valores de compressibilidade calculados para os três poços são todos maiores do que os determinados pelo experimento, e os valores de porosidade calculados são todos inferiores aos determinados pelo experimento, mas as diferenças entre os valores calculados e medidos experimentalmente são inferiores a uma ordem de magnitude. Considerando os custos e conveniência do método de resposta ao nível da água, este método é uma boa escolha para a obtenção das propriedades de um aquífero, especialmente aqueles em áreas de atividade tectônica e as afetadas por perturbações antropogênicas.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10040-020-02134-w/MediaObjects/10040_2020_2134_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10040-020-02134-w/MediaObjects/10040_2020_2134_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10040-020-02134-w/MediaObjects/10040_2020_2134_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10040-020-02134-w/MediaObjects/10040_2020_2134_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10040-020-02134-w/MediaObjects/10040_2020_2134_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10040-020-02134-w/MediaObjects/10040_2020_2134_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10040-020-02134-w/MediaObjects/10040_2020_2134_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10040-020-02134-w/MediaObjects/10040_2020_2134_Fig8_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acworth RI, Halloran LJS, Rau GC, Cuthbert MO, Bernardi TL (2016) An objective frequency domain method for quantifying confined aquifer compressible storage using earth and atmospheric tides. Geophys Res Lett 43(22):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071328
Acworth RI, Rau GC, Halloran LJS, Timms WA (2017) Vertical groundwater storage properties and changes in confinement determined using hydraulic head response to atmospheric tides. Water Resour Res 53(4):2983–2997. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020311
Adhikary DP, Guo H (2014) Measurement of longwall mining induced strata permeability. Geotech Geol Eng 32(3):617–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9737-8
Allègre V, Brodsky EE, Xue L, Nale SM, Parker BL, Cherry JA (2016) Using earth-tide induced water pressure changes to measure in situ permeability: a comparison with long-term pum** tests. Water Resour Res 52:3113–3126. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017346
Anochikwa CI, van der Kamp G, Barbour L (2012) Interpreting pore-water pressure changes induced by water table fluctuations and mechanical loading due to soil moisture changes. Can Geotech J 49(3):357–366. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-106
Bredehoeft JD (1967) Response of well-aquifer systems to earth tides. J Geophys Res 72(12):3075–3087. https://doi.org/10.1029/jz072i012p03075
Burbey TJ, Hisz D, Murdoch LC, Zhang MJ (2012) Quantifying fractured crystalline-rock properties using well tests, earth tides and barometric effects. J Hydrol 414–415:317–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.013
Cutillo PA, Bredehoeft JD (2011) Estimating aquifer properties from the water level response to earth tides. Ground Water 49(4):600–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00778.x
David K, Timms WA, Barbour SL, Mitra R (2017) Tracking changes in the specific storage of overburden rock during longwall coal mining. J Hydrol 553:304–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.057
Dawson KJ, Istok JD (1991) Aquifer testing: design and analysis of pum** and slug tests. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL
Ding WL, Dai P, Zhu DW, Zhang YQ, He JH, Li A, Wang RY (2016) Fractures in continental shale reservoirs: a case study of the upper Triassic strata in the SE Ordos Basin, central China. Geol Mag 153(4):663–680. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001675681500062X
Doan ML, Brodsky EE, Prioul R, Signer C (2006) Tidal analysis of borehole pressure: a tutorial. University of California, Santa Cruz. https://websites.pmc.ucsc.edu/~brodsky/reprints/tidal_tutorial_SDR.pdf. Accessed Feb 2020
Elkhoury JE, Brodsky EE, Agnew DC (2006) Seismic waves increase permeability. Nature 441:1135–1138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04798
Hsieh PA, Bredehoeft JD, Farr JM (1987) Determination of aquifer transmissivity from earth tide analysis. Water Resour Res 23(10):1824–1832. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR023i010p01824
Hsieh PA, Bredehoeft JD, Rojstaczer SA (1988) Response of well aquifer systems to earth tides: problem revisited. Water Resour Res 24(3):468–472. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR024i003p00468
Huang XJ, Wang GC, Liang XY, Cui LF, Ma L, Xu QY (2017) Hydrochemical and stable isotope (δD and δ18O) characteristics of groundwater and Hydrogeochemical processes in the Ningtiaota coalfield, Northwest China. Mine Water Environ 37(1):119–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-017-0477-x
Hussein MEA, Odling NE, Clark RA (2013) Borehole water level response to barometric pressure as an indicator of aquifer vulnerability. Water Resour Res 49(10):7102–7119. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014134
Igarashi G, Wakita H (1991) Tidal responses and earthquake-related changes in the water level of deep wells. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 96(B3):4269–4278. https://doi.org/10.1029/90jb02637
Ishiguro M, Tamura Y (1985) BAYTAP-G in TIMSAC 84. Comput Sci Monogr 22:56–117
Izadi G, Wang SG, Elsworth D, Liu JS, Wu Y, Pone D (2011) Permeability evolution of fluid-infiltrated coal containing discrete fractures. Int J Coal Geol 85(2):202–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2010.10.006
Jacob CE (1940) The flow of water in an elastic artesian aquifer. Eos Trans AGU 21(2):574–586. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR021i002p00574
Ju MH, Li XH, Yao QL, Liu SY, Liang S, Wang XL (2017) Effect of sand grain size on simulated mining-induced overburden failure in physical model tests. Eng Geol 226(30):93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.05.015
Jumikis AR (1983) Rock mechanics. Gulf, Houston, TX
Lai GJ, Ge HK, Wang WL (2013) Transfer functions of the well-aquifer systems response to atmospheric loading and earth tide from low to high-frequency band. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 118(5):1904–1924. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50165
Li ZX, Han ML, Li JT, Yu JF, Lv DW, Liu HF (2008) On the analysis of the high-resolution sequence stratigraphy and coal accumulating law of Jurassic in Ordos Basin. J Coal Sci Eng 14(1):85–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12404-008-0018-0
Liu WQ, Manga M (2009) Changes in permeability caused by dynamic stresses in fractured sandstone. Geophys Res Lett 36(20):287–292. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039852
Liu YR, Tang HM (2009) Rock mechanics. Chemical Industry Press, Bei**g
McMillan EC, Rau GC, Timms WA, Anderson MS (2019) Utilizing the impact of earth and atmospheric tides on groundwater systems: a review reveals the future potential. Rev Geophys 57:281–315. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000630
Mitchell TM, Faulkner DR (2008) Experimental measurements of permeability evolution during triaxial compression and initially intact crystalline rocks and implications for fluid flow in fault zones. J Geophys Res 113(B11):B11412. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005588
Molenda M (2011) Triaxial compression test. In: Encyclopedia of agrophysics. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3585-1_177
MWH (2014) Groundwater monitoring progress Report, first quarter 2014, Santa Susana Field Laboratory, Ventura County, CA. Prepared for The Boeing Company, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and US Department of Energy, MWH, Walnut Creek, CA
Pang GX (2012) Visualization of aquifer test software on hydrogeological parameters (in Chinese). Ground Water 34(3):195–196
Quinn PJ, Cherry A, Parker BL (2015) Combined use of straddle packer testing and FLUTe profiling for hydraulic testing in fractured rock boreholes. J Hydrol 524(2015):439–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.008
Rasmussen TC, Crawford LA (1997) Identifying and removing barometric pressure effects in confined and unconfined aquifers. Groundwater 35(3):502–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1997.tb00111.x
Rau GC, Acworth RI, Halloran LJS, Timms WA, Cuthbert MO (2018) Quantifying compressible groundwater storage by combining cross-hole seismic surveys and head response to atmospheric tides. J Geophys Res-Earth 123:1910–1930. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JF004660
Roeloffs E (1996) Poroelastic techniques in the study of earthquake-related hydrologic phenomena. Adv Geophys 37(1996):135–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60270-8
Rojstaczer S (1988) Determination of fluid flow properties from the response of water levels in wells to atmospheric loading. Water Resour Res 24(11):1927–1938. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR024i011p01927
Rojstaczer S, Agnew DC (1989) The influence of formation material properties on the response of water levels in wells to earth tides and atmospheric loading. J Geophys Res 94(B9):12403–12411. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB094iB09p12403
Smith LA, van der Kamp G, Hendry JM (2013) A new technique for obtaining high resolution pore pressure records in thick claystone aquitards and its use to determine in situ compressibility. Water Resour Res 49(2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20084
Su H, Kang WD, Cao ZZ, Zhu HL (2013) Analysis on precipitation and runoff changing trend from 1954 to 2009 in Kuye River basin (in Chinese). Ground Water 35(6):14–17
Sun XL, **ang Y, Shi ZM (2018) Estimating the hydraulic parameters of a confined aquifer based on the response of groundwater levels to seismic Rayleigh waves. Geophys J Int 213:919–930. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy036
Tamura Y, Sato T, Ooe M, Ishiguro M (1991) A procedure for tidal analysis with a Bayesian information criterion. Geophys J Int 104(3):507–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb05697.x
Theis CV (1935) The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage. Tans Am Geophs Union 2(2):519–524. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR016i002p00519
Timms WA, Acworth RI (2005) Propagation of pressure change through thick clay sequences: an example from Liverpool Plains, NSW, Australia. Hydrogeol J 13(5–6):858–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-005-0436-7
Turnadge C, Crosbie RS, Barron O, Rau GC (2019) Comparing methods of barometric efficiency characterization for specific storage estimation. Groundwater 57(6):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12923
Van der Kamp G, Gale JE (1983) Theory of earth tide and barometric effects in porous formations with compressible grains. Water Resour Res 19(2):538–544. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR019i002p00538
Wang HF (2000) Theory of linear poroelasticity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Wenzel HG (1997) Tide-generating potential for the earth. In: Wilhelm H, Zurn W, Wenzel HG (eds) Tidal phenomena. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0011455
Xu GW, Bai SW (2006) Fit analysis on size effect for elastic modulus of rock mass (in Chinese). Copper Eng 3:17–20
Xue YQ, Wu JC (2010) Dynamics of groundwater. Geological Press, Bei**g
Xue CJ, Chi GX, Xue W (2010) Interaction of two fluid systems in the formation of sandstone-hosted uranium deposits in the Ordos Basin: geochemical evidence and hydrodynamic modeling. J Geochem Explor 106(1–3):226–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2009.11.006
Xue L, Li HB, Brodsky EE et al (2013) Continuous permeability measurements record healing inside the Wenchuan earthquake fault zone. Science 340(6140):1555–1559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237237
Xue L, Brodsky EE, Erskine J, Filton PM, Cater R (2016) A permeability and compliance contrast measured hydrogeologically on the San Andreas Fault. Geochem Geophys Geosyt 17(3):858–871. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GC006167
Yang H, Liu X, Yan X, Zhang H (2015) Discovery and reservoir forming geological characteristics of the Shenmu gas field in the Ordos Basin. Nat Gas Indust 35(6):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2015.09.002
Yao JM, **a F (2007) A study on hydrogeological condition and mining method in Ningtiaota minefield (south limb), Shenmu-Fugu mining area (in Chinese). Coal Geol China 19(1):33–59
Zhang Z, Zhang R, **e H, Gao M, **e J (2016) Mining-induced coal permeability change under different mining layouts. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(9):3753–3768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-0979-z
Zhang SC, Shi ZM, Wang GC (2019) Comparison of aquifer parameters inferred from water level changes induced by slug test, earth tide and earthquake: a case study in the Three Gorges area. J Hydrol 579:124169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124169
Acknowledgements
We thank Liang **angyang for providing information regarding the coalfield and for help provided during the field work. This study is partly supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC0406401-1) and partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41972251, U1602266).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Appendices
Appendix 1: notation
- △hi:
-
Change in the sample height during the shearing process in the ith period, m
- △φ:
-
Phase shift between the Earth tide and atmospheric drivers, degree
- A :
-
Amplitude response, m/strain
- A v :
-
Volumetric strain sensitivity, m/strain
- A s :
-
Areal strain sensitivity, m/strain
- A 0 :
-
Initial cross-sectional area of the sample, m2
- a k :
-
Amplitude of the kth tidal constituent, m
- B :
-
Skempton coefficient
- b :
-
Aquifer thickness, m
- B′ :
-
Leakage factor, m
- BE:
-
Barometric efficiency
- D :
-
Hydraulic diffusivity, m2/s
- h 0 :
-
Initial height of the sample, m
- K :
-
Hydraulic conductivity, m/day
- LE:
-
Barometric loading efficiency
- M2ET:
-
M2 constituents of the Earth tides
- M2GW:
-
M2 constituents of the hydraulic head
- P :
-
Axial load, Pa
- r c :
-
Radius of the casing, m
- S :
-
Storativity
- S2AT:
-
S2 constituent of the atmospheric pressure
- S2ET:
-
S2 constituent of the Earth tide
- S2GW:
-
S2 constituent of the hydraulic head
- S s :
-
Specific storage, m−1
- T :
-
Transmissivity, m2/s
- y i :
-
Observed groundwater level at data point i, m
- β :
-
Aquifer matrix compressibility, Pa−1
- β f :
-
Water compressibility, Pa−1
- β s :
-
Solids compressibility, Pa−1
- ε 1 :
-
Axial strain
- ε a :
-
Areal strain
- ε v :
-
Volumetric strain
- η :
-
Phase shift between water level and Earth tide, degree
- ν :
-
POISSION ratio
- ρ :
-
Density of water, kg/m3
- σ 1 :
-
Maximum principal stress, Pa
- σ 3 :
-
Minimum principal stress, Pa
- Φ :
-
Porosity
- ω k :
-
Angular frequency of the kth tidal constituent, cycles per day (cpd)
Appendix 2: the processes of data treatment by different methods
1. Estimating hydraulic conductivity
Filtering of groundwater level data. In order to remove the disturbance of long-term trend and the other periodic loads, the data of high frequency (>3 cpd) and low frequency (<0.8 cpd) should be filtered by program TSOFT.
Removing barometric effects from groundwater level data. The horizontal and vertical flow models are based on water level in response to Earth tide. In this study the barometric effects are removed by the program Baytap-G (Zhang et al. 2019).
Tidal response analysis. The calculation of amplitude response A (i.e. Av) and phase shift η (Eq. 3) is an essential premise to estimate aquifer parameters, so it is necessary to correct the barometric pressure effect by tidal response analysis using program Baytap-G.
Estimating hydraulic conductivity K. According to the results of tidal response analysis, T and S can be fitted and calculated by the horizontal (Eqs. 4–5) or vertical flow model (Eqs. 7–8) decided by the sign of η. Consequently, hydraulic conductivity K can be calculated.
2. Estimating compressibility β and porosity Φ
Filtering of groundwater level data. In order to remove the disturbance of long-term trend and the other periodic loads, the data of high frequency (>3 cpd) and low frequency (<0.8 cpd) should be filtered by program TSOFT.
Estimating Asand LE.As is calculated by proportional relation (Eq. 14), and BE is calculated by program MATLAB based on Eq. (15), and according to the relation between BE and LE (Eq. 16), the consequent LE can be derived.
Estimating compressibility β and porosity ϕ. According to the calculated As and LE, compressibility β and porosity ϕ (Eqs. 10–11) can be calculated.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shen, Q., Zheming, S., Guangcai, W. et al. Using water-level fluctuations in response to Earth-tide and barometric-pressure changes to measure the in-situ hydrogeological properties of an overburden aquifer in a coalfield. Hydrogeol J 28, 1465–1479 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02134-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02134-w