Log in

Anatomical Retzius-space preservation is associated with lower incidence of postoperative inguinal hernia development after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Postoperative inguinal hernia (IH) is a non-negligible sequelae with a wide array of rates after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). Our aim was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of postoperative IH development in men undergoing RALP.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 839 patients “541 of conventional-RALP (C-RALP), and 298 of Retzius sparing-RALP (RS-RALP)” received treatment of prostate cancer between 2005 and 2016 and met with our inclusion criteria was performed. Primary endpoint was incidence of IH after RALP, while secondary endpoint was to assess risk factors of IH occurrence.

Results

Overall incidence of postoperative IH was 6.3% (53 out of 839). Mean follow-up period and median time of IH development were 24.1 and 14.0 months, respectively. Among patients who developed IH, there was a higher incidence in C-RALP compared to RS-RALP, (79.2 vs 20.8%, respectively, P = 0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that BMI group (HR 0.471, P = 0.023) and C-RALP (HR 2.834, P = 0.002) were significant predictors of IH development. Kaplan–Meier curve showed that 3-year IH-disease progression free rate was significantly higher after RS-RALP compared to C-RALP (94.2 vs 71.6%, respectively, P < 0.001), likewise in obese versus non-obese patients (87.7 vs 76.6%, respectively, P < 0.003).

Conclusion

Our study showed that overall incidence of IH was 6.3% after RALP. Nevertheless, RS-RALP carries a lower incidence of IH after surgery, while C-RALP and low BMI are predictors of IH development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhu S, Zhang H, **e L, Chen J, Niu Y (2013) Risk factors and prevention of inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 189:884–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lughezzani G, Sun M, Perrotte P et al (2010) Comparative study of inguinal hernia repair rates after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78:1307–1313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stranne J, Hugosson J, Iversen P, Morris T, Lodding P (2005) Inguinal hernia in stage M0 prostate cancer: a comparison of incidence in men treated with and without radical retropubic prostatectomy—an analysis of 1105 patients. Urology 65:847–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stranne J, Hugosson J, Lodding P (2006) Post-radical retropubic prostatectomy inguinal hernia: an analysis of risk factors with special reference to preoperative inguinal hernia morbidity and pelvic lymph node dissection. J Urol 176:2072–2076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abe T, Shinohara N, Harabayashi T et al (2007) Postoperative inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urology 69:326–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin BM, Hyndman ME, Steele KE et al (2011) Incidence and risk factors for inguinal and incisional hernia after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 77:957–962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stranne J, Johansson E, Nilsson A et al (2010) Inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: results from a randomized setting and a nonrandomized setting. Eur Urol 58:719–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shimbo M, Endo F, Matsushita K et al. (2017) Incidence, risk factors and a novel prevention technique for inguinal hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urol Int 98:54–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeong W, Araki M, Park SY et al (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the Asian population: modified port configuration and ultradissection. Int J Urol 17:297–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lim SK, Kim KH, Shin TY et al (2014) Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: combining the best of retropubic and perineal approaches. BJU Int 114:236–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J et al (2013) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol 65:124–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsubara A, Yoneda T, Nakamoto T et al (2007) Inguinal hernia after radical perineal prostatectomy: comparison with the retropubic approach. Urology 70:1152–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee DH, Jung HB, Chung MS, Lee SH, Chung BH (2013) Patent processus vaginalis in adults who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: predictive signs of postoperative inguinal hernia in the internal inguinal floor. Int J Urol 20:177–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nielsen ME, Walsh PC (2005) Systematic detection and repair of subclinical inguinal hernias at radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 66:1034–1037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nyhus LMCR (1989) Inguinal hernia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim Sung Han, Kim HGJ, Jeong In Gab, Lee Eunsik (2008) The incidence and risk factors for inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Korean J Urol 49:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Finley DS, Savatta D, Rodriguez E, Kopelan A, Ahlering TE (2008) Transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and inguinal herniorrhaphy. J Robot Surg 1:269–272

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Koie T, Yoneyama T, Kamimura N, Imai A, Okamoto A, Ohyama C (2008) Frequency of postoperative inguinal hernia after endoscope-assisted mini-laparotomy and conventional retropubic radical prostatectomies. Int J Urol 15:226–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Asimakopoulos AD, Miano R, Galfano A et al (2015) Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: critical appraisal of the anatomic landmarks for a complete intrafascial approach. Clin Anat 28:896–902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F et al (2013) Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥1 year of follow-up. Eur Urol 64:974–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu JC-H, Ou Y-C (2012) Inguinal hernia after a radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Urol Sci 23:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zendejas B, Hernandez-Irizarry R, Ramirez T et al (2014) Relationship between body mass index and the incidence of inguinal hernia repairs: a population-based study in Olmsted County, MN. Hernia 18:283–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Regan TC, Mordkin RM, Constantinople NL, Spence IJ, Dejter SW, Jr (1996) Incidence of inguinal hernias following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol 47:536–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lodding P, Bergdahl C, Nyberg M, Pileblad E, Stranne J, Hugosson J (2001) Inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a study of incidence and risk factors in comparison to no operation and lymphadenectomy. J Urol 166:964–967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sekita N, Suzuki H, Kamijima S, Chin K, Fujimura M, Mikami K et al. (2009) Incidence of inguinal hernia after prostate surgery: open radical retropubic prostatectomy versus open simple prostatectomy versus transurethral resection of the prostate. Int J Urol 16:110–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoshimine S, Miyajima A, Nakagawa K, Ide H, Kikuchi E, Oya M (2010) Extraperitoneal approach induces postoperative inguinal hernia compared with transperitoneal approach after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40:349–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. H. Rha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Nothing to declare.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

No informed consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, K.D., Abdel Raheem, A., Santok, G.D.R. et al. Anatomical Retzius-space preservation is associated with lower incidence of postoperative inguinal hernia development after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Hernia 21, 555–561 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1588-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1588-9

Keywords

Navigation