Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate and compare the consistency of agreement of two methods for measuring abdominal rectus diastasis (ARD), preoperative computed tomography (CT) scanning and preoperative clinical assessment were compared with direct measurement intraoperatively.
Methods
Fifty-five consecutive patients were retrieved from an ongoing prospective randomised trial comparing two operative techniques for the repair of ARD. All patients underwent a preoperative clinical assessment and CT scan, and the results were compared with intraoperative measurement of the ARD width. Agreement between methods was described with Bland–Altman plots (BA plots) and calculated using Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC).
Results
The median width of the diastasis was 4.0 cm in the upper midline and 3.0 cm in the lower midline for the intraoperative measurement. BA plots showed that measurements on CT and intraoperatively are not in agreement in the lower midline, whereas the agreement was stronger between the clinical and the intraoperative method. The CCC was higher for clinical vs. intraoperative measurement (0.479) than for CT vs. intraoperative measurement (−0.002) in the lower midline, although the agreement was over all low. CT scanning underestimated the width of the ARD when compared to 87 % of preoperative clinical assessments, and 83 % of intraoperative measurements. Preoperative clinical assessment overestimated ARD in 35 % when compared with intraoperative measurements.
Conclusion
Clinical assessment prior to surgery provides more accurate information than CT scanning in the assessment of ARD width. CT scanning underestimates ARD width when compared with intraoperative measurement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mantle MJ, Greenwood RM, Currey HL (1977) Backache in pregnancy. Rheumatol Rehabil 16(2):95–101
Ostgaard HC, Andersson GB, Karlsson K (1991) Prevalence of back pain in pregnancy. Spine 16(5):549–552
Noren L, Ostgaard S, Johansson G, Ostgaard HC (2002) Lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain during pregnancy: a 3-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 11(3):267–271. doi:10.1007/s00586-001-0357-7
Bursch SG (1987) Interrater reliability of diastasis recti abdominis measurement. Phys Ther 67(7):1077–1079
van Uchelen JH, Kon M, Werker PM (2001) The long-term durability of plication of the anterior rectus sheath assessed by ultrasonography. Plast Reconstr Surg 107(6):1578–1584
Nahas FX, Ferreira LM, Augusto SM, Ghelfond C (2005) Long-term follow-up of correction of rectus diastasis. Plas Reconstr Surg 115(6):1736–1741 (discussion 1742-1733)
Nahas FX, Barbosa MV, Ferreira LM (2009) Factors that may influence failure of the correction of the musculoaponeurotic deformities of the abdomen. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):334. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a83998 author reply 334-335
Brauman D (2008) Diastasis recti: clinical anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(5):1564–1569. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181882493
Benditte-Klepetko H, Sommer O, Steinbach R, Czembirek H, Deutinger M (2004) Clinical and ultrasound evaluation of donor site morbidity after tram-flap for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 24(3):174–181. doi:10.1002/micr.20044
Rosen A, Hartman T (2011) Repair of the midline fascial defect in abdominoplasty with long-acting barbed and smooth absorbable sutures. Aesthet Surg J 31(6):668–673. doi:10.1177/1090820X11415242
Elkhatib H, Buddhavarapu SR, Henna H, Kassem W (2011) Abdominal musculoaponeuretic system: magnetic resonance imaging evaluation before and after vertical plication of rectus muscle diastasis in conjunction with lipoabdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(6):733e–740e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c8a1
Mendes Dde A, Nahas FX, Veiga DF, Mendes FV, Figueiras RG, Gomes HC, Ely PB, Novo NF, Ferreira LM (2007) Ultrasonography for measuring rectus abdominis muscles diastasis. Acta Cir Bras 22(3):182–186
Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310
Lin LI (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45(1):255–268
Lin LI (2000) A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics 56(1):324–325
McBride GB (2005) A proposal for strength-of-agreement criteria for Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient. NIWA Client Report: HAM2005-062. http://www.medcalc.org/download/pdf/McBride2005.pdf
Stark B, Emanuelsson P, Gunnarsson U, Strigard K (2012) Validation of Biodex system 4 for measuring the strength of muscles in patients with rectus diastasis. J Plast Surg Hand Surge 46(2):102–105. doi:10.3109/2000656X.2011.644707
Muller M, Truong SN, Schumpelick V (1999) Sonographic diagnosis of abdominal wall relaxation. J Clin Ultrasound 27(4):183–186
Toms AP, Cash CC, Fernando B, Freeman AH (2002) Abdominal wall hernias: a cross-sectional pictorial review. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 23(2):143–155
Papadopulos NA, Staffler V, Mirceva V, Henrich G, Papadopoulos ON, Kovacs L, Herschbach P, Machens HG, Biemer E (2012) Does abdominoplasty have a positive influence on quality of life, self-esteem, and emotional stability? Plast Reconstr Surg 129(6):957e–962e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ecc2b
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Anna-Maria Kling, biostatistician at Scandinavian Development Services for help in statistical analysis, including interpretation of CCCs as well as Bland–Altman plots.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Emanuelsson, P., Dahlstrand, U., Strömsten, U. et al. Analysis of the abdominal musculo-aponeurotic anatomy in rectus diastasis: comparison of CT scanning and preoperative clinical assessment with direct measurement intraoperatively. Hernia 18, 465–471 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1221-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1221-0